Update on ongoing issues with ECE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrea M. Landis, PhD, RN UW LEAH
Advertisements

The Scientific Method.
Advanced Data Modeling
Copyright Irwin/McGraw-Hill Data Modeling Prepared by Kevin C. Dittman for Systems Analysis & Design Methods 4ed by J. L. Whitten & L. D. Bentley.
Characteristics of a good SRS
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Eighth Edition Chapter 6 Advanced Data Modeling.
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Tenth Edition Chapter 5 Advanced Data Modeling.
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Tenth Edition
Chapter 6 Advanced Data Modelling
BIS Database Systems School of Management, Business Information Systems, Assumption University A.Thanop Somprasong Chapter # 6 Advanced Data Modeling.
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Sample Hierarchy for Acute MI Acute MI of lateral wall Acute MI of apical-lateral wall Acute Myocardial.
Copyright © 2001 College of American Pathologists Sample Hierarchy for Hepatitis Chronic viral hepatitis Chronic viral hepatitis C About SNOMED Relationships.
UML Class Diagrams: Basic Concepts. Objects –The purpose of class modeling is to describe objects. –An object is a concept, abstraction or thing that.
Problem solving in project management
Concept Model for observables, investigations, and observation results For the IHTSDO Observables Project Group and LOINC Coordination Project Revision.
1 ER Modeling BUAD/American University Entity Relationship (ER) Modeling.
ICH V2 An FDA Update Susan Lu Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA January 21, 2003.
Overview, Benefits and how to approach Implementing - Robyn Richards (NEHTA)
The Relational Database Model
Chapter 8 Data Modeling Advanced Concepts Database Principles: Fundamentals of Design, Implementation, and Management Tenth Edition.
(Spring 2015) Instructor: Craig Duckett Lecture 10: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 Mere Mortals Chap. 7 Summary, Team Work Time 1.
1 Capturing Requirements As Use Cases To be discussed –Artifacts created in the requirements workflow –Workers participating in the requirements workflow.
The Guilty, the Innocent, and the SNOMED Shuffle Attributes in transition.
Perioperative Nursing Care
Some Thoughts to Consider 8 How difficult is it to get a group of people, or a group of companies, or a group of nations to agree on a particular ontology?
IHTSDO Editorial Advisory Group James T. Case Head of Terminology.
Summary Statements. The problem... Progress data included –5 progress categories –For each of 3 outcomes –Total of 15 numbers reported each year Too many.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
Fusion Design Overview Object Interaction Graph Visibility Graph Class Descriptions Inheritance Graphs Fusion: Design The overall goal of Design is to.
Lecture 5 Frames. Associative networks, rules or logic do not provide the ability to group facts into associated clusters or to associate relevant procedural.
Copyright © 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. Managing Items and Item Catalogs.
Data Modeling Advanced Concepts Updated 20/4/2015 TMC2034 Database Concept and Design1.
Events, conditions, episodes project group activities Bruce Goldberg, MD, PhD.
State Modeling. Introduction A state model describes the sequences of operations that occur in response to external stimuli. As opposed to what the operations.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Microorganism Name changes IHTSDO Business Meetings Content Advisory Group April 2016 London, England.
Characterstic of disease
Representation of Hypersensitivity and Allergy in SNOMED CT
Chapter 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
Representation of Hypersensitivity, Allergy and adverse reactions in SNOMED CT Bruce Goldberg, MD, PhD.
Representation of Hypersensitivity and Allergy in SNOMED CT
CRP C- reactive protein.
Addition of during, during AND/OR after to associated with role hierarchy Original goal of project was to develop model for intraoperative complications.
The Relational Database Model
Original model Disorder to allergic reaction Allergic state
February 17, 2017 Bruce Goldberg, MD, PhD
Observable entities and Clinical findings
Drug and Substance Project Update
2015 Record Review Training-Formula Approval Kevin Sarb
Observable entities and Clinical findings
Allergy Topics.
Complications and sequelae update
Hypersensitivity dispositions as clinical findings
CRP C- reactive protein.
Knowledge Representation
UML Class Diagrams: Basic Concepts
What is Qualitative Comparative Analysis?
Chapter 24 Testing Object-Oriented Applications
Chapter 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
Indexing and Hashing Basic Concepts Ordered Indices
Chapter 19 Testing Object-Oriented Applications
Chapter 5 Advanced Data Modeling
Chapter 19 Testing Object-Oriented Applications
Potentially Preventable Readmissions
Ramy Abdelrahman, MD Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health (DPMH)
Potentially Preventable Readmissions
Chapter 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
Adverse Event Analysis
Lecture 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Update on ongoing issues with ECE Bruce Goldberg, MD, PhD

Editorial guidance on complications/sequelae Final agreement on the model for surgical complications/sequelae

