16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
Advertisements

Mechanical Design & Analysis Igor Novitski. Outlines Electromagnetic Forces in the Magnet Goals of Finite Element Analysis Mechanical Concept Description.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
The construction of the model of the curved fast ramped superconducting dipole for FAIR SIS300 synchrotron P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova The construction.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
ASC 2014Nb 3 Sn Block Coil Dipoles for a 100 TeV Hadron Collider – G. Sabbi 1 Performance characteristics of Nb 3 Sn block-coil dipoles for a 100 TeV hadron.
MQXF Design and Conductor Requirements P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
MQXF support structure An extension of LARP experience Helene Felice MQXF Design Review December 10 th to 12 th, 2014 CERN.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 1 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
Superconducting Magnet Group Superconducting magnet development for ex-situ NMR LDRD 2003 Paolo Ferracin, Scott Bartlett 03/31/2003.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
GROUP C – Case study no.4 Dr. Nadezda BAGRETS (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology) Dr. Andrea CORNACCHINI (CERN EN Dept.) Mr. Miguel FERNANDES (CERN BE.
Hybrid Structure with Cooling John Cozzolino LARP Collaboration Meeting Port Jefferson, NY November 4-6, 2009.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
New options for the new D1 magnet Qingjin Xu
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 3 Paolo Ferracin ( ) European Organization for Nuclear Research.
16 T Dipole Design Options: Input Parameters and Evaluation Criteria F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT-VC, Sept. 4th, 2015.
S. Lassiter, P. Brindza, M. Fowler, E. Sun - Jefferson Lab G. Markham - NovaTech, B. Wands - Fermi Lab Abstract—Jefferson Laboratory is developing a set.
Cosine-theta configurations for S.C. Dipole Massimo Sorbi on behalf of: INFN LASA & Genova Team Giovanni Bellomo, Pasquale Fabbricarore, Stefania Farinon,
DESIGN STUDIES IR Magnet Design P. Wanderer LARP Collaboration Meeting April 27, 2006.
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE (DOUBLE COLLARING OPTION) S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 24 th 2015.
Answers to the review committee G. Ambrosio, B.Bordini, P. Ferracin MQXF Conductor Review November 5-6, 2014 CERN.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF D2 MECHANICAL STRUCTURE S. Farinon, P. Fabbricatore (INFN-Sezione di Genova) Sept. 17 th 2014.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
Update on PANDA solenoid design and analysis Gabriella Rolando Helder Pais Da Silva Herman ten Kate Alexey Dudarev 3 November
Page 1 TQC Mechanical Model Igor Novitski / Rodger Bossert May 24, 2006 Results of MM#4 and MM#5.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Mechanical behavior of the EuroCirCol 16 T Block-type dipole magnet during a quench Junjie Zhao, Tiina Salmi, Antti stenvall, Clement Lorin 1.
Massimo Sorbi on behalf of INFN team:
WORK IN PROGRESS F C C Main Quadrupoles FCC week 2017
TQS Overview and recent progress
Model magnet test results at FNAL
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
Mechanical tolerance analysis for the MQXF prototype structures
D2 Status The contract for the construction of the short model
Agenda 9:00  - Welcome ASG speaker 9:10 -  Introduction -       P.Fabbricatore 9:25 - The D2   magnets in HL-LHC   -  E. Todesco.
Outer Shell (fuel grain housing) Inner Shell (NOS/rocket housing)
Segreti, Lorin, Durante 11 July 2017
16 T Nb3Sn block dipole EuroCirCol
Cosq configuration - Mechanics
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
Mechanical Modelling of the PSI CD1 Dipole
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
FCC-hh 16 T, 1.9 K INFN Team October 2015.
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Block design status EuroCirCol
16T Cosθ Dipole Configuration
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
MKQXF FEA Model Haris Kokkinos
I. Bogdanov, S. Kozub, V. Pokrovsky, L. Shirshov,
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
MQXF coil cross-section status
CERN Accelerator School Superconductivity for Accelerators Case study 2 Paolo Ferracin European Organization for Nuclear Research.
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Large aperture Q4 M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
FRESCA2 - Coils 1+2 scenario
Q4 development M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet, E. Todesco
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis STEFANIA FARINON on behalf of INFN team: G. Bellomo, P. Fabbricatore, B.CAIFFI, V. Marinozzi, M. Sorbi and G. Volpini 10/18/2016

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting Overview Principal stresses and failure criteria 2D model: plain strain vs plain stress 2D mechanical optimization Cosq 2D models: CONFIGURATION 1 – vertical cut CONFIGURATION 1I – horizontal cut CONFIGURATION 1II – hybrid CONCLUSIONS 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

PRINCIPAL STRESSES Stress-strain tensor In cartesian coordinate system PRINCIPAL coordinate system: system in which the SS tensor is DIAGONAL The principal stress s1, s2 and s3, defined for each single element, are those in which the stress-strain tensor is diagonal (s3< s2< s1). s3 ~ sx in block coil geometry s3 ~ sq in cosq geometry Von Mises stress is defined as: S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting 10/18/2016

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting STRESSES sr sq sVM s3 s1 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

PLANE STRESS vs PLANE strain Plane stress is a stress state that varies only in the X and Y directions. The stress in the Z direction is always zero, as are the XZ and YZ shear stresses. Plane stress is generally used on flat, thin structures, where the deformation is assumed to be solely in the plane of the structure.  Plane strain is a stress state that varies only in the X and Y directions. The strain in the Z direction is always zero, as are the XZ and YZ shear strains, since the boundaries are fixed. Plain stress approximation is less conservative but more compatible with 3D simulation results. 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

