Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On Cavity Tilt + Gradient Change (Beam Dynamics) K. Kubo K. Kubo.
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.
CARE07, 29 Oct Alexej Grudiev, New CLIC parameters. The new CLIC parameters Alexej Grudiev.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.
For Draft List of Standard Errors Beam Dynamics, Simulations Group (Summarized by Kiyoshi Kubo)
Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
CERN, BE-ABP-CC3 Jürgen Pfingstner Verification of the Design of the Beam-based Controller Jürgen Pfingstner 2. June 2009.
Undulator parameters choice/wish based on a simplified XFEL cost model Jürgen Pfingstner 29 st of July 2015.
Simulations Group Summary K. Kubo, D. Schulte, N. Solyak for the beam dynamics working group.
Luminosity expectations for the first years of CLIC operation CTC MJ.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Status of the Rebaselining D. Schulte for the Rebaselining Team D. Schulte, CLIC Rebaselining, October 2013.
J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.
July 19-22, 2006, Vancouver KIRTI RANJAN1 ILC Curved Linac Simulation Kirti Ranjan, Francois Ostiguy, Nikolay Solyak Fermilab + Peter Tenenbaum (PT) SLAC.
Consideration for a plasma stage in a PWFA linear collider Erik Adli University of Oslo, Norway FACET-II Science Workshop, SLAC Oct 14,
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
CLIC Energy Stages Meeting D. Schulte1 D. Schulte for the CLIC team.
Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs A.Farricker 1, R.M.Jones 1, R.Ainsworth 2 and S.Molloy 3 1 The University.
Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY Summary of new FLASH CSR studies Bolko Beutner, DESY Beam Dynamics Meeting
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
How CLIC-Zero can become less expensive A.Grudiev, D. Schulte 16/06/09.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Adaptive control scheme for the main linac of CLIC Jürgen Pfingstner 21 th of October.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Principals of fast injection and extraction R. Apsimon.
Ion effects in low emittance rings Giovanni Rumolo Thanks to R. Nagaoka, A. Oeftiger In CLIC Workshop 3-8 February, 2014, CERN.
Peak temperature rise specification for accelerating structures: a review and discussion CLIC meeting
FASTION (by end 2007) A code to study the fast ion instability in a transport line Multi-bunch code, ions and electrons are macro-particles Ions of an.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
DRAFT: What have been done and what to do in ILC-LET beam dynamics Beam dynamics/Simulations Group Beijing.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
Electron cloud study for ILC damping ring at KEKB and CESR K. Ohmi (KEK) ILC damping ring workshop KEK, Dec , 2007.
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
X-band Based FEL proposal
J. Snuverink and J. Pfingstner LinSim LinSim Linear Accelerator Simulation Framework with PLACET an GUINEA-PIG Jochem Snuverink Jürgen Pfingstner 16 th.
Two-Stream Phenomena in CLIC G. Rumolo and D. Schulte for the ACE, 3 September 2008 * thanks to W. Bruns, R. Tomás, SPSU Working Team General introduction.
8 th February 2006 Freddy Poirier ILC-LET workshop 1 Freddy Poirier DESY ILC-LET Workshop Dispersion Free Steering in the ILC using MERLIN.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
ILC Main Linac Beam Dynamics Review K. Kubo.
The Cockroft Institute
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
Studies of emittance preservation methods and the status of their experimental validation Erik Adli 1, W. Farabolini 2, Reidar Lillestol 1, Jürgen Pfingstner.
Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free Steering in the Main Linac of CLIC Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free.
From Beam Dynamics K. Kubo
FACET Tests Update A. Latina, J. Pfingstner, D. Schulte,
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Effects of DFS on Single-beam Tuning
CLIC Rebaselining at 380 GeV and Staging Considerations
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Adaptive Alignment & Ground Motion
Other beam-induced background at the IP
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Accelerator Physics Technical System Group Review
The Strong RF Focusing:
CLIC Drive Beam Stabilisation
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Analysis of Multi-Turn ERLs for X-ray Sources
Operational Experience with LCLS RF systems
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Presentation transcript:

Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC Jürgen Pfingstner 4th of February 2014

Content Wake field effects in a gradient-scaled main linac Main linac scaling and beam parameters Wake field limitations for initial jitter Wake field limitations for misalignments Conclusions

1. Wake field effects in a gradient- scaled main linac

Purpose of the study Luminosity RF efficiency Optimisation of the acceleration gradient in the main linac of CLIC for the re-baselining A change of the gradient also changes linac length, induced energy spread due to RF The beam parameters (as charge) have to be adjusted. Charge is an especially important beam parameter How does the maximal charge scale with the acceleration gradient? Luminosity RF efficiency other important parameters

Why is the beam charge so important? Luminosity spectrum, constant RF efficiency RF power What can one do with high charge: When N then L or if L = const. then PRF since ηRF At the same time, when N then σx and therefore 1. βx* (relaxed final focus design) or 2. εx(relaxed damping ring specifications)

