Gated Mode - System Aspects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kailua-Kona, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University Readout Concept for Future Pixel Detectors based on Current Mode Signal Processing Marcel Trimpl.
Advertisements

Copyright 2001, Agrawal & BushnellVLSI Test: Lecture 261 Lecture 26 Logic BIST Architectures n Motivation n Built-in Logic Block Observer (BILBO) n Test.
MICE Tracker Front End Progress Tracker Data Readout Basics Progress in Increasing Fraction of Muons Tracker Can Record Determination of Recordable Muons.
Hamburg, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University A DEPFET pixel-based Vertexdetector for TESLA 55. PRC -MeetingHamburg, Mai 2003 M. Trimpl University.
DEPFET Electronics Ivan Peric, Mannheim University.
SODA: Synchronization Of Data Acquisition I.Konorov  Requirements  Architecture  System components  Performance  Conclusions and outlook PANDA FE-DAQ.
2. Super KEKB Meeting, DEPFET Electronics DEPFET Readout and Control Electronics Ivan Peric, Peter Fischer, Christian Kreidl Heidelberg University.
ECFA ILC Workshop, November 2005, ViennaLadislav Andricek, MPI für Physik, HLL DEPFET Project Status - in Summary Technology development thinning technology.
7 Nov 2007Paul Dauncey1 Test results from Imperial Basic tests Source tests Firmware status Jamie Ballin, Paul Dauncey, Anne-Marie Magnan, Matt Noy Imperial.
Phase-1 Design. i PHC Phase /04/2008 System Overview Clock, JTAG, sync marker and power supply connections Digital output.
Features of the new Alibava firmware: 1. Universal for laboratory use (readout of stand-alone detector via USB interface) and for the telescope readout.
MS IPHC-LBL phone meeting, July 10, Ladder Testing at IPHC and LBL.
LCWS08, Chicago, November 2008 Ladislav Andricek, MPI fuer Physik, HLL 1 DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors - Status and Plans - Ladislav Andricek for the DEPFET.
ClicPix ideas and a first specification draft P. Valerio.
Prague, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University DEPFET-Readout Concept for TESLA based on Current Mode Signal Processing Markus Schumacher on behalf.
The Belle II DEPFET Pixel Detector
ILD/ECAL MEETING 2014, 東京大学, JAPAN
SuperKEKB 3nd open meeting July 7-9, 2009 Hans-Günther Moser MPI für Physik Sensor and ASIC R&D Sensor Prototype Production: running, ASICs: Switcher,
1 Updates of EMCM Testing Jakob Haidl, Christian Koffmane, Felix Müller, Martin Ritter, Manfred Valentan o Hardware DHE (v3.2) Setups o Software o Measurements.
1 EMCM Measurements Florian Lütticke, Martin Ritter, Felix Müller.
1 Tests of EMCM Felix Müller on behalf of the MPP / HLL TestCrew (H.-G. Moser, C. Koffmane, M. Valentan) Belle II PXD – ASIC Review October , 2014.
1 Updates of EMCM Testing J. Haidl, C. Koffmane, F. Müller, M. Valentan 8th Belle II VXD Workshop September University of Trieste.
1 Test Beam with Hybrid 6 Florian Lütticke for the Testbeam Crew Bonn University 7th Belle II VXD Workshop and 18th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors.
Belle II VXD Workshop, Wetzlar ASICs - Overview.
Hybrid Boards for PXD6 5th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications Sept Oct Christian Koffmane 1,2 1 Max-Planck-Institut.
PXD ASIC review, October 2014 ASIC Review 1 H-.G. Moser, 18 th B2GM, June 2014 Date and Location MPP, October 27, 10:00 – October 28, 16:00, Room 313 Reviewers:
Simulation of a DEPFET Pixel Detector IMPRS Young Scientist Workshop July, 26 – 30, 2010 Christian Koffmane 1,2 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München.
Pixel structure in Timepix2 : practical limitations June 15, Vladimir Gromov NIKHEF, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
DHH Status Igor Konorov TUM, Physics Department, E18 PXD DAQ workshop Münzenberg –June 9-10, 2011.
H. Krüger, , DEPFET Workshop, Heidelberg1 System and DHP Development Module overview Data rates DHP function blocks Module layout Ideas & open questions.
Test beam preparations Florian Lütticke, Mikhail Lemarenko, Carlos Marinas University of Bonn (Prof. Norbert Wermes) DEPFET workshop Ringberg (June 12-15,
1 Characterization of Pilot Run Modules for the Belle II Pixel Detector Felix Müller Max-Planck-Institut für Physik IMPRS Young Scientist Workshop Ringberg.
H.-G. Moser, 6 th PXD/SVD workshop, Pisa, Oct PXD Summary 1 DEPFET Sensors production yield inter-metal insulation EMCM electronic tests ASICs Schedule.
Data Handling Processor v0.1 Preliminary Test Results - August 2010 Tomasz Hemperek.
1 The Belle II Vertex Pixel Detector IMPRS Young Scientist Workshop July , 2014 Ringberg Castle Kreuth, Germany Felix Mueller.
Clear Performance and Demonstration of a novel Clear Concept for DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors Stefan Rummel Max-Planck-Institut für Physik – Halbleiterlabor.
Preparations on DEPFET gate-mode Operation with Hybrid 4.1.x 17. April Christian Koffmane 1,2 for HLL team 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München.
13 th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications, Ringberg, June 2013, Ivan Peric 1 New DCD Chips Ivan Perić.
DHH progress report Igor Konorov TUM, Physics Department, E18 DEPFET workshop, Bonn February 7-9, 2011 Outline:  Implementation synchronous clock distribution.
1 Test of Electrical Multi-Chip Module for Belle II Pixel Detector DPG-Frühjahrstagung der Teilchenphysik, Wuppertal 2015, T43.1 Belle II Experiment DEPFET.
Ysterious apping ess Florian Lütticke On behalf of the test beam crew 20th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and.
Tomasz Hemperek, STATUS OF DHPT 1.0 PXD/SVD Workshop 5 th February 2013.
1 Test Program for the First Pilot Module Christian Koffmane, Felix Müller, Eduard Prinker, Jakob Haidl.
1 First large DEPFET pixel modules for the Belle II Pixel Detector Felix Müller Max-Planck-Institut für Physik DPG-Frühjahrstagung der Teilchenphysik,
PXD ASIC Review, Oct Ladislav Andricek, MPG Halbleiterlabor Belle II PXD Overview (An attempt to describe the) Interfaces between ASICs and the Experiment.
ASICs1 Drain Current Digitizer Chip (DCD) Status and Future Plans.
Status of DHP prototypes
Testsystems PXD6 - testing plans overview - by Jelena NINKOVIC Hybrid Boards for PXD6 - by Christian KOFFMANE Source measurements on DEPFET matrices using.
Latest results of EMCM tests / measurements
Thinning and Plans for SuperBelle
21st International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications
Charge sensitive amplifier
Digital Interface inside ASICs & Improvements for ROC Chips
Data Handling Processor v0.1 First Test Results
Florian Lütticke, Carlos Marinas, Norbert Wermes
Digital Fundamentals Floyd Chapter 7 Tenth Edition
Analog Readout Chips – the Status
Gated Mode - System Aspects
Readout electronics for aMini-matrix DEPFET detectors
DHH progress report Igor Konorov TUM, Physics Department, E18
PXD Summary Tests PXD9 Pilot Production ASICs Components Plans:
VMM Update Front End ASIC for the ATLAS Muon Upgrade
The Belle II Vertex Pixel Detector (PXD)
Development of the Data Handling Processor DHP
3.2 Shift Register Basic shift register function
Instructor: Alexander Stoytchev
CS Fall 2005 – Lec. #5 – Sequential Logic - 1
Sensor Performance During estbeam
Lecture 26 Logic BIST Architectures
Phase Frequency Detector &
Presentation transcript:

Gated Mode - System Aspects Felix Müller on behalf of the Gated Mode crew (Christian Koffmane, Philipp Leitl, Luigi Li Gioi) 21st International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and Applications 28th – 31th May 2017 Ringberg Castle

Gated Mode - Theory KEKB Continuous top-up injection with 50 Hz, i.e., every 20 ms Bunch revolution time: 10 μs Shield detector during passing of noisy bunches Limit by other sub-detectors: 1 μs BEAST Phase 2 will bring more information about damping time

Gated Mode PXD sensitive area readout direction Gated Mode 20 µs 10 µs Dead time: 1.4 µs – 1.9 µs → 14% of sensitive area → 19% of sensitive area Gated Mode 20 µs 10 µs Gated Mode Dead time: Shielding of DEPFETs and Pedestal oscillations / relaxation

DHP – DCD – Switcher principle gate changes every 8 clock cycles of GCK DHP memory blocks Switcher Switcher Signal Pedestal Offset gate 1 128bit to Switcher from DCD <, > threshold to DCD gate i 512 normal gate i+1 gate i+2 gate 192 spare until gate 256 512 VETO

DHP – DCD – Switcher principle for GM gate changes every 8 clock cycles of GCK Switcher Signal Pedestal Offset gate i GM Normal sequence gate i+k+1 gate i+1 gate i+k Switcher sequence

Gated Mode Apply Clear On voltage at all DEPFET pixels Switch Off the DEPFET 192 Switcher outputs in total Four groups to (de)-activate the Gated Mode, each Switcher has 4 groups: Each Switcher (de)-activate the Gated Mode for 8 gates simultaneously

Gated Mode w/o readout Stop Readout During gating there is no readout Continue readout after gating need to be in sync with offsets, pedestals and machine => Fast clocking

Fast clocking to get in sync Gated Mode w/o readout “Missing next frame” (Missing all frames during the damping time of noisy bunches (which prevent the sampling of the SerIn signal)) problem Switcher requires high clock for SerIn Fast clocking to get in sync

Gated Mode w/o readout Advantages: Can ramp up/down the Switcher groups with steps of 7.56 ns Adjust the length of activating the GM in steps of 3.26 ns Fast (de)-activation: 20 ns in theory for (de)-activation, and (90 ns) 75 ns are measured Disadvantage(s): Missing “next frame” problem / Missing all frames during the damping time of noisy bunches (which prevent the sampling of the SerIn signal) In addition: Pedestal oscillation, i.e., require extra time for relaxation of pedestals, ~ 1µs (must be measured again in more detail with newest generation of ASICs) total time for GM: ~ 370 ns total Gated Mode (enabling, gating, disabling, time to normal operation): 1.4 µs

Gated Mode without readout W37-IB DHPT 1.1 DCDBv4.2 SWB18v2.1 Switcher substrate voltage Felix Müller, Christian Koffmane

Ideas to solve problems – pedestal oscillations 1) Stop GCK after switching back to normal mode for 1 μs ensure synchronization with offsets and pedestals Extend readout time from 20 μs to 22 μs GCK ~1 μs Gated Mode Normal readout Gated Mode 0 μs 20 μs 40 μs 60 μs 80 μs Is it possible from DHE, DHP?

Ideas to solve problems – pedestal oscillations Switcher Signal Pedestal Offset 2) Running GCK, stop Switcher sequence Extend Switcher Sequence with empty signals, i.e., stop continuous rolling shutter mode out of sync with offsets out of sync with pedestals (occupancy ↑ ) GM Matrix readout Does not work Pedestals memory

FSYNC signal DHP reads / writes data in the next memory line every 8 clock cycles SerIn signal is stored in gate 190 Problem if the Gated Mode without readout is applied during gate 190 FSYNC DHP memory 1 192 FSYNC resets all memory pointers (Switcher sequence, offsets, pedestals) After 1536 clock cycles (8*192)

Ideas to solve problems – “missing next frame” 3) Extend Switcher sequence and build SerIn and CLK after normal GM sequence DHPT1.2 allows to decide whether the SerIn is used from normal switcher sequence or from Gated Mode switcher sequence: configuration via JTAG command DHP memory extended GM sequence: SerIn and high Clock Question: How fast can we write to JTAG that DHP should read SerIn from VETO Switcher Sequence? normal GM sequence extended GM sequence DHE needs to sent the FSYNC more than 1536 clock cycles. Otherwise the memory pointer within the DHP is reset. Does the DHE allow variable lengths of FSYNC for one frame? At least two fixed lengths?

