On behalf of the LHCb collaboration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
CERN June HERA-LHC Workshop Status and startup for physics with LHCb G. Passaleva (INFN-Firenze) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique des Hautes Energies July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
FPCP04, Daegu, 9 Oct 2004P J Dornan - Imperial College London1 B-Physics at the LHC P J Dornan Imperial College, London.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Physics Performance of LHC-B Neville Harnew University of Oxford Beauty-97, Los Angeles October Outline Introduction The LHC-B Experiment New.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Status of the LHCb Experiment 高原宁 清华大学高能物理研究中心 Introduction & physics motivations Status of the detector construction Topics on physics potentials Conclusions.
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
M.N MinardAspen Winter Meeting LHCb Physics Program On behalf of LHCb collaboration M.N Minard (LAPP) Status LHCb ( R.Jacobson) Single arm spectrometer.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
1 LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance LHCb: Reoptimized Detector & Tracking Performance Gerhard Raven NIKHEF and VU, Amsterdam Representing.
First physics results with the Silicon Vertex Trigger at CDF-II 2 nd Workshop on the CKM Unitarity triangle. April 5 th -9 th IPPP Durham, England, UK.
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
23/02/07G. Vidal-Sitjes, VCI2007 Vienna Conference on Instrumentation1 The LHCb RICH detector G. Vidal-Sitjes on behalf of the LHCb RICH team Outline:
1 Status of LHCb detector optimization LHCC Open Session CERN, 27 November 2002 On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration Tatsuya Nakada CERN and University.
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
Hadron Physics Lecture Week
Ivan Belyaev LAPP/Annecy & ITEP/Moscow
Physics with the LHCb calorimeter
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
LHCb Physics, Status, and Perspectives
The LHC collider in Geneva
Flavour Tagging performance in LHCb Marc Grabalosa Gándara (14/12/08)
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
FRONTIERS OF MATTER XI th RENCONTRES DE BLOIS
Lepton Number and Lepton Flavour Violation
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
LHCb Status and Prospects Doris Eckstein (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration 3rd International Conference on Flavor Physics Chungli, Taiwan,
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
High Level Trigger for rare decays at LHCb
The LHCb vertex detector
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
July 13-25, 2000, Hanoi, Vietnam Aurelio Bay Institut de Physique
B physics prospects at LHCb
Event Reconstruction and Physics Performance of the LHCb Experiment
LHCb Particle Identification and Performance
Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
T. Bowcock University of Liverpool For the LHCb Collaboration
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
The Large Hadron Collider beauty Experiment & Physics
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Università di Milano Bicocca LHC2003 International Symposium
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
Bs Physics and Prospects at the Tevatron
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
B-physics at the LHC Beyond 2010, february
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Sergey Barsuk CERN and ITEP,Moscow Assisi, June 20–24, 2005 On behalf of the LHCb collaboration The LHCb experiment: Status and expected physics performance

Introduction LHCb is a dedicated experiment to study CP violation and other rare phenomena in B meson decays (and also c,τ,jets,…): Precision measurement of CKM parameters; Test of Standard Model predictions / search for new physics Expect ~1012 b-hadrons / year All b-species are produced: Bu (~40%), Bd (~40%), Bs (~10%), Bc (~0.1%), Λb (~10%), … , Excited states, … Bu, Bd are being explored in great detail (thanks to B-factories) => Improve statistics (other sources of systematics) Bs time resolved studies (not accessible at B-factories)

b-production at LHCb θb LHC Luminosity @ LHCb: 2-5 x 1032 cm-2s-1 σbbar = 500 μb σinelastic = 80 mb beam θb 1 LHCb year = 2 fb-1 = 1012 bb

Detector requirements Example: Decay: Bs -> Ds K, Ds -> Φπ Flavour tag: B -> Dlν B Bs K π e ν D Ds PVx SVx Exclusive B-decay reconstruction => Kinematics measurement => Particle ID Flavour tagging => Particle ID Proper time (L~1cm) Fast Bs oscillations => Precise vertexing + Efficient trigger + Control of systematics

->Talk by Matthew Needham The LHCb detector: kinematic measurements Charged tracks γ, πo Vertex LOcator Trigger Tracker Inner/Outer Tracker Magnet Calorimeter ->Talk by Matthew Needham

Vacuum vessel arrived at NIKHEF in 04/2005 VErtex LOcator 21 stations in vacuum tank R/φ sensors ~180k R-O channels VELO Si sensor 1 m Sensors sensitive area 8mm from beam line (30 mm during injection) hybrid R-O chip PVx position resolution: x,y: ~ 8 μm z: ~ 44 μm IP precision: ~ 30 μm VELO in the TestBeam in 2006 -> study of pattern recognition, alignment, … Vacuum vessel arrived at NIKHEF in 04/2005

