Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0358r3 Submission March 2015 Daewon Lee, NEWRACOM Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Advertisements

Preamble Structure in ax
Submission doc.: IEEE /0621r2 May 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Design Principles for HE Preamble Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r1 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0584r1May 2015 Considerations on LTF Sequence Design Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1327r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Diversity Mode in OFDMA Date: Authors:
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
January 2016 doc.: IEEE /0095r1 Frequency Multiple Access in 11ay Date: Slide 1LG Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0079r2 January 2016 Kentaro Taniguchi, ToshibaSlide 1 Allocation sizes for BCC in OFDMA Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r0 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 Jan 2016 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Clarification of SFD Texts Date: Authors:
1x/2x/4x OFDM Symbol in HE SU PPDU with BCC
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
LTF Sequence Designs Date: Authors: November 2015
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
Signalling Support for Full Bandwidth MU-MIMO Compressed SIG-B Mode
EDMG capabilities for Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing in SU-MIMO
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
Discussions on HE SIG-A Structure
BW Field in HE-MU Format
Feedback Element Compression for ax
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
UL OFDMA-based Random Access Parameter Set (RAPS) element
Efficient FDMA transmission for WUR
Uplink ACK and BA Multiplexing
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
11az NDP Announcement Date: July 2008
Random Access RU Allocation in the Trigger Frame
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
SIG-B Structure Date: Authors: September 2015 Month Year
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
Consideration on multi-STA BA frame indication
Explanations for CR on NDP feedback report
EDMG-Header-A contests
UL MU Random Access Analysis
Preliminary design of EDMG PHY headers
Link Adaptation for HE WLAN
Bits Consideration for SIGNAL fields
HE-LTF Capabilities Date: Authors: July 2016
Fix the Issue on Number Of HE-SIG-B Symbols
EDMG capabilities for Open Loop Spatial Multiplexing in SU-MIMO
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
TGbb MAC Channel Access features proposal
Numerology for 11ax Date: Authors: March 2015 Month Year
SIG Fields Design of Long Preamble
HE NDP Frame for Sounding
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
Enhanced Resource Allocation Schemes for 11be
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
F3-6A, Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen
Scheduling Allocations Over Multiple Channels
Presentation transcript:

Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 November 2015 Supported Resource Allocations in SIG-B Date: 2015-11-09 Authors: Sungho Moon, Newracom John Doe, Some Company

November 2015 Background The following structures were agreed in the September meeting[1]: The RU allocation signaling in the common field of HE-SIG-B signals an 8 bit, per 20 MHz PPDU BW for signaling The RU arrangement in frequency domain  Number of MU-MIMO allocations: The RUs allocated for MU-MIMO and the number of users in the MU-MIMO allocations. The exact mapping of the 8 bit to the RU arrangement and the number of MU-MIMO allocations is TBD. Signaling for the central 26 RU in 80 MHz is TBD This contribution is talking about the mapping table and the center 26 RU supports Sungho Moon, Newracom

Resource Mapping for 8 bits November 2015 Resource Mapping for 8 bits The 8 bits should indicate the RU allocations and the number of users in the MU-MIMO allocations [2] Therefore, the RU allocations can be listed from the smallest size to the largest, and the number of users in MU-MIMO can be enumerated for a given RU size However, there are some consideration points as follows: Number of MU-MIMO multiplexed STAs in each RU Center 26RU support in 80MHz and 160MHz Some exceptional cases Sungho Moon, Newracom

Number of Supported STAs in MU-MIMO November 2015 Number of Supported STAs in MU-MIMO For a given RU (> 106), multiple STAs can be multiplexed by MU- MIMO Without any restriction, the number of assigned STAs can be up to 17 in case of 106RU(8 STAs)+26RU(1 STA)+106RU(8 STAs) allocation, and it can be up to 19 when two center 26RUs in 160MHz are assigned to different STAs Scheduling 17 users per 20MHz seems to be an overdesign, and is not likely be implemented in the near future (even with advancements in H/W). 106 26 8 MU-MIMO + 1 SU-MIMO + 8 MU-MIMO Is this absolutely necessary for 11ax? Sungho Moon, Newracom

Number of Supported STAs in MU-MIMO (cont.) November 2015 Number of Supported STAs in MU-MIMO (cont.) Maximum of 9 (or 10) users per 20MHz seems to be good target for 11ax 9 of 26 RUs (= 9) 4 MU-MIMO 106 RUs + 26 RU + 4 MU-MIMO 106 RU (=9) 8 MU-MIMO 242 RUs (=8) Design goals Number of spatially multiplexed STAs for 106 RU limited to 4 Full flexibility in the spatially multiplexed STAs for 242/484/996/2*996 RU Maximum of 9 (or 10) users per 20MHz block. 10 is if we include the central 26 RU in 80MHz Sungho Moon, Newracom

