Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Impact of Weld Metal Creep Strength on the Overall Creep Strength of 9% Cr.
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Ratcheting Studies on Type 304LN Stainless Steel Elbows subjected to Combined Internal.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Plastic Limit Loads of Pad Reinforced Cylindrical Vessels Under Out-of-Plane Moment.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optical Microscopy-Aided Indentation Tests J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic diagram of the coordinate system; θ is the viewing angle and O.R. represents.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Photo of measurement boat and unit. Figure Legend: From: Development of shape measurement.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Impact Pressure on Reducing the Weld Residual Stress by Water Jet Peening.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Natural Frequencies of Plate Supported Thermowells J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Unified Approach for Notch Stress Strain Conversion Rules
From: Measures of Bulk and Grain Strain in Deformation Processes
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Boilers Optimal Control for Maximum Load Change Rate
Date of download: 10/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Effect of High Strain Rate on Indentation in Pure Aluminum
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Hole-Drilling Residual Stress Profiling With Automated Smoothing
Date of download: 10/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/11/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/24/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Tool Temperature in Titanium Drilling
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Shear Deformation in Rectangular Auxetic Plates
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Scheme of a tube bending machine with a rotating template and a mandrel, (1) mandrel, (2) clamp bolt, (3) rotating template, (4) sliding slat, (5) planisher, (6) bed of sliding slat, (7) bending pipe, and (8) mandrels rod

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Scheme of the connection of a elbow and a straight section of a pipe when their internal and external diameters are equal, then (g1min  < gt), where gt is the thickness of the tube, rtm is the radius of the template, and m is the straight section of the elbow

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: (a) and (b) The schemes of connections of elbows with straight sections of pipelines: (a) for the case when centering isdone on the external pipe side (both dext are equal), (b) forthe case when centering is done based on the internal pipe side (both dint are equal). In both cases, it should be, that (g0 > g1min > gt). Remaining parameters as on Fig. 2.

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Geometrical and dimensional quantities pertaining to tube-bending processes

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Schematic picture of the elbow cross section and its characteristic parameters

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Variation of the initial thickness versus R for four calculation methods, for α=β=0 deg, kαb=180 deg and (g0=g0ext max,g0′=g0ext max′,g0″=g0ext max″,g0‴=g0ext max‴)

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Variation of the maximum initial thickness (g0ext′=g0ext max′,g0int′=g0int max′) of the wall of a tube subjected to bending, calculated according to a simplification of the first order and in measures of logarithmic strains, versus the bending radius R, when the required minimum wall thickness of the bent elbow is g1 = 4.5 mm and (α=β=0 deg, kαb=180 deg)

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Exemplary calculations of longitudinal deformations φ1, depending on the neutral axis displacement y0, where (dz ≡ dext)

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2016;139(1):011009-011009-10. doi:10.1115/1.4034944 Figure Legend: Exemplary calculations of the wall thickness distribution g1, depending on the neutral axis displacement y0, where (dz≡dext)