Huajin Jeng, Jeffrey Haas, Yakov Rekhter, Jeffrey Zhang

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 Multicast in BGP/MPLS VPNs and VPLS draft-raggarwa-l3vpn-mvpn-vpls-mcast-
Advertisements

Network Virtualization Overlay Control Protocol Requirements draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00 Lawrence Kreeger, Dinesh Dutt, Thomas Narten, David Black,
Chapter 9: Access Control Lists
L3VPN WG2012-Jul-301 MVPN Extranet First, a little background: MVPN Effort that began in 2004 culminated in the set of RFCs in 2012! (Well, really.
Network Localized Mobility Management using DHCP
BGP Extensions for BIER draft-xu-idr-bier-extensions-01 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Mach Chen (Huawei) Keyur Patel (Cisco) IJsbrand Wijnands (Cisco)
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 14. CS Summer 2003 MPLS VPN Architecture MPLS VPN is a collection of sites interconnected over MPLS core network. MPLS.
MOBILITY SUPPORT IN IPv6
1 IP Multicasting. 2 IP Multicasting: Motivation Problem: Want to deliver a packet from a source to multiple receivers Applications: –Streaming of Continuous.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 BGP AS AN MVPN PE-CE Protocol draft-keyupate-l3vpn-mvpn-pe-ce-00 Keyur Patel,
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 9: Access Control Lists Routing & Switching.
CSC 600 Internetworking with TCP/IP Unit 8: IP Multicasting (Ch. 17) Dr. Cheer-Sun Yang Spring 2001.
1 CMPT 471 Networking II IGMP (IPv4) and MLD (IPv6) © Janice Regan,
Virtual Topologies for Service Chaining in BGP IP/MPLS VPNs draft-rfernando-bess-service-chaining-00 (previously draft-rfernando-l3vpn-service-chaining-04)
Framework & Requirements for an Access Node Control Mechanism in Broadband Multi-Service Networks ANCP WG IETF 71 – Philadelphia draft-ietf-ancp-framework-05.txt.
Multicast Routing Protocols. The Need for Multicast Routing n Routing based on member information –Whenever a multicast router receives a multicast packet.
Universal Identifier UNIVERSAL IDENTIFIER Universal network = globally accepted method for identifying each computer. Host identifier = host is identify.
Bill Nickless IETF-55 MBONED draft-ietf-mboned-iesg-gap-analysis-00.txt Internet Multicast Gap Analysis From the MBONED Working Group For the IESG.
Draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02 1 FEC framework Configuration Signaling draft-ietf-fecframe-config-signaling-02.txt IETF 76 Rajiv Asati.
Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4 draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-01 H. Jeng, l. Jalil, R. Bonica, Y. Rekhter, K. Patel, L. Yong.
1 The Network Menu. 2 Static Routing The Static Routing functionality within GD eSeries allows users to easily configure static routes to networks not.
Admission Control in IP Multicast over Heterogeneous Access Networks
Network Virtualization Overlay Control Protocol Requirements draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp Lawrence Kreeger, Dinesh Dutt, Thomas Narten, David Black, Murari.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Chapter 39 How Multicast IP and MBone Work.
Global Table Multicast with BGP-MVPN draft-zzhang-l3vpn-mvpn-global-table-mcast London, 89 th IETF L3VPN WG2013-Nov-71.
Scope ancp-protocol-04 includes some ANCP extensions that support one multicast use case of ancp-framework NAS initiated ANCP Multicast Control lefaucheur-ancp-mc-extensions.
Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4 draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-01 H. Jeng, l. Jalil, R. Bonica, Y. Rekhter, K. Patel, L. Yong.
Extension of the MLD proxy functionality to support multiple upstream interfaces 1 Luis M. Contreras Telefónica I+D Carlos J. Bernardos Universidad Carlos.
Multicast state damping draft-morin-multicast-damping-00 draft-morin-multicast-damping-00 Thomas Morin, Stéphane Litkowski, Keyur Patel, Jeffrey Zhang,
1 Group Communications: Host Group and IGMP Dr. Rocky K. C. Chang 19 March, 2002.
MBGP and Customer Routes
Global Table Multicast with BGP-MVPN Protocol
1 CMPT 471 Networking II Multicasting © Janice Regan,
Internet Protocol Address
Discussion on DHCPv6 Routing Configuration
Multicast in BGP/MPLS VPN
Tuning the Behavior of IGMP and MLD for Mobile Hosts and Routers
draft-nortz-optimal-amt-relay-discovery-00
Softwire Mesh Solution Framework
V4-over-v6 MVPNs.
Multicast geo-distribution control draft-rekhter-geo-distribution-control-00 Huajin Jeng – AT&T Jeffrey Haas, Yakov Rekhter, Jeffrey Zhang – Juniper IETF.
Multi Topology Routing (MTR) for OSPF
BGP supplement Abhigyan Sharma.
Introduction to Networking
NAT , Device Discovery Chapter 9 , chapter 10.
Net 323: NETWORK Protocols
Chapter 4: Access Control Lists (ACLs)
* Essential Network Security Book Slides.
Access Control Lists CCNA 2 v3 – Module 11
ANCP Applicability to PON draft-bitar-wadhwa-ancp-pon-00
Neighbor discovery to support direct communication in ITS
By - Ricardo Sanchez, Ken Wolters and William Hibbard
Proposal for IEEE 802.1CQ-LAAP
Multicast/BIER As A Service
Extending MPLS/BGP VPNs to End-Systems
Proposal for IEEE 802.1CQ-LAAP
Working Principle of BGP
Proposal for IEEE 802.1CQ-LAAP
EVPN a very short introduction
COMP/ELEC 429/556 Introduction to Computer Networks
Anup K.Talukdar B.R.Badrinath Arup Acharya
EE 122: Lecture 22 (Overlay Networks)
Mobile IP Outline Homework #4 Solutions Intro to mobile IP Operation
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations
Mobile IP Outline Intro to mobile IP Operation Problems with mobility.
Optional Read Slides: Network Multicast
Multicast in L3VPN Signaled by EVPN Type-5 Routes
Multicasting Unicast.
BGP VPN service for SRv6 Plus IETF 105, Montreal
BGP Signaled Multicast
Presentation transcript:

Multicast geo-distribution control draft-rekhter-geo-distribution-control-03 Huajin Jeng, Jeffrey Haas, Yakov Rekhter, Jeffrey Zhang November 2013, 88th IETF Vancouver

A Multicast Content Delivery Service model Distribution Network Controller Content Distribution Controller (CDC) Apply content-access policy Determine content delivery method (e.g. multicast vs. unicast) Multicast Distribution Network Controller (MDNC) Determine, maintain, and communicate a global-view of multicast distribution access footprint Maintain and distribute multicast-distribution restriction policies (stipulated by CDCs) to Multicast Edge Routers Edge Routers (ERs) Network access routers of the IP Network infrastructure (R4, R5, R6 in following diagrams) Multicast capable Ers are responsible for enforcing multicast-distribution restriction policies Content Distribution Controller R2 R4 R0 R1 R5 R3 Content-Server R6 Content Provider Network Provider

Two problems to be solved Ability of content-provider to determine content-receiver network destination areas where multicast-delivery option is available at a given current time period. Ability of content-provider to restrict multicast delivery of a given content on a designated multicast channel (S,G) to exclude a set of content-receiver network destination areas This is to support compliance with geo-restriction (“black-out”) requirements that frequently exist for certain categories of live- event content distribution

Multicast Distribution Reachability Signaling Network Controller 1 MRZ={X, Y} 2 MRZ={X} Content Distribution Controller Zone X MRZ={Y} R2 R4 MRZ={(null)} R0 R1 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Multicast Distribution Network Controller Content-Receivers 3 MRZ= {X, Y} Content Distribution Controller Zone X R2 R4 R0 R1 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Content-Receivers

Multicast Distribution Reachability Control Network Controller MRZ= {X, Y} Content Distribution Controller 4 Zone X Content Source Request (C) Content Source (C) = (S,G) R2 R4 R0 R1 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Multicast Distribution Network Controller Content-Receivers MRZ= {X, Y} Content Distribution Controller Join (S,G) Zone X 5 R2 Join (S,G) R4 Join (S,G) R0 Join (S,G) R1 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Content-Receivers

