RDA Plenary 7, Tokyo, 3 March 2016,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Criteria for the trustworthiness of data centres Jens Klump Helmholtz Centre Potsdam German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) DataCite Summer Meeting.
Advertisements

Data Seal of Approval 16 guidelines in 16 slides Dr. Henk Harmsen.
April 2010 MRC Data Sharing Policy Peter Dukes Policy Lead – Data Sharing & Preservation.
DSA and the Certification Framework Ingrid Dillo Data Archiving and Networked Services DSA Conference, Florence 10 December 2012.
Joint Information Systems Committee Digital Library Services BL/JISC Workshop Rachel Bruce JISC Programme Director The Digital Library and its Services,
DANS is an institute of KNAW and NWO Data Archiving and Networked Services Certification and Dutch data management services Marjan Grootveld LIBER workshop,
Co-funded by the European Union under FP7-ICT aparsen.eu #APARSEN Audit & Certification: an auditors perspective Barbara Sierman, KB National Library.
Trusted data services for global science ICSU World Data System Mustapha Mokrane, Executive Director WDS International Programme Office.
Data Seal of Approval Overview Olivier Rouchon – Data Seal of Approval conference, Florence 10 th December.
CLARIN and the DSA Paul Trilsbeek The Language Archive Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Data Archiving and Networked Services DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO Certification at DANS Ingrid Dillo DSA Conference 2014 Amsterdam, 24 September.
Publishing Data in the context of ICSU World Data System Mustapha Mokrane Executive Director International Programme Office.
ICPSR and the Data Seal of Approval: A Case Study Mary Vardigan Assistant Director, ICPSR October 8, 2013.
Data Seal of Approval Overview Mary Vardigan University of Michigan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)
Data Seal of Approval Overview Lightning Talk RDA Plenary 5 – San Diego March 11, 2015 Mary Vardigan University of Michigan Inter-university Consortium.
DANS is an institute of KNAW and NWO Data Archiving and Networked Services DSA and CESSDA Heiko Tjalsma Policy Advisor DANS Data Seal of Approval Conference.
Who is doing a good job in digital preservation? Audit and Certification of Digital Repositories: ISO and the European Framework.
ISO 9001:2015 Revision overview - General users
Data Seal of Approval Overview guidelines, procedures, governance, regulations Paul Trilsbeek The Language Archive, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Science Archives in the 21st Century 25/26 April Towards an International standard for Audit and Certification of Digital Repositories David Giaretta.
Repository Requirements and Assessment August 1, 2013 Data Curation Course.
Data Archiving and Networked Services DANS is an institute of KNAW en NWO Trusted Digital Archives and the Data Seal of Approval Peter Doorn Data Archiving.
Data Archiving and Networked Services DANS is an institute of KNAW en NWO and the Peter Doorn Data Archiving and Networked Services EUDAT Conference Trust.
Repository Audit and Certification DSA–WDS Partnership WG RDA Working Groups Meeting at NIST November 13-14, 2014.
DigCCurr Professional Institute: Curation Practices for the Digital Object Lifecycle Digital Curation Program Development Nancy Y McGovern Research Assistant.
DIN and the nestor Seal for Trustworthy Digital Archives
SEDAC Long-Term Archive Development Robert R. Downs Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center Center for International Earth Science Information Network.
RDA, 5th Plenary, San Diego WDS Certification Objective: building trust in the usage of data & data services Michael Diepenbroek Rorie Edmunds Mustapha.
Data Seal of Approval Governance Mary Vardigan University of Michigan Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR)
Data Seal of Approval (DSA) SEEDS Kick-off meeting May 5, Lausanne Renate Kunz.
Core Common Certification Requirements and Procedures.
EUDAT receives funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme - DG CONNECT e-Infrastructures. Contract No Webinar on Trust.
GEO Data Management Principles Implementation : World Data System–Data Seal of Approval (WDS-DSA) Core Certification of Digital Repositories Dr Mustapha.
SciDataCon 2014, WDS Forum, Dehli WDS Certification Objective: building trust in the usage of data & data services Michael Diepenbroek Rorie Edmunds Mustapha.
School on Grid & Cloud Computing International Collaboration for Data Preservation and Long Term Analysis in High Energy Physics.
DSA & WDS WG Certification RDA Outputs: Munich 20 February 2015.
Audit & Certification Data Seal of Approval Hervé L’Hours. UK Data Archive & DSA Board APARSEN Trust & Digital Preservation hosted by the Digital Repository.
Co-ordinated by aparsen.eu #APARSEN Co-funded by the European Union under FP7-ICT Business Development activities after project completion Ruben.
Core Certification for Trustworthy Data Repositories
CESSDA SaW Training on Trust, Identifying Demand & Networking
Audit & Certification with ISO standards
Data Management Plans Ron Dekker Director CESSDA.
Legacy and future of the World Data System (WDS) certification of data services and networks Dr Mustapha Mokrane, Executive Director, WDS International.
Digital Repository Certification Schema A Pathway for Implementing the GEO Data Sharing and Data Management Principles Robert R. Downs, PhD Sr. Digital.
Auditing of Trustworthy Data Repositories – Speakers
Criteria for Assessing Repository Trustworthiness: An Assessment
Preparing a Trustworthy Domain Repository for ISO Certification
So what’s OGC’s role? Understanding where to find useful information
DSA and FAIR: a perfect couple
Current and Upcoming RDA Recommendations Dr. ir. Herman Stehouwer
Developing Criteria to Establish Trusted Digital Repositories
Certification of Trusted Repositories
Where might software fit with CoreTrustSeal
RDA/WDS IG Certification of Digital Repositories The new 'Core Trustworthy Data Repository Requirements' hands-on RDA Plenary 9, Barcelona,
DSA–WDS Partnership: Streamlining the landscape of data repository certification Lesley Rickards, Mary Vardigan, Ingrid Dillo, Françoise Genova, Hervé.
D33.1B PEER REVIEW OF DIGITAL REPOSITORIES
DANS Certification Efforts Use Case
Trustworthiness of Preservation Systems
Where might software fit with CoreTrustSeal
Peer-Reviewer Perspective Data Seal of Approval
Data Preservation Update Data Preservation, Curation & Stewardship
USING THE DSA TO BENCHMARK AND GUIDE TRUST WITHIN CESSDA
Sophia Lafferty-hess | research data manager
DRIVER Digital Repository Infrastructure Vision for European Research
Update RDA Strategy Discussion
Update RDA Strategy Discussion
RDA adoption story on CoreTrustSeal certification
The RDA Europe project CC BY-SA 4.0.
EOSC-hub Contribution to the EOSC WGs
Australian and New Zealand Metadata Working Group
Presentation transcript:

RDA Plenary 7, Tokyo, 3 March 2016, Final Results of the Repository Audit and Certification DSA–WDS Partnership WG Certification of Digital Repositories: Reaping the fruit and sowing the seeds RDA Plenary 7, Tokyo, 3 March 2016,

Outline Where we are? Where were we? Where next?

Where are we? Outputs - 1 Common Requirements Organisational infrastructure Digital object management Technology Context Mission / Scope Licences Continuity of access Confidentiality / ethics Expert guidance Organisational infrastructure Data integrity and authenticity Appraisal Documented storage procedures Preservation plan Data quality Workflows Data discovery and identification Data re-use Technical infrastructure Security http://tinyurl.com/pm9sflp

Where are we? Outputs - 2 Common procedures Implementation – introducing requirements in partnership URLs to evidence strongly encouraged Maturity ratings strongly encouraged Assessments to be publicly available Renewals every three years Three entry points for certification: (DSA, WDS, and new website) Successful completion means certification in both DSA and WDS Sustainable Review Process Pool of reviewers (training provided) Approved by the new DSA–WDS Certification Board Mutual Governance Process http://tinyurl.com/os6vb94

Where are we? Outputs - 3 Testbed – “Real-world” evaluation of Common Requirements and Procedures Develop common testbed, and surrounding organizational framework, for peer review and certification... [to] provide practical insight into the proposed common WDS–DSA catalogue and review process, thus enabling iterative improvements to those procedures Tested by 6 organisations Diverse set of repositories and services represented Procedures will follow agreed processes as much as possible Comments from testers feeding in to improving Common Requirements and Common Procedures Draft report almost ready – first version completed

Where were we? - 1 Data Seal of Approval 16 guidelines for Trustworthy Digital Repositories (data producers/repositories/consumers) DSA granted for a period of 2 years 49 seals acquired, some 50 underway World Data System Assessment to allow membership 17 criteria Review every 3-5 years ~50 members

Where were we? - 2 DSA and WDS came together in a WG under the auspices of the RDA Interest Group on Repository Audit and Certification Goal was to harmonize core certification requirements and procedures, ultimately setting the stage for a global shared framework including other standards Broader goal: to inspire trust, which is at the heart of sharing and archiving data. Trust among: Users, Depositors, Funders Understand threats to and risks within its systems Encourage regular cycle of audit and/or certification

Where were we? - 3 Working Group Members Lesley Rickards (UK, PSMSL, WDS-SC) [Co-chair] Mary Vardigan (USA, ICPSR, DSA Board) [Co-chair] Kevin Ashley (UK, Digital Curation Centre) Michael Diepenbroek (Germany, Pangaea, WDS-SC) Ingrid Dillo (The Netherlands, DANS, DSA Board) Françoise Genova (France, CDS, WDS-SC) Hervé L’Hours (UK, UK Data Archive, DSA Board) Guoqing Li (China, CEODE, WDS-SC) Jean-Bernard Minster (UCSD, and Chair of WDS Scientific Committee) Paul Trilsbeek (The Netherlands, MPI for Psycholinguistics, DSA Board) Eleni Panagou, Ph.D. Candidate in Web Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Greece [RDA Early Career Researcher]

Where next? - 1 Finalise testbed report Positive comments: “ …clear and understandable” “ …structure seems to be more suitable” “…stronger emphasis on documented procedures and plans” “…easier to meet the common requirements but …some need a more detailed description and evidence.” Further work needed: clarify the cross-disciplinary nature of the requirements - explaining ethical considerations further define outsourcing services clarify the subtle differences between the task of evaluating technical quality and the issue of research quality further explain data management and OAIS repository concepts repetition of requests (e.g. for metadata information) guidance on maximum length of answer

Where next? - 2 DSA and WDS formally adopt and implement Core Common Requirements Resolve “Needed” items in the Common Procedures document Consider Data Services and Networks Conduct outreach to publishers Explore linkage with re3data.org Conduct outreach to other standards like nestorSEAL and ISO

Where next? - 3 Towards a global certification framework

Repository Audit and Certification DSA–WDS Partnership WG Thank you Questions and comments?