Topics The case for remote radio detection of neutrinos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The NuMoon experiment: first results Stijn Buitink for the NuMoon collaboration Radboud University Nijmegen 20 th Rencontres de Blois, 2008 May 19.
Advertisements

LUNASKA LUNASKA: Towards UHE Particle Astronomy with the Moon and Radio Telescopes Clancy W. James, University of Adelaide (Supervisors: R. Protheroe,
An update on the High Energy End of the Cosmic Ray spectra M. Ave.
The Pierre Auger Observatory Nicolás G. Busca Fermilab-University of Chicago FNAL User’s Meeting, May 2006.
Radio detection of UHE neutrinos E. Zas, USC Leeds July 23 rd 2004.
AGASA update M. Teshima ICRR, U of CfCP mini workshop Oct
Tampa APS Meeting April 2004 P. Gorham 1 UH ANITA monte carlo Peter Gorham University of Hawaii A N I T A.
Shower & RF theory David Seckel, ANITA Collab. Mtg. Nov , /2002 Theory Notes on Shower and Radio Pulse.
ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna NASA funding started 2003 for first launch in 2006 Phase A approval for SMEX ToO mission 600 km radius, 1.1 million.
Tuning in to UHE Neutrinos in Antarctica – The ANITA Experiment J. T. Link P. Miočinović Univ. of Hawaii – Manoa Neutrino 2004, Paris, France ANITA-LITE.
Askaryan effect in salt: SLAC T460, June T460 rock-salt target 4lb high-purity synthetic rock-salt bricks (density=2.07) – 6 tons of it. + some.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
PERSPECTIVES OF THE RADIO ASTRONOMICAL DETECTION OF EXTREMELY HIGH ENERGY NEUTRINOS BOMBARDING THE MOON R.D. Dagkesamanskii 1), I.M. Zheleznykh 2) and.
July 10, 2007 Detection of Askaryan radio pulses produced by cores of air showers. Suruj Seunarine, Amir Javaid, David Seckel, Philip Wahrlich, John Clem.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera University.
Simulation Issues for Radio Detection in Ice and Salt Amy Connolly UCLA May 18 th, 2005.
radio lobe sound disk  t p ~ km  optical light cone The Vision *) see e.g. A. Ringwald,ARENA 2005 Build ~100 km 3 hybrid detector to: Confirm GZK cutoff.
Mar 9, 2005 GZK Neutrinos Theory and Observation D. Seckel, Univ. of Delaware.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
0 April 22, 2013 A. Romero-Wolf Interferometry in UHE particle astrophysics Andres Romero-Wolf Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
ARENA2012, Erlangen June Lunar Space Missions for Ultrahigh- energy Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos Observation G. A. Gusev, V. A. Chechin, and V. A. Ryabov.
The lunar Askaryan technique with the Square Kilometre Array Clancy James, Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics (ECAP) 34th ICRC, The Hague, Netherlands.
RICE David Seckel, NeSS02, Washington DC, Sept ,/2002 R adio I ce C herenkov E xperiment PI presenter.
Sept. 2010CRIS, Catania Olaf Scholten KVI, Groningen Physics Radio pulse results plans.
ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna University of Hawaii at Manoa Peter Gorham, PI John Learned and Gary S. Varner Ohio-State University Jim Beatty and.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
Neutrinos and Z-bursts Dmitry Semikoz UCLA (Los Angeles) & INR (Moscow)
RICE: ICRC 2001, Aug 13, Recent Results from RICE Analysis of August 2000 Data See also: HE228: Ice Properties (contribution) HE241: Shower Simulation.
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera 1.
31/03/2008Lancaster University1 Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy From Simon Bevan University College London.
Jeong, Yu Seon Yonsei University Neutrino and Cosmic Ray Signals from the Moon Jeong, Reno and Sarcevic, Astroparticle Physics 35 (2012) 383.
June 18-20, 2009 Detection of Askaryan radio pulses produced by cores of air showers. Suruj Seunarine, David Seckel, Pat Stengel, Amir Javaid, Shahid Hussain.
Detecting Ultra High Energy Neutrinos with LOFAR M.Mevius for the LOFAR NuMoon and CR collaboration.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Bergische Universität Wuppertal Jan Auffenberg et al. Rome, Arena ARENA 2008 A radio air shower detector to extend IceCube ● Three component air.
32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference August 2011, Beijing China First detection of extensive air showers by the TREND self-triggering radio experiment.
LUNASKA UHE Neutrino Flux Limits - From Parkes Onwards The Lunar Cherenkov Technique – From Parkes Onwards R. Protheroe R. Crocker C. James D. Jones R.
SADE ANITA Monte Carlo(SAM) Test Results Amir Javaid University of Delaware.
SADE ANITA Monte Carlo(SAM) Test Results Amir Javaid University of Delaware.
Downgoing Muons in the IceCube experiment: Final presentation for Phys 735, Particle, Prof. Sridhara Dasu L.Gladstone 2008 Dec 3.
Future high energy extensions of IceCube with new technologies: Radio and/or acoustical detectors Karle.
Andreas Horneffer for the LOFAR-CR Team
Lunar Radio Cerenkov Observations of UHE Neutrinos
HiRes 5Y Operations – Program and Context
Detecting UHE cosmic-rays and neutrinos hitting the Moon
LUNASKA The Directional Dependence of the Lunar Cherenkov Technique in Regards to UHE Neutrino Detection -C.W. James (University of Adelaide) IF we want.
“Performance test of a lead glass
Flux Limits for Ultra-High Energy Neutrinos
Discussion session: other (crazy
completed in austral season South Pole completed in austral season.
Recent Results of Point Source Searches with the IceCube Neutrino Telescope Lake Louise Winter Institute 2009 Erik Strahler University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Design of the LORD Experiment and Perspectives of Ultra-High Energy
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
Cosmic ray and Neutrino Physics
D. Seckel, Univ. of Delaware
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum Measured by HiRes Experiment
Telescopes and Images.
Pierre Auger Observatory Present and Future
ANITA antennas Frequency range: MHz Dual polarization needed
David Saltzberg (UCLA)
Basic parameters (June, 2006):
Relativistic Magnetic Monopole Flux Constraints from RICE
IceCube radio extension Status and results
Topological Study of Downgoing Muon Events for the
Alexander Kappes Francis Halzen Aongus O’Murchadha
Particle Acceleration in the Universe
for the Detection of UHE Cosmic Rays and Neutrinos
ANITA simulations P. Gorham 5/12/2019 P. Gorham.
Presentation transcript:

Topics The case for remote radio detection of neutrinos Overview (increasing remoteness) Balloon Satellite Telescope Not remote enough ANITA

Cosmic rays since 1912 Flux Sources Neutrinos Above GeV, steeply falling flux UHE large signals, starved for events Sources Acceleration: charged particles Propagation: still charged! dE/dx: interactions with CMBR: GZK threshold Magnetic deflection Neutrinos produced in source/propagation point back to source detect at EeV and above?

Go Remote: aperture v threshold

Overview of remote techniques Telescope Satellite Balloon Remotish-ground operations

Radio telescope observations of moon Parkes GLUE (Goldstone) Kalyazin LUNASKA (Parkes/ACTA) nuMoon (WSRT) RESUN (EVLA) LOFAR SKA

Prize for best drawing (Jeager, Mutel, Gayley)

Overview of lunar cherenkov (JMG)

Frequency, TIR, and Dq Scholten, etal

frequency: aperture v threshold

Fine … until compare to CR events: Jeong, Reno, Sarkevic

Events

CR 100x n – what to do separate n from CR? (spatially, by features (e.g. g-ray astronomy)) proximity of surface suppresses CR signal up rate dominates? return to high-f? true for orbiter, too. (LORD) (JRS) fluxes already nu-optimistic some science still OK? point sources cross-sections

Lunar technique promising for CR techniques going forward – see other talks ATCA: coherent addition of signals from several ants LOFAR: triggering(?) difficult for nu’s a lot of detail still to be done see ANITA list of details

Satellites: Lunar sats … Stal, etal

LORD From “ARENA”

FORTE (Lehtinen, etal.)

