Assessment of Student Learning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Advertisements

International Outcomes Assessment Dr. Barbara Wheeling Montana State University Billings Coordinator for Institutional Assessment College of Business Director.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Program Assessment Workshop Kathleen Harring. What is Assessment? Assessment is the systematic gathering and analysis of information to inform and improve.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Assistant Provost for Institutional Effectiveness Texas Christian University TAMU Assessment Conference 2011.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Intro to SLOs. Frequently Asked Questions Does it stand for “Student Liberation Organization”?
Writing Learning Outcomes David Steer & Stephane Booth Co-Chairs Learning Outcomes Committee.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment 1.2 Discuss approaches to auditing the capabilities and capacity of an college in or der to evaluate its readiness.
Program Learning Outcomes: Development Strategies & Practical Tools Sacramento City College Spring Flex, 2006 Facilitators: Alan Keys, Faculty Research.
Unit 5 Seminar D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Understanding Assessment The Basics Office for Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment.
Assessment: An Overview Original author: Holly Hull Modified by: Jim Julius.
College of Business Administration Assessing Inter- Cultural Learning: Direct Measures and Beyond Kathleen A. Krentler San Diego State University.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT DR. SHEMEKA MCCLUNG DIRECTOR ARNITRA HUNTER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE.
Institutional Learner Outcomes Coffeyville Community College Assessment.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Writing and Revising SLOs with Best Practices in Mind
How To Write Student Learning Outcomes
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Writing Program-level Student Learning Outcomes (PSLOs)
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Office of Planning & Development
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Consider Your Audience
Fullerton College SLOA Workshop:
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Closing the Assessment Loop
Developing a Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Plan and Report
Institutional Student Learning Outcome Assessment Report Fall 2015 Assessment Cycle
Program Learning Outcomes
SLOs: What Are They? Information in this presentation comes from the Fundamentals of Assessment conference led by Dr. Amy Driscoll and sponsored by.
Reporting for Key Universities Objectives
Creating Analytic Rubrics April 27, 2017
AACSB’s Standard 9: Curriculum content
November 17, 2016 Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
QM and Accreditation—Sounds Boring but It’s BASIC
Creating Assessable Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment and Accreditation
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK!
Criminal Justice A.A.S. School of Science, Health and Criminal Justice Fall 2015 Assessment Report
How to Assess Students at the Course and Program Level
Curriculum Coordinator: Marela Fiacco Date : February 29, 2015
2017: SLOs & Assessment Reboot
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Applied Psychology Program School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT AND REPORTING FY’17
NON-ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT REPORTING FY’17
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Student Learning An Integrated View

Why Assess? “When we care about something , we measure it.” Diane Halpern

…to improve student learning. Why Assess? …to improve student learning.

…to improve student learning. Why Assess? …to improve student learning. “Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding and improving student learning…systematically gathering, analyzing, and interpreting evidence to determine how well performance matches those expectations and standards … using the resulting information to … improve performance … assessment can help us focus our collective attention, examine our assumptions, and create a shared academic culture dedicated to assuring and improving the quality of higher education” (Angelo, AAHE Bulletin, November 1995, p. 7).

…to improve student learning. Why Assess? …to improve student learning. “Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding and improving student learning…systematically gathering, analyzing, and interpreting evidence to determine how well performance matches those expectations and standards…using the resulting information to … improve performance … assessment can help us focus our collective attention, examine our assumptions, and create a shared academic culture dedicated to assuring and improving the quality of higher education” (Angelo, AAHE Bulletin, November 1995, p. 7).

Multiple Assessment Stakeholders General Education SLO Assessment Program-specific SLO Assessment Course-specific SLO Assessment

What is an SLO? Student Learning Outcome (SLO) – An outcome that describes what a student is expected to learn as a result of participating in academic activities or experiences. * Operational phrasing of learning outcomes is a crucial part of the process * SLOs focus on knowledge gained, skills and abilities acquired or demonstrated, and attitudes or values changed.

Where do SLOs come from? University Vision/Mission/Strategic Priorities The University is committed to assist students in their search for knowledge and understanding and to prepare them with the attitudes, skills, and habits of lifelong learning in order to assume responsibility in a democratic community and to be useful members of a global society. College Mission & Goals The College mission is to…deepen understanding of behavioral, social, cultural, and environmental issues.  Program-specific Goals Students will exercise critical thinking, problem solving strategies, and scientific methodology in their academic studies and everyday lives. Course-specific Goals “Students will be able to effectively critique ‘lay persons’ and ‘technical’ article on the same topic.” (Method: Embedded; Evaluation Criteria: Rubric; Benchmark: 70% of students rated as at least “adequate”) Note. Accredited programs usually have their own competency-based/SLO requirements. GE-related SLOs may also have to be taken into consideration.

Selecting which SLOs to Assess Consider the stakeholders General Education / Pathway SLOs Program-specific SLOs Course-specific SLOs Key questions to consider What knowledge, skills, and values is a graduate from the program expected to acquire? How to determine whether the student has achieved some minimum standard of performance?

The Big Picture Creating a Curriculum Matrix Cross index courses and program SLOs Specifies the courses where competency for each SLO is “introduced”, “practiced”, and “demonstrated” Guides which courses are appropriate SLO assessment targets Helps to ‘close the loop’ Should specify where SLO competencies are Introduced Practiced Demonstrated

Criminal Justice (BA) Curriculum Matrix Criminal Justice Course Outcome 1 Critical Thinking Outcome 2 Oral Communication Outcome 3 Effective Writing Outcome 4 Content Knowledge Outcome 5 Understand Diversity Outcome 6 Understand Ethics POLS 250 Introduce (I) I POLS 257 Practice (P) P POLS 259A POLS 352 Demonstrate (D) POLS 353 POLS 459D P, D I, P D SOCI 384 Electives POLS 331 PHIL 332 CJ & the Individual CJ & Society Theoretical Foundations Courts & CJ System BA in Criminal Justice curriculum matrix. Shown with permission.

Economics (BA) Curriculum Matrix Student Learning Outcomes Courses Goal: I = Introduce P = Practice C = Competency Be able to apply the microeconomic theory to explain and predict price changes and economic behavior in individual markets. 101, 102, 103 301, 330, 335, 340, 253/333/ 355, 360, 365, 370, 375, 410 435, 440, 450, 462, 465, 466, 470, 495 I P C 2. Be able to apply mainstream macroeconomic theory to explain and predict events in the aggregate economy, including roles played by fiscal and monetary policies. 302, 330, 70, 375, 376, 410 431, 470, 483, 495 3. Be able to identify economic issues and problems, gather data needed to evaluate them, and analyze the data to gain insights into economic behavior and formulate possible solutions. 301, 302 335, 340, 352/333, 360, 365, 376, 389 431, 435, 440, 450, 462, 465, 495 466, 470, 481, 482, 483, 495 4. Be able to communicate with written and spoken word in the discipline of economics. 301, 302, 305, 307, 320, 340, 352/333, 355, 360, 365, 370, 376, 399, 410 431, 435, 440, 450, 462, 465, 466, 481, 483, 495 BA in Economics curriculum matrix. Shown with permission.

Operationalizing SLOs “write clear, correct, and appropriate sentences and paragraphs, avoiding major grammatical and semantic problems.” What are your thoughts about this SLO?

Operationalizing SLOs “write clear, correct, and appropriate sentences and paragraphs, avoiding major grammatical and semantic problems.” Is vague (what constitutes ‘appropriate’?) Is an example of ‘double barreling’ Rubric evaluation of an embedded assignment is the most likely method and evaluation

What do you want to know? Three broad SLO categories Knowledge SLOs (most commonly assessed) Bloom’s Taxonomy for example of Knowledge domains to assess Skill SLOs (quite commonly assessed) Writing and Oral communication are typical Skill SLOs Values / Attitude SLOs (least commonly assessed) Attitude surveys have been successfully used

It’s all about specificity Data targeted for assessment should align with competencies specified in the SLO Rubrics, rubrics; everywhere rubrics Information should be ‘actionable’ Does evaluation of the data provide information as to where improvements can be made? Bottom line… can you close the loop?

Setting Achievement Standards Benchmark acceptable standard of achievement (e.g., based on rubric) Percentage meeting some a priori level of achievement (e.g., 70% of students achieving at least ‘adequate’ on rubric; 70% of students correctly answering embedded question, etc.)

Thinking about Student Learning Outcomes: Closing the Loop

Assessment Methods and Data Embedded Assessment Target exam items, assignments, key course components Common final (not just overall grade; target exam concepts) Pre- and Post-test comparisons (“big idea” items) Third Party Assessments Professional exams Portfolios Attitude Surveys

Assessment Schedule Develop an overall SLO plan Align with program’s 5 year review or other review cycle Consider evaluating more than one SLO per AY cycle A single artifact (e.g., final paper) can be used to assess more than one SLO

Final Thoughts Clearly operationalize your SLOs What you measure should allow you to “Close the Loop” Assess all SLOs within a review cycle Make it a point to share assessment results during department meetings and/or with other stakeholders

“If we care about something, then we should measure it.” Diane Halpern