City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mn/DOT Bridges Legislative Staff Briefing
Advertisements

Local Agency Bridge (LABP) Program Overview Informational Presentation – January 7, 2011 Carol Olsen, ODOT LGS Bridge Program Manager Local.
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Gas Plant Operation and Maintenance Overview Presented by Geoff Vail.
ODOT/FHWA Stewardship Oversight Committee Meeting Gary Bowling (ODOT) and Tim Rogers (FHWA) May 29, 2012 Bridge Program Performance Measure Overview.
City of Lake Elmo · New Village Workshop-Focus on Infrastructure· January 20, 2007 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT REPORT PREPARED: NOVEMBER 16,
U.S. 421 Bridge DES# Thursday, July 17, :30 p.m. Frankfort Community Public Library 208 West Clinton Street, Frankfort, IN.
National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS)
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF December 2, 2014 Stakeholder’s Meeting.
January 6, REDIFIT Program Background  $5 million revolving loan fund established by the Idaho State Legislature in 2006  Transferred to ISDA.
Element Level Inspections  AASHTO Bridge Committee wanted a more comprehensive way to look at bridges  CoRe was developed in the mid  Bridge.
Asset Management Scott Matthews January 22, 2004.
Deficiencies, Needs H. Scott Matthews January 22, 2003.
Snapshot of Member States’ Feedback after the Minneapolis Bridge Collapse - Summary of Information Collected via Recent Surveys Malcolm Kerley, Chair –
Bridge Management New Bridge or Existing? New Design Conceptual Design Detailed Design Tender Preparation and Advertisement Construction Rehabilitation.
October Module 2: Regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Established accredited training and certification programs for workers,
Old Policy – which no one ever seem to have heard of.
Greenman-Pedersen, Inc. Coatings Group Review of Maintenance Prioritization Schemes from Three Transportation Authorities Christopher L. Farschon, P.E.,
Bridge Engineering Section Bridge Rehabilitation.
Office of Facilities Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council March.
NBIS – National Bridge Inspection Standards National standards for the proper safety inspection and evaluation of all hwy bridges NBI – National Bridge.
America’s Crumbling Infrastructure Case Study 2 Jory Schwach Mari Hunter Jacob Christianson CE 5212 Prof. Levinson.
Council Policy Forum Feb. 23, 2015 CAPITAL PLANNING & INFRASTRUCTURE.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Forms Completion Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge.
National Bridge Inventory Coding Guide Update Pontis Users’ Group Meeting September 5-6, 2007 Portland, Maine.
Asset Management Maintenance Management System
USACE Asset Management Risk and Reliability Workshop Condition Index Definitions Primer Allen C. Estes United States Military Academy.
1 Bridge Inspection Program Department of Transportation Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.
Why we need a rating system
A Marketing Approach to Bridge Longevity All about being specifically wrong … while being generally right Presented by: Heinrich O. Bonstedt Executive.
Leveraging Financial Resources Federal Highway Administration Funding Shana V. Baker Office of Metropolitan Planning Federal Highway Administration
Chapter 6 Requirements for a Maintenance Program.
2009 CUMULATIVE BRIDGE PROGRAM Monroe County Highway Department April 14, 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® FIMS Annual Comprehensive Training Bridge File Content and Management May 2016.
General Operations Limitation on Use of Funds Termination of Assistance Other Program Requirements.
2018 Preliminary Tax Levy Preliminary tax levy must be certified to the County by end of September for property tax statements mailed in late November.
Level II Inspection.
Inventory Information
Holly Street Bridge Retrofit and Rehabilitation Project
INDOT Roadway Preservation Initiative Update
There are 2 Types of Bridge Inspectors – Class B and Class A.
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
Logistics Management System Solutions
Understanding the 2017 ODOT Bridge Inspection Reports
FDOT Support Services Programs
INSPECTION POLICIES AND, PROCEDURES CLASS A CERTIFICATION REQUIREMNTS
FDOT Support Services Programs
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
Seismic Design Impact to
Blatnik Bridge Management Study
Scoping for Performance-Based Solutions; CR E2 ACEC Conference March 5, 2012 Tom O’Keefe Metro District Program Delivery.
Trimble County Public Schools
“That’s my old place?!”.
Inspector's Role and Responsibilities
David Conkel, MnDOT State Aid Bridge Davide Hedeen, MnDOT Bridge
Local Bridge Hydraulics 101 Planning & Funding Considerations
County State Aid Needs.
BRIDGE INVENTORY INFORMATION
Gull lake sewer + water authority
CDE Transportation Unit
Capital Improvement Plans
Federal Real Property Asset Management Initiative
STIP Development OTO Board Meeting
BRIDGE INVENTORY INFORMATION
State Infrastructure Bank
Sidewalk Maintenance Program
The Army Maintenance Program at the Platoon/Section Level
Alpena School District Academic Facilities Partnership Program
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Systems
Presentation transcript:

City of Milwaukee Department of Public Works Major Bridge Program

City Bridge Inventory 179 City-owned and maintained bridges Relative comparison of bridge types:

Bridge Structure Inspection In accordance with FHWA and WisDOT standards Conducted by DPW personnel FHWA certified Bridge Inspectors Bridges inspected every 24 months, except: Annually for: Movable bridges Structurally deficient bridges

Bridge Inspection Reports Standardized inspection reports Submitted to WisDOT and entered into their database Highway Structures Information (HSIS) database generates a bridge Sufficiency Rating (SR) Report: Photographs:

Sufficiency Rating (SR) FHWA standard measures service condition Three separate group factors determine SR Rating Structural adequacy (Deck, Superstructure, and Substructure) Serviceability and functional obsolescence Essentiality for public use Condition and function are rated to current standards (not what the bridge may have been built to) FHWA Coding Guide

Sufficiency Rating (SR) Cont’d 100 percent would represent an entirely sufficient bridge; 0 is insufficient or deficient bridge Rating is not a quantitative measure of safe versus unsafe Example, a 50 year old bridge may be structurally adequate but deficient due to current roadway widths, standards, or clearance

Milwaukee Bridge Performance SR of bridge inventory trending upwards

Milwaukee Bridge Performance Relative comparison of SR for city rated bridges, 2010 Federal/State funding eligibility SR < 80.0 : Bridge eligible for rehabilitation SR < 50.0 : Bridge eligible for rehabilitation or replacement

Federal/State Program Available only for those bridges deemed as federally eligible Competitive application process for limited state-wide program dollars Applied for on a 3 year cycle Generally 80% Federal/State funded with 20% local share Project schedule generally established by limits on available funding

Local Program Bridges not deemed Federal/State eligible Bridges in which Federal/State funds not available or insufficient Maintenance work including structure repair, painting, mechanical upgrades, inspections, pre-engineering activities, etc.

Summary of Capital Bridge Program 2003-2012

Questions?