Department of Artificial Intelligence

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
Advertisements

So What Does it All Mean? Geospatial Semantics and Ontologies Dr Kristin Stock.
Semiotics and Ontologies. Ontologies contain categories, lexicons contain word senses, terminologies contain terms, directories contain addresses, catalogs.
Of 27 lecture 7: owl - introduction. of 27 ece 627, winter ‘132 OWL a glimpse OWL – Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations.
OWL TUTORIAL APT CSA 3003 OWL ANNOTATOR Charlie Abela CSAI Department.
Ontologies - Design principles Cartic Ramakrishnan LSDIS Lab University of Georgia.
1 CSIT600f: Introduction to Semantic Web Ontology Engineering Dickson K.W. Chiu PhD, SMIEEE Text: Antoniou & van Harmelen: A Semantic Web PrimerA Semantic.
The Semantic Web Week 12 Term 1 Recap Lee McCluskey, room 2/07 Department of Computing And Mathematical Sciences Module Website:
Biological Ontologies Neocles Leontis April 20, 2005.
PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment Natalya F. Noy and Mark A. Musen.
October 15, 2007Inf 722 Information Organisation (Fall 2007) (Gangolly)1 Ontologies Lecture Notes Prepared by Jagdish S. Gangolly Interdisciplinary Ph.D.
Part 5: Ontologies.
Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Oscar Corcho Mariano Fernandez-Lopez Asuncion Gomez-Perez Presenter:
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Chapter 7A Semantic Web Primer 1 Chapter 7 Ontology Engineering Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen.
1 Ontology & Ontology Development 인공지능 연구실 허 희 근.
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 7 Slide 1 System models l Abstract descriptions of systems whose requirements are being.
Knowledge representation
Clément Troprès - Damien Coppéré1 Semantic Web Based on: -The semantic web -Ontologies Come of Age.
Chapter 7A Semantic Web Primer 1 Chapter 7 Ontology Engineering Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen.
Of 39 lecture 2: ontology - basics. of 39 ontology a branch of metaphysics relating to the nature and relations of being a particular theory about the.
OHTO -99 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING LECTURE 5 Today: - An overview to OO Analysis and OO Design - Introduction of Assignment 2.
RDF and OWL Developing Semantic Web Services by H. Peter Alesso and Craig F. Smith CMPT 455/826 - Week 6, Day Sept-Dec 2009 – w6d21.
An Introduction to Design Patterns. Introduction Promote reuse. Use the experiences of software developers. A shared library/lingo used by developers.
Reading Discussions Design of Ontologies (Tom Gruber) Conceptualization: class, relation, function or other object What is ontology, what is your understanding.
School of Computing FACULTY OF ENGINEERING Developing a methodology for building small scale domain ontologies: HISO case study Ilaria Corda PhD student.
Building an Ontology of Semantic Web Techniques Utilizing RDF Schema and OWL 2.0 in Protégé 4.0 Presented by: Naveed Javed Nimat Umar Syed.
Metadata. Generally speaking, metadata are data and information that describe and model data and information For example, a database schema is the metadata.
Dimitrios Skoutas Alkis Simitsis
Definition of a taxonomy “System for naming and organizing things into groups that share similar characteristics” Taxonomy Architectures Applications.
System models l Abstract descriptions of systems whose requirements are being analysed.
