OSIRIS Full Team Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VSG – CPDLC Msg Set Validation WG78/SC214 SG (Luxembourg) Feb 2012VSG - CPDLC Msg Set Validation Presented by VSG (Greg Saccone / Jerome Condis)
Advertisements

Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Wavelength Trades for Viewing Titan’s Surface: Can JET’s Science Objectives be Met with a 2-Micron Camera? Jason W. Barnes Associate Professor of Physics.
Philae Science Team Meeting Venice, 30 Mar. – 1 Apr Rita Schulz - Rosetta - Mission Status.
Mission: Launch 2014/15; Deployment June-August 2019, release alt. 100m Mission duration: 16 hrs of on-asteroid operation Main functions: On-surface up-righting.
Minor bodies observation from Earth and space: asteroid (2867)Steins A. Coradini, M.T. Capria, F. Capaccioni, and the VIRTIS International Team.
R&R Consulting Approach
MODULE C - LEGAL SUBMODULES C1. Conflict Of Interest/Code Of Ethics C2. Antitrust C3. Torts C4. Intellectual Property C5. Speaking For The Society.
OSIAM4HE Proposed org structure Authored by the strategy and organization team.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
Andrea Santangelo, Kepler Center-Tü Toulouse, February 2, 2012 “The Organization of the EUSO- Balloon mission” Andrea Santangelo * Kepler Center for Astro.
Exploring Our Past, Securing Our Future Space Grant Symposium April 12 th 2014 Model-based Systems Engineering of The OSIRIS-REx Mission's Science Processing.
EddiCam: The Eddington Photometric Camera EddiCam Definition Phase Kick-Off Meeting J. Miguel Mas-Hesse Vienna, 17th Sept., 2001.
Early Spacecraft Exploration Viking  “The scientific goal of the Viking missions is to ‘increase our knowledge of the planet Mars with an emphasis on.
PHOBOS - GRUNT Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. Basis for choice, goals and methods of study.
 Definition of a quality Audit  Types of audit  Qualifications of quality auditors  The audit process.
Creation of the Archiving Component of a MOU template for international missions IPDA MOU project members.
Planetary Missions Division Dvk, 26 Jun 2002 Pointing scenario - presented at the SWT #10 Daily schedule Overall status/How to proceed Status of inputs.
PHILAE Science Team, Venice Philae On-Comet Science Objectives prepared by HBO Document name = Scientific Objectives of the PHILAE Mission (RO-LAN-LI-1000),
Dawn Interaction of Energy and Matter: Dawn Mission Instrumentation Framing Cameras 1.
Software Requirements Specification Document (SRS)
GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 10, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting The Project Data Management Plan David Band – GSSC.
Europa Mission Lisa Gaddis (USGS, Astrogeology)
Requirements Specification for Lab1 COP4331 and EEL4884 OO Processes for Software Development © Dr. David A. Workman School of Computer Science University.
UCAR Office of Programs University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Overview of NAME Field Catalog NAME Special Session José Meitín NAME Project Office.
RICO DATA MANAGEMENT Steve Williams and Scot Loehrer UCAR/Joint Office for Science Support (JOSS) Boulder, Colorado RICO Workshop Boulder, CO February.
Radio Science PDS Function Report 25 March 2010 Dick Simpson Stanford University.
Creation of the Archiving Component of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Template for International Missions IPDA MOU project members.
ISRO –Programmatic Update S.Seetha Programme Director, Space Sciene Programme Office, ISRO HQ & Co-Chair-INMWG INMWG Meeting on 23 Rd Feb 2016.
WG 2/3 Splinter meeting Dec. 6, 2010 ESOC Darmstadt for WG2 & WG3: D. Bockelée-Morvan C. Engrand E. Grün H. Krueger.
Traceability in Chemical Measurement Comparable results are needed in order to avoid duplicating measurements which cost time and money. Comparable results.
Dario Dainelli, Article 14.4.c: SR proposal Business operators shall keep, for a period ending not before the expected shelf life of the material.
Sebastian Höfner, H. Sierks, J.B. Vincent, J. Blum
Rosetta Science Working Team Meeting #26 Working Group #1
OSIRIS Full Team Meeting Welcome, Introduction, Agenda
19 May 2010, ESOC Eberhard Grün and Harald Krüger
RSOC Overview at SWT #26, 11/12 June 2009
OSIRIS Full Team Meeting Welcome, Introduction, Agenda
Rosetta Status Mike A’Hearn.
OSIRIS operation summary
ROSETTA SWT 27th ESOC, 2-4 December 2009
Fly-By Working Group Meeting
ECE362 Principles of Design
WG1 Report Osiris Lander delivery Support and Science activities during Comet approach.
F. Tosi, A. Longobardo, O. Prieto-Ballesteros, G. Choblet
OSIRIS Cruise Science The OSIRIS cameras have demonstrated the capability to do competitive science as astronomical telescopes We should take advantage.
AMASIS Exercises Airbus FHS Campinas, October 2016 Thomas Lefrançois
ROCC Operations and The PSA RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017 Tanya Lim Archive Scientist.
PDS4 Data From The Rover RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
Pre-landing Orbiter Observations
OSIRIS Science planning
OSIRIS Full Team Meeting Welcome, Introduction, Logistics
OSIRIS coma dust phase function
Deeper insight in the Steins flyby geometry:
Post-Operation Status: Archiving, Calibration & Science
Lab. experiments at Uni. Bern
Summary of the science planned per mission phase
Photometry of dust grains of comet 67P and connection with nucleus regions G.Cremonese, E.Simioni, R.Ragazzoni, I.Bertini, F.La Forgia, M.Pajola, S.Fornasier,
Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC
WG – Chemistry – mineralogy elemental
The RSP Archive System RSP Archive Concept Review 28 September 2017
Philae status 21st Rosetta Science Team meeting
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
GIRO usage and GSICS Lunar Observation Dataset Policy S. Wagner
Exploitation of ISS Scientific data - sustainability
USOAP Continuous Monitoring Approach (CMA) Workshop
Definition of a benchmark for the GIRO
Systems Engineering for Mission-Driven Modeling
Overview US Paper C2-7.INF
Present and Future Deep Space Projects
Presentation transcript:

OSIRIS Full Team Meeting Data Exchange and ICDs (Rules of the Road) Holger Sierks

OSIRIS Data Exchange – ICDs Instrument OSIRIS will provide OSIRIS will receive  Status   PHILAE Lander Global albedo and composition maps, global terrain/shape, and local slopes, local composition, topography, and boulders of selected sites Lander ground proof on composition, 3-d topography, activity, thermal properties of material on surface and subsurface Lander requests are documented in RM document, OSIRIS-PHILAE ICD in iteration with Lander team (draft) VIRTIS Image data in clear for context, spectra in VIS, tbc VIS-NIR spectra, VIS for x-calibration, NIR for composition for ride alongs NDA proposal sent to VIRTIS ALICE Image data in clear for context, tbc UV spectral data from ride alongs NDA in iteration, ‘service’ images MIRO MIRO data from ride alongs NDA proposal sent to MIRO COSIMA Specific image data NAC and/or WAC in clear for context, jet geometry 3-d for selected cases, color filter data for combined analysis Dust characterization of individual grains for dust analysis as seen by OSIRIS, in dust jets and potential (uplifted) surface grains ICD iterated to v1/-, not signed yet CONSERT Shape of C-G Interior information, tbc No action yet ROSINA tbd GIADA As COSIMA? MIDAS RPC RSI Volume Mass No action yet, will share on density (as for Lutetia) In addition: ICD with Rosetta SGS concerning on site quicklook inspection of selected OSIRIS image data, no share with other instruments ICD with Rosetta MOC/FDyn on use of OSIRIS image data for navigation purposes, no share with other instruments

ICD Osiris/Lander (and baseline for others) Preamble This is a statement concerning the data exchange between Osiris and the Lander Team on the basis of the Rosetta Science Management Plan, RO-EST-PL-0001 (AD1), defining the rules for the use of the proprietary data, the non-disclosure of the data to third parties, and the process of context publication in scientific manuscripts, PR material, and any form of internal and external presentation. Declaration The Osiris PI and Lander Lead Scientist (for the Lander Team and Lander PIs where applicable) agree to share data in both directions, i.e., Osiris providing images to the Lander team for landing site selection and as context for the scientific investigations of the Lander, and the Lander team providing images and other suitable data to the Osiris team for the purpose of context calibration of the instrument (ground truth).

ICD Osiris/Lander (and baseline for others) Applicable Rules The proprietary data shall be kept on identified computers on both sides and shall not propagate by any means without notice and explicit agreement by the other party. The proprietary data shall be provided by the PI institute only (single-point interface, institute tbd for the lander). The data can be non-calibrated or calibrated according to the needs of the other party. The needs are to be justified, have to be traceable, and to be agreed upon (ref to applicable document). The proprietary data shall only be analyzed in the context of agreed investigations. The proprietary data shall not be made available or shown by any means to third parties, external, or internal within the Rosetta Science Team, without explicit agreement from the respective PI. The scientific interpretation of results is solely with the PI responsible for the data. Any use of data from the other party in scientific presentations, publications, PR, talks, etc., shall be accompanied by an agreed 'boiler plate' and credit line giving credit and acknowledgments to the PI and team providing the context to the investigation. In case of a conflict, the Osiris PI / Lander Lead Scientist is responsible for immediate action closing and, if requested, deleting all data of the other party until the conflict is resolved. The names of the team members having access to the proprietary data by any means (work station, viewing, etc.) shall be listed and forwarded to the Osiris PI and Lander Lead Scientist, respectively. The Osiris PI and Lander Lead Scientist (for the Lander Team and Lander PIs where applicable) agree not to process or alter the data of the other party by any means.  Definition: Proprietary data = Instrument data and data products produced within the proprietary phase of the mission and provided before formal delivery to the PSA/PDS archive.  Applicable documents: AD1, Rosetta Science Management Plan, RO-EST-PL-0001.