Possible limitations and test cases 1. Local wake field kick If local wake field kick becomes too large, the BNS damping does not work anymore. At a certain charge N an instability starts to occur. Kloc prop. W(2σz)N … local kick For kloc1 = kloc2 => N2 ≈ N1(L1/L2), e.g. for half the gradient N2 ≈ N1/2 2. Integrated wake field kick BNS damping does not work perfectly, due to several reasons. … integrated kick For kint1= kint2 => N2 ≈ N1√(L1/L2), e.g. for half the gradient N2 ≈ N1/√2 3. Incoherent kicks due to misalignments For incoherent kick and therefore oscillations BNS damping does not work very well. kincoh = √(k12+k22+ … kn2) … incoherent kick kincoh1/kincoh2 = √(L1/L2) => N1(L1/L2) < N2 < N1√(L1/L2), e.g. for half the gradient N1/2 < N2 < N1/√(2) Test machine: Machine that has half the gradient and is twice as long as the standard main linac Test imperfections: Initial jitter: tests local and integrated WF limits: 1% emittance growth (10% σy and σyp jitter) Misalignments: tests local and incoherent WF limits, simulated via 20 time steps of ground motion D with QP stabilisation V1 (approximation of the action of orbit feedback).

2. Main linac scaling and beam parameters

Lattice scaling The 12 sectors have been prolonged by a factor, by putting more original FODO cells Also the number of cavities per decelerator and the number of cavities running at the specified phase have been scaled. The scaling is available in the Framework of Jochem and me: set use_linac_scaling 1 set linac_scaling_factor $factor The rest is done automatically, (e.g. change of gradient svn co svn+ssh://[username]@svn.cern.ch/reps/clicsim/trunk/CLIC/

Overview of the beam parameter choice Charge cannot just be increased! To create a proper energy spread along and especially at the end of the linac also the bunch length has to be changed Recipe to find N and σz: σE has to be kept small for a the BDS (0.35%) ϕ is limited by not increasing the linac length too much (8 degree) Combinations of N and σz can be found to fulfill create this σE. These combinations can be found with an iterative approach (script from Daniel) Which combination can be used (Nmax) has to be determined via simulations (my task) BNS damping Stability properties

Comments to the created energy spread Due to the change of the bunch length with a change of the charge, the RF acts differently in the beam. The energy spread is not the same for the different charges, to reach the same final energy spread. Higher average energy spread for higher charges will help for the BNS damping.

3. Wake field limitations for initial jitter

WF effects in the standard ML For nominal charge N, no amplification of initial beam jitter For 18% more charge already a small amplification visible For 41% more charge amplification of jitter effect by a factor 2 ML design stays in regime were no WF amplification is observable (security)

WF effects in the standard ML without initial incoherent energy spread Without initial uncorrelated energy spread (right), the initial filamentation does not stop the “natural” wake field influence on the beam propagation. In the nominal CLIC case, the initial oscillations would be are actually damped. It seems to be possible that oscillations are also damped by wake field effects!

Beam oscillation damping via wake fields G. V. Stupakov, BNS Damping of Beam Breakup Instability, SLAC-AP-108, 1997 1. What is the limit of this damping process? 2. Could it be used to make the ML more robust and allow for higher charge? V. Balakin, Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Next-Generation Linear Colliders, SLAC-report-335, page 56, 1988

WF effects in the ML with half gradient Initial beam jitter is less critical then for the nominal ML. Correlated energy spread is build up slower, due to the lower gradient. Oscillations can filament fully. Remaining growth come from an instability where the coherent energy spread is not build up yet.

4. Wake field limitations for misalignments

WF effects in the standard ML For the nominal charge, no increase of the emittance due to wake field is observable. For 20% more charge, already and effect in the end of the ML can be observed. For 40% more charge, the emittance is increase by a factor of 2. ML design says in a regime where no wake fields effects are visible (security). Misalignment effects seems to be more important then the initial beam jitter.

WF effects in the standard ML without transversal wake fields To check how much the the emittance growth is dependent on the transverse wake field, the wake fields have been turned off. Without transverse WFs, the emittance is independent of charge and twice as large as for the nominal case. WFs actually help against misalignments! A factor 2 of emittance reduction seems to be the optimum.

WF effects in the ML with half gradient With increasing charge emittance increases mainly in the end of the linac. In this area the correlated energy spread is reduced. Robustification in this area could be an interesting topic. For N2=N1/√2 the long linac shows the same WF behaviour as the nominal one. However, the optimal emittance growth is higher by a factor of 2, but this is independent of the charge!

5. Conclusions Misalignments seem to have a higher influence than the initial beam jitter. The minimal multi-pulse emittance growth due to misalignments scales linear with the linac length: εy,mp,mis ≈ 0.24xL/L0 [nm.rad] This is independent of the used charge, if the charge is small enough. The maximal useable charge scales as: N = N0√(L0/L) e.g. L = 2xL0 => N = N0/√2 This corresponds to the instability case and allows to use high charge in the scaled ML. The main linac seems to operate in a regime where beam oscillations are damped due to wake fields. This reduces the multi-pulse emittance growth by a factor of 2 for nominal and the prolonged main linac. Optimisation of this damping behaviour seems to be an interesting topic. Instabilities due to too high charge occur in certain areas in the linac. Focusing on these areas could improve the behaviour. Open point is the change of performance of alignment methods (DFS, RF alignment). To be finished.

Thank you for your attention!