Blunt Rollback of Fuel Economy Standards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CA Manufacturers & Technology Assn. Mike Rogge Greenhouse gas presentation to Cal EPA Climate Action Team workshop October 24, 2005.
Advertisements

Passenger Vehicle Greenhouse Gas and Fuel Economy Standards A Global Review Public Hearing: Reducing CO 2 from Passenger Cars and Light Commercial Trucks.
Air Pollution: CAFE Standards and Gas Taxes Mario Samano Department of Economics.
Global Comparison of Passenger Car and Light-commercial Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards Update: February 2014.
Does a Prius Consume More Energy than a Hummer? By: Jason Holleb
Carbon Emissions. Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration Atmospheric increase = Emissions from fossil fuels + Net emissions from changes in land use.
1 What Would it Take? To Reduce Mobile CO2 Emissions Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the COG Climate Change Steering.
E3 Calculator Revisions 2013 v1c4 Brian Horii June 22, 2012.
How Can I reduce my Carbon Footprint?. What I can do myself. Installing fluorescent bulbs in my room, and other rooms in the house: An ENERGY STAR qualified.
Storm Water Regulation: What’s Next? Presented to: September 30, 2014.
MCIC Workshop 2012 Complying with NC Air Quality Regulations Boiler MACT/GACT and 112j Steve Schliesser Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
Comments on NESCAUM LCFS Trenton Public Meeting Al Mannato, API October 27, 2009.
COPYRIGHT © 2007 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
By Matt Radom. Carbon Footprint Defined as “The total amount of greenhouse gases produced to directly and indirectly support human activities.” The main.
Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle CAFE and GHG Standards Joint Briefing for WP29 June 2010 Informal document No. WP ,
COPYRIGHT © 2007 Thomson South-Western, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and South-Western are trademarks used herein under license.
How can we reduce our oil consumption ? Drive less and transport fewer goods less far design more energy efficient vehicle switch to non-fossil fuel based.
1 Income Taxes chapter chapter Understand the concept of deferred taxes and the distinction between permanent and temporary differences. 2. Compute.
Worcester Regional Transit Authority Key Performance Indicators Electric Bus Deployment Project December 18, 2013.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
Update: August 2011 Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards.
Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21,
Carbon Offsets and the Illinois Tollway System. The Illinois Tollway System Barrier Tollway System Utilizes the I-Pass System with Open Road Tolling.
1 Corporate Average Fuel Economy Rulemaking National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Informal Document No. WP th session, June.
The Influence of Weight Average model weight of light-duty gas vehicles and trucks Freight-ton miles per heavy-duty diesel truck.
Canada’s Passenger Automobile and Light Truck Greenhouse Gas Emission Regulations for Model Years Briefing for WP.29 Steve McCauley Environment.
Environmental Reform Climate Change Update VCEDA Annual Business Outlook Conference October 15, 2010 Sharon Rubalcava Alston + Bird.
1 The Renewable Fuels Standard: A Status Report Dr. Michael Shelby EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality March 7 th.
World Bank Energy Sector Lending: Encouraging the World’s Addiction to Fossil Fuels Heike Mainhardt-Gibbs Bank Information Center – March 2009.
Driving Down GHG Emissions, Driving Up Fuel Efficiency: Coordinating a Groundbreaking National Vehicle Policy Kathryn Thomson Counselor to the Secretary.
Waste Reduction Improve the Environment and Reduce Costs.
Air Quality Programs.
It’s Easy to Quantify Changes in GHG Emissions from Cars and Light Trucks – Right? Presented to: SACOG Panel Discussion April 16, 2009 Presented by: Bob.
Jack Ampuja Supply Chain Optimizers Niagara University.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
Unintended Consequences: Why U.S. AFV Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption & GHG Emissions under Federal CAFE/GHG Policy Jeremy J. Michalek Professor.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
Air Quality Management Comparison of Cap-and-Trade, Command-and Control and Rate-Based Programs Dr. Ruben Deza Senior Environmental Engineer Clean Air.
1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
WHY WE LOVE OUR FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS (Really, we do!) DR. DAVID L. GREENE SENIOR FELLOW, HOWARD H. BAKER, JR. CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH PROFESSOR,
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Carbon from Cars: Pollution Impacts of Vehicle Transportation
Efficiency standards, vehicle technologies, and consumer fuel savings
CURRENT STATUS AND ISSUES OF THE KOREAN EMISSION TRADING SCHEME
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
The TPB What Would It Take Scenario: Meeting Regional Climate Change Mitigation Goals for the Mobile Sector Presentation to MWAQC CAC June 15, 2009 Monica.
(Model Years ) Jeffrey King Chief, Energy and Climate Programs CEEPC
NSPS Rulemakings for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
C h a p t e r 3 EXTERNALITIES AND GOVERNMENT POLICY
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) Fuel Economy Regulations
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
Clean Cities Washington Day 2004 Fuel Economy Opportunities
Emily Wimberger California Air Resources Board TE3 Conference
1 Summary for Policymakers
CTR Performance 2015/2016 Cycle Aggregate Report
Compliance of RICS Code of Practice for Commercial Service Charges
1 Summary for Policymakers
Leading the Clean Energy Transition
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
1 Summary for Policymakers
"The Price, Reliability, and Environmental Impacts of Electricity- Related Fuel Diversity Trends in New England" Alan Nogee Energy Program Director.
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
1 Summary for Policymakers
Air Quality in the Charlotte Region
Presentation by Bill Hohenstein
Presentation transcript:

Blunt Rollback of Fuel Economy Standards DRAFT ICCT Assessment v5 June 8nd, 2017

Key Points about the Blunt Bill Strictly speaking, the bill’s direct impacts are modest because it only adjusts the CAFE standards from now until 2021, and leaves the GHG emission standards untouched. But such a view about the bill’s impacts ignores the forthcoming regulatory actions to reopen the GHG emissions standards and set the next phase of CAFE standards. Within this context, the Bill sets the course for delaying the 2017-2021 annual rate of improvement from 4.3%/3.0% (car/LDT) to about 1.2% and delaying the 2025 GHG and CAFE standards by 2 to 6 years. The Bill’s stated rationale of harmonizing the CAFÉ program with the GHG program, but it provides over twice the credits needed to harmonize. The Bill does this by granting two windfall credits to auto companies that were explicitly designed to ease the transition into the early stages of the rulemaking and then expire.

Credits 101 CAFE credits GHG credits And why they differ . . .

Existing Credit Provisions 2025 CAFE walk-down from the 2012 rulemaking GHG stds. – mpg equivalent without A/C refrigerant credits CAFE stds. – adj. for A/C refrigerant credits (2010 baseline) Actual CAFE achieved with flexibilities and credits (2010 baseline) 54.1 mpg 48.7 mpg 46.2 mpg Air conditioning refrigerant credits – GHG only Off-cycle credits (inc. air conditioning efficiency credits) GHG: 2012-2021 CAFE: 2017-2021 Overcompliance credits – all model years CAFE: Carryforward 5 years, carryback 3 years GHG: always allowed carryforward from 2010-2021

What would the Blunt Bill do? Impacts CAFE standards Increases lifetime of credits for over-compliance Allow credits from 2010-2015 to be carried forward to 2021 Retroactively adds off-cycle credits for 2012-16 NHTSA specifically set lower 2012-16 CAFE standards to compensate for lack of credits

Credit Impacts CAFE windfall credits

Blunt Bill Impacts on CAFE Standards 2010-15 overcompliance credits gain new life Windfall credits were granted in 2010 against the old car standard of 27.5 (unchanged since 1990), with the understanding they would expire by 2015 Excess 2010 and 2011 credits have already expired 2012-16 off-cycle credits are a new windfall Retroactively weakens the 2012-16 standards – even though they have already been met, this is another pool of credits that can be used through 2021 Net is not harmonization with GHG standards, but far less stringent requirements for CAFE

Off-Cycle Credits Windfall EPA GHG Air Conditioning and Off-Cycle Credits retroactively added to CAFE compliance A/C and off-cycle credits currently available only for 2012-16 GHG Tailpipe over-compliance credits available for GHG and CAFE adapted from analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists

Carry-forward Credits Windfall Removal of 5-year carry-forward limit roughly doubles the amount of credits available under the CAFE standards, compared with the GHG standards Left graph: Credits available for to help comply with EPA 2017-2021 stds. Right graph: Same credits applied to CAFE with the 5 year carryforward limit removed adapted from analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists

Application of Credits to Compliance Pathways Direct impact on 2017-21 CAFE standards Baseline for 2022-25 CAFE and GHG standards

adapted from analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists Direct MPG Loss – 2017-21 - Car Blunt Bill could reduce 2021 car CAFE by 5.7 mpg, 3.0 mpg below EPA GHG-equivalent requirements Jump needed for 2022 Blunt Bill windfall credits adapted from analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists CAFE Compliance includes 5-year carryforward of overcompliance credits Blunt-Stabenow adds 2012-16 off-cycle credits and extends all credits to 2021 Trend/EPA line is compliance with GHG requirements, including credits

Direct MPG Loss – 2017-21 – Light Truck Blunt Bill could reduce 2021 light-truck CAFE by 4.4 mpg, 1.3 mpg below EPA GHG-equivalent requirements Total car + light-truck reductions would result in about 350 million barrels of additional oil being burned and $34 billion in additional fuel costs Jump needed for 2022 Blunt Bill windfall credits adapted from analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists CAFE Compliance includes 5-year carryforward of overcompliance credits Blunt-Stabenow adds 2012-16 off-cycle credits and extends all credits to 2021 Trend/EPA line is compliance with GHG requirements, including credits

Bigger Issue – Reset of 2022-25 baseline: 4 Bigger Issue – Reset of 2022-25 baseline: 4.7% annual improvement maintained The Blunt Bill would likely reset the baseline for the 2022-2025 standards Otherwise, CAFE would require massive jump from 2021 to 2022 Current 2022-25 standards require annual improvement of 4.7% Assuming the 4.7% annual improvement is maintained, resetting the baseline to Blunt Bill would delay 2025 CAFE compliance by about 3 years EPA trend line would delay 2025 CAFÉ compliance by 1.5 to 2 years

Bigger Issue – Reset of 2022-25 baseline: Annual improvement decreased to 2017-21 trend The Blunt Bill would likely reset the baseline for the 2022-2025 standards Otherwise, CAFE would require massive jump from 2021 to 2022 2017-21 annual improvement trend under EPA GHG standards, assuming all available credits are used, is 2.6% for cars and 2.4% for light trucks Assuming these 2017-21 EPA trends are extended, resetting the baseline to: Blunt Bill would delay 2025 CAFE compliance 8 to10 years (car/LDT) EPA trend line would delay 2025 compliance by 5.5 to 8 years (car/LDT)