Dairy Nutrient Management Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interim Permits - What?  Interim Permits are for the correction of pollution hazards at the feedlot facility. Facility is l ess than 1000 animal units.
Advertisements

Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
Ohio Livestock Environmental Assurance Program. KEY REGULATIONS Chapter 6, LEAP Federal State –Ohio EPA –Ohio Dept. of Agriculture –Ohio Dept. of Natural.
Whatcom CWP Partnership Whatcom County Planning and Development Whatcom County Health Whatcom County Public Works Whatcom Conservation District Nooksack.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
WISHA Update Stephen M. Cant, CIH Division of Occupational Safety & Health WA Department of Labor & Industries October 8, 2009.
MFRPS Lesson Learned North Carolina
Indiana Confined Feeding Operations Permit Program Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Overview of the Revised CAFO Regulations Ralph Summers EPA Region 7.
Regulating Plant- Incorporated Protectants (PIPs) A State and National Perspective Western Region Pesticide Meeting May 12-14, 2004 Spokane, Washington.
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Regulations - Update Meg Collins Colorado Livestock Association & Landon Gates Colorado Farm Bureau Water.
Dairies and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Environmental Concerns and Research Needs USEPA, Region 9 March 2004.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Nutrient Management Planning Canada-Manitoba Farm Stewardship Program Steve Sager, P.Ag. Soil Resource Specialist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-PFRA.
Chapter 18 Administrative Law Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
Regulations that Protect Clean Water Jocelyn Mullen, P.E. PART 2 OF PRESENTATION Presented at The Water Course January 27, 2010 Mesa County Water Association.
Overview of the Final EPA Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) Regulations April 1, 2003.
2008 CAFO Roundtable October 16,2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Presented by: Yolanda Chavez, RN, BSN Policy Rules and Curriculum Development Unit DADS Regulatory Services 1 DADS REGULATORY UPDATE March 2013.
Nebraska CNMP Educational Program Records for NPDES Permit.
1 Enforcement Options and Case Studies Lisa Brown Assistant Counsel for Enforcement Cal/EPA CUPA/UST Conference February 8, 2006 February 8, 2006.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
A GENCY P OLICY : T HEORY & P RACTICE. First. The Theory.
EMS in Agriculture and Agribusiness - United Egg Producers XL Project.
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination 6/4/20161 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination.
CFO and CAFO Regulatory Issues IN Pork Producers January 30, 2007.
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
Confined and Concentrated Animal Feeding Permitting Indiana Soybean Alliance December 12, 2006.
NC Rules and Requirements: Certified Inspectors of Subsurface Systems NC Certified Inspector Training School.
& Food Safety Modernization Act Update North American Agricultural Marketing Officials July 15,
Manure Wastewater Handling & Storage Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Manure Wastewater Storage and Handling.
IDEM Update by Commissioner Easterly Indiana Professional Dairy Producers June 4, 2007.
TAS and TIP Swinomish Tribe and the Incremental Approach.
2007 Oregon CAFO Program Summary. CAFOs in Oregon Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) as defined in OAR (3) Confined Animal Feeding.
Water Quality Protection And Improvement 30+ Years of the Clean Water Act Most industries, municipalities, and other dischargers of pollutants were not.
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
Introduction to Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations CAFOs Christina Richmond West Virginia Department of Agriculture.
Leon Wirschem, REHS/HMS County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Western Center for Risk Management Education Center Update and Emerging Risk Issues Shannon Neibergs Director, WCRME Associate Professor Extension Economist.
WHAT TO DO WHEN YOU HAVE AN “ALLEGED” VIOLATION Keith W. Turner Watkins & Eager.
BACWA – Leading the way to protect our Bay Mercury Watershed Permit Special Provisions BACWA Annual Members Meeting January 29, 2009 Michele Pla Melody.
INTRODUCTION TO OSHA Lesson
NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security
ClinicalTrials.gov Requirements
permitting & compliance in hillsborough county
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Enforcement of Floodplain Management Regulations
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Lewis & Clark Law School
Abdulla Al Yammahi Specialist, Radiation Safety Inspection
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Preparing for a Regulatory Inspection
Laws Relating to Accreditation, the use of NGABs, and Enforcement
Water Quality Programs – OAWP’s Role
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CAFO Rule and the Proposed Idaho NPDES CAFO General.
Dairy Nutrient Management Program
Environmental Management Systems The ISO Approach Initial Environmental Review & Gap Analysis Presented by: NC Division of Pollution Prevention.
Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, PA DEP Secretary
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
Pinal County Air Quality Enforcement Action
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Compliance and Enforcement of the Privacy Rule
Manure Management Implementation by US Farmers
Annual Enforcement Report Overview
House Select Committee on School Safety - Prevention and Response Protocol Subcommittee Recommendations Charles A. Quagliato, Division of Legislative.
Wastewater Permitting Updates
Presentation transcript:

Dairy Nutrient Management Program WSDA – Nutrient Application Education Project WA Dairy Industry Meeting November 10-11, 2015 Ginny Prest WSDA Dairy Nutrient Management Program Manager

Proviso Project = Nutrient application education project $575,000 of the state toxics control account Implement a training program for farmers Provides training in agronomic application of dairy nutrients Track completion of training when, where, and how much manure to apply to meet crop nutrient requirements and to protect waters of the state.