Multicast Distribution Reachability Control Network Controller MRZ= {X, Y} Content Distribution Controller Join (S,G) Zone X R2 Join (S,G) R4 Join (S,G) R0 Join (S,G) R1 R5 Zone Y R3 6 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Multicast Distribution Network Controller Content-Receivers MRZ= {X, Y} Content Distribution Controller Join (S,G) Zone X R2 Join (S,G) R4 Join (S,G) R0 Join (S,G) R1 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 7 Zone Z Content Source Request (C) Content Source (C) = (S) Content-Receivers

Multicast Distribution Reachability Control Network Controller MRZ= {X, Y} Content Distribution Controller Join (S,G) Zone X R2 Join (S,G) R4 Join (S,G) R0 Join (S,G) R1 R5 Zone Y R3 9 Content (C) Content-Server 8 R6 Content Request (C) Zone Z Content-Receivers

Multicast Distribution Reachability Signaling (Refer to charts in slides #4~7) Each ER (R4, R5, R6) is aware of the multicast reachability status for each subscriber (“content receiver”) zone (IP destination prefix) that it serves It’s permissible that an ER might have a mixture of some multicast-enabled zones and some non multicast enabled Each ER announces (“signals”) to the MDNC its list of multicast- enabled zones The MDNC maintains the list of all multicast-enabled zones in the network and announces the list to CDCs of CP/CDN customers who subscribe to content-multicast services The CDC keeps this list for use in selecting content distribution method in response to requests for content it manages 1 2 3

Multicast Distribution Reachability Signaling (Refer to charts in slide #4~7) The CDC selects an available multicast-channel (S,G) for multicast distribution of Content C In response to a request for Content C from a user in zone X which is multicast-enabled the CDC returns the multicast channel (S,G) as the “source address” for the content The user issues a multicast Join (S,G) message to its serving ER R1. and receives a replicated multicasted copy of C from the network In response to a request for Content C from a user in zone Z which is not multicast-enabled the CDC returns the unicast address S as the “source address” for the content The user issues a content request to source S. and receives a replicated unicasted copy of C from server S 4 5 6 7 8 9

Multicast Distribution Exclusion Signaling 3 Multicast Distribution Network Controller 1 MEZ(S,G)={Y} 2 MEZ(S,G)={Y} MEZ(S,G) ={Y} Content Distribution Controller Zone X MEZ(S,G)={Y} R2 R4 MEZ(S,G)={Y} R0 R1 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Multicast Distribution Network Controller Content-Receivers MEZ(S,G) ={Y} Content Distribution Controller Zone X R2 R4 R0 R1 4 MEZ(S,G)={Y} R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Content-Receivers

Multicast Distribution Exclusion Control Network Controller 5 MEZ(S,G) ={Y} Content Distribution Controller Join (S,G) Content Source Request (C) Zone X Content Source Request (C) Denied R2 Join (S,G) R4 Join (S,G) R0 Join (S,G) R1 MEZ(S,G)={Y} R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Multicast Distribution Network Controller Content-Receivers MEZ(S,G) ={Y} Content Distribution Controller Join (S,G) Zone X R2 Join (S,G) R4 Join (S,G) R0 Join (S,G) R1 MEZ(S,G)={Y} 6 R5 Zone Y R3 X Join (S,G) Content-Server R6 Zone Z Content-Receivers

Multicast Distribution Exclusion Signaling 9 Multicast Distribution Network Controller 7 8 Content Distribution Controller Zone X R2 R4 R0 R1 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Multicast Distribution Network Controller Content-Receivers Content Distribution Controller Zone X R2 R4 R0 R1 10 R5 Zone Y R3 Content-Server R6 Zone Z Content-Receivers

Multicast Distribution Exclusion Signaling (Refer to charts in slides #10~12) The CDC selects an available multicast-channel (S,G) for multicast distribution of Content C Assuming that Content C has geo-restriction rule that excludes zone Y from receiving the Content C, the CDC links this exclusion policy to multicast channel (S,G) as long as this channel is being used to distributes C The CDC announces (“signals”) the exclusion policy for (S,G) to the MDNC The MDNC distributes the exclusion policy to the (multicast enabled) ERs For signaling processing efficiency, the MDNC can limit the distribution of a given exclusion policy to those ERs serving the zones affected by that policy ER R5 which is the serving access router for zone Y records the exclusion rule for enforcement 1 2 3 4