Umi Laili Yuhana December, Context Aware Group - Intelligent Agent Laboratory Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University.
February 24, 2006 ONTOLOGIES Helena Sofia Pinto ( )
A MOF Metamodel & UML Profile for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) January 30, 2003 Elisa F. Kendall CEO & Founder (650)
Semantic web course – Computer Engineering Department – Sharif Univ. of Technology – Fall Knowledge Representation Semantic Web - Fall 2005 Computer.
Proposed NWI KIF/CG --> Common Logic Standard A working group was recently formed from the KIF working group. John Sowa is the only CG representative so.
EEL 5937 Ontologies EEL 5937 Multi Agent Systems Lecture 5, Jan 23 th, 2003 Lotzi Bölöni.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Artificial Intelligence 2004 Ontology
Metadata Common Vocabulary a journey from a glossary to an ontology of statistical metadata, and back Sérgio Bacelar
Presented by: Yuhana 12/17/2007 Context Aware Group - Intelligent Agent Laboratory Computer Science and Information Engineering National Taiwan University.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
An Introduction and UML Profile for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) October 23, 2002 Elisa F. KendallMark E. Dutra CEO & FounderChief Architect
Semantic Interoperability in GIS N. L. Sarda Suman Somavarapu.
Of 24 lecture 11: ontology – mediation, merging & aligning.
16 April 2011 Alan, Edison, etc, Saturday.. Knowledge, Planning and Robotics 1.Knowledge 2.Types of knowledge 3.Representation of knowledge 4.Planning.
Knowledge Representation Part I Ontology Jan Pettersen Nytun Knowledge Representation Part I, JPN, UiA1.
Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 8 Slide 1 System models.
Lecture 7: Semantic Web and Ontologies in Enterprises Dr. Taysir Hassan A. Soliman December 7, 2015 INF411 Information Engineering Information Systems.
OWL (Ontology Web Language and Applications) Maw-Sheng Horng Department of Mathematics and Information Education National Taipei University of Education.
ece 627 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
The Semantic Web By: Maulik Parikh.
COMP6215 Semantic Web Technologies
DOMAIN ONTOLOGY DESIGN
SysML 2.0 Formalism: Requirement Benefits, Use Cases, and Potential Language Architectures Formalism WG December 6, 2016.
SysML v2 Formalism: Requirements & Benefits
ece 627 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Lecture #11: Ontology Engineering Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham
Abstract descriptions of systems whose requirements are being analysed
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Methontology: From Ontological art to Ontological Engineering
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
Lec 3: Object-Oriented Data Modeling
Chapter 20 Object-Oriented Analysis and Design
Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents
Ontology-Based Approaches to Data Integration
Chapter 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
ONTOMERGE Ontology translations by merging ontologies Paper: Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web by Dejing Dou, Drew McDermott and Peishen Qi 2003.
Lecture 10 Structuring System Requirements: Conceptual Data Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Department of Artificial Intelligence Ontologies Charlie Abela Department of Artificial Intelligence charlie.abela@um.edu.mt

Last Lecture Introduction to Description logics and its relevance to knowledge representation Problems? CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Lecture Outline What is an Ontology? Components Ontology development CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

What is an Ontology? An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualization (Gruber 1993) Ontologies are defined as a formal specification of a shared conceptualization (Borst 1997) Studer explains: Conceptualization: refers to an abstract model of some phenomenon in the world identified by concepts of that phenomenon Explicit: both type of concepts and constraints on these concepts are explicitly defined Formal: refers to the fact that the ontology should be machine-readable Shared: reflects the notion that the ontology captures consensual knowledge, accepted by a group. CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Why develop an Ontology? To share common understanding of the structure of information among people or software agents facilitating information extraction and aggregation by software agents To enable reuse of domain knowledge reuse, extend and integrate existing ontologies To make domain assumptions explicit explicit definition of such knowledge (instead of hard-coding it) makes it easier to change To separate domain knowledge from operational knowledge E.g. use different ontologies but same algorithm (to solve different problems) To analyse domain knowledge possible once a declarative specification of the terms is available (valuable when reusing and extending ontologies) CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Existing Domain-Specific Ontologies Medical domain: Cancer ontology from the National Cancer Institute in the United States Cultural domain: Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) with 125,000 terms in the cultural domain Union List of Artist Names (ULAN), with 220,000 entries on artists Iconclass vocabulary of 28,000 terms for describing cultural images Geographical domain: Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names (TGN), containing over 1 million entries CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Integrated Vocabularies Merge independently developed vocabularies into a single large resource E.g. Unified Medical Language System integrating 100 biomedical vocabularies The UMLS meta-thesaurus contains 750,000 concepts, with over 10 million links between them The semantics of a resource that integrates many independently developed vocabularies is rather low But very useful in many applications as starting point CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Upper-Level Ontologies Some attempts have been made to define very generally applicable ontologies Describe very general concepts that are common across the domains Provide general notions under which all the terms in existing ontologies should be linked OpenCyc, with 60,000 assertions on 6,000 concepts DOLCE: a Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering Suggested Upper Merged Ontology (SUMO) CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Linguistic Resources Describes semantic constructs rather then model specific domains Used mostly in nlp They are bound to the semantics of grammatical units (words, adjectives etc) E.g. WordNet (focus on word meaning) CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Main Components of an Ontology Concepts or Classes related to a domain of discourse Slots (Roles or Properties) properties of concepts describing various features and attributes of concepts Facets (Slot/Property Restrictions ) restrictions on slots/properties Instances Individual instances of classes (constitute a knowledge base) CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Classes Represent concepts in a particular domain E.g. locations (cities, villages), lodgings (hotels, hostels), means of transportation (planes, trains) Classes are organised in taxonomies through which inheritance mechanisms can be applied E.g. a taxonomy of travel packages (economy, business) Classes can represent both abstract and specific concepts abstract (beliefs, intentions) specific (people, computers) CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Properties or Slots Describe properties of classes and instances E.g subClassOf(Hotel,Lodging) for classification They represent binary relations E.g. arrivalPlace(flight, location) Slots are inherited by subclasses E.g. arrivalPlace slot can be applied to the class Travel but it also applies to its subClass Flight CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Facets or Property Restrictions Facets describe the value type, allowed values, cardinality, domain and range of slots slot:flightNumber domain: Flight range: string cardinality:1 CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Building Ontologies No one correct way to model a domain Alternatives will always exist Best solution depends on application and anticipated extensions Development is an iterative process Start with a rough draft, then revise and refine, filling details along the way Concepts should be close to objects and relationships in the domain Most likely to be nouns (objects) or verbs (relationships) in sentences that describe the domain CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Development Noy, McGuinness method: 7 steps identified Determine the domain and scope of the ontology Consider reusing existing ontologies List important terms in the ontology Define the classes and class hierarchy Define the properties of the classes- slots Define the facets for the slots Create Instances 8th step: Check for anomalies CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

1. Determine the domain and scope Answer basic questions to identify scope and intended use. What is the domain to be covered? What is the use of the ontology? Which terms are relevant? Define a set of competency questions that the ontology will have to answer. These questions are just a sketch and need not be exhaustive Which characteristics of travelling need to be considered? Which types of lodging to consider? Which transportation methods need to be considered? E.g. domain: travelling, purpose: knowledge used by travel agencies or tourists catalogue system relevant terms: places, lodging, types of lodging, transport, types of transport CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

2. Consider Reuse Look for libraries of reusable ontologies Search the Web or use Swoogle Some libraries: Ontolingua ontology library Open Directory Project (www.dmoz.org) Almost always worth checking if its possible to refine and extend existing ontologies. There is almost always an ontology available from a third party that provides at least a useful starting point for our own ontology CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

3. Enumerate important terms Elaborate the list of important terms List the properties related to these terms Initially the list should be comprehensive without caring about overlap between concepts relations among terms properties related to concepts whether concepts are classes or slots CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

4. Define classes and class hierarchy Several approaches Top-down: start with the most general concepts Bottom-up: start with the most specific A combination: define the more important concepts and then generalise and specialise as required. Organise classes into a hierarchal taxonomy by following the rule: If class A is a superclass of class B, then every instance of B is also an instance of A CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Classes in the Travelling Domain Lodging Hotel LuxuryHotel Transport Train Class Hierarchy Hotel is-a-kind of Lodging LuxuryHotel is-a-kind of Hotel Train is-a-kind of Transport CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

5. Define Properties After identifying classes from the list of terms and defined them formally, choose the terms that define properties of these classes. These properties become attached to these classes Since properties are inherited by subclasses, these should be attached to the most general class. Examples of properties: departureDate, arrivalDate: attached to class Travel flightNumber: attached to class Airplane hasRating, hasLocation: attached to class Lodging CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

