A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLIC-ACE, 20 June 2007 Alexej Grudiev, CLIC main linac structure optimization. CLIC main linac accelerating structure CLIC_G Alexej Grudiev.
Advertisements

ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
Choke-mode Damped X-band Structure for CLIC Main Linac Hao ZHA, Jiaru SHI CERN Sep 27, 2011 Jiaru Shi, LCWS11 Workshop, Granada1.
Choke-mode damped accelerating structures for CLIC main linac Hao Zha, Tsinghua University Jiaru Shi, CERN
CLIC drive beam accelerating (DBA) structure Rolf Wegner.
CLIC DBA Rolf Wegner 1 Structures for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator Rolf Wegner.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
I. Syratchev F D, GHza, mmb, mmR/Q, k  /m  M, % QMQM E S /E A K T, V/pC/m/m  D, % QDQD  D, deg
ABSTRACT We report on the suppression of long-range wakefields in the main linacs of the CLIC collider. This structure operates with 2π/3 phase advance.
R.M. Jones, International Workshop on Linear Colliders, 18 – 22 Oct. 2010, CERN, Geneva 1 Status and Prospects for the CLIC DDS Roger M. Jones Cockcroft.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
July Alexej Grudiev, Improvement of CLIC structure. Possible improvement of the CLIC accelerating structure. From CLIC_G to CLIC_K Alexej.
T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G GHz measurements versus simulations A.Grudiev CERN
4th CLIC Advisory Committee (CLIC-ACE), 26 th - 28 th May Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linac Roger M. Jones, Vasim Khan,
MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN Vasim Khan Bohr seminar series, HEP group, The University of Manchester.
INVESITGATION OF AN ALTERNATE MEANS OF WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN CLIC MAIN LINACS CLIC_DDS.
A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS Vasim Khan
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, 18 – 22 Oct. 2010, CERN, Switzerland 1 Recent progress on CLIC_DDS Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The.
Vasim Khan 4th Annual X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN /36 CLIC_DDS & Test Structure V. Khan, A. D’Elia, R. Jones A.
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS Vasim Khan. 24 cells No interleaving 48cells 2-fold interleaving ∆fmin = 32.5 MHz ∆tmax =30.76 ns ∆s = 9.22 m 24 cells No interleaving.
ABSTRACT A damped detuned structure (DDS) for the main linacs of CLIC is being studied as an alternative design to the present baseline heavily damped.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /13 CLIC_DDS study
CLIC MAIN LINAC DDS DESIGN AND FORTCOMING Vasim Khan & Roger Jones V. Khan LC-ABD 09, Cockcroft Institute /14.
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /21 CLIC_DDS_HPA study
Wakefield suppression in the CLIC main accelerating structures Vasim Khan & Roger Jones.
Vasim Khan X-Band RF Structures, Beam Dynamics and Sources Workshop, Cockcroft Institute /24 CLIC_DDS study
WAKEFIELD SUPPRESSION IN THE MAIN LINACS OF CLIC Vasim Khan The Cockcroft Institute of Accelerator Science and Technology, Daresbury, Warrington, WA4 4AD.
ABSTRACT The main accelerating structures for the CLIC are designed to operate at 100 MV/m accelerating gradient. The accelerating frequency has been optimised.
DDS limits and perspectives Alessandro D’Elia on behalf of UMAN Collaboration 1.
CLIC Drive Beam Linac Rolf Wegner. Outline Introduction: CLIC Drive Beam Concept Drive Beam Modules (modulator, klystron, accelerating structure) Optimisation.
Room temperature RF Part 2.1: Strong beam-cavity coupling (beam loading) 30/10/2010 A.Grudiev 5 th IASLC, Villars-sur-Ollon, CH.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Overview of CLIC main linac accelerating structure design 21/10/2010 A.Grudiev (CERN)
Higher-Order Modes and Beam-Loading Compensation in CLIC Main Linac Oleksiy Kononenko BE/RF, CERN CLIC RF Structure Development Meeting, March 14, 2012.
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
Frequency-domain study of acceleration & beam loading based on a circuit model by raquel fandos.
CLIC crab cavity design Praveen Ambattu 24/08/2011.
WP 9.2 DDS Status, R.M. Jones, 25 th Oct 2010, WebEx Phone-in, Geneva 1 WP 9.2: DDS Status Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester.
Update on TCTP heating H. Day, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: L. Gentini and the EN-MME team.
Hybrid designs - directions and potential 1 Alessandro D’Elia, R. M. Jones and V. Khan.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
Tolerances coming from RF Alexej Grudiev 24 Nov 2014 X-band accelerating structure review.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
1 Design and objectives of test accelerating structures Riccardo Zennaro.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
CLIC Drive beam BPM Requirements and cost estimate.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 18/06/2015 High Gradient work shop 2015.
Damped and Detuned Structures for CLIC The University of Manchester The Cockcroft Institute 4/10/2013I.Nesmiyan1 Acknowledgements to colleagues at CERN,
Structure Wakefields and Tolerances R. Zennaro. Parameters of the CLIC structure “CLIC G” (from A. Grudiev) StructureCLIC_G Frequency: f [GHz]12 Average.
Status of the sub-harmonic bunching system for the CLIC DB injector front end Hamed Shaker School of Particles and Accelerators, Institute for Research.
Test Accelerating Structures Designs, Objectives and Critical Issues
New test structures for CLIC (RF design)
Vasim Khan & Roger Jones
Roger M. Jones Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
RF Power Generation and PETS Design
CLIC_DDS study
Summary of the test structure design
Testing Infrastructure, Program and Milestones
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Update of Damping Ring parameters
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
A proposal for a pulsed surface heating experiment in a CLIC accelerating structure using variable pulse length Alexej Grudiev.
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Presentation transcript:

