D0 and its integrability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Advertisements

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Crab crossing and crab waist at super KEKB K. Ohmi (KEK) Super B workshop at SLAC 15-17, June 2006 Thanks, M. Biagini, Y. Funakoshi, Y. Ohnishi, K.Oide,
Beam-Beam Effects for FCC-ee at Different Energies: at Different Energies: Crab Waist vs. Head-on Dmitry Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk FCC-ee/TLEP physics.
Towards an extremely-flat beam optics with large crossing angle for the LHC José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN Beams dep. Supervised by F. Zimmermann,
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
BB Effect and Early Separation Scheme Guido Sterbini CERN – MCS - MA 7 December 2006.
24/01/08Energy deposition, LIUWG, Elena Wildner1 Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet Elena Wildner Francesco Cerutti Marco Mauri.
Monochromatization for Higgs production A.Faus-Golfe IFIC - LAL March1FCC Week 2015.
ENERGY DEPOSITION IN HYBRID NbTi/Nb 3 Sn TRIPLET CONFIGURATIONS OF THE LHC PHASE I UPGRADE FermilabAccelerator Physics Center Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
Crab cavity location for 2-mrad x-ing December 7, 2004 A.S.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
Overview of Possible LHC IR Upgrade Layouts CARE HHH-2004 Workshop CERN 8-11 November 2004 J. Strait, N.V. Mokhov, T. Sen Fermilab bnl - fnal - lbnl -
Crab Cavities in IR1 and IR5 Some considerations on tunnel integration What will be the situation in the tunnel after the LHC IR Phase-1 Upgrade. What.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.
Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H. Braun Miniworkshop on Machine and Physics Aspects of CLIC based future Collider Option, Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H.
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Guido Sterbini CERN – MCS - MA Section Meeting, 8 th February 2007.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Studies on low crossing angle bumps for the LHC luminosity upgrade G. Sterbini Accelerator Technology Department Magnet and Superconductors Group CERN,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Overview of Wire Compensation for the LHC Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CARE-HHH Meeting on beam-beam effects and beam-beam compensation CERN 08/28/2008.
08/11/2007M. Giovannozzi – CARE-HHH-APD IR’071 Optics issues for Phase 1 and Phase 2 upgrades Massimo Giovannozzi, CERN Outline: –Option for Phase 1 and.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Crossing Schemes Considerations and Beam-Beam Work plan T. Pieloni, J. Barranco, X. Buffat, W. Herr.
Global Collaborations Towards LHC Crab Cavity J. P. Koutchouk Thanks to Rama Calaga and Rogelio Tomas Crab Cavity Validity Requirement Workshop August.
Layout and Arcs lattice design A. Chancé, B. Dalena, J. Payet, CEA R. Alemany, B. Holzer, D. Schulte CERN.
Experimental considerations about  physics at DA  NE2 F. Anulli, D. Babusci, G. Pancheri Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati  Physics window at DA  NE2.
Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
BeamCal Simulation for CLIC
Task 2. 5: Beam-beam studies D. Banfi, J. Barranco, T. Pieloni, A
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
WP3 status Interaction Region design
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Tas and Q0: Simple parametric study for Tas 15/03/07
Study on Thermal Deposition in the Interaction Region Magnets
LHC Accelerator Upgrade
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Jean-Pierre Koutchouk, Frank Zimmermann
Upgrade phase 1: Energy deposition in the triplet
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Frank Zimmermann & Walter Scandale
Lecture II.
Pushing the LHC nominal luminosity with flat beams
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Possible Quadrupole-first Options with beta* <= 0.25 m
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Large emittance scenario for the Phase II Upgrade of the LHC
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

D0 and its integrability Guido Sterbini Jean-Pierre Koutchouk CERN – MCS - MA ‘Towards a Roadmap for the Upgrade of the LHC and GSI Complex’ IFIC, Valencia, Spain, 16–20 October 2006

Outline Introduction Potential of peak luminosity increase Possible implementations D0’s strength D0’s position The main challenges Beam-beam effect Energy deposition Magnet design Conclusion and plans.

1- Introduction I The nominal b*=0.55 m was selected for LHC since the gain in reducing it was small due the higher Xing angle BUT the lattice sextupoles and the matching sections were sized to open the possibility of b*=0.25 m To cope with the Xing angle two solutions were presented 1. to halve ss: new RF system & impact all around the LHC 2. to use crab cavities: a completely new approach In CARE 05 was presented a new scheme: 3. to use an early separation scheme.

1- Introduction II D0 D1 TRIPLETS Allow a vanishing crossing angle at the IP using a dipole on each sides of the IP: the D0 PROS simple, cheap, local change, transparent to the rest of the machine. CONS intrusion of magnetic element in the detectors Two possible implementations the Full Early Separation scheme (FES) the Partial Early Separation scheme (PES).

1- Introduction III The Full Early Separation scheme (FES) The Partial Early Separation scheme (PES) D0 D0 We need a residual crossing angle

2- Potential in peak luminosity increase Nominal luminosity The D0 gives the opportunity of gaining in luminosity with a lower increase in the beam current by modifying the geometry of the collision to take full (or almost full) advantage of the decrease of the *.

2- Potential in peak luminosity increase 200 events per crossing 100 events per crossing The D0 gives the opportunity of gaining in luminosity with a lower increase in the beam current by modifying the geometry of the collision to take full (or almost full) advantage of the decrease of the *.

3.1- Which field do we need? 8 T m = Value taken into consideration so far We consider a D0’s kick of 160 mrad and the value of 8 Tm is our reference value.

3.2- Are there slots for a D0? We cannot put the D0 in the inner detector which excludes the FES for 25 ns. BUT there are potential slots starting at 3.5 m and 6.8 m (ATLAS) that are the starting points for our study of a PES. Courtesy of M. Nessi, ‘Machine upgrade, ATLAS considerations’, June 2006

3.3- Strategy for implementation We can consider the first two ATLAS slots: Slot1 starting at 3.49 m from IP with a total length of 1.09 m Slot2 starting at 6.80 m from IP with a total length of 1.86 m We can obtain the 8 Tm splitting the dipole into two: a 4 T D0a in Slot1 (it should be transparent) a 4 T D0b in Slot2 (it should be massive)

3.3- Where would we put the D0 in ATLAS?

3.3- The same strategy in CMS .436 is 1 m .812 is 1.86 m

4.1- Diffusion due to the beam-beam effect Nominal D0a (mrad) D0b (mrad) 80 40 120 20 140 Thanks to U. Dorda and F. Zimmermann for their active collaboration The beam dynamic’s behavior of D0 seems not to depend on the different distribution of kick’s angle between D0a and D0b.

4.2- Energy deposition Courtesy of C. Hoa The energy deposition in the D0a appears to lie between 34 W and 90 W depending on simulations. These studies require to be cross-checked and active efforts are made in this direction. Thanks to F. Broggi, C. Hoa and E. Wildner for sharing their results.

4.3- Other important issues to study Mechanical aspects (forces and torques) Magnetic interference and backscattering Compatibility with detector’s maintenance Room for services’ routing.

5- Conclusions The D0 boosts significantly the luminosity with only a local change of the machine. It further allows reaching the 1035 cm-2s-1 with a lower beam current. So far, the initial studies and discussions with experimental physicists showed no show-stoppers but many issues. Plan of action: To clarify the beam separation requirements To study the integration and energy deposition To choose the magnet technology accordingly and to design the D0a and D0b. Show the interaction with experimental physicists