I Will Fight No More Forever Project By: D Atwood, A Fausto, and L Navarro

Thesis or Claim Chief Joseph of the Nez Percé tribe voices his views towards to constant quarrels among his people and the U.S. Army. He speaks of his people’s incessant struggles to survive among the violence. The chief finally announces his resignation to fighting and his hope to reunite any remaining members of his tribe.

Tone or Attitude The chief gives off a resigned attitude and pessimist image on the circumstances he and his people are in. “My people, some of them, have run away to the hills and have no blankets, no food.” His way of speaking and his direct language make it clear as to his desire to surrender. “I am tired of fighting.”

Purpose Address the tribes State his view of fighting End the fighting Prevent more deaths “Our chiefs are killed.” “The old men are all dead.” “My people, some of them, have run away to the hills… no one knows where they are—perhaps freezing to death.” Stop the suffering of his people

Audience and Occasion Speaking to his people (Tribe) General Howard “Tell General Howard I know his heart.” To past chiefs that have died “Hear me, my chiefs.” During a time of war with the United States

Evidence or Data “The Nez Percé had signed a treaty in 1863 giving the government control of the tribe’s land,” (p.594). Chief Joseph refused to recognize the treaty. U.S. wanted to move the tribe from Oregon to Idaho. 1877 war started between tribe and U.S. “On October 5, after defeat in a battle in the Bear Paw Mountains of Montana, Chief Joseph finally surrendered,” (p.594). The Nez Percé ended up being sent to a territory in Oklahoma.

Appeals Ethos: By the author being the chief of the tribe there is more attention paid to what he says He might be taken more seriously and/or given more of a response because he is the leader Logos: “I Will Fight No More Forever” itself had less appeal to facts and documents, but it did contain decisions by logic Simply, one example would be the chief’s reasoning for ending the war; he saw that his people were suffering, so he decided he wanted to stop it Pathos: The chief is seen in a more compassionate light when he refers to his “children” because he does not literally mean his offspring, but those in his tribe By appealing to emotions, readers sympathize with the chief and his people’s struggles

Assumptions or Warrants If he stops the fight with the whites he will get to see his children once again. But maybe he might be pretending, so that the whites can win and he can get something out of it. He might think that if the war doesn’t stop then all the Indians will die and be no more.

Style Rhetorical modes It makes us want to feel sorry for him because he wants the war to end. He hasn’t seen any of his children. He is a good person. Devices Allegory: describing how Indians life was and how Chief Joseph didn’t like the fight with the whites. Short story: it is a brief summary of why Chief Joseph doesn't want to fight any more. Diction He uses very descriptive words to describe how he feels. Syntax He uses short sentences it makes them stronger. Easy language anyone can understand.

Works Cited Stifler, Bill. "Rhetorical Modes." Rhetorical Modes. 2002. Mar 2007 <http://users.cdc.net/~stifler/en110/modes.html>. Braiman, Jay. "Literary Devices." Literary Devices. 2006. Mar 2007 <http://mrbraiman.home.att.net/lit.htm>. "Glossary of Literary Terms." All American: Glossary of Literary Terms. Mar 2007 <http://www.uncp.edu/home/canada/work/allam/general/glossary.htm>. Crewell, Dustin. "The Art of Rhetoric: Ethos, Logos, and Pathos." The Art of Rhetoric:Ethos, Logos, and Pathos. 2006. Mar 2007 <http://www.rpi.edu/dept/llc/webclass/web/project1/group4>. The American Experience: California Edition (Prentice Hall Literature Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes). California Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, April 2002.

The End