Diphoton+MET: Update on Plans and Progress

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC monojet measurements and interpretations David Berge, CERN, ATLAS Measurements by ATLAS and CMS ADD interpretations WIMP interpretations.
Advertisements

Search for Large Extra Dimensions at the Tevatron Bob Olivier, LPNHE Paris XXXVI ème Rencontre de Moriond Mars Search for Large Extra Dimensions.
Effect of b-tagging Scale Factors on M bb invariant mass distribution Ricardo Gonçalo.
Update on the Diphoton + MET Analysis Basckground Bruce Schumm, Susan Fowler (Penn), Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Khilesh Mistry (Penn), Tobias Orthen.
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Hasty Overview of Photon + MET Studies in the Context of GMSB Bruce Schumm Joint SUSY/UED Meeting 23 November 2010.
Update from the Photons + MET Group Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 11 March 2010.
Issues and Run-II Musings About the  +MET Analysis Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Ryan Reece (SCIPP), Sheena Schier (SCIPP), Bruce Schumm (SCIPP) Prepared.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
SUSY with Photons and MET: Introduction and thoughts about Diphoton and Single Photon Analyses Annecy DESY/University of Hamburg Liverpool University Tokyo.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
1 Hgg Cut based Analysis update Jim Branson, Chris Palmer, Marco Pieri, Matteo Sani, Sean Simon.
QCD and Top backgrounds in W+jets and Rjets Alessandro Tricoli (CERN) on behalf of W+jets and Rjets groups 3 rd May 2013 W+jets and Rjets EB Meeting.
Update on the Diphoton + MET Analysis Basckground Bruce Schumm, Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Ryan Reese (SCIPP), Sheena Schier (SCIPP) 26 August 2014.
Diphoton+MET 2015: Tasks and Timelines A living document… Bruce Schumm SCIPP.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
Higgs Reach Through VBF with ATLAS Bruce Mellado University of Wisconsin-Madison Recontres de Moriond 2004 QCD and High Energy Hadronic Interactions.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.
Search for the Higgs boson in H  ZZ (*) decay modes on ATLAS German D Carrillo Montoya, Lashkar Kashif University of Wisconsin-Madison On behalf of the.
 DM Models & Signatures in CMS searches  Analyzing CMS data  MonoJet, MonoLepton, MonoPhoton, MonoTop, Top pairs  SUSY Searches  Perspectives for.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
Diphoton + MET Analysis Update Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 24 January 2014 Editorial Board Meeting.
Diphoton + MET Analysis Update Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 03 July 2013 Editorial Board Meeting.
28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from.
Update on the Diphoton + MET Analysis Basckground Bruce Schumm, Susan Fowler (Penn), Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Khilesh Mistry (Penn), Tobias Orthen.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
(Di-)Photon + MET Status and Plans for 5 fb -1 Analysis Who plans to contribute? DESY (Ehrenfeld, Wildt, Vankov) Annecy (Przysiezniak-Frey) Penn (Williams,
Photon + MET Analysis Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 05 August 2013 SUSY Review Talk.
News from H->bb Ricardo Gonçalo on behalf of H->bb Note group HSG5 Meeting – 3 Dec
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Photon Physics activities Higgs activities ATLAS LPNHE group meeting, 2011, Nov. 8th.
Diphoton+MET 2015: Overview of Path towards First Results A living document… Bruce Schumm SCIPP 18 May 2015.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
Update on the Diphoton + MET Analysis Bruce Schumm, channeling Ben Auerbach (Argonne), Osamu Jinnouchi (Tokyo Tech), Susan Fowler (Penn) UC Santa Cruz.
Methodology and examples to determine fake rate separate signal from background Using fit on sideband. Using independent control sample.
Some Thoughts on Directly Constraining X  (126)-Z Associated Production with 20 fb -1 of 8 TeV Data Bruce Schumm Andy Kuhl UCSC/SCIPP.
Data Driven study for Same Sign Dileptons July 31 st 2009, “CMS SUSY Leptonic Meeting” 1 Sanjay Padhi.
Top quark pair cross-section D0 (1 fb -1 results) Viatcheslav Sharyy for D0 collaborations CEA-Saclay / IRFU/ SPP ● Introduction ● Dilepton.
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
DiPhoton + MET: Towards Unblinding of the 5 fb-1 Analysis
Diphoton+X 2015: Overview of Plans and Goals
Photon(s)+X: Paper Draft Status
SM Direct Photons meeting
Proposals for near-future BG determinations from control regions
Open Reading of the SUSY Photon+X+MET Paper
Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.
CDS comments on supporting note
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Overview of CMS H→ analysis and the IHEP/IPNL contributions
RAA predictions show enhancement highly sensitive to jet quenching
Quarkonium production in ALICE
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
Observation and measurement of HW+W-
ATLAS 2.76 TeV inclusive jet measurement and its PDF impact A M Cooper-Sarkar PDF4LHC Durham Sep 26th 2012 In 2011, 0.20 pb-1 of data were taken at √s.
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
W/Z and Di-Boson Results from ATLAS Srivas Prasad Harvard University On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Pheno Madison, Wisconsin May 09, 2011.
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
Top quark production cross section Top quark mass measurement
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Study of Top properties at LHC
Higgs physics at CEPC Physics workshop
A brief Update on secondary vertex tagged jets
Presentation transcript:

