Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Second Order Velocity-Slip/Temperature-Jump on Basic Gaseous Fluctuating.
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Validation of a Pressure Diameter Method for Determining Modulus and Strain of.
Date of download: 6/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Cerebral Blood Flow in a Healthy Circle of Willis and Two Intracranial Aneurysms:
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Dynamics of Flow in a Mechanical Heart Valve: The Role of Leaflet Inertia and.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Study of the Velocity and Strain Fields in the Flow Through Prosthetic Heart Valves.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Study of Cerebroarterial Hemodynamic Changes Following Carotid Artery.
Date of download: 6/26/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Application of Womersley Model to Reconstruct Pulsatile Flow From Doppler Ultrasound.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optical Microscopy-Aided Indentation Tests J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Numerical Modeling of Regenerative Cooling System for Large Expansion Ratio Rocket.
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Stability of Carotid Artery Under Steady-State and Pulsatile Blood Flow: A Fluid–Structure.
Date of download: 7/2/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Calibrated Coarse Grid-Finite Volume Method for the Fast Calculation of the Underhood.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Cyclic Motion on Coronary Blood Flow J Biomech Eng. 2013;135(12):
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Three-Dimensional Modeling of Supine Human and Transport System Under Whole-Body.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effects of Swirl Velocities From Fan Assemblies Mounted on Lifting Surfaces J.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/20/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Simulation and Optimization of Drying of Wood Chips With Superheated Steam in.
Date of download: 9/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Pressure Surge During Cryogenic Feedline Chilldown Process
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/17/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/20/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Hemodynamics of the Mouse Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Date of download: 10/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Three-Dimensional-Printing of Bio-Inspired Composites
Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/14/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Flow Pattern and Slug Dynamics Around a Flow Splitter
Date of download: 12/16/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 1/7/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/27/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: That Hemodynamics and Not Material Mismatch is of Primary Concern in Bypass Graft Failure: An Experimental Argument J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):881-886. doi:10.1115/1.1992532 Figure Legend: The experimental setup used in the study. The sideview of the stiff graft model is shown together with the measurement locations. A schematic diagram of the flow circuit is also shown for the proximal model test. The graft pipe is connected to the head reservoir while the artery pipe is connected to the return reservoir. For the proximal model test, the connection of the graft and artery pipes to the reservoirs is reversed.

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: That Hemodynamics and Not Material Mismatch is of Primary Concern in Bypass Graft Failure: An Experimental Argument J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):881-886. doi:10.1115/1.1992532 Figure Legend: Topview of junction illustrating bulging from 0mmHgto140mmHg (top) with graphical results of the top view deformations for the compliant graft model (Artery/Artery) and the stiff graft model (Graft/Artery) at the toe and 4.65mm from the toe (within the junction) which corresponds to the location of maximum displacement.

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: That Hemodynamics and Not Material Mismatch is of Primary Concern in Bypass Graft Failure: An Experimental Argument J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):881-886. doi:10.1115/1.1992532 Figure Legend: Sideview illustrating constrained expansion of artery bed from 0mmHgto140mmHg (top). The graph shows the percentage less the deformations of the ESA models are when compared to the straight artery model (Healthy Artery). Sideview measurements were taken for various axial locations along the host artery of the ESA. The stiff graft (G/A) has a constraining effect on the host artery when compared to the compliant graft (A/A).

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: That Hemodynamics and Not Material Mismatch is of Primary Concern in Bypass Graft Failure: An Experimental Argument J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):881-886. doi:10.1115/1.1992532 Figure Legend: Quantitative LDA results for the center-plane measurements in the proximal (top) and distal junctions (bottom). More significant fluid dynamic disturbance is evident in the distal junction when compared to normal fully developed flow. The comparisons between the stiff (bold line) graft model profiles and the compliant (dotted line) graft model profiles are less significant.

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: That Hemodynamics and Not Material Mismatch is of Primary Concern in Bypass Graft Failure: An Experimental Argument J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):881-886. doi:10.1115/1.1992532 Figure Legend: Percentage difference plots of results of hemodynamic investigations for data across the artery. The proximal end results (top) show the magnitude of the velocity decrease in the compliant model when compared to the stiff model. The distal end results (bottom) show the magnitude of the velocity decrease in the compliant model when compared to the stiff model. It is seen that the differences between the profiles generally lie within 40% with notable exceptions at the distal end. The toe −4.65mm position corresponds to the position of the maximum bulge.

Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: That Hemodynamics and Not Material Mismatch is of Primary Concern in Bypass Graft Failure: An Experimental Argument J Biomech Eng. 2005;127(5):881-886. doi:10.1115/1.1992532 Figure Legend: Percentage difference plots of results of hemodynamic investigations for data across the artery. The compliant graft results (top) show the contrast in velocities between the proximal and distal end for the compliant model. The stiff graft results (bottom) show the contrast in velocities between the proximal and distal end for the stiff model. It is seen that the differences between the flows at the proximal and distal ends vary up to 80%. The toe −4.65mm position corresponds to the position of the maximum bulge.