P Supplemental COLA April 20, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Retirement System Board Consideration of Assumption Changes September 5, 2012.
Advertisements

Retirement Planning Fresno County Employees’ Retirement Association Location: 1111 H Street Fresno, CA Phone: (559) Stop Mail #: 40 Web Address:
Ohio University January 27,  OPERS has a long history of proactively addressing issues as early as possible (examples include the Choices Health.
FCERA Board of Retirement and Fresno County Board of Supervisors Joint Meeting – April 30, 2009 Contribution Volatility and Asset Smoothing FCERA Board.
1 New Hampshire Retirement System Presentation to NHSAA September 25, 2008.
Oregon PERS Policy Options: Effects on Employer Rates and the State General Fund ECONorthwest April 10, 2003.
Public Employee Pension Plans Steven Kreisberg Steven Kreisberg Collective Bargaining Director Collective Bargaining DirectorAFSCME 1.
Copyright © 2012 GRS – All rights reserved. TMRS Rate Stabilization Part of the Toolkit October 8, 2012 Mark Randall.
Illinois SURS Member Guide –Contributions (page 2) –Disability Benefits (pages 7-9) –Disability Retirement Allowance (page 10) –Retirement Benefits (pages.
Alternate Contribution Rates. PSPRS Employer Memo 7/28/15 p.4 Currently, rates for PSPRS and CORP are based on the aggregate actuarial valuation and EORP.
FCERA June 2008 Interest Crediting FCERA Board Interest Crediting and Excess Earnings Policy Discussion Wednesday, June 18, 2008 Paul Angelo, FSA.
FCERA April 2008 Interest Crediting FCERA Board Interest Crediting and Excess Earnings Policy Discussion Wednesday, April 16, 2008 Paul Angelo,
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
The Illinois Pension Problem What is Wrong with Illinois Pensions?
City Rates and Actuarial Issues 2007 Annual Training Seminar 2007, Texas Municipal Retirement System.
OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 OPEN – C&HR – 1 June 13-14, 2013 Board of Curators Compensation and Human Resources Committee June 13-14, 2013.
1 A Review of MCPS Budget Category 12 Office of Legislative Oversight Report Presentation to Montgomery County Board of Education Fiscal Management.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
PENSION REFORM: LACERS TIER II P RESENTATION TO L ABOR O RGANIZATIONS Office of the City Administrative Officer City of Los Angeles September 6, 2012.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
SOCCCD TENTATIVE BUDGET BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING JUNE 24, 2008.
WHO’S COUNTING ON US? 307,600 active public employees 194,256 retirees, survivors, and disabled people 11% of Minnesota’s population (586,897 people)
Oregon Public Employees’ Benefit Board Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) July 1, 2006 Actuarial Valuation PEBB Board Meeting April 17, 2007.
Vermont’s Expanding Pension Crisis Presented by David Coates to the Ethan Allen Institute June 19,
Funding Public Pensions Seventh Annual Employee Benefits Symposium John Marshall Law School April 20, 2009 by Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Fire and Police Retirement System Funding Plan March 28, 2010.
Kentucky Teachers’ Retirement System March 17, 2010 Information for Kentucky Educational Development Corporation Gary L. Harbin, CPA Executive Secretary.
Pension schemes in the updated SNA Anne Harrison Editor.
FCERA Dec. 16, 2009 Board Meeting Comparison of Different Amortization Methods and Periods Paul Angelo, FSA The Segal Company San Francisco v2.
Retirement Planning Session
SHARED RISK PLAN FOR ACADEMIC EMPLOYEES OF UNB (AESRP) Pre-Retirement Seminar UNB Human Resources & Organizational Development.
City of San Diego Retiree Medical Proposal City Council Presentation May 13, 2011.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 FCERA Benefits and Reserves January 11, 2006 P.
1 Article 7 - Concord Town Manager FY11 Transfer from Insurance Reserve Fund to OPEB Trust Mr. Whelan moves: that the Town vote to transfer the sum of.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 DRAFT Supplemental Benefits Issues and Options August 29, 2005 P.
1 Accounting for OPEB Retiree Health Benefits Committee September 11, 2006.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
General Fund Update Joe Lopez, Deputy City Manager Steve Christensen, Budget Manager Strategic Commitments.
March 2009 Update Ruth Ryerson, Executive Director 1.
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
1 Foregone revenue & lost savings $ Impact on TRA Foregone revenue from 1% ER contribution increase$43.0 million Permanent foregone savings if delay COLA.
ACTUARIAL VALUATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS -CA RAHUL JAIN
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
Chief Deputy County Executive
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
Other Post Employment Benefits
City of Phoenix Employees’ Retirement System
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
RSI Reform Principles Retirement should be safe and secure
Texas’ Retired Employees Obligations: Case Study – City of Houston
Assembly-Board Joint Worksession- KPBSD’s FY14 Budget
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Introduction of Five Year
City of Houston Retired Employees Obligations
Presented by: Director of Finance, Joseph Lillio February 5, 2019
William B. Fornia, FSA April 11, 2019
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
OHIO POLICE AND FIRE HEALTH CARE
The 71st Meeting of the Executive Council
Retirement Policy in the 21st Century
Getting More for a Client’s Income Options
Retiree Benefit Information
Presentation transcript:

P Supplemental COLA April 20, 2005

Today’s Discussion What is it? Who gets it? Funding Trend Options

Purchasing Power Year 1 2 3 4 5 Benefit $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093 1 2 3 4 5 Benefit $1,000 $1,030 $1,061 $1,093 $1,126 $1,159 Inflation 4.0% COLA 3.0% COLA Bank 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 5.0%

Purchasing Power Lost Retirement during twelve-month period ended April 1 Accumulated COLA Bank April 1, 2005 Accumulated COLA Bank April 1, 2004 1973 or earlier 69.5% 71.5% 1974 69.0% 71.0% 1975 66.0% 68.0% 1976 59.0% 61.0% 1977 52.0% 54.0% 1978 49.5% 51.5% 1979 45.0% 47.0% 1980 38.5% 40.5% 1981 33.0% 35.0% 1982 21.0% 23.0% 1983 11.0% 13.0% 1984 8.5% 10.5%

Purchasing Power Lost

Purchasing Power Supplement Retirement during twelve-month period ended April 1 Excess COLA Bank 2005 Excess COLA Bank 2004 1973 or earlier 44.5% 46.5% 1974 44.0% 46.0% 1975 41.0% 43.0% 1976 34.0% 36.0% 1977 27.0% 29.0% 1978 24.5% 26.5% 1979 20.0% 22.0% 1980 13.5% 15.5% 1981 8.0% 10.0%

Funded Percentage – Purchasing Power Benefits As of June 30 2002 2003 2004 PVB $ 26.5 $ 35.4 $ 30.1 Actuarial Assets $ 6.4 $ 4.0 $ 2.1 Unfunded Projected Liability $ 20.1 $ 31.4 $ 27.9 Funded Percentage 24.0% 11.3% 7.1%

Funded Percentage as of 6/30/2004 – Non-Valuation Benefits $ in Millions Purchasing Power Benefits Retiree Health Benefits Total Non-Valuation Benefits PVB $ 30.1 $ 88.3 $ 118.4 Actuarial Assets $ 2.1 $ 72.7 $ 74.8 Unfunded Projected Liability $ 27.9 $ 15.6 $ 43.5 Funded Percentage 7.1% 82.3% 63.2%

Funded Percentage – Non-Valuation Benefits

Some Options Examples of choices designed to show range of possibilities There are many combinations and other variations that could be added if desired by the Board

Option 1 Stop payments when reserve is depleted Projected August 2005

Option 2 Transfer assets from Non-Valuation Retiree Health Reserve. Fully fund Purchasing Power COLA Transfer Amount: $30.2 million

Option 3 Transfer assets from Non-Valuation Retiree Health Reserve. Continue current benefit amount for those who are currently receiving it until they all die. Estimated Transfer amount: $11.9 million

Option 4 Transfer assets from Non-Valuation Retiree Health Reserve. Continue current benefit amount for those who are currently receiving it for 2-3 years. Transfer Amount: Approx. $1.8 million per year

Questions