PRIDE (Miller, etal.: Europa)

BB radio detection of cosmic particles Overview Neutrino detection event generation event simulation ANITA detector analysis results Cos-Ray detection Monopoles EVA

Overview

Neutrino detection Simulation Detector Operations Analysis event generator event simulation Detector Operations Analysis calibration backgrounds reconstruction

Neutrino interactions

Cherenkov and Total Internal Reflection

Aperture

ANITA flight(s)

Event Simulation Askaryan mechanism Determine list of sources Signal Characteristics Determine list of sources For each source Determine launch angle via ray tracing Propagation effects Emission spectrum Spectrum at detector Sum spectra from sources

Event ® source list CC events Better modeling of fluctuations ne em + hadronic shower nt, nm brem/photonuclear ® secondary showers nt decay Better modeling of fluctuations multiple sub-showers Multiple paths reflection from bottom internal refraction (not for ANITA) Exotica Monopoles: quasi-continuous photonuclear

Askaryan Frequency domain – linear response ice attenuation velocity of propagation antenna, amps, filters (time domain for discriminators) Spectrum from Alvarez-Muniz, Zas, & Friends Could be improved.

Scaling of Askaryan signals R: Moliere radius L: Width of shower max Hadronic EM: LPM effect

Askaryan

Find launch angle (ray tracing)

Propagation: Attenuation

Propagation: Attenuation

Propagation: focusing

Propagation: birefringence We don’t simulate this, but … dn/n ~ 10-3 is possible dt = 5 ns per km. Predict Hpol arrives first

Cerenkov Beam

ANITA detector Efficient data handling Airframe and payload infrastructure Analog front end Antennas Low Noise Amps, filter, splitter Cables/connectors/boxes Trigger multistage, narrow dt: reduce accidentals Digitizer Low power switched capacitor array Efficient data handling

ANITA Payload Weight Rigidity Form-factor Power Thermal Remote

Front end: antennas

RF subsystems (ANITA-I)

Triggers

Digitizing electronics (Anita-I) Key component: Switched Capacitor Array (SCA) by G. Varner.

Operations Campaign operations C3 NH preparations McMurdo Flight Recovery Taylor Dome C3

ANITA-View display

Analysis Timing Calibration Interferometry Backgrounds Thermal (reconstruction amplitude) Anthropogenic (clustering) I: 0 neutrino candidates II: 1 neutrino candidate Limits

Calibration

Interferometry

Backgrounds

Clustering

Candidate events

ANITA GZK flux limit Also – no news from GRBs

Cosmic Ray Detection

ANITA-I analysis Event selection Strong interference amplitude 14 below horizon 2 above Consistent waveforms w/reflection Correlated with B

Air shower highlites 16 events in ANITA I WaveForms: 2 direct, 14 reflected Tan(V/H) vs. B

MC and Energy Scale exposure reflection w/roughness freq-spectrum E-spectrum angular offset see Konstantin’s talk

Magnetic Monopoles

Worlds best limit for (relativistic) monopoles

ANITA-III ANITA-III Fly 2013/14 Low resolution phased trigger (improve S/N) Dual triggers UHECR/UHEN More antennas

ExaVolt Antenna (Gorham, etal - 1102.3883v2)

Summary Remote techniques sacrifice threshold for aperture Lunar observations hold promise for CR, but confirming a neutrino flux will be difficult Satellites ? Balloon borne radio detection provides large aperture at modest cost. Sensitive to GZK neutrinos. Constrain optimistic models, approaching baseline models. Detect UHE cosmic ray induced air showers at inclined angles. Energy scale still somewhat uncertain.

extra slides

Constant index of refraction

Comparison – for discussion only (Dec 2009)