10th ITPA on SOL/divertor physics, Jan 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
J. Roth, EU PWI TF, SEWG Fuel Retention, Cadarache, June 15, 09 Tritium inventory: Joint international scaling for ITER WP09-PWI-01-01/IPP/PS Status by.
Advertisements

1TPL Dismantling Project Review 08/12/06 Bernard Pégourié TORE SUPRA Association EURATOM-CEA D program: Specific experiments before dismantling Purpose:
J. Roth, EU PWI TF, SEWG Fuel Retention, Garching, July 19, 2010 Report on: WP10-PWI /IPP/PS Multi machine scaling of fuel retention for ITER Validation.
6 th EU PWI TF Meeting Madrid, Oct Tritium Inventory in ITER: Laboratory data and extrapolation from tokamaks Th Loarer, J Roth, S Brezinsek, A.
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.
EFDA Fusion Roadmap Status of implementation Francesco Romanelli EFDA Leader.
WBS Tokamak Exhaust Process
Y. Ueda, M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka (Osaka University)
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
1 A Bayesian Non-Inferiority Approach to Evaluation of Bridging Studies Chin-Fu Hsiao, Jen-Pei Liu Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics National.
Physics of fusion power
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
Summary Report of the Energy Issues Working Group Organizer: Farrokh Najmabadi Covenors:Jeffrey Freidberg, Wayne Meier, Gerald Navaratil, Bill Nevins,
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Master Budgeting and Responsibility Accounting.
Topic 10 – Strategic Logistics Planning Outline 1.1What is Strategic Planning? 1.2The Importance of Planning 1.3The Corporate Planning Process.
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
Measurement of the Plasma Driven Permeation Flux in the Spherical Tokamak QUEST S. K. Sharma 1 H. Zushi 2, I. Takagi 3, Y.Hisano 1, M. Sakamoto 2, Y. Higashizono.
Measurement and modeling of hydrogenic retention in molybdenum with the DIONISOS experiment G.M. Wright University of Wisconsin-Madison, FOM – Institute.
ASIPP In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7 Y. YANG*, and HT-7 team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Nuclear Fusion Katharine Harrison. Why Are We Interested? There are great challenges that are associated with fusion, but there are also very large possible.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
Selection of Plasma Facing Components for ITER and ITER Operational plan V. Chuyanov (Thanks to Y. Shimomura ) ITPA Garching May
Tritium Retention in Graphite and Carbon Composites Sandia National Laboratories Rion Causey Sandia National Laboratories Livermore, CA
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
1 TW4-TSW-001/D1c: Watching brief activities in the field of radioactive waste management: Detritiation K. Dylst, J. Braet, A. Bruggeman SCKCEN Final meeting.
Update on IFE Target Fabrication and Injection Activities Presented by Dan Goodin at the ARIES Project Meeting January 10-11, 2002 UCSD San Diego, California.
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
9th Hydrogen Workshop, Salamanca, June Tritium retention buildup towards pulses in ITER PFCs and dust W.M. SHU, S. Ciattaglia and M. Glugla ITER.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
T.A. Casper, ITPA IOS Kyoto, Japan 1 IOS-JA10: Scenario modeling for non-activation phase: a proposal ITPA IOS meeting October 18 – 21, 2011 Kyoto, Japan.
IFETritium Collection, and Purification System IFE Tritium Collection, and Purification System Abstract In support of The High Average Power Laser (HAPL)
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
KIT Objectives in Fusion by 2020 Workshop on the European Fusion Roadmap for FP8 and beyond April 13 – 14, 2011; IPP Garching.
Introduction of 9th ITPA Meeting, Divertor & SOL and PEDESTAL Jiansheng Hu
PSI 2008 Toledo May 2008 © Matej Mayer Carbon balance and deuterium inventory from a carbon dominated to a full tungsten ASDEX Upgrade M. Mayer a, V. Rohde.
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.
ASIPP In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7 Y. YANG*, and HT-7 team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Background Long term tritium retention is one of the most critical issues for ITER during the tritium phase. It is mandatory to evaluate the long term.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
FIRE Engineering John A. Schmidt NSO PAC Meeting February 27, 2003.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
Can we control PMI to reduce erosion or deposition? Effects of excited particles Reflection of excited neutrals, on deposition and erosion Excited molecules.
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Dust and the ITER Issue Cards Presented by Phil West with Charles Skinner Presented.
J. Roth: ITPA SOL/DIV, Avila, Jan Prediction of ITER T retention levels with W PFCs J. Roth, and the SEWG Fuel retention of the EU Task Force on.
US Participation in the
Nuclear Fusion Katharine Harrison.
Master Budgeting and Responsibility Accounting
KAI ZHANG Nuclear Fusion Power KAI ZHANG Oct
Fire Study in Multiple Compartments
Improving confidence in the materials choices for ITER
In-time retention evaluation by particle balance analysis on HT-7
An Overview of Erosion-Deposition Pattern in JET with ITER-Like Wall
Tritium Research in TITA Information Required
Properties of Seawater
Master Budgeting and Responsibility Accounting
ITER consequences of JET 13C migration experiments Jim Strachan, PPPL Jan. 7, 2008 Modeled JET 13C migration for last 2 years- EPS 07 and NF paper in prep.
D 4 Food webs Process: two open workshops WGGES consultation
p = average reservoir pressure
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
Review of Project Goals
A. Vertkov et al., SC “Red Star”, Moscow, Russia
Regular Production of Hydrogen and Argon Plasmas.
Preliminary Analysis of Loss of Vacuum Events in ARIES-RS
TWG goals, approach and outputs
Presentation transcript:

10th ITPA on SOL/divertor physics, Jan 2008 ITER measurements on retained H/D/T 10th ITPA on SOL/divertor physics, Jan 2008 Philip Andrew Diagnostics Division ITER International Organization Cadarache, France philip.andrew@iter.org

ITER T inventory control strategy T phase Outline ITER T inventory control strategy T phase Gas accounting Tritium burn-up Local measurements H phase Status of retention measurements What could be proposed? Summary

ITER T inventory control strategy Strategy in formulation Design Change Request, DCR#131 driven by safety License to construct License to operate Elements of T control strategy Measurement Removal

Gas Accounting Tritium Handling system can measure available tritium inventory to 0.5-1% (measure of T decay heat) Measurement done outside operation (eg. overnight) Tritium deficit = T retention + T burn up

Amount of T 10% error in neutron fluence (T burn up) measurement over 10 years results in 0.5kg error in T measurement DT ITER pulse 50g T fuelling (fuelling rate 51022 D+T/s) 0.35g T burned (3.51020 D+T/s) 0.035g T error in burn (0.351020 D+T/s) Retention*: > 0.14g T (>1.41020 D+T/s) Modelled retention**: 0.02-2g T (0.2-201020 D+T/s) Existing (all carbon) tokamaks**: (0.05-61020 D+T/s) *Be wall, W divertor, presented by J. Roth at this meeting **[ITER physics basis]

Need a direct measurement of inventory Local measurements Need a direct measurement of inventory deal with accumulated error in T burned Traditional method: remove wall tiles remotely detachable wall/divertor samples probably still need to vent In-situ methods Laser ablation of wall target with spectroscopic measurement of ablation cloud

Laser based surface probe (E.E. Mukhin) Sensitive to H, D & T

Local measurement  vessel inventory Large uncertainty when extrapolating T distribution very non-uniform > x 10 error possible Need to benchmark measurement Against gas balance Against analysis of components removed in shutdown i.e. gradually learn how to interpret measurement

H phase retention: Status In T phase, Inventory evaluated by difference in tritium plant (TP) inventory at different times pVT-c pressure, volume, temperature, concentration (variety of ways of measuring concentration) In H phase (3 years?) Tritium plant unavailable (still being commissioned for T usage) but ready for D DCR 136 non-active gas supply during H-phase Any criteria & requirement of H tracking could be incorporated into DCR 136

Inventory derived from H phase retention: what could be done? Inventory derived from Intergrated Flow in - Integrated Flow out Flow in : flow meters available from beginning of H-phase, ~1-5% accuracy Flow out: asdf Pressure x conductance, ~ 50% accuracy PVT-c measurement of integrated exhaust, ~5% Modelled retention (for C/Be/W): 4% Requirements for H retention measurements could be folded into the H gas handling DCR

Main T retention measurement Direct measurements of inventory Summary Main T retention measurement Tritium Plant deficit & Tritium burn-up Direct measurements of inventory Deal with T burn-up error (if retention small) to indicated where T is being held up not presently part of ITER design Hydrogen phase does not have T plant available for gas accounting H gas balance challenging, even with C in divertor