Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dark energy workshop Copenhagen Aug Why the SNLS ? Questions to be addressed: -Can the intrinsic scatter in the Hubble diagram be further reduced?
Advertisements

Lensing of supernovae by galaxies and galaxy clusters Edvard Mörtsell, Stockholm Jakob Jönsson, Oxford Ariel Goobar; Teresa Riehm, Stockholm.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Dark Matter in Galaxies using Einstein Rings Brendon J. Brewer School of Physics, The University of Sydney Supervisor: A/Prof Geraint F. Lewis.
Strong Lensing in RCS-2 Clusters Matt Bayliss University of Chicago Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics Great Lakes Cosmology Workshop 8 – June 2, 2007.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 12; February
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 13; February
Measuring the local Universe with peculiar velocities of Type Ia Supernovae MPI, August 2006 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics.
On the Distribution of Dark Matter in Clusters of Galaxies David J Sand Chandra Fellows Symposium 2005.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Type Ia Supernovae on a glass: The bread and butter of peculiar velocities Lunch meeting Aarhus, March 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute.
Survey Science Group Workshop 박명구, 한두환 ( 경북대 )
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
The future of strong gravitational lensing by galaxy clusters.
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
Complementarity of weak lensing with other probes Lindsay King, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University UK.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
Cosmology with Cluster Surveys Subha Majumdar Canadian Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics Toronto along with Joe Mohr, Martin White & Jose Diego International.
Constraining Dark Energy with Cluster Strong Lensing Priyamvada Natarajan Yale University Collaborators: Eric Jullo (JPL), Jean-Paul Kneib (OAMP), Anson.
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
PREDRAG JOVANOVIĆ AND LUKA Č. POPOVIĆ ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY BELGRADE, SERBIA Gravitational Lensing Statistics and Cosmology.
Black hole binaries are standard sirens
Our Evolving Universe1 Vital Statistics of the Universe Today… l l Observational evidence for the Big Bang l l Vital statistics of the Universe   Hubble’s.
Dark Matter and Dark Energy components chapter 7 Lecture 4.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
How Standard are Cosmological Standard Candles? Mathew Smith and Collaborators (UCT, ICG, Munich, LCOGT and SDSS-II) SKA Bursary Conference 02/12/2010.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Gravitational Lensing Analysis of CLASH clusters Adi HD 10/2011.
Type Ia Supernovae and the Acceleration of the Universe: Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey Kevin Krisciunas, 5 April 2008.
Constraining Cosmography with Cluster Lenses Jean-Paul Kneib Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille.
The effects of the complex mass distribution of clusters on weak lensing cluster surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
10/5/2004New Windows on the Universe Jan Kuijpers Part 1: Gravitation & relativityPart 1: Gravitation & relativity J.A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics,
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
WAVE GOODBYE TO COLD DARK MATTER ENOCH LEUNG (HKU) PROF. TOM BROADHURST (UPV/EHU) DR. JEREMY LIM (HKU) Hong Kong Astrophysical Society Annual Meeting 14.
Zheng I N S T I T U T E for ADVANCED STUDY Cosmology and Structure Formation KIAS Sep. 21, 2006.
April 3, 2005 The lens redshift distribution – Constraints on galaxy mass evolution Eran Ofek, Hans-Walter Rix, Dan Maoz (2003)
Cosmology with Large Optical Cluster Surveys Eduardo Rozo Einstein Fellow University of Chicago Rencontres de Moriond March 14, 2010.
Elinor Medezinski Johns Hopkins University Galaxy Galaxy Lensing in CLASH clusters.
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
Investigating dark matter halos of galaxies from the COMBO-17 survey Martina Kleinheinrich (Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Heidelberg) & Hans-Walter.
Observational evidence for Dark Energy
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
COSMIC MAGNIFICATION the other weak lensing signal Jes Ford UBC graduate student In collaboration with: Ludovic Van Waerbeke COSMOS 2010 Jes Ford Jason.
Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters Drew Newman Newman et al. 2009, “The Distribution of Dark Matter Over Three Decades in Radius in the Lensing Cluster Abell.
The Dark Side of the Universe L. Van Waerbeke APSNW may 15 th 2009.
Cosmological constraints on neutrino mass Francesco De Bernardis University of Rome “Sapienza” Incontro Nazionale Iniziative di Fisica Astroparticellare.
Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and Alex Hall ArXiv:
Bayesian analysis of joint strong gravitational lensing and dynamic galactic mass in SLACS: evidence of line-of-sight contamination Antonio C. C. Guimarães.
Cosmology with Strong Lensing.
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Cosmology with gravitational lensing
The Dark Energy Survey Probe origin of Cosmic Acceleration:
Cosmological Constraints from the Double-
Glenn van de Ven Institute for Advanced Study
Advisors: Tom Broadhurst, Yoel Rephaeli
Probing the Dark Universe with Weak Gravitational Lensing
Lecture 2 IGM, Scaling Laws Clusters Cosmology Connection
Some issues in cluster cosmology
The Role of Baryons in Strong Lensing properties of Simulated Clusters
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Galaxy Cluster Mass from Spectroscopic Magnification Measurements
CLUSTER MASS MEASUREMENTS FROM X-RAY SURVEY DATA
Presentation transcript:

Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and others ArXiv:1203.2758, ArXiv:1303.6564 and unpublished work

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source Image configurations depend on the distances

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source

Strong lensing is an optical bench Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Strong lensing is an optical bench Lens Source Image configurations depend on the lensing mass.

Uncertainty in the mass model makes cosmography hard Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Uncertainty in the mass model makes cosmography hard Hubble constant + can add a term for spatial curvature Dark Energy Equation of State Matter Density

Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Time Delays: Different images: Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Δt ∝ DΔt = (1+ zl) (Dl Ds) / Dls Need to get mass model right! (Suyu, Collett+ 2013)

Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Time Delays: Different images: Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Δt ∝ DΔt = (1+ zl) (Dl Ds) / Dls Need to get mass model right! (Suyu+ 2013) (Suyu+ 2013)

What is double source plane strong lensing? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett What is double source plane strong lensing?

What is double source plane strong lensing? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett What is double source plane strong lensing? A gravitational lens system with two background sources, each at a different redshift.

What is double source plane strong lensing? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett What is double source plane strong lensing? A gravitational lens system with two background sources, each at a different redshift. SLACS J0946+1006

What is double source plane strong lensing? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett What is double source plane strong lensing? A gravitational lens system with two background sources, each at a different redshift. Lens Galaxy SLACS J0946+1006

What is double source plane strong lensing? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett What is double source plane strong lensing? A gravitational lens system with two background sources, each at a different redshift. Images of the intermediate source SLACS J0946+1006

What is double source plane strong lensing? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett What is double source plane strong lensing? A gravitational lens system with two background sources, each at a different redshift. Images of the background source SLACS J0946+1006

The observable: The Ratio of Einstein Radii. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The observable: The Ratio of Einstein Radii.

The observable: The Ratio of Einstein Radii. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The observable: The Ratio of Einstein Radii.

The observable: The Ratio of Einstein Radii. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The observable: The Ratio of Einstein Radii.

No dependence on the Hubble constant! Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The observable: The Ratio of Einstein Radii. No dependence on the Hubble constant!

Jullo et al. (2010) Results: ΩM= 0.25 ± 0.05, wDE = −0.97 ± 0.07 Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Jullo et al. (2010) Results: ΩM= 0.25 ± 0.05, wDE = −0.97 ± 0.07 (Abel 1689 + WMAP5 + X-ray cluster constraints) The mass is very complicated Hard to control systematics

BAD GOOD Jullo et al. (2010) Results: Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Jullo et al. (2010) Results: BAD GOOD

Constraining Cosmology. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology. Preliminary models of J0946 suggest statistical uncertainty of ~1% on the ratio of Einstein Radii. Uncertainty is dominated by the lens' mass density slope

Constraining Cosmology. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology. zl = 0.35 zs1 = 0.6 zs2 = 1.5 Collett+ 2012

Constraining Cosmology. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology. zl = 0.35 zs1 = 0.6 zs2 = 1.5 WMAP Collett+ 2012

Constraining Cosmology. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology. zl = 0.35 zs1 = 0.6 zs2 = 1.5 WMAP Combination Collett+ 2012

Finding more systems Piggy-back on deep, large area surveys Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Finding more systems Piggy-back on deep, large area surveys Target known lenses Target the most massive galaxies

Constraints with 6 systems. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Constraints with 6 systems. Collett+ 2012 Forecast the distribution of lens and source redshifts WMAP+6 systems is ~2.5 times better than WMAP+1. WMAP+ 1 system wDE = −0.99 ± 0.27 6 systems wDE = −1.01 ± 0.11

Beyond wCDM Evolving models of dark energy: Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Beyond wCDM Collett+ 2012 Evolving models of dark energy: Olive: 6 double source plane lenses Grey: Planck (Forecast, including polarization and weak lensing constraints) Black: combination

