Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems—Modelling within finger variability  Nicole M. Egli, Christophe Champod, Pierre Margot  Forensic Science International  Volume 167, Issue 2, Pages 189-195 (April 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Illustration of the 6 peripheral minutiae. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Illustration of the 10 peripheral minutiae. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Illustration of the 6 central minutiae. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Illustration of the 10 central minutiae. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Probability plot between scores obtained from 66 livescans and a Weibull distribution. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Weibull probability plot of the scores obtained using 6 minutiae on marks visualised using DFO compared to 15 fingerprints of the same finger. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Boxplots of scores for 6 minutiae on livescans (Lsc) and marks visualized using four methods (CA, powder, Ninhydrin and DFO) as well as a random selection of marks visualised using any of the four methods (All). Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 8 Histograms of the scores obtained for 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 minutiae in a peripheral region. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 9 Histograms of the scores obtained for 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 minutiae in a central region. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 10 Weibull probability plot for 7 minutiae in central region. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 11 Tippett plot obtained using the scores for 7 minutiae. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 12 The mark (a) and the print (b) considered in the case example. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 13 Lognormal probability plot for between finger variability on 7 minutiae in the peripheral region. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 14 Within and between finger scores distribution with the score of the comparison indicated. Forensic Science International 2007 167, 189-195DOI: (10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.054) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions