What It Is and How It Works

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

What’s new in the accreditation standards for TSPC programs.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division BPC Conceptual Framework.
“Sticking Points” Conceptual framework has five structural elements Conceptual framework has five structural elements Standard 1 requires data, not information.
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
A Roadmap for Meeting the NCATE Preconditions* *(and keeping everyone in the unit on speaking terms) Pamela Ehrenberg NCATE.
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
1 NCATE Standards. 2  Candidate Performance  Candidate Knowledge, Skills, & Dispositions  Assessment System and Unit Evaluation  Unit Capacity Field.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Welcome to Teacher Education at ECU. Teacher Education Undergraduate programs lead to initial license in NC in 21 different teaching areas Director of.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Introduction to NCATE and PSC Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
ACCREDITATION SITE VISITS.  DIVISION 010 – SITE VISIT PROCESS  DIVISION 017 – UNIT STANDARDS  DIVISION 065 – CONTENT STANDARDS.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
NCATE Standards for Professional Development Schools Doug MacIsaac Stetson University Cynthia Hutchinson University of Central Florida.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
East Carolina University’s Conceptual Framework for Preparing Education Professionals.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Developing Educational Leaders Who Create Tomorrow’s Opportunities: Issues for Partner Instructors in the College of Education April 10, 2008.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
PESB Standards Standard 4: Program Design. How Standards are Judged Standards are deemed unmet, met or exemplary. A standard is deemed ‘met’ if: A program.
A conceptual framework establishes the shared vision for a unit’s efforts in preparing educators to work in P–12 schools. … Conceptual Framework.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
NCATE Unit Standards…Revised Antoinette Mitchell Vice President, Unit Accreditation.
Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,
Performance-Based Accreditation
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Partnership for Practice
Conceptual Framework: The Reflective Practitioner
Town Hall Meeting November 4, 2013
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
COE Assessment The “Then” and “Now”.
Advanced Level Programs and NCATE Unit Review
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
NSG 511 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
NJCU College of Education
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Building a Sustainable Community Collaboration
Assessment Committee Meeting December 15, 2010
Hope International School November 14-17, 2016
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Professional Learning Community (PLC)
February 21-22, 2018.
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
School District No.73 (Kamloops/Thompson)
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

What It Is and How It Works Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works

A conceptual framework: Represents the guiding structure of the unit Represents the vision and direction for the unit and its work Is a process, not a thing. Is codified in a document but infused throughout the unit Is not a standard by itself, but is still assessed

What’s the purpose of the conceptual framework? To articulate the goals of the unit To ensure that administrators, faculty, K-12 partners and candidates are working toward the articulated goals To ensure that the goals encourage professionally sound commitments and dispositions Visit “resources” section of NCATE website for examples of conceptual frameworks

Conceptual framework should be: Developed collaboratively Shared by all stakeholders Consistent with institutional and unit mission Continuously evaluated Evident in different aspects of the unit Knowledge-based

What are the structural elements of the CF? vision and mission of the institution and unit philosophy, purposes, goals, and institutional standards of the unit knowledge bases, including theories, research, the wisdom of practice, and educational policies that drive the work of the unit

CF Structural Elements (cont.) candidate proficiencies related to expected knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions, including proficiencies associated with diversity and technology, that are aligned with the expectations in professional, state, and institutional standards summarized description of the unit’s assessment system

Element 1: The vision and mission Vision: What does the unit see as its ideal? What does the unit hope to achieve? What does the unit strive to do? Mission: What is the unit going to do – an action statement What is the mission of the institution? How do the unit and institutional missions relate?

Element 2: Philosophies, pur-poses, goals, & institutional stds. Philosophy: What is the unit’s overarching belief system? Purposes/goals: What are the broad goals or outcomes of the unit. Think about connections back to philosophy and mission. Think about diversity and technology.

Element 3: Knowledge bases, including theories, research, an wisdom of practice, & ed policies Knowledge bases: What theories, research, and wisdom of practice undergird the unit’s belief that its purposes/goals are worthwhile and of value? Using literature, explain why are the unit’s purposes/goals are important.

Element 4: Candidate proficiencies related to expected knowledge, skills, and professional dispositions, including proficiencies associated with diversity and technology, that are aligned with the expectations in professional, state, and institutional standards.

Alignment with professional, state, and institutional standards Clearly define the unit’s proficiencies – which are expectations of candidate performance that should be related to the unit’s purposes/goals Align the proficiencies with three sets of standards: state, institutional, and professional Use a table to illustrate the relationships between proficiencies, especially state and institutional standards Note: institutions can indicate that programs are aligned to professional standards without showing the detailed alignment. This alignment is important and must be done, but need not be included in detail in the cf.

Element 5: Summarized description of candidate assessment At what critical points are candidates assessed? What assessments are used? Do assessments link to unit proficiencies? How does the unit ensure that assessments are accurate and consistent? What happens when candidates do not perform at levels expected by the unit (counseling, remediation, etc)?

How is the CF connected to the unit standards? Integrated throughout the standards Standard 1 - assessment data Standard 2 – assessment system Standards 3 and 4 – field experiences Standard 5 – curricula and methods Standard 6 – professional community Commitments to diversity and technology