Beyond wCDM Evolving models of dark energy: Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Beyond wCDM Collett+ 2012 Evolving models of dark energy: Olive: 6 double source plane lenses Grey: Planck (Forecast, including polarization and weak lensing constraints) Black: combination FoM = 6.17π/A95 = 14.2 WMAP plus Union SNe → 15 (Mortonson+2010)

Euclid Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Euclid

Expect at least hundreds! (maybe even thousands) Euclid Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Euclid Expect at least hundreds! (maybe even thousands) ~105 galaxy scale strong lenses (based on COSMOS ) 1 in 40-80 galaxy scale lenses will be doubles (Gavazzi+ 2008)

Euclid Black: 6 lenses, Ωk = 0 FoM = 14.2 Red: 100 lenses, Ωk ≠ 0 Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Euclid Black: 6 lenses, Ωk = 0 FoM = 14.2 Red: 100 lenses, Ωk ≠ 0 FoM = 38 Collett+ in prep.

Systematics A.K.A. Learning cool stuff about mass in the universe Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Systematics A.K.A. Learning cool stuff about mass in the universe

Systematics Mass between the two rings Mass of the intermediate source Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Systematics Mass between the two rings Mass of the intermediate source Mass along the line of sight

Perturbations by the intermediate source Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Perturbations by the intermediate source If completely neglected: LMC: ~1% systematic error on η MW: ~10% systematic error on η Effect is detectable: include in the lens model. (Sonnenfeld+ 2012, Fixed cosmology, photometric zs2)

Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Profile of the Lens Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR γDM = 1.7 ± 0.2 Using dynamics and both Einstein radii (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Overdense dark matter halos cause convergence of rays

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Overdense dark matter halos cause convergence of rays Underdense voids cause divergence of rays

κ = (4πGDlsDl/c2Ds) Σ The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Effect depends on the distance of the source – slightly perturbs the inferred cosmology Convergence proportional to surface mass density κ = (4πGDlsDl/c2Ds) Σ

EVERYTHING IS WEAKLY LENSED Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Magnification-Absolute magnitude degeneracy Directly relevant to High-z SNe GRBs High redshift luminosity functions EVERYTHING IS WEAKLY LENSED

? ? ? ? The Mass Sheet Degeneracy 0.01 change in κ approximately: Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy ? ? ? ? 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

? ? ? ? The Mass Sheet Degeneracy 0.01 change in κ approximately: Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy ? ? ? ? Hilbert+ 2010 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy 45 arcsec 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy 45 arcsec Greene, Collett+ 2013 Greene, Collett+ 2013 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy 45 arcsec Greene, Collett+ 2013 Greene, Collett+ 2013 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy 3 arcmin 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy 3 arcmin 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Collett+ 2013 0.01 precision on κ. Unbiased* Width of ensemble P(κext) 3 arcmin 0.01 change in κ approximately: 0.5% in ratio of Einstein radii, 1% in time-delay distance, 2% in magnification of an unlensed source

I'm working hard to make sure the systematics are under control! Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Summary Strong lensing provides powerful complementary constraints on cosmological parameters I'm working hard to make sure the systematics are under control!

Thanks to for sponsoring my attendance Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thanks to for sponsoring my attendance

Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Spare Slides

What about the assumption of flatness? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett 59 59 59 What about the assumption of flatness? Ωk ≠ 0 Ωk ≡ 0

What if we can't measure the ratio of Einstein radii to 1%? Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett What if we can't measure the ratio of Einstein radii to 1%? 1. Compound lensing – the intermediate source has mass 2. The lens is an astrophysical object – they aren't perfectly isothermal or perfectly spherical

Cosmology with a population of systems. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Cosmology with a population of systems. SLACS: 1.1mm, S > 1 mJy → ~1.5 double source plane systems (1.5 in 78) 1.1mm, S > 0.3 mJy → ~3 double source plane systems (3 in 78) But can be more efficient if you focus only on the most massive lenses.

Constraints with 6 systems. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraints with 6 systems. Pick the set of systems that provided the median constraints on w. WMAP+6 systems is ~2.5 times better than WMAP+1. WMAP+ 1 system wDE = −0.99 ± 0.27 6 systems wDE = −1.01 ± 0.11 WMAP+BAO+Time Delay+ 6 systems wDE = −1.04 ± 0.09

Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses 63 63 63 Planck+6

ρ=ρ0r-γ' Probing the mass profile of galaxies Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 64 Probing the mass profile of galaxies Combine Einstein Radius with stellar dynamics Fit a power-law: ρ=ρ0r-γ' Lenses are approximately isothermal (γ'=2). (Koopmans+ 2006) (Auger+ 2010) γ' = 2.078 ± 0.027 with an intrinsic scatter of 0.16 ± 0.02