Proposed GECC Changes Spring 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Advertisements

ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
PDR Process Level B and C. UC PERFORMANCE & DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 2009 – Academic Staff Staff member preparation (Academic staff) Supervisor preparation.
SLO Course Assessment in 5 Easy Steps Vivian Mun, Ed.D.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
Clearing Up the Confusion Comparing General Education and Program Assessment A Panel Presentation Sponsored by the University Committees on General Education.
Development of Student Learning Outcomes for GE: lessons from a collaborative approach A Lawson General Education in California Conference, CSU Fullerton.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
SLOAC Committee Flex Day Working Session Date: Time: 12:45 – 2:15.
Academic Year.  Still working well 17 reports submitted, 1 missing  9 of 18 departments expressed concerns about assessment 4 departments reported.
PARTNERSHIP FOR STUDENT SUCCESS AT SANTA BARBARA CITY COLLEGE Overview and Two Models.
Strategies for Implementing Program-Level Assessment through Outcomes Jeremy Anderson Manager, Academic Computing Dr. Kaitlin Walsh Instructional Designer/Technologist.
Goal Assessment Team Orientation February 18, 2009.
About This Presentation We will discuss – What the curriculum process is – How to use the UCC web site – The UCC forms – Who should fill out UCC forms.
Connecting Course Goals, Assignments, and Assessment Faculty Development for Student Success at Prince George’s Community College William Peirce
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
Assessment Committee. Communicate what we Think about Assessment. Learn to Integrate assessment into our teaching practice and Act on it toward continuous.
Patty Francis Associate Provost Institutional Assessment & Effectiveness.
UMKC ALL-FACULTY MEETING March 15, Agenda ■Opening remarks and State of the Campus Report – Chancellor Morton ■Academic updates – Provost and Executive.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
ASFC RECOMMENDATION TO THE PROVOST AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM TO FACULTY SENATE LEAP AND GEN ED.
The Process The Results The Repository of Assessment Documents (ROAD) Project Sample Characteristics (“All” refers to all students enrolled in ENGL 1551)
ESET Timing Close Study Results Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment.
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Making assessment in PhD programs more useful for faculty and students
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
New Program Director Workshop:
New Department Chair Workshop:
Curriculum Development Updates
ASSESSMENT OF THE GEN ED PROGRAM –
General education reform
Discourse Faculty Meeting
Self Study Data Collection
Kennedy-King College’s Assessment Academy Project Report
Healthy Program Reporting
Preparing Future Faculty/FaCET Assessment Session
Institutional Program Review 2017 Update
Building Engagement in Course Evaluation
Initiator Faculty Affairs Liaison Approver Senior Administrator
Workflow: Create New & Evaluate Position Description (Faculty)
Time Line for Program Reviews
Dean of the Lash Division of Teaching and Learning
Doctoral Field Study Orientation
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Collecting Data to Assess Capstone and Culminating Courses
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Tasks & Grades for MET1.
New Certificate Program
Terminate an Academic Unit
Assessment History Since 2013 the department has performed ongoing assessment of RWS 100 & 200 comprised of Internal, department-driven, self-assessment.
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Establish a New Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
Concept Proposal template for presentation by Dean to evaluation panel
Pilot Goals Focus Consistency Response
Critical Inquiry (Goal A):
Time Line for Program Reviews
Critical Inquiry (Goal C):
Administrative Review Committee
Chair: Nadine Jennings Date of Presentation: January 19, 2017
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Critical Inquiry (Goal B):
Assessment of the UCA Core Annual Brief (AY ‘18-19) Diversity
Cyclical Program Review
Presentation transcript:

Proposed GECC Changes Spring 2016

Recommendation One The GECC has currently had last approval of all Gen Ed courses and Gen Ed course approval has bypassed the UCC. The pace of new GE course approval has slowed down The specific recommendation: Modify the current Courseleaf approval process so that Gen. Ed. Courses go through BOTH the UCC and then the GECC. This means GECC can focus solely on the Gen Ed items in courses. If passed: Courseleaf workflow is modified. UCC becomes final Faculty approver for all courses, as it currently is for all non-Gen Ed courses.

Recommendation Two The initial round of course assessment was unsustainable. Every student in every course was assessed, every year. Specific Recommendation: Stagger so that 1/3 of courses is assessed each year and assess a sample of work. If passed: Each year, the following will be assessed: One Anchor course level and their shared Discourse classes One focus course SLO Selected approximately 100 student artifacts from each course type Select randomized artifacts

Recommendation Three We heard from instructors that it was too much effort for them to perform assessment. We also saw that assessment across courses was not standardized. Specific Recommendation: Standardize Gen Ed Assessment If passed: Create a panel that does assessment (similar to NIH study section), meets each summer Panel collects assignments and course-specific rubrics, performs sampling Panel uses standardized rubrics for each Gen Ed SLO Instructors perform and return self-assessment/proposed change evaluation Results go back to instructors and division/dept. heads

Recommendation Four Change the name of the Discourse classes The name causes confusion among students/transfers Specific Recommendation: Change the name of these courses from Discourse: Speech and Writing to Written and Oral Communication, dropping the term Discourse entirely. If Passed: The course names are altered in the catalog, literature, etc. as soon as practical.

What We Need A motion or motions to proceed with these changes in whole or in part

Other Notes SLO reports also go to Fac. Senate, Provost Disseminated back to Deans, Dept/Div heads, Instructors Instructors fill out a three point survey: What worked What didn’t Proposed changes Assessment office archives results of assessment and surveys for central report All courses assessed on three year schedule If courses are not meeting Gen Ed SLOs and improvements are not proposed and followed up, Fac. Senate + Provost follow up Training Probation/Suspension of courses as Gen Ed courses