Signaling for the Center 26RU in 80MHz November 2015 Signaling for the Center 26RU in 80MHz In 80MHz and 160MHz, there is one or two center 26RUs, respectively, but it not included in the current SIG-B structure In order to utilize the center 26RU, two methods can be considered Alternative 1: Explicit signaling for the existence of the center 26RU allocation in SIG-B common field A STA-specific field for the center 26RU is considered as part of the STA- specific field encoding pair (a single encoding block may contain up to 2 STA-specific field). 80MHz 12 Edge 1 3 11 Edge 7 DC 12 Edge 996 usable tones +5 DC 242 2 6 26 52 102+4 central 26 RU Sungho Moon, Newracom

Signaling for the Center 26RU in 80MHz (cont.) November 2015 Signaling for the Center 26RU in 80MHz (cont.) Alternative 2: No explicit signaling in the common field, detection of additional STA-specific field at the end of SIG-B. The STA-specific field is encoded separated contains and contains CRC (and tail bits). The existence of the STA-specific field can be validated by STA-ID and CRC Alternative 1 is preferred. A Common (A) Common (C) tail STA-specific (STA1) STA-specific (STA2) tail CRC STA-specific (STA3) tail CRC STA-specific (STA4) tail CRC B … Common (B) Common (D) tail STA-specific (STA5) STA-specific (STA6) tail CRC STA-specific (STA5) STA-specific (STA6) tail CRC Padding 80MHz C Duplication of SIG-B in Channel A D Duplication of SIG-B in Channel B Separately encoded STA-specific info. for central 26 RU Sungho Moon, Newracom

Discussions for Exceptional Cases November 2015 Discussions for Exceptional Cases ‘2x996SU’ is not needed among the RU allocation states In 160MHz, no other STA can be multiplexed more in frequency domain, and thus, it is the case of SU PPDU in which no SIG-B is transmitted ‘No STA Assigned’ state is needed Some RU allocation subfield (8bits) can have no STA-specific subfield For example, the common (C) in the below figure has no STA to be assigned, and no related STA-specific field is needed The common (C) can indicate ‘No STA Assigned’ state not to transmit unnecessary STA-specific subfield 484RU (STA3) Spatially multiplexed (MU-MIMO) 484RU (STA2) No assignment A Common (A) Common (C) STA-specific (STA1) STA-specific (STA2) Padding 484RU (STA1) … B … Common (B) Common (D) STA-specific (STA3) STA-specific (STA4) Padding … 80MHz 484RU (STA4) C Duplication of SIG-B in Channel A … D Duplication of SIG-B in Channel B SIG-B Data Sungho Moon, Newracom

Supported Resource Allocation November 2015 Supported Resource Allocation ‘No STA assigned’ state is added All combinations of RUs which are smaller than 106, and each has SU format 99 states All combinations of SU and MU, and MU is allowed up to 4 STAs in the RU size of 106 All combinations of SU and MU, and MU is allowed up to 8 STAs 2*996 SU is excluded Sungho Moon, Newracom

Supported Resource Allocation (cont’d) November 2015 Supported Resource Allocation (cont’d) Same set of states when the center 26RU in 80MHz is supported 99 states Sungho Moon, Newracom

November 2015 Conclusions A set of supported resource allocation with 8 bits is suggested Total number of states is 198 including the following states 1 state for ‘No STA Assigned (NA)’ 8 states each for MU-MIMO of 484, 996, 2x996 RU No SU-MIMO state for 2x996 RU States for all possible OFDMA multiplexing (full flexibility) States for ‘center 26RU in 80MHz’ is included States for MU-MIMO multiplexing with the following restrictions: No MU-MIMO in RUs smaller than 106 Maximum of 4 STAs in MU-MIMO in the RU of 106 Maximum of 8 STAs in MU-MIMO in RUs larger than 106 Sungho Moon, Newracom

Straw Poll #1 Do you agree to add the following text into the SFD? November 2015 Straw Poll #1 Do you agree to add the following text into the SFD? The 8 bits in the common field of HE SIG-B includes a state of ‘No STA Assigned’ for which no STA-specific field is transmitted Sungho Moon, Newracom

Straw Poll #2 Do you agree to add the following text into the SFD? November 2015 Straw Poll #2 Do you agree to add the following text into the SFD? The number of spatially multiplexed STAs for 106 RU limited to 4 For RUs larger than 106, it can be 8 STAs as maximum Sungho Moon, Newracom

Straw Poll #3 Do you agree to support the following text? November 2015 Straw Poll #3 Do you agree to support the following text? The 8 bits in the common field of HE SIG-B includes explicit states for the existence of the center 26RU of 80MHz Sungho Moon, Newracom

November 2015 Reference [1] 11-15/0132r9, “Specification Framework for TGax”, Sept. 2015 [2] 11-15/1066r0, “HE-SIG-B Contents”, Sept. 2015 Sungho Moon, Newracom