Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

Advertisements

From: An open day in the metric space

Figure 5. The relationship between hepatic lymphocyte subsets, hepatosteatosis and perisinusoidal fibrosis. Hepatosteatosis was associated with ( a )

Fig. 1 The non-genomic effects of E2 on aggressive behavior are seasonally variable in songbirds and mice. Bar graphs (mean ± SEM) representing.

Figure 1. Effects of state home- and community-based services (HCBS) expenditures on the hazard of nursing home admission by child availability. The x.

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Source: compiled from various sources.

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Figure 1. Least square means of the swimming speed procedures, over a 6-month time period (24–30 months). Longevity was significantly predicted by higher.

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Bevo I, ca. 1920, photographer unknown

Figure 1. VoC conceptual framework linking employment mobility and welfare production regimes From: Complexity in Employment Life Courses in Europe in.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Fig. 1. Geographic locations of Shenzhen and Dongguan

From: Unmasking Masks in Makkah: Preventing Influenza at Hajj

Figure 1. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) testing uptake and results among women delivering at Bairo Pite Clinic in Dili, Timor-Leste. From: Prevalence.

Fig. 1 Proportion of study participants with ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics by self-rated health. Ideal category of Cardiovascular Health Metrics.

Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis in patients

From: Where do we go from here

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Figure 1. Relationship between Log Transfers and Age of Eldest HH Member(a) Bandwidth 0.05(b) Bandwidth 0.1(c) Bandwidth 0.5 From: The Effect of a Transfer.

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

Figure 1 Study flowchart.

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of patient selection and study design.

Figure 1. Academic productivity and high academic income: top earners vs. the rest of academics. The average number of ‘peer-reviewed article equivalents’

Figure 1 Effects of time constant and time-varying characteristics on occupational status at the start of a career and at the time of change in the time.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Figure 1 Flow of data processing

Figure 1. Frailty components in mice vs humans.

Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source:

Figure 1. Examples of e-cigarette discussions in social media

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning moderates crime exposure: regions of significance on X (crime). The lines represent two.

Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.

NOTE.—Error bars in all figures represent standard errors of the means. From: So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and.

Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.

Figure 1. Distribution of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels at the baseline visit in a study population of adults aged 18–59 years (n = 309), Toronto,

Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.

Figure 1. Influence of endogenous and exogenous factors on aging

Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

Figure 5. Tungiasis: a 21-year-old woman returned from Peru with painful nodules on her toes. From: Illness in Travelers Returned From Brazil: The GeoSentinel.

Figure 2 Map of traveller arrivals to Tanzania and performed checks (arrivals with checks/all arrivals). Change: change of aircraft, no change: no change.

Figure 3. Changes from baseline in activated CD4+ T cells (% CD4+CD25+) during the 52-week intervention period in the.

Figure 1. The cell-lineage specification of the early mouse embryo

Figure 1. HR (95% CI) of death from dementia associated with weight or BMI in middle age and in old age. From: Adiposity in middle and old age and risk.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Figure 1: Yearly net investment flows from Japan

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA

Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are shown in rectangles. Indirect effect β = −.12, SD = .028, p < .001. ***p < .001; only significance for the structural model is displayed. CIH= complementary and integrative health; SD = standard deviation. From: HIV Stigma and Older Men's Psychological Well-Being: Do Coping Resources Differ for Gay/Bisexual and Straight Men? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. Published online July 21, 2017. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx101 J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figure 2. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for gay/bisexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are shown in rectangles. Indirect effect β = −.24, SD = .056, p < .001. ***p < .001; only significance for the structural model is displayed. CIH= complementary and integrative health; SD = standard deviation. From: HIV Stigma and Older Men's Psychological Well-Being: Do Coping Resources Differ for Gay/Bisexual and Straight Men? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. Published online July 21, 2017. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbx101 J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.