Installed and commissioned in 2004 Magnet ∫Bdl = 4 Tm Warm dipole magnet (Al), Fe yoke = 1600 t Daily reverse field to reduce systematics Installed and commissioned in 2004 Field mapping ongoing

Tracker T1-3 OT TT IT Sensors Kapton cable Trigger Tracker Silicon Strip, 1.6 x 1.3 m2 => 144k channels Inner Tracker Silicon Strip, 1.2 x 0.6 m2 => 129k channels Outer Tracker Straw tubes, 5.6 x 4.6 m2 => 54k channels Sensor ladders 60% of chambers produced Electronics hybrid Efficiency ~94% (p>10 GeV/c) Ghost rate ~3% (pT>0.5 GeV/c) Momentum resolution ~0.4%

->Talk by Tito Bellunato The LHCb detector: particle ID π/K/p e, γ, πo μ RICH system Calorimeter μ -system ->Talk by Tito Bellunato

RICH system RICH1: Aerogel and C4F10 RICH2: CF4 15-120 mrad RICH1 125-300 mrad RICH1: Aerogel and C4F10 RICH2: CF4 π/K separation for true pions from B->ππ events <π/K separation> Photon detectors: Hybrid PhotoDiodes (HPD)

RICH system Contract for 500 HPDs signed Delivery starting from 07/2005 Installation of RICH1 shielding in the LHCb detector Entrance/exit windows of RICH2

Calorimeter Scintillator Pad Detector / Preshower (SPD/PS) Electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) Hadronic calorimeter (HCAL) projective geometry, variable granularity SPD/PS SPD/PS Sc-Pb-Sc 15mm-14mm-15mm 2 x 6k detector cells/R-O channels Deep groove design of cell 2.5 Xo depth Production ongoing HCAL ECAL SPD/PS modules with 144, 64 and 16 detector cells 100% outer type modules produced

Lateral scan of ECAL module with 50 GeV e-beam Calorimeter: ECAL Shashlyk technology 6k detector cells/R-O channels Volume ratio Pb:Sc = 2:4 (mm) 25 Xo , 1.1 λ depth Production completed Light yield: ~3000 ph.e./GeV Cell-to-cell spread: r.m.s.<7% Energy resolution: σ(E)/E = 10%/VE + 1% Lateral scan of ECAL module with 50 GeV e-beam ADC channels Spread across the module: for beam parallel to module axis: < ±1.3% for beam at 200 mrad: < ±0.6% mm X

Calorimeter: ECAL Wall size is within measurement error to design value x,y-positions of module are known to ±0.5 mm z-position: all modules within ±2 mm

Calorimeter: HCAL Fe-Scintillator tile calorimeter 1.5k detector cells/R-O channels 5.6 λ depth Production completed Cell-to-cell spread: r.m.s. < 5% Assembly of HCAL module 1/2 HCAL is installed in the detector

Muon detector 5 stations with projective pad R-O Production at 6 sites In total: 1368 MWPCs Produced and tested: 450 MWPCs (~30%) PNPI2 Poliuretanic foam Cathode PCB Cathode pads 20 ns Efficiency ~95% π-misID rate <1% 2mm pitch wire R-O

A very busy time in the LHCb cavern

Trigger -> talk by Frederic Teubert Level 0 (40 MHz -> 1 MHz) -> hardware high-pT e, γ, πo, μ, h => CALO, MUON pile-up veto => VELO Level 1 (1 MHz -> 40 kHz) -> software large IP and pT tracks => VELO, TT High Level Trigger complete event info => ALL ~offline selection -> 2 kHz on tape -> systematics and data mining Large pT b-physics topology Mb ~ 5 GeV/c2 βγcτ ~ 1 cm Large IP L0 L1 L0xL1

Baseline measurements Bs oscillations frequency, phase and ΔΓs Bs -> Ds π Bs -> J/Ψ Φ, J/Ψ η, Φ ηc Measurement of γ=-Arg Vub Bs -> Ds K only tree diagrams -> no NP Bd -> ππ, Bs -> KK U-spin symmetry, NP in gluonic penguins Bd -> Do K*, Do K*, DCP K* Dunietz-Gronau-Wyler method, NP in DD-mixing Rare decays, search for NP Bd -> K*γ, ωγ, Bs -> Φ γ Bs -> ΦΦ, Bd -> ΦKs Bd -> K* μμ Bs -> μμ

Event generator: Pythia+QQ Full detailed Geant simulation of detector pile-up and spill-over included Realistic digitization and reconstruction with full pattern recognition Realistic L0, L1 trigger simulation Assumption: Major background: bb-inclusive events large pT, IP, secondary vertices, multiplicity Toy MC used for sensitivity studies acceptance and resolutions parameterized from full MC Reconstruction/analysis software environment -> talk by Patrick Koppenburg