6. Define Facets (Restrictions) Several common facets can be defined Property cardinality Only one departureDate (cardinality =1) Property-value type flightNumber is of type string Domain and range properties transportMeans: Travel (domain), Transport(range) singleFare: Travel(domain), currencyQuantity( range) hasRating: Lodging(domain), Rating(range) hasLocation: Lodging(domain), Location(range) CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

7. Create Instances Defining an individual instance requires Choosing a class Creating an individual instance of that class Filling in the property values A flight instance KM2561 is a type of flight Fare currency for KM2561 is in Euros Departure date for KM2561 is 24-12-2007 Destination of KM2561 is Madrid CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

8. Check Anomalies Detect possible inconsistencies In ontology or ontology+ instances Examples of common inconsistencies incompatible domain and range definitions for transitive, symmetric, or inverse properties cardinality properties requirements on property values can conflict with domain and range restrictions CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Mapping Problem: Many Ontologies available that describe the same domain Different Ontologies emphasis different aspects Different vocabulary for same Classes/Properties Different degree of detail Applications that are based on different Ontologies need to collaborate We need to translate one Ontology into another one! Manual mapping has a high precision, but it does not scale! Large Ontologies require an automatic mapping. CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Mapping II CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Mapping - Techniques tag name mapping: names of XML tags are mapped Problem: Same expressions for different Classes/Properties element content: searches for same/similar content in two Instances Problem: Text in elements has to be unique and expressive structure analyzer: considers XML document as graph, tries to map subgraphs with each other Problem: Is structure sufficient to extract the semantics? Overall problem: Precision Combination of techniques possible, increases precision. Other approaches to increase precision: Semi-automatic mapping: Tools that support an efficient manual mapping by recommending mapping candidates. CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Mapping –Related Techniques Ontology merging: Join two different Ontologies into one coherent Ontology. Final Ontology consists of the full, unchanged source Ontologies. Ontology alignment: Generate links between two Ontologies (with usually complementary domains) Ontology integration: Integrate two or more Ontologies into one (with some changes) CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Merging Example Two ontologies, one about the ear and another about the lungs are merged. Concepts from the second ontology are added to the preferred ontology one at a time. CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Suggested Reading Jena RDF tutorial, http://jena.sourceforge.net/documentation.html Ontology languages for the Semantic Web, http://www.cs.umbc.edu/771/papers/ieeeIntelligentSystems/webservices/ontologyLanguages.pdf Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology, OWL guide, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/ CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Next Lecture OWL: Web Ontology Language CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Building Methodologies Uschold and King method: uses the following process Identify the purpose of the ontology Build it Evaluate it Document it Gruninger and Fox method:uses the following process Identify the main scenarios (ie. possible applications for the ontology) Identify a set of competency questions (to determine scope) Use answers to extract the main concepts, properties, relations and axioms Formally express the knowledge in first order logic CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Building Methodologies Methontology: Based on the IEEE standard for software development Three categories of activities are advised Ontology management activities, such as Scheduling, Control, Quality assurance Ontology development oriented activities Pre-development: environment study, feasibility study Development: specification, conceptualisation, formalisation and implementation Post development: Maintenance Ontology support activities Knowledge acquisition, Evaluation, Integration, Merging, Alignment CSA 3210 Ontologies ©

Ontology Languages Ontolingua and KIF (Knowledge Interchange Format) Ontolingua is an ontology language based on KIF and Frame Ontology KIF is based on first-order predicate calculus OCML (Operational Conceptual Modelling Language) Frame-based language with Lisp-like syntax Provides primitives to define classes, relations, functions, axioms and instances Provides also primitives to define rules (for backward and forward chaining) F-Logic (Frame Logic) Integrates features from: OO, frame-based KR and first order logic Features: inheritance, polymorphic types, query methods and encapsulation Can be combined with HiLog to improve ontology reasoning CSA 3210 Ontologies ©