THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks
Advertisements

TRADEMARKS CONTAINING A NATIONAL FLAG
Convergence Programme CP 4. Scope of Protection B&W Marks Alicante October 2012.
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Comparison and overlap between trademark and design rights and the protection by unfair competition rules Presentation for IBA Conference, European Forum.
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
September 10, 2010 Hà Thị Nguyệt Thu (NOIP) Well-known trademark protection Reference to the Japanese experience.
Should the names of the States be included in Article 6ter of the Paris Convention?
McCarthy Trademark Roundtable Oxford, 14 February 2014 Keyword advertising and EU trademark law Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird.
By BR Rutherfold. Introduction The present article presents how the British Trade Mark Act of 1994 and Trade Mark Act of 1993 of South Africa is designed.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
RED DE PROPIEDAD INTELLECTUAL E INDUSTRIAL EN LATINOAMÉRICA PILA-Network is a project co-funded by the European Union in the framework of the ALFA programme.
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
8th WIPO Advanced Research Forum on Intellectual Property Rights, WIPO- Geneva, May 26-28, 2014 The need for a fair referential trademark use from the.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
FUNDAMENTALS OF TRADEMARK LAW THE HONORABLE BERNICE B. DONALD U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN SEPT. 18, 2013 LAHORE, PAKISTAN.
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq. Gavin Law Offices, PLC GRIPLA October 28, 2010 International Trademark Treaties and.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
Seminar IP and Creative SMEs WIPO, May 26, 2010 IP reforms: a need for horizontal fair use? Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird &
Dilution in Europe: Setting the Threshold for Blurring Prof. Spyros Maniatis Head, Centre for Commercial Law Studies Queen Mary University of London 1Maniatis.
NON CONFUSION INFRINGEMENT OF ® Prof. Charles Gielen Milan 20 June 2007.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. AN OVERVIEW TRADEMARKS DESIGNS COPYRIGHT UTILITY PATENT UTILITY MODEL IP & ENFORCEMENT - HOW SWAROVSKI HANDLES CONTENT.
Circulation of authentic instruments under Regulation 650/2012 speaker – Ivaylo Ivanov – Bulgarian Notary Chamber.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
 Trademark role  Trademark evolution  Trademark protection  Well known trademarks.
IP Translator perceived by the legal professionals Dr. Katalin Szamosi ECTA Member Attorney at Law Managing Partner of SBGK Patent and Law Offices ECTA.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
AIPPI IP IN GERMANY AND FRANCE Paris, 7-8 November 2013 THREEE-DIMENSIONAL MARKS Contribution José MONTEIRO (L’Oréal) 9/8/20151AIPPI - FORUM - PARIS.
Oppositions and enforcement related to the European Community Trademarks - practical issues Markpatent Seminar, Ahmedabad, February 2010.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
1 Twinning Project “Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine” TRADEMARKS IN EU Monica POP, Prosecutor IPR.
LOGO The collective agreement. The labour contract.
The Protection of Trademarks With a Reputation Procedural Issues Trademark Law Institute Amsterdam, October 2010 Marcus Höpperger.
Trademark Law Institute Amsterdam October 15 and 16, 2010 Concepts of marks with a reputation Jan Rosén Professor of Private Law Stockholm University.
TRADE MARKS: LATEST EU CASE LAW ON ENFORCEMENT By Annick Mottet Haugaard Attorney at law, 2nd Vice President ECTA International Baltic Conference on Intellectual.
© Melanie Fiedler, Attorney at law 2005 Sofia The Community Trade Mark The functions of a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking.
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
The need to keep technical subject matter available Prof. Luigi Mansani University of Parma Conference "Trademark Law and the Public Interest in Keeping.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
Page 1 24 November 2009 LLM in Intellectual Property Law – University of Turin  Impact of EC Law on National Practices: the Example of France.
“Bad Faith” Trademark Filings/Registrations: TIPO’s Solution Jeffrey CHEN TIPO, Chinese Taipei 37 th IPEG Meeting in Medan 1.
Ip4inno 1 A.Copyright B. ‘Reputation’ and common law trade marks C. Unregistered designs D. Semiconductor topography right.
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
CIPIL: Exhaustion Without Exasperation, 15 March 2014 Double Identity, Origin Function and International Exhaustion Prof. Dr.
“GOODS IN TRANSIT - THE EUROPEAN (EU) EXPERIENCE”
Geographical Indications
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq
4. COPYRIGHT LAW IN EU AND TURKEY A) EU
HOW TO AVOID INVALID U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS BY BEING ABLE TO PROVE A BONA FIDE INTENT TO USE IN THE U.S. Presented by Howard J. Shire 13 October.
IP Protection under the WTO
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
Workshop on « Economic Analysis of Trade Marks and Brands »
6th TLI Symposium Trademark Law and Other Rights in Distinctive Signs (30 October 2015) _________________________ Registered Trade Marks and Unregistered.
Passing Off. Passing Off Contents Summary Key points Passing Off compared with Trade Mark infringement Approach to Passing Off in Courts esp IPEC.
8th Trademark Law Institute Symposium
Professor Thomas Riis Centre for Information and Innovation Law
Honest trade practices and the essential function of the trade mark
Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
Presentation transcript:

THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS Forum on Legal Protection Of Well-known trademarks PAUL RANJARD September 7, 2008

OUTLINE Primary function of the trademark : distinction Protection of consumers against confusion Well-known trademarks / Paris convention (6bis) Secondary function of the trademark : attraction Protection of economic value for the owner EU regulation (8.5) & TRIPS (16.3)

A. Primary function : distinction To guide the consumer towards a particular product/service, amongst products/services of the same nature To guarantee a certain indication of quality Avoid confusion between products/services Protect the consumer

Primary function : distinction EU Directive 21 Dec 1988 (Art 4.1.b) Regulation 20 Dec 93 (Art 8.1) Community Trademark Upon opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark, the trade mark applied for shall not be registered: if it is identical with the earlier trade mark and the goods or services for which registration is applied for are identical with the goods or services for which the earlier trade mark is protected; if because of its identity with or similarity to the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public in the territory in which the earlier trade mark is protected; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark.

Primary function : distinction “… the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark” was inserted at the request of Benelux countries. Sabel vs Puma (European Court of Justice) 11 Nov 1997 “the concept of likelihood of association is not an alternative to that of likelihood of confusion” If no likelihood of confusion, no protection

Primary function : distinction Paris Convention article 6 bis (1967) “(1) The countries of the Union undertake, ex officio if their legislation so permits, or at the request of an interested party, to refuse or to cancel the registration, and to prohibit the use, of a trademark which constitutes a reproduction, an imitation, or a translation, liable to create confusion, of a mark considered by the competent authority of the country of registration or use to be well known in that country as being already the mark of a person entitled to the benefits of this Convention and used for identical or similar goods…” Non-registered trademark protected if well known Consumer protected against risk of confusion

Primary function : distinction EU Community Trademark Regulation 20 Dec 93 (Art 8.2.c) 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, earlier trade marks means: (c) trade marks which, on the date of application for registration of the Community trade mark, or, where appropriate, of the priority claimed in respect of the application for registration of the Community trade mark, are well known in a Member State, in the sense in which the words “well known” are used in Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention.

B. Secondary function : attraction Image of success, quality, luxury Economic value for the owner Need of protection against Dilution (blurring / tarnishment) Coca Cola with many products, or engine oils.. Parasitism

Secondary function : attraction TRIPS (1994) Article 16 - Rights Conferred 3. Article 6bis of the Paris Convention (1967) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to goods or services which are not similar to those in respect of which a trademark is registered, PROVIDED that use of that trademark in relation to those goods or services would indicate a connection between those goods or services and the owner of the registered trademark AND provided that the interests of the owner of the registered trademark are likely to be damaged by such use. The concept of “connection” ( or “risk of association”) applies to well-known trademarks used on non similar goods

Secondary function : attraction EU Regulation 20 Dec 93 (Art 8.5) 5. Furthermore, upon opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark within the meaning of paragraph 2, the trade mark applied for shall not be registered where it is identical with or similar to the earlier trade mark and is to be registered for goods or services which are NOT SIMILAR to those for which the earlier trade mark is registered, where in the case of an earlier Community trade mark the trade mark has a reputation in the Community and, in the case of an earlier national trade mark, the trade mark has a reputation in the Member State concerned AND where the use without due cause of the trade mark applied for would take unfair advantage of, OR be detrimental to, the distinctive character OR the repute of the earlier trade mark.

Secondary function : attraction Use of the trademark on other goods Detrimental to the distinctive character (“blurring”) the repute (‘tarnishment”) Take undue profit of distinctive character or reputation “parasitism”

Secondary function : attraction A loophole : Use of a “remotely” similar trademark on identical or similar goods/services, Creating a likelihood of association Nothing in the Directive or the Regulation

Secondary function : attraction European Court of Justice Davidoff (5 June 2003) “… cannot give an interpretation which would lead to marks with a reputation having less protection where a sign is used for identical or similar goods or services” Adidas II (29 October 2003) “… grant protection which is at least as extensive for identical or similar goods or services as for non-similar goods or services”

CONCLUSION

IDENTICAL/SIMILAR GOODS REGISTERED (TRIPs 16.3) REGISTERED NOT REGISTERED (Paris 6 bis) ( Davidoff -Adidas) NON-SIMILAR GOODS IDENTICAL/SIMILAR GOODS IDENTICAL/SIMILAR GOODS WELL-KNOWN REPUTATION WELL-KNOWN TARNISHMENT BLURRING IDENTICAL IDENTICAL similar Parasitism similar NO CONFUSION BUT ASSOCIATION confusion association TRADEMARK OWNER CONSUMERS

THANK YOU ! Paul Ranjard ranjard@wanhuida.com