Variation among hospitals in selection of higher-cost, “higher-tech,” implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) Registry Rachel Lampert, MD, Yongfei Wang, MS, Jeptha P. Curtis, MD American Heart Journal Volume 165, Issue 6, Pages 1015-1023.e2 (June 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.003 Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Timeline depicting model families available at the start of the analysis period and those released during the analysis period. American Heart Journal 2013 165, 1015-1023.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.003) Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Hospital variation in use of “previously released” devices. American Heart Journal 2013 165, 1015-1023.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.003) Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Physician variation in use of previously released devices. American Heart Journal 2013 165, 1015-1023.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.003) Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 Correlation of physician use of “previously released” devices between hospitals. Each point represents the correlation between hospitals for 1 physician of the 174 physicians performing at least 10 implants at each of 2 hospitals. R2 value for the correlation was 0.25, P < .001. American Heart Journal 2013 165, 1015-1023.e2DOI: (10.1016/j.ahj.2012.12.003) Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions