International Workshop on Micropiles May 29 - 31, 2002 Venice, Italy Full Scale Field Tests on Single Micropiles and Groups/Networks of Titan Micropiles.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Drystone Retaining Walls Presentation to Bridge Owners Forum at Kings College, Cambridge 13 May 2008.
Advertisements

1 Prepared for: International Society for Micropiles (ISM) 2009 International Workshop on Micropiles London, England May 13 th, 2009 A DECADE OF LOAD HOLD.
Research Proposal Requirements and Networking Workshop ESTEC, Noordwijk, 13 September 2004.
JP Singh and Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., P.E. Gary Norris, Ph.D., P.E. March 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM S-SHAFT FOR LATERALLY LOADED.
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
Soil Pile Group Interaction in FB-MultiPier
Department for ENGINEERING STRUCTURES Professor Vlado MICOV, Ph.D Head of Department.
AASHTO LRFD Section 11 Abutments, Piers, and Walls
FHWA Update 2011 VOBug Meeting Helena, MT Thomas Saad, P. E. FHWA Resource Center Phone:
1 ADSC: The International Association of Foundation Drilling.
IWM 2004 Tokyo, Japan Micropiles State of the Art Report Research and Practice Issues USA John R. Wolosick, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. Atlanta, Georgia.
Joint Research of Seismic Retrofitting Technology for Existing Foundations Masahiro Ishida Public Works Research Institute JAPAN “Design and Execution.
C ONTACT STRESS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING. Introduction 1 Skyscrapers Bridges Dams How are these constructions supported? Why are all these large constructions.
CODES, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
Topics on Micropiles in Japan
FROM UNDERGROUND … Address: 59, 3 rd September Str. GR 10433, Athens, Greece s:
IWM 2004 Jouko Lehtonen Jouko Lehtonen Quality Assurance of Drilled Micropiles in Finland.
6 th International Workshop on Micropiles Tokyo, Japan, August 24-27, 2004 Development of ADSC-FHWA Micropile Teaching Module into NHI Course Dr. Donald.
6 th International Workshop on Micropiles Tokyo, Japan, August 24-27, 2004 Synopsis of Findings from IWM 2003, Current and Future Status of IWM, and Breakout.
Current Research on Slope Stabilization with In-situ Reinforcement
AN INTEGRATED DESIGN CONCEPT … … FROM UNDERGROUND UP TO THE TOP ODOTECHNIKI LTD CONSULTING ENGINEERS Address: 59, 3 rd September Str.
MICROPILES RESEARCH AT WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Dr. Adrián Rodríguez-Marek, Dr. Balasingam Muhunthan, and Dr. Rafik Itani Civil and Environmental Engineering.
No Cell Phones, Please. Thank You.. Division of Layne Christensen Company Specialty Foundation Construction Jet Grouting Drilled Micropiles Vibratory.
HEWLETT PACKARD BUILDING 5 SEISMIC UPGRADE CORVALLIS, OREGON, USA TOM A. ARMOUR, P.E. SESSION III STRUCTURAL SUPPORT & SEISMIC APPLICATIONS IWM 2002 MAY.
4.4 SOIL NAILING SOIL NAILING IS A REINFORCEMENT METHOD TO REINFORCE THE GROUND WITH STEEL BARS OR STEEL BARS IN GROUT FILLED HOLES. IT IS MAINLY USED.
Recent Construction Sites of Micropiles in Germany Thomas F. Herbst Wessling / Munich Germany 5th IWM 2003 Seattle – Session 2.
PRACTICE AND RESEARCH ON MICROPILE GROUPS AND NETWORKS Prof. François SCHLOSSER ENPC - CERMES 2 nd LIZZI lecture Tokyo IWM August 2004.
1 MICROFOR Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and slOpe Reinforcement Micropile Interstate Cooperative Research on Foundations and.
Research Needs Assessment for Micropiles: The Past, Present and Future Gary M. Weinstein Research Fellow Polytechnic University Brooklyn, NY IWM 2003.
City of Winnipeg SOUTHWESTERN RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDOR Bidder Meeting October 16 th, 2009.
1 International Workshop on Micropiles May , 2002 Venice, Italy Full Scale Field Tests on Single Micropiles and Groups/Networks of Titan Micropiles.
MDOT Geotechnical Construction Support Anthony Pietrangelo, P.E. Geotechnical Construction Support Engineer Midwest Geotechnical Conference September 22,
The French National Research Project Soil Reinforcement by Micropile Systems François SCHLOSSER - Roger FRANK Ilan JURAN - Roger ESTEPHAN FOREVER.
DEEP FOUNDATIONS Course Work Topics
PAC Meeting July 2, Agenda  Introductions and thanks  Project to date  Next steps  Questions.
IWM 2004 Tokyo, Japan Micropile Foundations Johnson City Medical Center Johnson City, Tennessee John R. Wolosick, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Construction Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering II
DESCRAMBLE Executive Summary Project description:
Review of Indian Seismic Codes
Development of ADSC-FHWA Micropile Teaching Module into NHI Course Dr
Introduction: Excavations and other engineering constructions in the ground are central to many civil and mining projects. Ground reinforcement includes.
Quality Assurance of Drilled Micropiles in Finland
Bridge Pile Foundation Evaluation for a Soil Remediation Project
U.S.-Taiwan Workshop on Soil Liquefaction
Synopsis of Findings from IWM 2003, Current and Future Status of IWM, and Breakout Session Guides Dr. Donald A. Bruce.
CFAC Review NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Update
Lecturer: Dr. Frederick Owusu-Nimo
John R. Wolosick, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. Atlanta, Georgia
John R. Wolosick, P.E. Hayward Baker Inc. Atlanta, Georgia
Research Needs: The Academic Perspective
Research Needs Assessment for Micropiles: The Past, Present and Future
No Cell Phones, Please. Thank You..
CT Reinforced Earth Structures
Christopher R. McGann, Ph.D. Student University of Washington
Topics on Micropiles in Japan
The French National Research Project
IWM 2000 Turku, Finland Pasi Korkeakoski
USFS Acquisition Mechanisms and Potential for Increased Local Contracting A Collaborative effort between USFS Region 5 and the Sierra institute for community.
Mike Turner (Applied Geotechnical Engineering)
Micropile Implementation: Educating the Practitioners
Preliminary design of foundation for HEPS
Ground Improvement Technology – Micropiles FHWA Short Course Dr
Paul Woodfield for Mike Turner Applied Geotechnical Engineering, Ltd.
IWM 2003 Retrospective on Venice and Prospective on Seattle
SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MICROPILE SYSTEMS
ADSC: The International Association of Foundation Drilling
Multi-Family Fourplex Apartment
Synopsis of Findings from IWM 2003, Current and Future Status of IWM, and Breakout Session Guides Dr. Donald A. Bruce.
Presentation transcript:

International Workshop on Micropiles May 29 - 31, 2002 Venice, Italy Full Scale Field Tests on Single Micropiles and Groups/Networks of Titan Micropiles and Future Initiatives Dr. Donald A. Bruce – Geosystems, L.P. Gary M. Weinstein – Polytechnic University

SUMMARY - Full scale field tests funded by U.S. Military, installed and tested by Structural Preservation Systems (SPS) in Baltimore, MD, and designed and analyzed by Geosystems, L.P. - Bulk of tests used a total of 100 + “self-drilling” Titan Ischebeck micropiles, installed and tested in three discrete phases: > Phase I: Sept. 1999 - Feb. 2000 > Phase II: August 2001 > Phase III: September 2001 Phase I : 28 grouped/networked, 6 singles (9’) Phase II: 32 grouped/networked, 33 singles (4’/9’) Phase III: 8 grouped/networked

Solution: TITAN Injection Anchor Overall Program Goals UNIQUE Environment - Rock - Soil (Gravel, Sand, Silt, Clay) - Frozen Ground Loads - Concrete and Asphalt - Axial, Shear, Torsion (Static/Dynamic) Materials Equipment - One “Anchor” - One “Tool” - Grout - Self Contained Power Installation Logistics - One “Process” - Lightweight (threshold) - Clean - Packaging (threshold) - User Friendly - Economically Feasible - Time - Inventory/Field Reduction Solution: TITAN Injection Anchor Self-Drilling, Grouted, Continuously Threaded Tubular Anchor Superior Shear, Bending & Structural Characteristics Ultimate bond values for individual vertical Titans in sand ranged from 1.72 to 2.63 kips/ft (avg. 2.2 kips/ft). (21 to 27 psi: avg. 24 psi). For the two shortest piles in clayey fill with no other overburden cover, the values were several times lower.

Program Test Objectives Phase I: - Lateral and tensile testing of groups/networks. Tensile testing only of vertical elements. Phase II: - “Specialized” testing of groups/networks. Tensile testing only of vertical elements utilizing both cement and solution grouts. Phase III: - “Specialized” and Lateral testing of groups/networks utilizing both cement and solution grouts.

As-built pile group layout.

Plan view of various test elements (Phase I).

Cyclic Lateral Loading of Micropile Future Work Cyclic Lateral Loading of Micropile Groups/Networks (Theory & Field) Purpose? Design Standards and Specifications Who Benefits? Private Industry (Contractors, Engineers, Consultants) Federal/State Gov’t (FHWA, State DOTs, etc.) Academia (the cycle continues . . .) What Benefits? Transportation Projects (Highways, Bridges . . ) All Deep Foundation projects (new/retrofit/etc.) Industry in General > Future Work – based on lessons learned from Baltimore/FOREVER/Lizzi/Japanese, et. al. >>>> see email > The cycle continues: Applied Research => Analysis => Understanding + Lessons Learned = More Applied Research and Theory 1. FHWA State-of-Practice Review Including . . . Research Needs Assessment on Drilled and Grouted Micropiles (Contract No. FHWA-DTFH61-93-C-00128) - July 1995 Other undertakings, studies 2. FOREVER (1993 - 1999): French National Research Project $7,000,000 between French Gov’t, Partner, and FHWA Isolated, Groups & Networks (static and Seismic) Full-scale tests, Shaking table, Centrifuge, FEM, numerical studies 3. ADSC Involvement 4. TWG . . . . 5. National Geotechnical Experimentation Sites (NGES) 6. Private Industry (% of construction costs towards full-scale instrumentation and testing/research on site)

Future Work (cont..) How Do We Get There? Practical and Applied Research that . . . is Conducted in an Environment of Sharing & Cooperation incorporates Lessons Previously Learned is of Benefit to All Cooperative Environment =>> see IWM Vision Statement >> Philosophy of Information Sharing for Benefit of Community 1.

Future Work (cont..) With this Synthesis of Applied & Theoretical Research FHWA: Further Study of Micropile Network Experiments Review recently conducted full-scale experiments Interpret . . . Summarize similar experiments  Future Research Needs Academic Research: Lateral Loading of Micropile Networks Rigorous Cycled Tests Instrumentation & Monitoring Lab & Field Testing of Soils, FEA? Analyze, Predict, and Conclude 1. FULL CIRCLE