Multicast Distribution Exclusion Signaling (Refer to charts in slides #10~12) The CDC denies any request for Content C from any user in exclusion zone Y ER R5 will ignore Join (S,G) messages from any user in exclusion zone Y who attempts to access Content C by learning about (S,G) through illegitimate means and issuing an Join (S,G) message to the network When multicast channel (S,G) is no longer used for C, the CDC removes the exclusion policy on (S,G), and signals to the MDNC The MDNC withdraws the exclusion policy in its signaling to the (multicast enabled) ERs ER R5 which is the serving access router for zone Y removes the exclusion rule from enforcement 5 6 7 8 9 10 HQN 11/15/10 AT&T Proprietary (Internal Use Only)

Status & Request draft-rekhter-geo-distribution-control-00 now split into the following three: draft-rekhter-geo-distribution-control-03 General problem & proposal description Seeking Mboned review & adoption draft-rekhter-mdrs-00 BGP procedures with new SAFI for multicast reachability signaling Seeking IDR review & adoption draft-rekhter-mdcs-00 BGP Flow-spec extensions for geo-restriction information signaling

Backup slides

Signaling multicast destination reachability What: Content receivers with multicast connectivity from the ER. To Whom: Content Distribution Controllers (CDC) How: The receivers are encoded as IP prefixes The prefixes are sent in BGP using the IPv4 or IPv6 AFI and a new MCAST-REACH SAFI (TBD) draft-rekhter-mdrs in IDR

Limiting distribution of multicast reachability to interested BGp speakers Only the CDCs are interested in the new MCAST-REACH reachability. Provisioning AFI/MCAST-REACH only sessions from each ER to each CDC does not scale well. Constrained Route-Target distribution (RFC 4684) is used control distribution of MCAST-REACH destinations toward interested CDCs: CDC is provisioned with a Route-Target for each AFI. The RT is not re- used elsewhere. CDC distributes the RT into RTC. ERs attach RT to MCAST-REACH reachability.

Signaling Multicast Distribution Control in BGP Why: While the CDC can block a particular content request, a receiver may obtain enough information through other means to join the relevant multicast channel – the ERs need to be able to block the multicast join request based on geo-restrict information What: Particular multicast content as (S,G) and whether the content is included or excluded on a per-zone basis. To Whom: Interested ERs

Signaling Multicast Distribution Control in BGP How: Using BGP Flow-spec (RFC 5575) encoding. Source goes in source prefix, Group goes in destination prefix. AFI is IPv4 or IPv6. New SAFI, MCAST-FLOWSPEC (TBD). Included/Excluded content for a zone is signaled with an Included Route-Target or an Excluded Route-Target for each zone. Receiver ports are associated with zones. draft-rekhter-mdcs: IDR

Signaling Multicast Distribution Control in BGP How: MCAST-FLOWSPEC routes are compiled into applicable policy on the receiving router. For example, on an ER, only policy matching zones for attached ports is necessary. When a subscriber tries to access content from a given port (PIM or IGMP join), the MCAST-FLOWSPEC policy is. If the port’s zone matches inclusive or exclusive Route-Targets, the appropriate policy is applied and the join is either permitted or ignored. A default policy of accept or reject may limit the number of routes that must be distributed.

Signaling Multicast Distribution Control in BGP Example policy from draft: Consider an ER in Manhattan that has a port that is provisioned with the following import RTs: <include-manhattan, exclude- manhattan, include-nyc, exclude-nyc, include-east, exclude-east, include-usa, exclude-usa> When the ER receives a Flow Spec route with <exclude-nyc, include- manhattan, include-usa> RTs, the ER first try to match "include- manhattan" or "exclude-manhattan" (the first ones on the list) - and the result is "include-manhattan". Therefore, the (S, G) carried in the Flow Spec route is allowed on that port of the ER.

Limiting distribution of Multicast Distribution Control Only some ERs may be interested in specific MCAST-FLOWSPEC routes. A Route-Target could be assigned for interested ERs according to internal provisioning decisions. MCAST-FLOWSPEC routes will have these RTs added. Constrained Route-Target distribution is used to limit the flooding of the routes. Static RTC can be used to provision the ER targets in RTC. In some (most?) circumstances, the zone RTs could be used for RTC purposes