The Role of Experts in Construction Arbitration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How does the FAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the FIBA Arbitration Tribunal (FAT)
Advertisements

Chapter 4: Enforcing the Law 4 How Can Disputes Be Resolved Privately?
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA FACULTY OF ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 20. Claim, Disputes and Arbitration [Construction Contract Administration]
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
How does the BAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT)
MEETINGS AND HEARINGS in Adjudication John Redmond.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
EVIDENCE Some Basics Spring Overview The cases you read involve facts and law Most often appellate courts decide legal issues based on the facts.
Stages of an Arbitration Arbitration Week in Palestine Session #4 December 9,
2008 Commissioners Indaba 19 – 21 st November 2008 Sun City, North West Province HOW to CONDUCT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS RANDALL van VOORE.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
Elspeth Horner – Partner PROVING THE CASE: Evidence for Court.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
General Condition THE EMPLOYER Construction Law Supervised By : Dr. Kamalain Shaath Prepared By : Eng. Fawzy El.farra.
Legal Document Preparation Class 12Slide 1 Functions of the Discovery Process Narrow the issues –After investigation, you can more easily determine which.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
The Adversary System Part I Chapter 7. Learning Intention Explain the processes and procedures for the resolution of criminal cases and civil disputes.
SESSION SEVEN THE HEARING (UNCITRAL 2010) Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University Kaliningrad, Russia John B. Tieder, Jr., Esq. McLean, Virginia USA
Seminar on the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration Evidence & Hearings under the Swiss Rules Belgrade, 9 December 2015 University.
ICC Dispute Resolution Services The ICC Court powers under Article 6(2) of the Rules Alina Leoveanu Deputy Counsel, ICC International Court of Arbitration.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
ARBITRATION ACT. Challenge of arbitrator The appointment of an arbitrator may be challenged on the issues of – (i) impartiality, – (ii) independence,
AUDIT EVIDENCE AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ASSERTIONS 1.
Help! I’ve been called to give evidence in Court…  The doctor’s survivor guide for preparing for and attending court Sofia Papachristos, Special Counsel,
Pre-action Procedure for Financial Cases
Drafting Findings of Fact
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
TOPS TRAINING.
Administration of a FIDIC Contract - Project Control
PRE-FILING DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
Law of Evidence Oral Evidence.
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Pretrial Conference After discovery, a pretrial hearing is held to clarify the issues, consider a settlement, and set rules for trial Once the trial court.
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
LATIHAN MID SEMINAR AUDIT hiday.
Law of Evidence OPINION EVIDENCE 2/12/2014 Chapter 8.
Arbitration Process Arbitrator G C Kabi
The Inquisitorial System of Trial
Arbitration and Procedures. Default (rule 2 (d)) Means failure on the part of any person, to repay to the financing bank or to any other society a loan.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
CHAPTER 3 Court Systems 3-1 Forms of Dispute Resolution
Principles of Evidence
THE EMPLOYER Right, of access to the site.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Civil Pretrial Practice
Traveling with the MSHA Inspector
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Approaches to Witness Evidence in International Arbitration
BC Council of Administrative Tribunals ADJUDICATOR BOOT CAMP
« Use of Experts: Strategic & Procedural Aspects »
The Role of Tribunal Counsel
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Hearing Officer Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

The Role of Experts in Construction Arbitration The Role and Development of Arbitration 16 May 2017

Case Study

Case Study

Case Study

Case Study

KCAB International Arbitration Rules Article 27. Experts What is an Expert? KCAB International Arbitration Rules Article 27. Experts 1. The Arbitral Tribunal may appoint one or more experts to report to it on specific issues to be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal and communicated to the parties. A copy of the expert’s terms of reference, established by the Arbitral Tribunal, shall be communicated to the parties. 2. The Arbitral Tribunal may require a party to give the expert any relevant information or to provide access to any relevant documents, goods or other property for his inspection. 3. Upon receipt of the expert’s report, the Arbitral Tribunal shall send a copy of the report to all parties and shall give the parties an opportunity to comment on the report. A party may examine any document on which the expert has relied in preparing such a report.