A 2.3 GHz BANDWIDTH STRUCTURE FOR CLIC_DDS Vasim Khan 17.07.09

Spectral function 48cells 24 cells 2-fold interleaving No interleaving

∆fmin = 65 MHz ∆tmax =15.38 ns ∆s = 4.61 m ∆fmin = 32.5 MHz ∆tmax =30.76 ns ∆s = 9.22 m 48cells 2-fold interleaving 24 cells No interleaving ∆fmin = 16.25 MHz ∆tmax = 61.52 ns ∆s = 18.46 m ∆fmin = 8.12 MHz ∆tmax =123 ns ∆s = 36.92 m 96 cells 4-fold interleaving 192 cells 8-fold interleaving

Results based on only 3 cell simulations. Unloaded Unloaded Allowed limit = 260 MV/m Allowed limit = 56 K Corrected formula for effective pulse length [1] Results based on only 3 cell simulations. [1] A. Grudiev, CLIC-ACE, JAN 08

7 cell simulations.

232 47.3

(for corrected pulse length: Eff.=26.6%) Updated Parameters CLIC_G (Optimised) [1,2] CLIC_DDS (Non-optimised) Bunch space (rf cycles/ns) 6/0.5 8/0.67 Limit on wake (V/pC/mm/m) 7.1 5.6 Number of bunches 312 Bunch population (109) 3.72 4.5 Pulse length (ns) 240.8 273 Fill time (ns) 62.9 41.68 Pin (MW) 63.8 72 Esur max. (MV/m) 245 232 Pulse temperature rise (K) 53 47.3 RF-beam-eff. 27.7 24.1 (for corrected pulse length: Eff.=26.6%) [1] A. Grudiev, CLIC-ACE, JAN 08 [2] CLIC Note 764

Considering 8 fold interleaved structure Parameters Structure # 1 Structure # 8 f1, f24 (GHz) 15.5787, 17.9543 16.0329, 18.2153 ∆f (GHz) 2.0756 2.1824 a1, a24 (mm) 4, 2.5175 3.8968, 2.3 N (x109 particels/bunch) 5.41 4.6275

Structure # 1 Pin=76.5 MW 210 50.25

Structure # 8 73.5 MW

Sum RMS wake-field of an 8-fold interleaved structure Amplitude wake Sumwake wake

Random error in frequencies +/- 3.5 MHz Random error in f (MHz) Cell # f (GHz) Cell #

Random error in frequencies +/- 3.5 MHz 8 fold interleaved structure

Random error in frequencies +/- 3.5 MHz Amplitude wake Sumwake wake

Dipole simulations with fillet and high mesh Cell # 1 No fillet, solution is not converged (only 3 passes )and average mesh = 50 k Geometry with fillet, solution is converged and average mesh = 400 k Cell # 13 No fillet, solution is not converged (only 3 passes )and average mesh = 50 k Geometry with fillet, solution is converged and average mesh = 400 k No fillet, solution is not converged (only 3 passes )and average mesh = 40 k Cell # 24 Geometry with fillet, solution is converged and average mesh = 400 k