DART: Drivers, Design, Dimensions, Demonstrators and Deliverables

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IATUL Porto, May 21, 2006 DOI and e-Science Dr Anne E Trefethen Oxford e-Research Centre
Advertisements

The Messy World of Grey Literature in Cyber Security 8 th Grey Literature Conference 4-5 December 2006 New Orleans, Louisiana Patricia Erwin – I3P Senior.
DRIVER Building a worldwide scientific data repository infrastructure in support of scholarly communication 1 JISC/CNI Conference, Belfast, July.
Building Repositories of eprints in UK Research Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation DCC/NeSC eScience Workshop, June 2008 Working in partnership with the eScience community This work.
CURRENT ISSUES Current contents Over 3,000 items open access, 42% reports and working papers, 21% journal articles, 21% conference items, 7% book chapters,
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Dealing with Data: Roles, Rights, Responsibilities & Relationships.
Joint Information Systems Committee Digital Library Services BL/JISC Workshop Rachel Bruce JISC Programme Director The Digital Library and its Services,
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: UK Perspectives on the Curation and Preservation of Scientific.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Changing Roles, Responsibilities and Relationships Dr Liz.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: UKOLN Update on Selected Activities Dr Liz Lyon, Director,
Digital Repositories: interoperability & common services Closing Remarks Dr Liz Lyon, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK
Providing collections, tools and services for digital humanities A national library perspective Clément Oury Head of Digital Legal Deposit Bibliothèque.
Enabling Access to Sound Archives through Integration, Enrichment and Retrieval WP1. Project Management.
The Data Lifecycle and the Curation of Laboratory Experimental Data Tony Hey Corporate VP for Technical Computing Microsoft Corporation.
Clever Recordkeeping Metadata Project Automating Recordkeeping Metadata Capture and Re-use: Translations from Theory to Practice Joanne.
An Overview of eResearch Activities in Australia Paul Davis, GrangeNet Jane Hunter, Uni of Qld.
Clever Recordkeeping Metadata Research Project Report A Decade in Digital: New Directions for Managing and Preserving Digital Information.
Chronopolis: Preserving Our Digital Heritage David Minor UC San Diego San Diego Supercomputer Center.
Teula Morgan The Adaptable Repository: Swinburne Online Journals.
1 The Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories Margaret Henty Digital Futures Industry Briefing November 8, 2006.
Integrating Repositories into a New Model of Scholarly Communication Dr Andrew Treloar Director, Information Management and Strategic Planning, Monash.
Working towards Open Access for Monographs - A pilot with Jisc / UK universities Session 5: New models for libraries LIBER conference, 25 July 2014, London.
Creating Access to Europe’s Television Heritage Prof. Dr. Sonja de Leeuw (project-coordinator, Utrecht University) Johan Oomen MA (technical director,
Geoff Payne ARROW Project Manager 1 April Genesis Monash University information management perspective Desire to integrate initiatives such as electronic.
DIGITAL CURATION: THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN SA Graham Dominy National Archivist of South Africa PRESENTATION TO AFRICA DIGITAL CURATION CONFERENCE: CSIR:
A disaggregated model for preservation of E-Prints Gareth Knight SHERPA DP Project Arts and Humanities Data Service.
Digital/Open Access repositories Paul Sheehan Director of Library Services DCU HEAnet National Networking Conference Athlone 11 th November 2005.
Caring and Sharing Collaboration in Digital Curation outside North America Ross Harvey Simmons College, Boston Curation Matters: 17 June 2010.
Andrew Treloar, ARCHER Project Director Cathrine Harboe-Ree, University Librarian Alan McMeekin, Executive Director ITS Dancing with.
1 Digital Archives - Past, Present & Future Issues Anne Van Camp Manager, Member Initiatives The Research Libraries Group Digital Archives Directions (DADs)
The DART Project: building the new collaborative e- research infrastructure Presentation to 2006 AusWeb Conference.
BlogForever Project Presentation Vangelis Banos, Project Manager, ALTEC Software Stratos Arampatzis, Dissemination Manager, Tero Dr. Alexandra Cristea,
UKOLN is supported by: Digital Preservation Benefits Tools Project Dissemination Workshop Dr Liz Lyon, Associate Director, UK Digital Curation Centre Director,
Infrastructures for Social Simulation Rob Procter National e-Infrastructure for Social Simulation ISGC 2010 Social Simulation Tutorial.
Information Infrastructure Evolution ARIIC is working towards – a distributed electronic research environment that allows researchers to share, annotate,
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
Carcanet Case Study Fran Baker, John Rylands University Library University of Manchester SPRUCE event 19 January 2012.
UKOLN is supported by: Introduction to UKOLN Dr Liz Lyon, Director UKOLN, University of Bath, UK Grand Challenge Meeting, June a centre.
1 Video Message: Welcome ETD 2015: 18 th Int’l Symposium on ETDs New Delhi, India Edward A. Fox Executive Director, Chairman of the Board NDLTD,
Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non-Commercial - Share Alike 3.0 License.
Dr Liz Lyon Associate Director, Outreach Funders: Engaging the Users: the Outreach & Community Support Programme Digital Curation Centre a centre of expertise.
The Collaborative Semantic Grid David De Roure University of Southampton, UK
Institutional Repositories: the DSpace Experience Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
April 14, 2005MIT Libraries Visiting Committee Libraries Strategic Plan Theme III Work to shape the future MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology.
EDLproject WP3 “Developing the European Digital Library” LIBER – EBLIDA workshop Digitisation of Library Material in Europe Copenhagen, October.
Carl Lagoze Digital Library Service Registry Workshop Services in a Scholarly Communication Framework.
David De Roure Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science Provenance, a.
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
UKOLN is supported by: Library futures in the new research landscape. Dr Liz Lyon, UKOLN, University of Bath, UK CURL Members Meeting October 2004, London.
DART Developing Toolkits for e-Research Dr Jeff McDonell, DART Project Director July 2006.
Fourth UNICA Scholarly Communication Seminar, Prague The LIFE Project Costing Digital Preservation May 2008 Richard Davies LIFE 2 Project Manager,
Our digital memory accessible tomorrow Sharon McMeekin APARSEN Alliance for Permanent Access to the Records of Science.
The New Now: Institutional Repositories and Academia Institutional Repository USM April 17, 2015 Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian.
ARCHER Building data and information management tools for the complete research life-cycle July 2006.
Why Invest in Humanities Research Infrastructure? Dr Jennifer Edmond Trinity College Dublin Co-Head, DARIAH VCC-2.
ARCHER and DART Key projects developing e-Research software tools Jeff McDonell, DART Project Director November 2006.
DART Project Work Packages CR4 and CR5 Tom Denison, Nicholas McPhee, Monash University.
Integrated infrastructure for UQ researchers
E-Research Coordinating Committee report to CAUL
INTAROS WP5 Data integration and management
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
Systems for scholarly communication
Changing Practices… Changing Values
Connecting the European Grid Infrastructure to Research Communities
DRIVER Digital Repository Infrastructure Vision for European Research
National data services for South African research
Brian Matthews STFC EOSCpilot Brian Matthews STFC
Moving data from research enabler to trusted research output: challenges for infrastructure providers and national services Andrew Treloar ANDS Director.
Virtual Competency Centre 1: e-Infrastructure General VCC meeting, 2/3 April 2012, Utrecht, The Netherlands Karlheinz Moerth (Co-head of VCC 1, Austria)
Presentation transcript:

DART: Drivers, Design, Dimensions, Demonstrators and Deliverables Dr Andrew Treloar DART Project Architect ARROW Technical Architect Director, Information Management and Strategic Planning, ITS, Monash University

But first, a word from our sponsors… The DART project has been funded by the Australian Commonwealth Department of Education, Science and Training through to the end of 2006. The funding has been provided through the Systemic Infrastructure Initiative as part of the Commonwealth Government's Backing Australia's Ability - An Innovation Action Plan for the Future.

DART Drivers

Grid 5 Virtual Learning Environment Digital Library E-Experimentation E-Scientists Entire E-Science Cycle Encompassing experimentation, analysis, publication, research, learning 5 Institutional Archive Local Web Publisher Holdings Digital Library Graduate Students Undergraduate Students Virtual Learning Environment E-Experimentation Technical Reports Reprints Peer-Reviewed Journal & Conference Papers Preprints & Metadata Certified Experimental Results & Analyses Data, Metadata & Ontologies Source: Liz Lyon, eBank UK Presentation

Theoretical Framework: Pathways Model http://www.infosci.cornell.edu/pathways/ Reconceptualises units of communication and processes of communication Non-vertically-integrated value chain perspective on scholarly communication Van de Sompel, et. al. (2004), “Rethinking Scholarly Communication: Building the System that Scholars Deserve”, DLib Magazine, V10, N4 http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel.html

Pathways Functions DART: Research Process Registration allows claims of precedence for a scholarly finding Certification establishes the validity of a registered scholarly claim Awareness allows actors in the scholarly system to remain aware of new claims and findings Archiving preserves the scholarly record over time Rewarding rewards actors based on metrics derived from communication system. DART: Annotation

DART Benefits (modified Pathways model)

DART Design

DART Overview Co-ordinated programme of e-Research requirements analysis, software development, policy and guideline creation and prototyping to investigate how best to deal with large data sets infrastructural issues deposit, access, and annotation intellectual property concerns next-generation methods for research publication and access

Design Criteria Initially: Identify best-of-breed solutions in each candidate area Standards-based Open-source wherever possible Leverage existing work and expertise Don’t re-invent the wheel Later, identify common frameworks for Security Network transport Integration

DART Dimensions

DART Dimensions $A3.23 million 3 partners (Monash - Principal Institution, JCU, UQ) 12 months Ends in Dec 2006 27 Separate work packages Data Collection, Monitoring and Quality Assurance (DMQ) Annotation and Assessment (AA) Storage and Interoperability (SI) Content and Rights (CR) Discovery and Access (DA) 40 staff

Seven DART Chief Investigators Andrew Treloar Asad Khan David Abramson Ann Monotti 6 WPs 4 WPs 2 WPs 1 WP Jane Hunter Xiaofang Zhou 6 WPs 3 WPs Ian Atkinson 5 WPs

DART Demonstrators

DART Demonstrators Designed to show value of the end-to-end DART lifecycle approach: Identify researchers Specify realistic activity sequences Embed Information Management specialists in the research teams Construct iterative DART prototypes Progressively refine prototypes as DART delivers increased functionality Design customized DART portals for each discipline

DART Deliverables

DART Deliverables By end of 2006 DART aims to deliver: Working proof-of-concept software in each of the work package areas Clear understanding of how to turn this proof-of-concept functionality into robust production systems Feedback from demonstrator researchers about the value of the DART integrated lifecycle approach Reports detailing recommended best practice in a number of areas

Acknowledgements: Questions? J U C Q U Without the hard work of all these people, DART just wouldn’t happen! J C U U Q Questions? Andrew.Treloar@ its.monash.edu.au 03 990 51138 M U