Δms measurement: Bs -> Dsπ Ds -> KKπ Proper time resolution ~40 fs LHCb 1 year Δms = 25 ps-1 82k events/year B/S = 0.32 ± 0.10 5σ measurement in 1 year of running for Δms up to 68 ps-1 (far beyond Standard Model expectation Δms < 26 ps-1) Once oscillations are established, determine Δms with σ(Δms) ~ 0.01stat ps-1

γ measurement: Bs -> DsK Ds -> KKπ K/π !!! 5.4k events/year B/S < 1 Bs -> Dsπ Bs -> DsK Measures γ-2χ 5 LHCb years Bs -> DsK 1 LHCb year Bs -> Dsπ Δms, (ps-1 ) 20 25 30 σ(γ), (o) 14.2 16.2 18.3

Bd -> ππ, Bs -> KK Bd -> ππ Bs -> KK K/π !!!

γ measurement: Bd -> ππ, Bs -> KK Measures γ Time-dependent asymmetries for Bd->ππ and Bs->KK: ACP(t) = Adir cos(Δm t) + Amix sin(Δm t) Parameters: γ, φd(φs), P/T = d e iθ Take φd(φs) from other measurements U-spin symmetry [Fleischer]: dππ = dKK and θππ = θKK => 4 measurements, 3 unknown => Solve for γ σ(γ) ~ 5o in 1 LHCb year Uncertainty from U-spin assumption Sensitive to new physics in penguins Bd -> ππ 25k events/year Bs -> KK 37k events/year LHCb 1 year Contours 68% CL 95% CL

Bs -> J/Ψ Φ J/Ψ -> ll Φ -> KK Non-CP state => partial waves Measures φs = -2 χ; χ~0.02 is small Simultaneous measurement of ΔΓs; in SM ΔΓs/Γs~0.1 Annual yield B/S 100k < 0.3 7k < 5.1 3.2k < 1.4 => 5 years sensitivity σ(φs)~0.02

Test of SM/QCD; search for NP Rare decays Test of SM/QCD; search for NP Bs -> Φγ Bs -> ΦΦ Gluonic penguin E/W penguin 9.3k events/year B/S < 2.4 1.2k events/year B/S < 0.2 Bs -> μμ Bd -> K*μμ E/W penguin LHCb 5 years 4.4k events/year AFB ~17 events/year

Bc -> J/Ψ π LHCb ~1.5 month CDF 2005 Yield: 14k events/year B/S < 0.8

Flavour Tagging SVx PVx Determine the flavour of the signal B-meson at production Quality of the flavour tagging tagging efficiency εtag = (R+W) / (R+W+U) wrong tag fraction ω = W / (R+W) effective tagging efficiency εeff = εtag (1-2ω)2 (after passing trigger and offline cuts) Bs Bo D l- K- K+ Qvx PVx SVx Algorithms “Opposite side” leptons from semileptonic decays K± from b->c->s chain inclusive vertex charge “Same side” K± from fragmentation accompanying Bs meson In the LHCb, measure ω using control channels with similar topology

Summary of principal physics channels Nominal year = 1012 bb pairs produced (107 s at L=2x1032 cm-2s-1 with σbb=500μb) Yields include factor 2 from CP-conjugated decays Branching ratios from PDG or SM predictions

Performance after 1 LHCb year (2 fb-1) channel yield precision γ Bs -> Ds K Bd -> ππ, Bs -> KK Bd -> Do K* Bd -> DCP K* 5.4k 26k, 37k 0.5k 3.4k 0.6k σ(γ) ≈ 14o σ(γ) ≈ 6o σ(γ) ≈ 8o χ Bs -> J/Ψ Φ 120k σ(χ) ≈ 2o |Vtd/Vts| Bs -> Ds π 80k Δms up to 68 ps-1 rare decays Bd -> K* γ 35k σ(ACPdir) ≈ 0.01 + systematics ! -> talk by Guy Wilkinson

Summary LHCb detector is optimized for precise measurement of CP violation and search for new phenomena Exploit ~1012 b-hadrons / year with all b-species -> B(s,c)-factory Complementary/competitive to (Super)-B(d,u)-factories and Tevatron Detector construction is advancing well To be ready for the first LHC collisions in 2007 Physics potential can be fully exploited with the initial LHC luminosity More on LHCb in Wednesday/Thursday talks: -> M.Needham “Status of the LHCb tracking system” -> T.Bellunato “Status of LHCb RICH and HPD” -> F.Teubert “LHCb trigger development” -> G.Wilkinson “LHCb strategy to understand systematics” -> P.Koppenburg “Reconstruction and analysis software environment of LHCb”

To conclude … Historically, competitions on Beauty involve the famous apple … … the Apple of Discord

… and in a few years … NP