Diphoton+MET: Update on Plans and Progress Bruce Schumm SCIPP On Behalf of the Photon+X Working Group La Plata, LPNHE Paris, Milano, Tokyo Tech, UCSC 21 January 2016

But First: Photon + jets: status and next steps 01/11/12 01/11/12 Optimization and Control Regions studies (including fits and normalization factors) are done and results are documented in the backup note. Data driven background estimates for jets faking photon will be based on the proposed ABCD method, but need to be adapted to the photon+jets scenario with the corresponding selection (contribution is very small in SR anyways). Systematics Tools for systematics concerning object identification and calibration are in place in SUSYTools but the corresponding uncertainties still need to be evaluated. Signal theory systematics are already evaluated. Background theory systematics need to be evaluated. Validation Regions are in place, need to run and have a preliminary look at the distributions (MC based backgrounds and no systematics yet). Back to Diphotons… 2 2

Recent Progress to be Reported Signal Grid Optimization EW (e  ) background e   fake rate estimation QCD ( and j  ) backgrounds Irreducible backgrounds W control sample Z cross section scale factor Plans January 21 2016

January 21 2016

January 21 2016

January 21 2016

Resubmit 12 failed points very soon… Comparison of kinematics between old and new (1300,1290) point checks out Resubmit 12 failed points very soon… January 21 2016

New: minimum background uncertainty of b = 0.2 events January 21 2016

Optimization: (mgluino,mbino) = (1500,100) January 21 2016

Optimization: (mgluino,mbino) = (1500,1300) January 21 2016

Optimization Results Results suggest single SR with the following selection cuts: pT > 75 GeV (jet,MET) > 0.5 Etmiss > 175 GeV Meff > 1500 GeV Relative to the 8 TeV analysis, we have Introduced background uncertainty in the optimization Have x10 less luminosity This seems to lessen emphasis on ultra-low background, lead to optimization point that is very inclusive of the signal, de-emphasizing the differences between the two focus points. January 21 2016

Background Estimation EW (e  ) Background e   fake rate estimation QCD (jet  ) Background Irreducible Background Wgg (via control sample) Zgg (via Sherpa normalized to Bozzi et al) January 21 2016

e   Fake Rate Slightly new approach: no distinction between “tag” and “probe”; instead, just look at ee and e pairs within the Z mass region Consider both electron and photon objects down to 25 GeV ee e January 21 2015

e   Fake Rate Continued Form 2D grids in , pT Two entries for ee events; only photon for e events Ratio of grids gives fake rate as a function of , pT Have required e+e- to be back-to-back; may limit pT reach of study Are looking into removing this requirement January 21 2016

January 21 2015

QCD Background Estimate Old approach: “Data” in above plot is pseudophoton control sample  is from MC Use MET shape of pseudophoton sample, after subtracting off  contribution, to estimate QCD background July 15 2015

New Approach: “ABCD” Method Real diphoton background from  MC Jet   contribution from date-driven fake factor via “ABCD” method Combination normalized in low-MET region Pseudo-photon selection from monophoton analysis Fake factor definitions January 21 2015

Fake-factor give by ratio of isolated to anti-isolated pseudo-photons Jet   Fake Factor Fake-factor give by ratio of isolated to anti-isolated pseudo-photons In Progress January 21 2015

W Control Sample January 21 2015

W Control Sample January 21 2015

Z Background January 21 2015

Z Background January 21 2016

Summary/Outlook Signal Grid, optimization essentially done  Single SR for the 2015 analysis EW (e  ) background: Almost done; e   fake rate measurement being refined QCD ( and j  ) backgrounds: Objects defined and final studies underway Irreducible backgrounds W control sample defined Z cross section scale factor determination almost complete Still Needed: Validation study (e.g. 100 < Etmiss < 150) Then UNBLINDING (backup note being developed in parallel with analysis) January 21 2016

Monophoton Pseudophoton Def’n 17.06.2018