IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
Advertisements

Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
Efficacy and Safety of Three Bortezomib-Based Combinations in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: Results from All Randomized Patients.
1. 2 Lenalidomide in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Clinical Update EHA 2010 DR. OUSSAMA JRADI.
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Kovacs G et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 23.
Korde N et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 2105.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Corre J et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 180.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Phase II Clinical and Correlative Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Followed by Lenalidomide Extended Dosing (CRD-R) Induces High Rates.
Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: Initial Results of a Multicenter, Open Label.
Lenalidomide Maintenance Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Singh PP et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 407.
Second Primary Malignancies in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide: Analysis of Pooled Data in 2459 Patients Palumbo A.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Maintenance Therapy in Myeloma Myeloma Canada National Conference Donna E. Reece, M.D. Princess Margaret Hospital 24 September 2011.
Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment Improves Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Extended Follow-Up of the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
ClaPD (Clarithromycin, Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) Therapy in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Mark TM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 77.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Chemoimmunotherapy with Fludarabine (F), Cyclophosphamide (C), and Rituximab (R) (FCR) versus Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) in Previously Untreated and.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
IMAJEM, a Substudy of IFM 2009: Prognostic Role of MRI and PET/CT in MM New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage* of ASH 2015, December.
Value of MRD to Predict PFS in MM: Results From IFM/DFCI 2009
A European Collaborative Study of 230 Patients to Assess the Role of Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Upfront Treatment of Patients with.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
Editor: Neil Love, MD Faculty commentator: Noopur Raje, MD
BCT Bortezomib Consolidation Trial
Vose JM et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 661.
Chen R et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 518.
1 Stone RM et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 6.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Maury S et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 1.
Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 310.
Korde N et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 732.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Platzbecker U et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 12.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Slide set on: McCarthy PL, Owzar K, Hofmeister CC, et al
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Martinelli G et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 679.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Fujiwara H et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 181.
Jabbour E et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 83.
San Miguel JF et al. 1 Proc EHA 2013;Abstract S1151.
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Attal M et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 8018.
Rossi A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8008.
Niesvizky R et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 619.
Jakubowiak AJ et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 862.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8007.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Vesole DH et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 308.
Final Results of a Frontline Phase 1/2 Study of Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone (CRd) in Multiple Myeloma (MM)1 Final Results from.
What is the best frontline regimen for CLL patients
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Zaja F et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 966.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Boccadoro M et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 8020.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma
Presentation transcript:

IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma (MM) in the Era of New Drugs Phase III study of lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (RVD), with and without ASCT, followed by 1 year of maintenance lenalidomide N = 700 patients with previously untreated MM, age ≤65 years Primary study endpoint: Progression-free survival (PFS) Survival RVD (n = 350) RVD + ASCT (n = 350) Hazard ratio, p-value Median PFS 34 mo 43 mo 0.69,<0.001 PFS rate (4 y) 35% 47% Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 391.

IFM/DFCI 2009: Conclusions For patients with newly diagnosed MM, the addition of ASCT to RVD is associated with a 31% reduced risk of progression or death (p < 0.001): Improved time to disease progression (p < 0.001) and rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (80% vs 65%, p < 0.001) ASCT should remain a standard procedure for young patients with de novo myeloma. Further follow-up is needed to make any conclusions about overall survival (OS) as the number of deaths is still low in both arms. An ongoing parallel trial in the United States (NCT01208662) uses a similar design but, importantly, administers lenalidomide maintenance continuously until progression in both study arms. Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 391.

Predictive Value of MRD by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial Bone marrow MRD evaluation before and after maintenance therapy in patients with very good partial response (VGPR) or better MRD assessment by flow cytometry (FCM) and NGS Prediction of PFS by MRD status as determined by NGS Comparison of MRD sensitivity of NGS and FCM Sensitivity: FCM = 10-4; NGS = 10-6 Of 163 patients MRD-negative by FCM, 84 (51%) were positive by NGS Three-year PFS for patients achieving complete response MRD-negative by NGS (<10-6) MRD-positive by NGS (≥10-6) Before maintenance 87% 63% After maintenance 92% 64% Avet-Loiseau H et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 191.

Predictive Value of MRD in IFM/DFCI 2009: Conclusions Evaluation of MRD by NGS is feasible in 92% of patients and is highly sensitive (<10-6) This sensitivity is achieved in 100% of patients MRD negativity at 10-6 sensitivity is strongly predictive of PFS at 3 years. 13 of 26 patients with t(4;14) and none of 16 patients with del(17p) achieved MRD negativity. MRD evaluation may identify patients with MM who are cured. This warrants further evaluation in clinical trials. Avet-Loiseau H et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 191.

Correlation with PFS (p-value) Correlation with OS (p-value) IMAJEM Study: Evaluation of MRI and PET-CT in Patients with MM in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial Comparison of whole-body PET-CT to MRI of the spine and pelvis among 134 patients at diagnosis, after 3 cycles of RVD and before maintenance therapy Correlation with PFS (p-value) Correlation with OS (p-value) MRI normalization After RVD (3 cycles) Before maintenance 0.29 0.30 0.61 PET-CT normalization 0.04 <0.001 0.12 0.003 Moreau P et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 395.

IMAJEM: Conclusions The 2 modalities are equally effective in detecting bone involvement at diagnosis (MRI: 94.7%; PET-CT: 91%). Normalization of MRI after 3 cycles of RVD and before maintenance therapy has no prognostic value for PFS or OS. PET-CT normalization after 3 cycles of RVD and before maintenance therapy is associated with a significant improvement in PFS. Normalization of PET-CT before maintenance was a predictor for improved OS. PET-CT should be incorporated in the follow-up of young patients receiving novel agent-based therapy, to predict outcome. Moreau P et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 395.

Investigator Commentary: FM/DFCI 2009 Trial of RVD with or without ASCT for MM All 3 presentations were based on the IFM trial comparing ASCT to continued RVD treatment. Dr Attal presented the interim analysis with 700 patients, which showed a PFS benefit with transplant (median 43 mo vs 34 mo), but the rate of VGPR or better at the end of the designated 12-month maintenance therapy was high in both arms (88% and 78%). MRD testing by NGS was performed for 41% of patients (n = 289) at the initiation and the end of maintenance, and those data were presented by Dr Avet-Loiseau. MRD negativity by NGS was highly predictive of PFS, and testing was feasible for 92% of patients: With MRD negativity achieved, a portion of patients may be cured, but longer follow-up is required to demonstrate this. The DETERMINATION trial is using lenalidomide maintenance until disease progression, which may contribute to deepening remissions and increased MRD negativity. In an imaging trial with 134 of the 700 patients, 95% and 91% had positive MRIs or PET CT scans, suggesting high sensitivity for detecting bone disease. MRI did not change before maintenance therapy for 83%, but PET CT was normalized for 79% and correlated well with PFS, which suggests its value as a predictive tool in subsets of patients.. Interview with Noopur Raje, MD, February 10, 2016