Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 5/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Experimentally Validated Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for a Data Center.
Advertisements

Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: The Effect of Gas Models on Compressor Efficiency Including Uncertainty J. Eng.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Optical Microscopy-Aided Indentation Tests J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2008;130(1):
Date of download: 6/29/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Double-Layer Microchannel Heat Sinks With Transverse-Flow Configurations J. Electron.
Date of download: 7/7/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. Cost-Effective Reliability Analysis and Testing of Medical Devices 1 J. Med. Devices.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Three-Dimensional Temperature Gradient Mechanism in Selective Laser Melting of.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Impact Pressure on Reducing the Weld Residual Stress by Water Jet Peening.
Date of download: 9/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 9/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/7/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/10/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/12/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Forced Flexural Gravity Wave Motion in Two-Layer Fluid
Date of download: 10/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/15/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/19/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Effect of High Strain Rate on Indentation in Pure Aluminum
From: Reliability of Lead-Free Solder Joints
Date of download: 10/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Hemodynamics of the Mouse Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Date of download: 10/31/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/1/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/2/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Anisotropic Materials Behavior Modeling Under Shock Loading
From: Parallel Dynamic Optimization of Steel Risers
Date of download: 11/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/4/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/5/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/6/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/8/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 11/13/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Development of a Coring Test for Non-Coring Huber Needles
From: Energy and Momentum Transfer in Air Shocks
Date of download: 12/18/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: A Damage-Mechanics-Based Constitutive Model for Solder Joints
Date of download: 12/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/23/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/25/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Elasticity Solutions to Nonbuckling Serpentine Ribbons
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Date of download: 12/28/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Effects of Tensile Stress on the Corrosion Rate of Magnesium1
Date of download: 1/1/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Shear Deformation in Rectangular Auxetic Plates
Date of download: 1/3/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Feasibility Study of an Intercooled-Cycle Marine Gas Turbine
Date of download: 1/23/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: Configuration of JEDEC standard plate with 15 components

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: The FE impact model of PCB with IC components potted by a resin

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: (a) Unpotted case; (b) single layer potting configuration sectional view with the cutting plane parallel to X-Z plane; (c) bilayer potting configuration sectional view with the cutting plane parallel to X-Z plane

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: The interconnection stress history for unpotted case

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: The effect of various potting materials on the averaged stress in interconnection along impact direction

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: History curves of interconnection stresses for four representative components: (a) U1, (b) U3, (c) U6, and (d) U8 as indicated in Fig. 1 with various potting materials

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: The maximum PCB central deflection for different potting materials

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: History curves of PCB deflection at center for different potting materials

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: Effect of bilayer potting thickness ratio on (a) averaged interconnection stress along z-axis, and (b) maximum PCB central deflection

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: Effect of varied exterior potting modulus of bilayer potting on (a) averaged interconnection stress along z-axis and (b) maximum PCB central deflection

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: Effect of varied interior potting modulus of bilayer potting on (a) averaged interconnection stress along z-axis, and (b) maximum PCB central deflection

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: Illustration of the simple analytical model for three configurations: unpotted, single layer potting design, and bilayer potting design

Date of download: 10/27/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Effective Mitigation of Shock Loads in Embedded Electronic Packaging Using Bilayered Potting Materials J. Electron. Packag. 2014;136(4):041010-041010-9. doi:10.1115/1.4026542 Figure Legend: (a) Contour plots of the normalized stress on the plane of the normalized moduli of the two potting layers, and (b) zoom-in plot. The unlabeled line indicates the same stress as the unpotted situation. The different dots mark the investigated potting cases in the simulations.