Title of the Change Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Monday 17 September (Materials presented to the Mayoral Team on 28 August 2012)
Advertisements

An Intro to Professionalizing Procurement & Strategic Sourcing
Implementation of Care Bundles in an Acute Children’s Care Setting ‘not without its challenges’! Paula McGrath Project Co-Ordinator Quality Department.
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Niall Byrne, Deputy Director, Social Services Inspectorate, HIQA.
Developed by Health and Wellbeing
National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
Disability Federation of Ireland National Conference November nd 2007 Working together for the future Ger Reaney Local Health Manager.
Reconfiguration of Services in the Mid West Future Role of the Local Hospital.
A Regional Approach to Improvement Julie Branter Associate Director for Clinical Governance and Patient Safety 21 September 2010 South West Strategic Health.
CONCLUSION The Quality Improvement Forum was successfully initiated and has implemented a number of QIPs. An audit of each QIP will be performed to determine.
Establishing a baseline of the seven day services clinical standards in acute care ‘A how to guide’ To activate the links in this slide set please view.
”Out with the Old, In with the New” Ward Manager/Team Leader Regional Initative Carolyn Kerr Deputy Director of Nursing, Northern HSC Trust.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
Tom Taylor Chief Executive Trust Board 27 th September 2007.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
Linking the learning to the National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare Joan Heffernan Inspector Manager Regulation – Healthcare Health Information.
Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council Social Services CSSIW Performance Evaluation Report 2014–15.
Better Care Better Health Better Life Leadership Framework The Leadership Framework is based on the concept that leadership is not restricted to people.
Liberating the NHS: Developing the healthcare workforce Workforce planning, education and training Consultation Engagement.
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Children’s Surgery and Anaesthesia Provider Engagement Session 8th December 2015.
Welcome to Southern Health Southern Health exists to improve the health, wellbeing and independence of the people we serve.
8 March 2016 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN THE HEALTH SECTOR In association with.
Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS What’s it all mean??!
Programme for Health Service Improvement Clinical Services Planning Group Moving forward CARDIFF AND VALE NHS TRUST YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG CAERDYDD A’R FRO.
Title of the Change Project
HSE Change Process Initiation Planning Implementation Mainstreaming
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Embedding the golden threads that lead to quality care every time……
Niall Byrne, Deputy Director, Social Services
Title of the Change Project
HSE Home Birth Service Clinical Professional Seminar & workshop for healthcare professionals.
Preventing HCAI’s through an education programme for nurses
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Title of the Change Project
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
Title of the Change Project
An introduction to ACSA
Workforce Planning Framework
North Durham CCG and DDES CCG Governing Bodies in Common County Durham & Darlington Community Services Mobilisation and Transformation 18th September.
Improving Care for Older People in Acute Care
Wilson Wellbeing Services Enterprise Workshop 29 November 2018
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
Information & Communications Technology (ICT) in Healthcare –
Head of Corporate Governance/ Board Secretary
May 2019 The Strategic Programme for Primary Care
Implementing Sláintecare
Presentation transcript:

Title of the Change Project Student ID. MSc in Healthcare Management, Institute of Leadership, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Foundations for Governance; Designing the structure and preparing for Clinical Directorates in a Model 4 Hospital Liz Moran MSc in Healthcare Management Header line 1 Header line 2 Header line 3 Abstract Background: This project centres on defining the structures and preparing our organisation (UH) for the implementation of Clinical Directorates. Clinical Directorates are managed clinical units led by a Clinical Director, who is accountable for the provision of safe quality patient care within allocated resources. Following self-assessment against a number of national reports, UH identified weaknesses in its Corporate and Clinical Governance. This prompted the Executive Management Board of the hospital to implement a Clinical Directorate structure. Methodology: The new structure was designed by a stakeholder representative group who discussed, debated and made decisions based on data provided by the author. This data was gathered from research, sites of best practice and stakeholder corporate memories. Each decision by the representative group was reflected as a deliverable on the project plan. A substantial consultation process also took place with influential stakeholders. The HSE Change Model helped guide the change process. Evaluation: A significant organisational change such as this can be challenging particularly in a complex environment such as an acute hospital. The CIPP evaluation model was used to guide the evaluation. The aims and objectives were achieved. A new Organogram has been designed and all clinical services are mapped to one of four Clinical Directorates. Organisational Impact: This is a political process so robust leadership and the capacity to build and sustain relationships is critical. The agreed structures, a leadership development programme, and the project plan will ensure UH is ready to move into the implementation phase of the Clinical Directorate project.

Foundations for Governance; Designing the structure and preparing for Clinical Directorates in a Model 4 Hospital Liz Moran MSc in Healthcare Management Introduction & Background Methodology Evaluation University Hospital (UH) is one of two Model 4 Hospitals in the Hospital Group. Self Assessment against the HIQA Safer Better HealthCare standards1 and the Limerick Report2 identified weaknesses in the Corporate and Clinical Governance. The EMB decided to introduce Clinical Directorates to strengthen the governance and align the hospital for the move to the Group Directorate structure in the near future. UH needs to strengthen its position as a model 4 hospital to continue to serve the people of the region. Figure 1: Force Field AnalysisNeed for strategy Lack of clinical leadership The HSE change model was used to guide the project. Initiation: EMB decision to introduce Clinical Directorates. EMB appoint student as Project Manager. EMB seek volunteers from EMB to be on representative group for decision making and to support Project Manager. Planning: Representative Group (CDSG) of stakeholders established. Liaison with National Clinical Directorate Programme Development of SWOT and Stakeholder Analysis Data gathered through consultation with stakeholders, literature review, visiting sites of best practice Development of a project Risk register Implementation: CDSG debate and decision-making on directorate options Decisions communicated out to wider hospital Ongoing engagement with stakeholders Identification of leaders Mainstreaming: Agreed Organogram circulated Allocations of Clinical Staff completed Clinical Directorate Project Team appointed Clinical Director posts advertised A new hospital structure is defined and the organisation is ready for Directorates. A new Organogram was developed. All Clinical Services/Staff are assigned a Directorate. Terms of Reference for the new EMB has been agreed. A Gantt Chart for implementation is complete. Four Clinical Director posts were advertised Figure 3: New UH Organogram Hospital Group Shared Services Medical CD Peri-op CD Women & Child CD Diagnostic CD EMB Organisational Impact Figure 2: HSE Change Model 3 Development and maintenance of relationships is critical to the Clinical Directorates. Resilient leadership is pivotal. Access to and ability to interpret data is crucial; as data will be the common language. A comprehensive leadership development programme for the teams will ensure a strong foundation for the four Directorates. Managing the politics has been critical. Aims & Objectives Aim: To design a structure and prepare for Clinical Directorates in University Hospital by 30th April 2015. Objectives: Design and agree an organogram to reflect the new structures by March 30th 2015. Assign all clinical staff to a Clinical Directorate by 30th March 2015. Develop and secure sign off on Terms of Reference for new EMB by 15th April 2015. Complete a Gantt Chart for the implementation phase of the Project by the 30th April 2015 Advertise Clinical Director Posts by 30th April 2015 References 1. HIQA. National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare. Dublin: HIQA, 2012. 2.HIQA. Report of the review of the governance arrangements as reflected in the safety, quality and standards of services at UL Hospitals. Dublin: HIQA, 2013. 3. HSE. Improving Our Services, A Users’ Guide to Managing Change in the Health Service Executive. Dublin: HSE, 2008. 4. Stufflebeam D, The CIPP Model for Program Evaluation. In: Madaus G, Stufflebeam D, editors. Evaluation Models. Dordrecht: Kluiver-Nijoff;1983. 117-141