2d mechanical optimization Cables undergo degradation if: stress on conductors >150 MPa @room temperature; stress on conductors > 200 MPa @cold; stress on conductors > 150 MPa @cold after energization in the high field region → attention must be given in particular to first layers. Tensile stress on the iron yoke at 4 K < 200 Mpa. Contact pressure Ti pole-conductors > 2 MPa after energization at 16T. 41 435 829 1223 1616 2010 2404 2798 3192 3586 F[N] S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting 10/18/2016

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting Material parameters E modulus [GPa] (T=4K) E modulus [GPa] (T=300K) a (K-1) νxy Conductor Ex=33 Ey=27.5 Ex=30 Ey=25 ax=3.08E-3/296 ay=3.36E-3/296 0.3 Steel 210 191 2.8e-3/296 0.28 Iron 224 204 2.0e-3/296 Aluminum 79 72 4.2e-3/296 Copper 110 100 3.4e-3/296 Resin 27.5 25 2.5e-3/296 0.2 Titanium 126.5 115 1.7e-3/296 +10% 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting CONFIGURATION 1 ANSYS model Bladder & key configuration Key length= 20 mm, interference= 0.6 mm Vertical cut both in the steel collar and in the iron yoke C-clamp mandatory to achieve enough contact pressure at the pole, interference= 0.15 mm Al alloy Vertical cut 55 mm Iron C-clamp 155 mm SS key 40 mm 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

Contact pressure and principal stress Assembly Cool Down Energization Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ[Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] B.Caiffi WP5 Coordination Meeting sθ peak= -111 MPa S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting s θ peak=-195 MPa s θ peak= -182 MPa 10/18/2016

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting CONFIGURATION 2 Bladder & key configuration Key length= 20 mm, interference= 0.4 mm Horizontal cut both in the steel collar and in the iron yoke Al alloy Iron 45 mm 160 mm SS key 30mm Horizontal cut 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

Contact pressure and principal stress Assembly Cool Down Energization Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ[Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] sθ peak= -97 MPa s θ peak=-206 MPa s θ peak= -232 MPa 10/18/2016

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting CONFIGURATION 2 IVth layer shifted upward by 1 mm A Peak stress due to the edge IIIrd and IVth layers shifted upward by 1 mm B 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

Contact pressure and principal stress Assembly Cool Down Energization Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ[Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting sθ peak= -90 MPa s θ peak=-187 MPa s θ peak= -225 MPa 10/18/2016

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting Turn number: Layer 1: 13 Layer 2: 20 Layer 3: 30 Layer 4: 38 Tot: 202/ap. Wedge minimum thikness: 0.86 mm In LHC: 0.70 mm In D11: 0.98 mm 16T-22b-36-optd6f7 Field harmonics < 1 unit Cable 1 (inner) Cable 2 (outer) 22 36 1.1 mm 0.712 mm 13.2 mm 13.5mm 1.892 mm 1.225 mm 2.072 mm 1.343 mm 0.15 mm 0.5° 0.85 2.1 11200 A 1167 A/mm2 1154 A/mm2 86% Cable 1 (inner) Cable 2 (outer) Strand number 22 36 Strand diameter 1.1 mm 0.712 mm Bare width 13.2 mm 13.5mm Bare inner thickness 1.892 mm 1.225 mm Bare outer thickness 2.072 mm 1.343 mm Insulation 0.15 mm Keystone angle 0.5° Cu/NCu 0.85 2.15 Operating current 11180 A 11180A Copper current density 1165 A/mm2 1143 A/mm2 Operating point on LL (1.9 K) 86% 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

Tensile stress in the iron Tensile stress peak in the iron (s1 peak) ~ 350 MPa 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting CONFIGURATION 3 Al alloy Bladder & key configuration Key length= 20 mm, interference= 0.5 mm Horizontal cut in the steel collar →greater contact pressure at the pole Vertical cut in the iron yoke →smaller tensile stress on the iron Vertical cut Iron 60 mm 150 mm SS 45 mm 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting Horizontal cut

Contact pressure and principal stress Assembly Cool Down Energization Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ[Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] B.Caiffi WP5 Coordination Meeting sθ peak= -107 MPa s θ peak=-226 MPa s θ peak= -219 MPa 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

Contact pressure and principal stress Assembly Cool Down Energization Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Contact Pressure [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ[Pa] Azimuthal Stress s θ [Pa] B.Caiffi WP5 Coordination Meeting sθ peak= -102 MPa s θ peak=-210 MPa s θ peak= -216 MPa 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting

S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting Conclusions The mechanics of the 16T costheta dipole has been investigated, giving particular importance to the fulfillment of the following requirements: stress on conductors <150 MPa @room temperature, stress on conductors < 200 MPa @cold and contact pressure Ti pole-conductors > 2 MPa after energization. Different configurations were considered, among those the more promising were presented: CONFIGURATION 1- vertical cut in the steel collar and the in the iron yoke Bladder&Key + C-clamp mandatory to achieve contact pressure at the pole Almost fulfill stress limits on the conductor Good contact pressure at the pole for all the layers CONFIGURATION II – horizontal cut in the steel collar and in the iron yoke Very high values for tensile stress on the iron (350 MPa) CONFIGURATION III- hybrid solutions, horizontal cut in the steel collar and vertical cut in the iron yoke 10/18/2016 S.Farinon US-EuroCirCol coordination meeting