Proviso Project = Nutrient application education project Funds may also be used to increase inspection activities Filled 1.5 temporary positions to assist with project implementation. Locations 0.5 FTE Lynden and 1.0 FTE in Yakima. Additional 0.5 position in Olympia planned for Jan 2016.

Proviso Project = Nutrient application education project Work with interested stakeholders to identify curriculum 2016 to include Agronomic Application Right amount, right time, right place Risk analysis Weather, field conditions Recordkeeping Irrigation water management Feed management

Proviso Project = Nutrient application education project Work with interested stakeholders to identify gaps in the manure management program, including existing rules and statutory language, and Start date: Oct 2015 Completion date: Dec 2016

Proviso Project = Nutrient application education project Report to the governor and the legislature December 31, 2015 June 30, 2016, and on June 30, 2017 level of participation and results of the program.

Any questions? Ginny Prest Dairy Nutrient Management Program vprest@agr.wa.gov P: 360-902-2894 C: 360-529-7422

Enforcement Action 2013 &2014 Notice of Correction (17) Order (1) Discharge Potential to pollute Notice of Correction (17) Order (1) Notice of Penalty (11) 20% equipment malfunction, 28% lagoon, 48% field conditions/setbacks during land applications Warning Letter (122) Notice of Correction (27) 46% recordkeeping, 23% lagoon, 24% field conditions/setbacks WSDA notifies all producers that a discharge of pollution to waters requires a CAFO permit (RCW 90.48.160).   Enforcement Stats 2013- 2014

Challenges/Gaps Can be fixed with Rule making Need to update WAC 16-611 Nutrient Management Soil sampling protocols (timing and depths) Recordkeeping format Gaps in authority/accountability WSDA’s authority extends only to dairy facilities and land application acreage that falls under NMP WSDA cannot follow the manure when exported off the dairy and out of control of the dairy  Refer to Ecology Ecology lacks “access” authority similar to WSDA so non- dairies are not held to same regulatory requirements

Authorities Livestock/Manure Routine Inspections Complaint Responses Informal Enforcement Formal CAFO Permit Administration Non-permitted dairies WSDA Lead, Chapter 90.64 RCW WSDA If discharge, coordinate per MOU Ecology Determines if permit is required per MOU Permitted CAFOs, dairy and non-dairy Ecology Lead, Chapter 90.48 RCW Established by MOU Coordinated per MOU Ecology/WSDA Coordinate per MOU WSDA assists per MOU Non-permitted other AFOs and CAFOs N/A Non-AFOs - Pasture, Rangeland or Small Livestock Manure complaints when the responsible party is uncertain WSDA lead for initial response and to determine if dairy is responsible per MOU WSDA will handle follow up if dairy is responsible Ecology may handle follow up with any non-dairy party MOU= Memorandum of Understanding between WSDA and ECY, November 2011

Comparison of regulatory requirements Non-dairy AFO/CAFOs Dairies AFO/CAFOs RCW 90.48 Water pollution control Prohibited to discharge Penalty up to $10,000/day/violation RCW 43.05 Technical Assistance Regulatory agencies must provide regulatory TA RCW 90.64 Dairy nutrient management All dairies licensed by Food Safety required to: .017 Register with the program .026 Develop nutrient management plan .010 Prevent discharges .010 Maintain records WSDA must: .023 Implement inspections of dairies .026 Monitor development of nutrient management plan .030 Investigate water quality violations .130 Maintain database .150 Penalty account – use for grants .190 Report certain information in ranges .200 Authority to access dairies .901 Transferred programs to WSDA, 2003 WAC 16-611 Nutrient management .020 Establishes recordkeeping requirements for dairies .200 Penalty for lack of recordkeeping .300 Penalty for discharge of pollutants License from FS triggers DNMP work with dairy

Program must Survey for evidence of violations Identify corrective actions for actual/imminent discharges that violate or could violate the state's water quality standards Monitor development and implementation of dairy nutrient management plans Identify dairy producers that will benefit from technical assistance programs

DNMP Mission Protect water quality from livestock nutrient discharges Help maintain a healthy agricultural business climate

How we do our work Clear guidance, education, and technical assistance Equitable enforcement of state and federal water quality laws Good communication with industry, related agencies, and other stakeholders Emphasize producer and stakeholder communication.

The results In 2013 and 2014 combined, approximately 94% of identified issues were addressed through informal enforcement such as Warning Letters and Notices of Correction. 6% proceeded to formal enforcement (Civil Penalty or Administrative Order).  Enforcement issues addressed generally fall into three categories – where manure is applied, when manure is applied, and how much manure is applied.  Most Penalties include a settlement process: Reduction in penalty Required to adopt specific management practices Required not to discharge If management practices not adopted or if a discharge occurs within 36 months, then collect the entire penalty The good news…end with a bit about working with stakeholders to educate, assist, inform…to avoid situations that lead to compliance actions.