IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated Implementation of Initiatives: SEL, PBIS, RTI Marla Dewhirst, Technical Assistance Director, PBIS Network
Advertisements

School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Issues and Challenges in School-wide Prevention Carl Liaupsin University of Arizona pbisaz.org (with support and material from the National Technical Assistance.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University.
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: School-based Prevention George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
SWPBS (aka EBS) 10 Year Perspective George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
SW-PBS & RtI: Lessons Being Learned George Sugai Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut & Oregon August 1,
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut March 10,
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Securing Sustainable Funding, Political Support, & Visibility Barbara Sims & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut October 30, 2008.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
Sustained Implementation of Tiered System of Behavior Support George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Neag School of Education Response to Intervention III SW Behavioral Assessment George Sugai Director CBER Co-Director Center on PBIS
Is PBIS Evidence-based? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
Responsiveness-to-Intervention: What is It? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut October.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
SW-PBS: Leadership & Sustainability George Sugai Center on PBIS University of Connecticut University of Oregon November 2, 2005
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SW-PBS & RtI: Lessons Being Learned George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut & Oregon November 16,
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Evolution of RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut January 23,
SWPBS & RtI for All George Sugai University of Connecticut OSEP Center on PBIS September 24, 2008
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Scaling & Sustaining Evidence-Based Practices Glen Dunlap, Steve Goodman, Tim Lewis, Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS OSEP Project Directors’
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
SCTG COACHES WEBINAR November 3, 2015 December 1, 2015 January 5, 2016 February 2, 2016 March 1, 2016 April 5, 2016 May 3, 2016.
Multi-tiered Systems of Support & Bullying Behavior Phi Delta Kappan - UConn George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Kayla Locklear- Behavioral Specialist Leon Maynor – Behavioral Specialist SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT: DISCIPLINE & BEYOND.
SWPBS: Implementation Fidelity & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Apr 7,
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October
Systematic Support for Students
Impacting Students with Autism through All 3 Tiers of PBIS
SWPBS: Sustainability
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
SWPBS Overview: Establishing Continuum of Support for All
What is Positive Behavior Intervetions and Supports (PBIS)?
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support
PBIS PRACTICES.
SW-PBS & RtI: Lessons Being Learned
Maryland State Coaches’ Meeting AM Session
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Reaching All Students: RtI & SWPBS
Sustainability & Scaling & Failure of Friday In-service Day
Oregon Coaches’ Training School-wide PBIS
Adapted from Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu,& George Sugai, 2008
DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
MN SW Positive Behavior Support Initiative
District Leadership SCCOE
Presentation transcript:

IL PBIS 2008: Leadership Lucille, Holly, Kelly, Diane, Brandi, Seth, Rob & George OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut August 4, 2008 www.pbis.org www.cber.org George.sugai@uconn.edu

BIG IDEAS Long history of effective behavioral interventions exists PBIS practices & systems related to improved academic & social behavior outcomes Accurate implementation possible by real implementers Optimism National priority & visibility Research-based practices & policy Guided systemic implementation - sustainability & scaling Continuous research & technical assistance

Supporting Social Competence & Basics: 4 PBS Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior

Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students

PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations

Local Implementation Capacity SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION Continuous Self-Assessment Relevance Priority Efficacy Fidelity Valued Outcomes Effective Practices Practice Implementation Local Implementation Capacity

VIOLENCE PREVENTION? Positive, predictable school-wide climate Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) White House Conference on School Violence (2006) Positive, predictable school-wide climate High rates of academic & social success Formal social skills instruction Positive active supervision & reinforcement Positive adult role models Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort

90-School Study Horner et al., in press Schools that receive technical assistance from typical support personnel implement SWPBS with fidelity Fidelity SWPBS is associated with Low levels of ODR .29/100/day v. national mean .34 Improved perception of safety of the school reduced risk factor Increased proportion of 3rd graders who meet state reading standard.