Final agreement on the model for surgical complications/sequelae Definitions A complication of surgery is an undesired effect due to surgery A postoperative complication is a complication that arises after surgery has been completed. It may or may not be due to the surgery A sequela of surgery is an undesired but expected effect that arises after surgery has been completed. It is not considered (by surgeons) to be a complication. E.g. inability to walk after leg amputation A preoperative complication is a complication that occurs before surgery. It obviously cannot be due to the surgery. E.g. preoperative hyponatremia A perioperative complication occurs before, during and/or after surgery An intraoperative complication occurs during surgery Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative complications are thus kinds of perioperative complications and denote time intervals (before, during, after) relating the complication to surgery but do not necessarily indicate a causal relationship between the complication and surgery

Models 116224001 |Complication of procedure (disorder) 116223007 |Complication (disorder)| 42752001 |Due to (attribute)|= 71388002 |Procedure (procedure)| 302049001 |Sequelae of disorders (disorder)| 362977000 |Sequela (disorder)| 42752001 |Due to (attribute)|= 64572001 |Disease (disorder)| 255234002 |After (attribute)|= 64572001 |Disease (disorder)| Perioperative complication (disorder) Temporally related to = 387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)| Preoperative complication (disorder) 288556008 |Before (attribute)|= 387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)| Intraoperative complication (disorder) 371881003 |During (attribute)|= 387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)| 385486001 |Postoperative complication (disorder)| 255234002 |After (attribute)|= 387713003 |Surgical procedure (procedure)|

Revised associated with hierarchy

Modeling of peri-operative complications

Allergy to substance

Original model (after replacing fully defined parent)

Proposed revision of model

Effect of substitution of allergic process (qualifier value) with allergic sensitization (qualifier value)

Effect of making Allergic sensitization (disorder) primitive

Effect of removing after Allergic sensitization (disorder) relationship

Recommendations For now, go with this Or this

Issues with the allergy model The top level nodes representing the conditions (disposition or reaction/process) are fully defined using pathological process allergic process (qualifier value) which results in the disposition inheriting the pathological process role from the condition.

Suggested long range revision of allergy model The condition nodes which represent disjunction should not be fully defined. Condition X would ideally subsume only 2-3 children; Disposition X, Pathological process X, Pathological structure Xa Allergic diseases (e.g. allergic rhinitis) are ambiguous as to whether representing dispositions or processes and thus there may be a need to represent these separately as both i.e. allergic rhinitis and propensity to allergic rhinitis aFor the case of Allergic condition only Disposition and Process (reaction) are used

Proposed new models for allergy 1* *This model will work equally as well for pseudoallergy in which the value of Has realization can be replaced by pseudoallergic reaction (disorder)

Proposed new models for allergy 2

Has realization

Revised allergy model Advantages Disadvantages Eliminates use of pathological process attribute in the definition of the disposition class Provides a direct link between an allergic disposition and it realization as an allergic reaction via a Has realization relationship Creates a uniform, consistent and accurate model for both allergy and pseudoallergy Eliminates requirement for allergic sensitization class Disadvantages Top level classes are primitive Requires a new Has realization attribute May require duplication of some concepts as both dispositions and reactions Additional considerations Should allergic reactions/processes be events?

Final approval on editorial guide updates for combined disorders

Additions - 1 Temporal sequencing (without necessary implication of causation) As indicated in the truth table above, the current reason for selecting this option is to capture and emphasise the non-overlap of the phenomena (the preceding phenomenon is NOT included in the life phase being described). Explicit causation may be captured by either the use of a new due_to_and_after role, or perhaps by the use of both due_to AND after (not yet implemented).  Default modelling pattern Default FSN construction Assign the ‘second/following’ disorder as a supertype (or ensure that the caused disorder is present in the ancestor tree following classification) Assign the ‘first/followed’ disorder (or procedure) as the target of an After relationship Note – whilst there are no lexical cues to indicate this, the ‘following’ modelling pattern also applies to allergy dispositions (which occur ‘following sensitisation’). Where X occurs after Y (and it is not specified that  X is due to Y although causality is frequently implied), construct an FSN of the form: “X following Y” Conformant examples: Anetoderma following varicella (disorder) Sweet's disease following infection (disorder) Calcinosis following localized fat necrosis (disorder) Adverse event following complementary therapy (disorder) Aseptic peritonitis following a procedure (disorder) Hemopericardium as current complication following acute myocardial infarction (disorder)

Additions - 2 For infectious complications, use causative agent role if the complication is the direct result of the presence of the infectious agent. Other wise use (co-occurrent and) due to or after infection Examples: 103611000119102 |Cirrhosis of liver due to hepatitis B (disorder)| Due to = Viral hepatitis type B (disorder) 195888009 |Proteus pneumonia (disorder)| Caused by = Genus Proteus (organism) 123949001 |Post-streptococcal reactive arthritis (disorder)| After = Streptococcus pyogenes infection (disorder)

Results of combine disorder naming exercise Summary # concepts revewed 19 # reviewers 5 Total agreement 7 (37%)

Combined disorder exercise # 2 (part 1)

Combined disorder exercise # 2 (part 2)