BANI Arbitration Rules Article 23. Evidence and Hearings What is an Expert? BANI Arbitration Rules Article 23. Evidence and Hearings 4. Witnesses If the Tribunal considers it necessary, and/or at the request of either party, expert witnesses or witnesses as to facts may be summoned. Such witnesses may be required by the Tribunal to present their testimony in a written statement first, on the basis of which the Tribunal shall determine, on its own or upon request of either party, whether oral testimony of any such witness shall be required.

CIArb Essential Roles of an Expert Protocol for the Use of Party-Appointed Expert Witnesses in International Arbitration:

Essential Roles of an Expert Concern that experts may provide opinions based on what the party instructing them wants to achieve. However, self- regulating as a reputation of an expert survives far beyond a single case. Not unlike the reputation of arbitrators.

Essential Roles of an Expert Knowledge Must have thorough knowledge of the area upon which he is to give expert evidence. Including the pros/cons Understanding Must have the ability to understand the facts of any given scenario; also apply his knowledge to those facts. Academic reasoning and discussion is not enough Must be able to apply that knowledge Issue of Academics v. Professionals

Essential Roles of an Expert Expression and Clarity Cannot be over-stated! If expert fails to express thoughts to Tribunal = no assistance. Expert not there to teach Tribunal, but to assist in the resolution of the dispute. Must be clear in expression and thought in both written expert report and at oral hearing.

Essential Roles of an Expert Expression and Clarity Cannot be over-stated! If expert fails to express thoughts to Tribunal = no assistance. Expert not there to teach Tribunal, but to assist in the resolution of the dispute. Must be clear in expression and thought in both written expert report and at oral hearing.

Quantum Experts Generally 3 types of Construction Experts: Technical Expert Delay Expert Quantum Expert Focus on Quantum Expert: Why? The best legal arguments (based on technical and delay expertise) will not help the client’s case, if the quantum calculations and presentations are ignored!

Quantum Experts Proof of Quantum Challenges: Sheer Volume of Documentation In construction, contractor’s record keeping obligations and standards are extensive. Thousands of documents. Need to identify, review and manage. Lawyers can assist as they will have in-depth knowledge of evidence.

Quantum Experts Which documents to submit to satisfy the legal burden of proof? Evidence that is: Relevant; Third-party generated; Contemporaneous; Original; and Properly translated.

Quantum Experts Multiple Claims Construction claims almost always involve multiple claims E.g., claims regarding: Variation claims; Claims for disruption; Claims for defects; Claims for unpaid work; Also involves multiple parties, from different industries and jurisdictions. Can result in multiple arbitrations against different parties.

Quantum Experts Care must be given to how claims are raised: Must look at the dispute clause: E.g., if claim must go through engineer first, then it cannot be raised in arbitration if Engineer has not made a determination.

Quantum Experts Calculations of various costs Costs typically include the following: Direct costs: Allocating costs incurred for the specific event. Challenge is to show extra costs as being above and beyond the project plan level, but also demonstrably attributable to the specific event giving rise to the dispute. Project and head office Overheads: Allocating overhead costs to the specific claim event that is seen to be reasonable and rational. (e.g., personnel flown to site for 2 months to deal solely with a single issue is not convincing).

Quantum Experts Profit margins: Establishing a reasonable gross or net profit margin that, but for the claim event, would have been earned on the project.

Hot Tubbing What is “Hot Tubbing”?

Hot Tubbing AKA “concurrent evidence” involves experts from the same discipline giving evidence at the same time and in each other's presence. PROS Allows Tribunal to compare differences on each specific issue (compare apples to apples); Less adversarial (than cross-examination), more inquisitorial; Produces a well-ordered hearing transcript.

Hot Tubbing CONS Takes away opportunity of counsel to cross-examine expert in detail; Important documents could be missed if Tribunal does not raise them;