The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PER UN PAESE MIGLIORE 21/22/23 OTTOBRE 2010 MOSTRA D’OLTREMARE/NAPOLI SECONDO CONGRESSO NAZIONALE DEI DOTTORI COMMERCIALISTI E DEGLI ESPERTI CONTABILI.
Advertisements

© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION LAW AND MOTION.
Rule Changes In a chapter 15 case, the debtor must state the country of the debtor's main interest and list each country in which a case involving.
1 TMA Europe Conference Madrid, 8 June 2012 Will European Reforms put an end to UK Scheme Tourism? Panellists: Stephen Taylor, AlixPartners (London, UK)
Bankruptcy & Reorganization Business Finance 335 Supplemental Material.
The Constitution of the United States: The Rule Book for the Nation
Order granting a motion to dismiss under 12(b)(1) – lack of subject matter jurisdiction? Order granting a motion to dismiss under 12(b)(2) – lack of personal.
The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Bankruptcy Proceedings * *Portions reprinted by permission of JAMS.
Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CEE Member States Due process in competition law Michaela Nosa Antimonopoly Office of the SR.
Rule 16-Requests for Prior Authorization for Medical Services Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?
Presented by V. Wayne Young, Executive Director and General Counsel Kentucky Association of School Administrators KASA Education Law and Finance Institute.
6/22/20151 INTRODUCTION TO LAW INTRODUCTION TO LAW Sources of Law & Court Structure; Anatomy of a Lawsuit Copyright 2009 Barbara E. Wilson Wanda M. Temm.
Unitary Patent and UPC fees József Tálas. Unitary Patent Fees AIPLA commented on original in March Revised proposal on 7 May 2015 True TOP 4 and true.
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Legal Institutions.
Civil Rules Update Denton County Bench-Bar Conference April 25-26, 2013 Justice Phil Johnson Texas Supreme Court 1.
John B. Pegram Fish & Richardson P.C. U.S. Federal Court Rule Changes 1 © AIPLA 2015.
IMS Act: “Justice delayed Justice Denied” Dr. Arun Gupta Rohtak 17 April
16. POLISH INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY LAW PROVISIONS APPLICABLE IN NON-EU CASES DR MAREK PORZYCKI International Insolvency Law.
Petr Lavický  Appeal  Revision  Cassation.
Judicial Control of Public Authorities. Judicial Review Judicial Review – the power of a court to review a statute, or an official action or inaction,
Sports Mediation World Forum of Mediation Centres Frank Fowlie Prague, Czech Republic June 7, 2013.
Proposed By-Law Revisions: General Additions & Changes August 2015.
LEGISLATIVE BRANCH Structure, Qualifications, etc… Powers of Congress Vocabulary Checks & Balances Powers Denied How a Bill Becomes.
The Czech Insolvency Act and insolvency procedure From 2006.
Court System. Sources of Law Statutes: laws passed by state legislatures or Congress – Substantive & legal rights – Procedural rules Louisiana Code of.
United States vs. Nixon. What happen? The Watergate scandal was constantly creeping outwards in the Nixon administration, seeming to not have any end,
3-1 (9-15) Basic Principles of the Constitution. Journal (9-15 Constitution) 1 paragraph Why has the plan of government provided by the U.S. Constitution.
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via at:
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
Discussion on Chapter V (Insolvency of groups of companies) Moderator: Daniel Fritz, HERMANN RWS, Frankfurt am Main Dr. Irit Mevorach, University of Nottingham,
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
Sponsors INSOL Europe would also like to thank the following organisation for their support: INSOL Europe would like to thank the following.
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
Sponsors INSOL Europe would also like to thank the following organisation for their support: INSOL Europe would like to thank the following.
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
Consumer Insolvency Tourism and the EIR – stuck between convergence needs and the Stockholm action plan? Dr. Thomas Hoffmann, LL.M. Institute of East European.
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
Sarajevo, November 14, 2012 JUDr. Ivana Hrdlickova, Ph.D. The Reduction of Backlog cases The Experience of The Czech Republic.
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor Academic Forum SponsorConference Supporter
Sponsors INSOL Europe would also like to thank the following organisation for their support: INSOL Europe would like to thank the following.
Fight Over Reconstruction
The Supreme Court Ch. 10 Sec. 3 Pp
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support
University of Missouri
Overview of the US Supreme Court
Checks and Balances in the Thai Parliamentary System
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards in Russia Roman Zaitsev, PhD, Partner 05/09/2018.
The Courts and the Constitution
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support
The Constitution and Judicial Review
Unit 4: Law & the Legal System
Basic Principles of the Constitution
Warm-up: What does democracy mean? What are the ideas behind it?
The Court System Appeals.
Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier 1987.
Parts of Our Government Principles
Lawmaking Process at the National Level
©2008 Prentice Hall, Inc..
The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support
Jeopardy Senate House of Reps About Congress Leaders of
Chapter 7 test review game
Bankruptcy: Effects on Medically Indigent Applicants
Jeopardy Senate House of Reps About Congress Leaders of
State of florida tax information sharing Paula Barfield August 5, 2015
Presentation transcript:

The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor www.buse.de Conference Supporter Academic Forum Sponsor Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili www.cndcec.it www.edwincoe.com

Dr Tomas Richter, Charles University Prague Verification and Contesting of Creditors’ Claims: Constitutional Limits in the Czech Insolvency Code Dr Tomas Richter, Charles University Prague

OVERVIEW Control over the proceedings under the 2006 Act Importance of claims verification / contestation The original rule The Constitutional Court intervention The revised rules

CONTROL OVER THE PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE 2006 ACT Creditors as the decisive constituency Influence over: Type of proceedings Selection of administrator Election of creditors committee, etc. All via voting rights attached to proven claims Risk of tactical behaviour

IMPORTANCE OF CLAIMS VERIFICATION/CONTESTATION Temptation to prove more than the creditor is owed The counter-measure via a „penalty“ payable to the estate (ConCourt review is pending) Temptation to contest other creditors’ claims Countermeasure via not granting the right to contest claims to creditors = THE ORIGINAL RULE

THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT INTERVENTION In re Bohemia Crystalex Pl. 14/10 of 1 July 2010 A rule completely denying the creditor’s right to contest claims filed by other creditors is unconstitutional given the other modalities of the 2006 Act - it violates the right to fair trial Rule quashed as of 31 March 2011

THE REVISED RULES Bill 233 Reinstates creditors’ right to contest claims, but subject to important checks: No influence over voting rights pertaining to the contested claim Formalised motion, subject to strict time and other requirements Rules on costs + other safeguards Summary

The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor www.buse.de Conference Supporter Academic Forum Sponsor Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili www.cndcec.it www.edwincoe.com

The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor www.buse.de Conference Supporter Academic Forum Sponsor Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili www.cndcec.it www.edwincoe.com

The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor www.buse.de Conference Supporter Academic Forum Sponsor Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili www.cndcec.it www.edwincoe.com

The organisers of the Conference thank the following for their support Conference Sponsor www.buse.de Conference Supporter Academic Forum Sponsor Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti e degli Esperti Contabili www.cndcec.it www.edwincoe.com