Some Result of HyCal Resolution

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

HyCal reconstruction: current situation current situation and future tasks. V. Mochalov, IHEP (Protvino)

Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.

VETO Analysis Update Michael Wood University of Massachusetts, Amherst Outline Introduction and basics Reconstruction packages Efficiencies Simulation.

Secondary beam analysis – PS and SPS Started May 22, 2012.

Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.

13/02/20071 Event selection methods & First look at new PCB test Manqi Ruan Support & Discussing: Roman Advisor: Z. ZHANG (LAL) & Y. GAO (Tsinghua))

Timepix Test beam(09 August) Study Resolution Zhou Xing

ECAL Testbeam Meeting, Rome 28 March 2007 Toyoko Orimoto Adolf Bornheim, Chris Rogan, Yong Yang California Institute of Technology Lastest Results from.

Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.

More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.

EM Calorimetry Study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2006.

5/10/20101GlueX Col meeting, A. Gasparian1 The PrimEx HyCal Calorimeter A. Gasparian NC A&T State University, Greensboro, NC Outline  HyCal calorimeter.

Cherenkov radiation and Cherenkov detectors in the Cherenkov laboratory A.S.Belousov Lebedev Physical Instirute Russian Academy of sciences Report on the.

ScECAL Fermilab Beam Test analysis ScECAL Group Meeting Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, August 6 th, 2010 Adil Khan, Satoru Uozumi,

Angular resolution study of isolated gamma with GLD detector simulation 2007/Feb/ ACFA ILC Workshop M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO collaborated with Acfa-Sim-J.

D ATA ANALYSIS FROM THE CERN TEST EXPERIMENT ABOUT THE HADES ELECTROMAGNETIC CALORIMETER By : Tazio Torrieri Supervisor : Vladimir Wagner.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.

Measurement of Gas Bremsstrahlung at the Pohang Light Source Hyosang Lee Seoul National University, Q2C Pusan National University, HANUL HNP2011.

PANDA collaboration meeting2.-4. June 2004 simulation statusOverview New Framework  why  status  schedule Simulation subdetector  Forward spectrometer.

Photon Beam Position Stability Mike Grissom UNCW July 29,2005.

Photon Beam Position Stability Mike Grissom UNCW July 29,2005.

Angular resolution study of GLD Calorimeter 2006/Dec/21 ILC-sousei Annual Meeting M1 ICEPP, Tokyo Hitoshi HANO.

16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.

7 May 2009Paul Dauncey1 Tracker alignment issues Paul Dauncey.

Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.

Hycal Energy Resolution, Timing, &Trigger Efficiency, A cumulative study. Chris Mauney.

Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.

Min-DHCAL: Measurements with Pions Benjamin Freund and José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Collaboration Meeting Max-Planck-Institute, Munich.

11/18/2016 Test beam studies of the W-Si tracking calorimeter for the PHENIX forward upgrade Y. Kwon, Yonsei Univ., PHENIX.

Reconstructing energy from HERD beam test data Zheng QUAN IHEP 3 rd HERD work shop Xi’an, 20 Jan

Some feedbacks from DRS data analysis (very preliminary) F. Scuri - I.N.F.N Sezione di Pisa RD52 – Collaboration Meeting – Pavia, March 12, 2013 F. Scuri.

Six modules Micromegas TPC beam test & Test bench 12/4/2012W.Wang_RD51 mini week1 D. Attié, P. Colas, M. Dixit, P. Hayman, W. Wang.

1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.

 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.

DREAM Coll. Meeting, Rome 2009F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa Template Analysis of DRS Data  Motivations  Preliminary results F. Bedeschi, R. Carosi, M. Incagli,

CALICE, CERN June 29, 2004J. Zálešák, APDs for tileHCAL1 APDs for tileHCAL MiniCal studies with APDs in e-test beam J. Zálešák, Prague with different preamplifiers.

PbWO 4 crystals Calorimeter Liping Gan University of North Carolina Wilmington.

High Performance PbWO 4 - Lead Glass Hybrid Calorimeter at Jefferson Lab M. Kubantsev ITEP, Moscow, Russia/Northwestern University, Evanston, USA A. Gasparian.

Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,

ArgonneResult_ ppt1 Results of PoGO Argonne Beam Test PoGO Collaboration meeting at SLAC, February 7, 2004 Tsunefumi Mizuno

M.D. Nov 27th 2002M0' workshop1 M0’ linearity study  Contents : Electronic injection Laser injection Beam injection Conclusion.

1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.

Introduction of my work AYAKO HIEI (AYA) Hiroshima Univ 2008/5/30 me.