Ideas to solve problems – “missing next frame” 02/01/08 Ideas to solve problems – “missing next frame” 3) Extend Switcher sequence and build SerIn and CLK after normal GM sequence Keep in sync with pedestals, offsets Out of sync with machine – Problems? Gated Mode Normal readout SerIn Gated Mode 0 μs 20 μs 40 μs 60 μs 80 μs Ladislav Andricek, MPI Munich

Gated Mode with readout Continue readout during Gated Mode Cannot read DEPFET values due to pedestal oscillations Need 315 ns for (de)-activation in theory (20 ns for GM without readout) Measured 330 ns / 335 ns for (de)-activation in practice Adjust shielding time in steps of 105 ns (3.27 ns for GM without readout)

Gated Mode with readout W37-IB Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 DHPT 1.1 DCDBv4.2 SWB18v2.1 Switcher substrate voltage Group 4 Group 3 Group 2 Group 1 Felix Müller, Christian Koffmane

Gated Mode – 2 Possibilities Measurements on W37-IB (PXD9-7 with SWB18v2.1) Gated Mode with readout (GM w/ RO): needs 315 ns in theory (330 ns measured) to enable the GM, i.e., to shield all pixels needs 315 ns in theory (335 ns measured) to disable the GM, i.e., to switch to normal operation can apply the GM for all pixels in steps of 105 ns total time for GM: ~ 870 ns additionally, the read-out of the pedestals currents after the GM show oscillations (increased spread), which take ~ 1µs (must be measured again in more detail) total Gated Mode (enabling, gating, disabling, time to normal operation): 1.6 µs – 1.9µs Gated Mode without readout (GM w/o RO): needs 20 ns in theory (75 ns measured) to enable the GM, i.e., to shield all pixels needs 20 ns in theory (90 ns measured) to disable the GM, i.e., to switch to normal operation can apply the GM for all pixels in steps of 3.27 ns total time for GM: ~ 370 ns additional pedestals currents after the GM : ~1 µs (must be measured again in more detail) total Gated Mode (enabling, gating, disabling, time to normal operation): 1.4 µs Felix Müller, Christian Koffmane

Layout change – PXD9-7 Reduced ohmic resistance from Switcher Substrate net PXD9-6: 55 Ω for Switcher 1, 172 Ω for Switcher 6 PXD9-7: 10 Ω for Switcher 1, 27 Ω for Switcher 6 W31-OF1 DHPT 1.1 DCDBv4.2 SWB18v2.0

Layout change – PXD9-7 Reduced ohmic resistance from Switcher Substrate net PXD9-6: 55 Ω for Switcher 1, 172 Ω for Switcher 6 PXD9-7: 10 Ω for Switcher 1, 27 Ω for Switcher 6 W31-OF1 DHPT 1.1 DCDBv4.2 SWB18v2.0

Summary and Outlook Gated Mode without readout is faster but there is the “missing next frames” problem Ideas to shift frame, increase frame time – need to consider system aspects from DHE/DHP Need to measure pedestal oscillation time Testing procedures for GM mass testing to be evaluated if needed? Wait after “mass testing” Is it better to use GM w/o RO and lose in 1.6% of the cases the 4 ms (200 frames) with gating time of 1.4 µs OR is it better to use GM w/ RO, do not lose consecutive frames but with a gating time of 1.9 µs (preliminary) ⇒ Planned: Effect of the PXD Gated Mode on Physics should be evaluated Gated Mode w/o RO Gated Mode w/ RO (De)activation 90 ns Adjustment of gating time in steps of 3.27 ns Total time for GM 370 ns + pedestal oscillations De(activation) needs 335 ns Adjustment of gating time in steps of 105 ns Total time for GM 870 ns + pedestal oscillations

Radioactive Source and Laser setup Infrared Laser (980 nm) to cover entire module area Needs to be installed (Laser safety 3B) LED setup to study clear efficiencies and gated mode operation, not in pixel scan, no laser setup Felix Müller, 14.09.2016 - 10th Belle II VXD Workshop

Readout directions (1) L2 BWD L2 FWD Arrows depict the readout direction L1 BWD L1 FWD Felix Müller, Christian Koffmane

Readout directions (2) Backward Forward Arrows depict the readout direction Felix Müller, Christian Koffmane

PXD Arrangement Arrows depict the readout direction Felix Müller, Christian Koffmane