SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
of LFD Compensation Study S1 Global Cryomodule
Advertisements

J. Branlard ALCPG11 – March 2011 – Eugene OR, USA Results from 9mA studies on achieving flat gradients with beam loading P K |Q L studies at FLASH.
Lorentz force detuning measurements on the CEA cavity
Tuning system requirements
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- XFEL Tuner Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup New Saclay design.
Piezo Studies and Temperature Measurements Ruben Carcagno May 11, 2005.
SLHC-PP – WP7 Critical Components for Injector Upgrade Plasma Generator – CERN, DESY, STFC-RAL Linac4 2MHz RF source Thermal Modeling Gas Measurement and.
Shuichi Noguchi, KEK6-th ILC School, November Auxiliary Components  Input Power Coupler  HOM Dumping Coupler  Frequency Tuner  He Jacket  Magnetic.
Cavity Integration summary H. Hayano April 25, 2008 ILC-SCRF
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Sept. 30 Albuquerque Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Test Items in S1-G Cryomodule Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
TDR Part 2: 3.3 Cavity Integration (10 pages) H. Hayano Baseline Design based on the meeting discussion.
Cavity Tuner Spec. profile for Plug Compatibility H. Hayano April 22, 2008 ILC-SCRF
E. KAKO (KEK) 2010' Sept. 10 KEK Global Design Effort 1 Lorentz Force Detuning Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Summary of AWG7 SCRF technologies Eiji Kako Wolf-Dietrich Moeller Akira Yamamoto Hitoshi Hayano Tokyo, Nov
1 Results from the 'S1-Global' cryomodule tests at KEK (8-cav. and DRFS operation) Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) LOLB-2 (June, 2011) Outline I. 8-cavity installation.
First Mini-workshop on IHEP 1.3GHZ SRF LLRF and Tuner Sun YI (孙 毅) Accelerator Center, IHEP June 10, 2009.
Shuichi Noguchi,SRF2007,10.71 New Tuners for ILC Cavity Application Shuichi Noguchi KEK.
RF Cavity Simulation for SPL Simulink Model for HP-SPL Extension to LINAC4 at CERN from RF Point of View Acknowledgement: CEA team, in particular O. Piquet.
LLRF ILC GDE Meeting Feb.6,2007 Shin Michizono LLRF - Stability requirements and proposed llrf system - Typical rf perturbations - Achieved stability at.
Compatibility in the ILC ML. 主なデザインと相違点 BCD ( TTF) STF-BL その他 空洞、シー ル Φ 78 mm ビームパイ プ、アルミヘキサゴ ン Φ 80 mm ビームパイ プ、インジウムヘリ コ LL, Re 入力カプ ラー TTF-III 円筒セラミック窓.
LLRF-05 Oct.10,20051 Digital LLRF feedback control system for the J-PARC linac Shin MICHIZONO KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (JAPAN)
Recent LFD Control Results from FNAL Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert TTF/FLASH 9mA Meeting on Cavity Gradient Flatness June 01, 2010.
S.Noguchi (KEK) ILC08 Chicago , Nov . 17, Cavity Package Test in STF STF Phase-1 E. Kako, S. Noguchi, H. Hayano, T. Shishido, M. Sato, K. Watanabe,
Plug compatibility Document ILC10 cavity integration session H. Hayano.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
28/Jul/ Test Results of the International S1-Global Cryomodule Kirk.
W. 5th SPL collaboration Meeting CERN, November 25, 20101/18 reported by Wolfgang Hofle CERN BE/RF Update on RF Layout and LLRF activities for.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
1 Simulation for power overhead and cavity field estimation Shin Michizono (KEK) Performance (rf power and max. cavity MV/m 24 cav. operation.
ILC FAST TUNER R&D PROGRAM at FNAL Status Report CC2 Piezo Test Preliminary Results Ruben Carcagno (on behalf of the FNAL FAST TUNER Working Group) 4/5/06.
Shuichi NoguchiHayama ILC Lecture, Part III ILC BCD Cavity  Maximum Use of Potential Performance  Maximum Use of each Cavity Performance 
Cold Tuner test overview S1-Global at KEK 5-9 July 2010.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
Summery of the power coupler session at the LCWS13 workshop E. Kako W.-D. Möller H. Hayano A. Yamamoto All members of SCRF WG November 14, 2013.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2009' Oct. 26 ILC KEK Global Design Effort 1 Cavity Preparation for S1-Global Eiji Kako (KEK, Japan)
Preliminary Results from First Blade Tuner Tests in HTS Yuriy Pischalnikov Warren Schappert Serena Barbannoti Matteo Scorrano.
GDE 4/Mar/20081 Lorentz Detuning Calculation for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the.
E. KAKO (KEK) 2010' August, 02 meeting Global Design Effort 1 Summary of Low Power RF Tests in S1-G Cryomodule E. Kako, H. Hayano, S. Noguchi,
KEKB crab RF architecture & controls K.Nakanishi KEK Dec. 16, 2010 LHC-CC10 1.
Hayama ILC Lecture, , Shuichi Noguchi 1 Part III ILC BCD Cavity  Maximum Use of Potential Performance  Maximum Use of each Cavity Performance.
Tuner, Coupler WP & specification table H. Hayano, KEK GDE Sendai.
Plug compatibility discussion TILC09 cavity integration session H. Hayano.
Warren Schappert Yuriy Pischalnikov FNAL SRF2011, Chicago.
1 Tuner performance with LLRF control at KEK Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) Dec.07 TTC Beijing (Michizono) S1G (RDR configuration) - Detuning monitor - Tuner control.
LFD and Microphonics Suppression for PIP-II Warren Schappert April 15, 2014.
Overview Step by step procedure to validate the model (slide 1 and 2) Procedure for the Ql / beam loading study (slide 3 and 4)
Shuichi Noguchi, KEKTTC Meeting at IHEP Beijin, Slide Jack Tuner.
SRF Cavities Resonance Control. CW mode of operation (FNAL’s experience). Yu. Pischalnikov W. Schappert FNAL TTC CW SRF Meeting, Cornell University, 12June,
LLRF regulation of CC2 operated at 4˚K Gustavo Cancelo for the AD, TD & CD LLRF team.
RF Issues with Configuration Options Project X retreat Nov 2, 2010 Brian Chase, Julien Branlard, Gustavo Cancelo, Warren Schappert, Yuriy Pischalnikov.
Recent Result for the STF-2 Cryomodule Operation
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
dependence on QL can not longer be seen
R. Paparella, INFN-Milan, LASA Laboratory, Segrate, Italy
S1-G for TTC meeting Global Design Effort
Tuner system Zhenghui MI 2017/01/17
Cavity Theory Feng QIU.
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
S1-G Webex meeting Global Design Effort
Mechanical setups Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup
High Gradient Cavities: Cost and Operational Considerations
Y. Yamamoto, H. Hayano, E. Kako, S. Noguchi, M. Sato, T. Shishido, K
Cavity resonance control
High Efficiency X-band Klystron Design Study
1/10 prototype support tube
High gradients in TESLA nine-cell cavities
Lorentz Force Detuning Studies at STF (Phase–1.0)
TTC meeting, Milano Global Design Effort
Strategic Communications at TRIUMF
Presentation transcript:

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Measurement & Calculation of the Lorentz Detuning for the transient response of the resonant cavity Introduction “Two modes” model Method of the calculation for the transient response Case of Flat-top Comparison between experiment and calculation Piezo Compensation Strategy Next Measurement Plan Summary SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 1 Y. Yamamoto, H. Hatori, H. Hayano, E. Kako, S. Noguchi, M. Sato, T. Shishido, K. Watanabe(KEK), H. Hara, K. Sennyu(MHI)

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Introduction The shape of the resonant cavity is generally deformed by the Lorentz force. The frequency of the cavity is changed according to the square of the field strength. The cavity is detuned, and the field may not be constant during the flat-top of the pulse. It is necessary to compensate or lower the detuning by the Lorentz force. The methods to do it are following… (1) Using Piezo (2) Putting the initial offset to the cavity frequency (3) Increasing the mechanical strength of the cavity support STF B.L. cavity is mechanically stronger than TESLA’s one! SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 2

Thick Titanium Baseplate, Thick Nb Beam Tube & Thick Nb End-cell Improvement in the KEK TESLA-like Cavities Cell Taper 13 deg. → 10 deg. TTF Cavity Beam Tube f78 → f84 KEK TESLA-like Cavity Fz Fr Thick Titanium Baseplate, Thick Nb Beam Tube & Thick Nb End-cell Input Port f40 → f60 KEK TESLA-like Cavity TTF Cavity Stiffness of Cavity Fixing Support 80 kN/mm  13 kN/mm Lorentz Detuning -480 Hz -1050 Hz (31.5 MV/m) 6/18/2018 SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 3

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Mechanical Oscillation (Two Modes Model) Very roughly speaking, the fast mode is mainly contributed to the Lorentz Detuning before 500μsec and the slow mode after 500 μsec. Oscillation Amplitude (Xk) Slow mode Offset Compensation Fast mode Stationary Amplitude Piezo Compensation Eacc 1.5 msec. Time The behavior of the filling is considered not to be different between on resonance and the slight detuning. SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 4

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Two Modes Model In this model, the Lorentz detuning is generated by two modes. One is the “slow mode” and the other is “fast”. 90Hz 300Hz In the simulation 500μsec 5msec(=200Hz) slow mode (sine) fast mode (linear) From the mechanical calculation Actually, so many modes exist in 9-cell cavity! But, these modes are mainly effective. slow mode SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 fast mode 5

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Cavity Voltage Equation From J. Slater Equi-angular Spiral If the factor in each term is constant in time, this equation can be solved analytically. But, if not so… SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 6

Method of the calculation for the transient response Within the very short period (Δt), the following equation is filled and solved analytically. 1μsec SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 7 Generally normalized by 1

Expressions and values for the calculation Used expressions Used numerical values filling time : Tf = 2QL/ω0 f0 = 1300.25MHz QL = 1.15x106 (from horizontal test for STF B.L. #3 cavity) Δt = 1μsec (sufficiently short) Δf = sine + linear (t<500μsec) → sine (t>500μsec) tanΨ=-2QLΔf/f0 After 500µsec, the fast mode disappears, because the damping is very fast. SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 8

Example of the calculation for the transient response fast mode + slow mode After 500µsec, the fast mode disappears. Input data (frequency) slow mode (sine) tanΨ=-2QLΔf/f0 Input data (degree) Output data (VC) Output data (ΨCavity) SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 9

Case of Flat-top (offset +160Hz, w/o Piezo) 500µsec 0µsec SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008

One pulse during High-Power Test (+160Hz Offset, w/o Piezo) This pulse is used for the comparison later. Ψcavity 5˚ Pkly PRef 18.5MV/m Vcavity SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 11

Comparison between experiment and calculation ① Preliminary No offset +160Hz offset 1500µsec 500µsec 500µsec Before 500µsec, the response of the phase detector is probably significant. After that, it is consistent between the experiment and the calculation. “Two modes model” is valid! SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 12

Comparison between experiment and calculation ② Preliminary +300Hz offset -160Hz offset 500µsec 500µsec “Two modes model” is valid! SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 13

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 For the real operation with Piezo, the calculation is modified for a few parameters. Eacc = 18.5 → 35MV/m QL = 1.15x106 → 3.00x106 Sorry! There is not the experimental data around 35MV/m. The result around 30MV/m will be obtained in STF Phase-1.0 on June or July. SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 14

Example of Piezo Compensation (#1) Preliminary 500µsec 0µsec 1500µsec Piezo Condition Amplitude : 400Hz (300Hz=1µm) Period : 300Hz Delay time : –450µsec (fixed!) SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 15 Variously changing

Criteria of Piezo parameters (#1) Preliminary Good operational region for the stable cavity voltage SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 16

Example of Piezo Compensation (#2) Preliminary 500µsec 1500µsec 0µsec Piezo Condition Amplitude : 480Hz (300Hz=1µm) Period : 320Hz Delay time : 0µsec SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 17 The Piezo is added more load in this case!

Criteria of Piezo parameters (#2) Preliminary In this case, the voltage drop is less than before, but the added load to the Piezo is larger! This may cause the breakdown of the Piezo or the lifetime may be shorter. And, the cavity phase should be also considered! Good operational region for the stable cavity voltage SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 18

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Next Measurement Plan Comparing between two types of Piezo actuator High voltage type 40μm/1000V@Room Temp. (2μm/1000V@2K) Low voltage type 20μm/200V@Room Temp. (?μm/1000V@2K) Measurement of the Lorentz detuning around 30MV/m STF #2 B.L. cavity achieved 29.4MV/m in the V.T. Measurement of the detuning angle during the RF decay This was already demonstrated in the horizontal test of LL cavity. Cavity voltage control using Piezo If the cavity voltage is dropped, the Piezo may work for the control. Checking the response of the phase detector 300Hz/μm for Δfcavity SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 19

Suggestion to the compensation method for the Lorentz Detuning Put the initial offset for the cavity frequency During the filling time, the cavity frequency is gradually decreased by the Lorentz force. Work Piezo with the small load Avoid the breakdown of the Piezo by the larger load Longer lifetime of Piezo Increase the mechanical strength of the cavity support It is difficult to deform the cavity. SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 20

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Summary “Two modes model” is valid for the transient response of the STF B.L. #3 cavity in the horizontal test at STF Phase-0.5. It is effective to increase the mechanical strength of the cavity support structure for the reduction of the Lorentz detuning. It is similarly effective to set the initial offset to the cavity frequency around the high field. In STF Phase-1.0, we will compare between the experimental data around 30MV/m and the simulation. We will re-examine “two modes model” for more optimization. SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 21

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Backup Slides SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 22

Mechanical Detuning Equation It is expected that there are two modes from the calculation of the mechanical oscillation. One is the fast mode and the other is slow. SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 23

SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 Two Dominant Mechanical Modes F ~ + Need Stiff Jacket-Tuner Need Stiff Cavity F ~200Hz ~2500Hz Fundamental mode (Slow mode) 2-nd order mode (Fast mode) SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 24

Case of Flat-top ① (no offset) Phaser diagram SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 25

Case of Flat-top ③ (offset +300Hz) SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 26

Case of Flat-top ④ (offset -160Hz) SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 27

One pulse during High-Power Test (No Offset) Ψcavity This pulse is used for the comparison later. 5˚ Pkly PRef 18.5MV/m Vcavity SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 28

One pulse during High-Power Test (+300Hz Offset) SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 29

One pulse during High-Power Test (-160Hz Offset) SCRF Meeting @FNAL 21-25/Apr/2008 30