Monitoring Energy Gains Using the Double and Single Arm Compton Processes Yelena Prok PrimEx Collaboration Meeting March 18, 2006.

On behalf of the Acfa-Sim-J Group

Vertical Slice Test Data

The Optimized Sensor Segmentation for the Very Forward Calorimeter

Oleg Gavrishchuk, JINR, Dubna

p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result

PrimEx II 0 analysis status

Update on TB 2007 Xtal Irradiation Studies at H4

° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.

Results of HyCal Analyses

I.Larin, PrimEx Analysis meeting

EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4

HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs

Time resolution in TileCal

Status of Instrumental Beam Studies and Technical Description of Detectors and DAQ February 24, 2017.

Report on p0 decay width: analysis updates

Energy Calibration with Compton Data

Hycal response function study

Hycal response function study

Detecting dark matter through line emission

Research algorithm of overlapping clusters in PrimEx

西村美紀（東大）他 MEGIIコラボレーション日本物理学会第73回年次大会（2018年）東京理科大学（野田キャンパス）

Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay

Compton Run Liping Gan June 18, 2004.

COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION

Study of coherent c.s. dependence on Energy, what was done

° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.

Presentation transcript:

Some Result of HyCal Resolution Liyang Jiang CIAE/UNCW

Energy Resolution of PWO

General Information Run: 4280; Crystal: centered on W2016 for 5 minute deep statistics run; Hycal Calibration Constants: gain5_iter; Landau*Gaussian Fit.

Fitting Results (PWO) Eg=5.47GeV Eg=4.76GeV Eg=3.09GeV Eg=2.27GeV

Linearity of Ec at PWO E cluster (GeV)

Sigma/E vs Eg at PWO

Energy Resolution at Lead Glass

Information Run: 4279; Crystal: centered on G657 for 5 minute deep statistics run; Hycal Calibration Constants: gain5_iter; Landau*Gaussian Fit.

Fitting Results (Glass) Eg=5.47GeV Eg=4.76GeV Eg=3.09GeV Eg=2.27GeV

Linearity of Ec at Glass E cluster (GeV)

Sigma/E vs Eg at Glass

Position Resolution at PWO

Gaussian Fit Results (PWO) Eg=5.47GeV Eg=4.76GeV X (cm) X (cm) Eg=3.09GeV Eg=2.27GeV X (cm) X (cm)

X VS E gamma (PWO) X (cm)

X sigma VS E gamma (PWO)

Position Resolution at Glass

Gaussian Fit Results (Glass) Eg=5.47GeV Eg=4.76GeV Eg=3.09GeV Eg=2.27GeV

X VS E gamma (Glass)

X sigma VS E gamma (Glass)

Position Resolution at Different Place

PWO Information Run: 5348 (Second Snake Scan) Scan from W1884 to W1851

Fitting Results

Sigma Y VS X (PWO)

Beam-on modular id of Run 4279 Erratum in Logbook Beam-on modular id of Run 4279 Logbook, page 240, Run 4279: “Centered on Glass 587 – deep statistics”; Online database, Run 4279: “Centered on G657 for 5 minute deep statistics run”.

Information from EPICS bank; Reconstructed X and Y position; Erratum in Logbook Information from EPICS bank; Reconstructed X and Y position; Energy deposit in each modular.

Position info in EPICS bank Erratum in Logbook Position info in EPICS bank In EPICS bank, the value of position is not changed through Run 4279. ptrans_x.RBV =448.47 mm, ptrans_y.RBV =257.37 mm.

Reconstructed position Erratum in Logbook Reconstructed position X=-44.34 cm Y=-25.53 cm

Mean Energy deposited in each modular (T counter 30) Erratum in Logbook Mean Energy deposited in each modular (T counter 30) G595 1.515E-03 G596 4.401E-03 G597 6.869E-03 G598 4.868E-03 G599 1.817E-03 G625 3.884E-03 G626 2.487E-02 G627 7.279E-02 G628 2.629E-02 G629 5.202E-03 G655 6.400E-03 G656 7.521E-02 G657 2.590E+00 G658 1.084E-01 G659 8.046E-03 G685 5.443E-03 G686 2.572E-02 G687 1.057E-01 G688 3.230E-02 G689 6.081E-03 G715 1.868E-03 G716 5.196E-03 G717 8.647E-03 G718 5.512E-03 G719 1.831E-03

Erratum in Logbook Conclusion The evidence listed above proved that in Run 4279, the beam is hit on the modular G657. The note about Run 4279 in the logbook Page 240 “Centered on Glass 587 …” should be “Centered on Glass 657…”. NO Lead Glass modular numbered 587.