Project Target: Preliminary Findings Bradshaw & Leaf, in press PBIS (21 v. 16) schools reached & sustained high fidelity PBIS increased all aspects of organizational health Positive effects/trends for student outcomes Fewer students with 1 or more ODRs (majors + minors) Fewer ODRs (majors + minors) Fewer ODRs for truancy Fewer suspensions Increasing trend in % of students scoring in advanced & proficient range of state achievement test

Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures 1-5% 1-5% Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response 5-10% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive 80-90% Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive 80-90%

RtI IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS STUDENT PERFORMANCE CONTINUOUS PROGRESS MONITORING DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI

RtI: Good “IDEiA” Policy Approach or framework for redesigning & establishing teaching & learning environments that are effective, efficient, relevant, & durable for all students, families & educators NOT program, curriculum, strategy, intervention NOT limited to special education NOT new Principles embedded within possible reauthorization of NCLB

Quotable Fixsen “Policy is “Training does not predict action” Allocation of limited resources for unlimited needs” Opportunity, not guarantee, for good action” “Training does not predict action” “Manualized treatments have created overly rigid & rapid applications”

Continuum of Support for ALL RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Universal Targeted Intensive Few Some NOTICE GREEN GOES IS FOR “ALL” All Dec 7, 2007

RtI Application Examples EARLY READING/LITERACY SOCIAL BEHAVIOR TEAM General educator, special educator, reading specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. General educator, special educator, behavior specialist, Title I, school psychologist, etc. UNIVERSAL SCREENING Curriculum based measurement SSBD, record review, gating PROGRESS MONITORING ODR, suspensions, behavior incidents, precision teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS 5-specific reading skills: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension Direct social skills instruction, positive reinforcement, token economy, active supervision, behavioral contracting, group contingency management, function-based support, self-management DECISION MAKING RULES Core, strategic, intensive Primary, secondary, tertiary tiers

Identify existing practices by tier Specify outcome for each effort CONTINUUM of SWPBS TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound/PCP Special Education Audit Identify existing practices by tier Specify outcome for each effort Evaluate implementation accuracy & outcome effectiveness Eliminate/integrate based on outcomes Establish decision rules (RtI) ~5% ~15% SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach & encourage positive SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Effective instruction Parent engagement ~80% of Students

National ODR/ISS/OSS July 2008 K-6 6-9 9-12 # Sch 1756 476 177 # Std 781,546 311,725 161,182 # ODR 423,647 414,716 235,279 ISS # Evnt 6 38 avg/100 # Day 12 49 61 OSS 30 24 10 74   # Expl 0.03 0.29 0.39 2409 1,254,453 1,073,642

SWIS summary 07-08 July 2, 2008 2,717 sch, 1,377,989 stds; 1,232,826 Maj ODRs Grade Range # Schools Mean Enroll. Mean ODRs/100/ sch day (std dev.) K-6 1,756 445 ..35 (.45) 1/300 day 6-9 476 654 .91 (1.40) 1/100 /day 9-12 177 910 1.05 (1.56) 1/105/day K-(8-12) 308 401 1.01 (1.88)

July 2, 2008

July 2, 2008

Sustaining Change Know your basics Implement with fidelity Give priority to what matters Know your outcomes Integrate for efficiency Build durable capacity

Summary Notes Demonstrations – Implementation sustainability Formalizing family engagement & support Sustainability involves recognition Measurable definitions to enable evaluation of time use

Tertiary Demonstrations Interagency – Establishing demos Specific direction for multiple players/sites Work w/ existing structures/resources

School/Family/Community Partnerships - Engagement Driven by stakeholders Self-assessment & existing structures Thinking long term with measurable benchmarks

Fiscal – Implementation costs Enhancements for ease of use Retest before distribution Cost data summaries are useful

Related Initiatives - Coaching Identify what exists & common ground (SIP) Integrate around outcomes & need data Generic functions

Political Support/Visibility – National legislation Nonpartisan approach Promoting policy through best practice & examples Targeting small # of powerful influential advocacy groups

Overall “Working Smarter” – Is “it”…. Effective Efficient Relevant Durable Scalable

RtI as umbrella for academic & behavior Integration for predictability, efficiency, & continuous regeneration Family engagement metric & continuum of evidence-based practices (RtI)….metric directly outcome linked

Model/demonstrate before promoting Research-Practice-Policy Precorrect-prevent, teach, acknowledge, & reinforce at systems level

Organization Common Vision ORGANIZATION MEMBERS Common Experience Common Language

Sr+ Striving for common vision, language, & routine Using data & outcome driven decisions Sticking w/ what works Modeling what you want to see Acknowledging & showcasing accomplishments Staying connected to student outcomes