AMI Hidden Costs and Hidden Values

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER AUDIT DATA COLLECTION AND VALIDATION USING THE Awwa free water audit software© George KUNKEL, P.E. WATER EFFICIENCY PROGRAM MANAGER PHILADELPHIA.
Advertisements

NONREVENUE WATER - Current and Future Remedies Gary Harstead Director – Asset Management United Water NARUC Winter Meeting February 2013.
NRW TECHNIQUES & SMART METERING TO IMPROVE OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES ACWUA, AMMAN – JORDAN, JANUARY 2013.
Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
11 Rate Design to Complement AMI Implementation in Danville, Virginia Presentation by Denise Sandlin Support Services Director Danville, VA APPA 2009 Business.
ANALYTICS: BRINGING VALUE TO THE UTILITIES IN MITIGATING ENERGY LOSSES José-Manuel LOPEZ Istanbul, May 9, 2014.
Water Services Department Arizona Mexico Commission Bi-National Meeting March 9-11, 2008 David Cavazos Deputy City Manager Water Services Department Arizona.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
IBM Smarter Cities Challenge City of Tucson Award Recipient for 2013 November 14, 2012.
A Workshop for Communities Implementing Water Loss Management Prepared for Columbia Basin Trust by IKEN Services Ltd. May 2013 Leak Detection Methods.
Leak Detection at C.C.W.A.. History of C.C.W.A. CCWA produces up to 39 million gallons a day of potable water. We have a potable water storage capacity.
The City of North Bend Sanitary Sewer System
Smart Cities & Smart Utility
LONG-RANGE PLANNING FOR SMART-WATER NETWORK IN BOSTON APRIL 17,2015 John P. Sullivan, P.E. Chief Engineer and Operations Officer.
U.S Conference of Mayors August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional.
City of Polson April 5, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING Water System Improvements PRESENTATION ON PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT.
Your Water System Sources of Water reservoir underground aquifer Energy Sources pumps gravity Distribution Network of Pipes.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
1 AMI’s place in the future AMI is THE key enabler for the future smart grid The ‘intelligent grid’ is not intelligent without AMI Customers are not empowered.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Water Loss BMP Revision Jim Metropulos Andrew Chastain-Howley.
WSNTG Annual Conference 8 th September 2005 WSNTG 9 th Annual Conference “Water Services Strategic Plans – Fact or Fiction”
Systematic Municipal Water Use Accounting and GPCD Calculations John W. Longworth, P.E. -- Chief Water Use and Conservation Bureau NM Office of the State.
Making your Water System Smarter with Intelligent Infrastructure™
Department of Water Affairs Water Requirements and Availability Reconciliation Strategy for Mbombela Municipal Area Water Conservation and Water Demand.
Seattle City Light – AMI Business Case Results
Washington’s Water Use Efficiency Rule May Require Increased Coordination for Many Utilities Dan Sander, P.E. Senior Engineer.
Developing a Non- Revenue Water Strategy
Asset Management: What It Means For Water Distribution Operability & Criticality December 09, 2008 Paul Schumi Wachs Utility Services.
Infrastructure management system Managers and engineers need clear guidelines for life-cycle management of infrastructure systems for water, sewer, and.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
Water Audits: A simple “How To…”
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
Illinois Water Audit and Loss Control Training Workshop Fall 2014.
ECLAC HANDBOOK FOR ESTIMATING EFFECTS OF DISASTERS1 HANDBOOK FOR ESTIMATING SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF DISASTERS Economic Commission for.
Benchmarking Water Loss Performance:
Illinois Water Audit and Loss Control Training Workshop Fall 2014 Intro Fall 2014 Intro.
Update on DRBC Source Water Protection Efforts EPA Region 3 All States Meeting Wilmington DE June 4-6, 2013 Jessica Rittler Sanchez.
By: Eng. Ayman Afifi March Water Consumption The consumption or use of water, also known as water demand, is the driving force behind the hydraulic.
Component Analysis of Apparent Losses Paul Fanner, Principal of Veritec.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
June 17, 2015 (Regina) June 18, 2015 (Saskatoon) SaskEnergy 2015 Rate Application.
City of Palo Alto Utility Rate Changes FY 2013 Facility Managers’ Meeting August 16, 2012 Ipek Connolly, Senior Resource Planner.
London 2062 Symposium London’s Energy Future Peter North 19 th March 2012.
Pyramids A pyramid's design has most of the weight closer to the ground -creating a stable structure Julian Thornton.
PILOT PROJECT ON NRW IN SHEETAL PARK AREA OF RAJKOT CITY IN GUJARAT Danish Water Forum AND Rajkot Municipal Corporation.
What is the Cost of Lost Water? AWWA / RCAP Small Systems Operator Training Columbus, Ohio May 24, 2016 AWWA / RCAP Small Systems Operator Training us,
WATER SYSTEM WORKSHOP February 27, 2012
Infrastructure Discussion 1 Mark A. Harral and Raul Rodriquez April 19 th, 2016.
Water Supply Municipal Water Demand Civil Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering and Technology The University of Jordan Instructor: Ghada Kassab,
A large meter chamber A leak A PRV station Leak noise correlators
Innovative Approach to Water Main Renewal
Lecture (11): Water Distribution Systems
Advanced Technologies Decentralized Recovery and Reuse
Portugal Cove - St. Philip’s
SC Rural Water Conference 2016
Water Loss Audit Findings (FY 13-14)
Strategic directions in the water industry
Managing Things that Matter – Saving Water
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Smart Water Metering Market Set to Record Exponential Growth by 2024: Global.
Non-Residential Customer Non- Residential - Capacity Evaluation Borough of Conshohocken Authority Customer Informational Meeting June 20, East.
City of Asheville Comprehensive Non-Revenue Water Program
Matjhabeng Local Municipality FS 184
Reducing Non-Revenue Water
City of Fernley City Council Meeting
Night Flow Measurement, Step Testing, Leak Detection Equipment
Introduction to NRW Introduction to IWA Water Balance, NRW components and Performance indicators.
Johnny François Regional Office Manager, Les Cayes
MODELLING OF AN OPTIMIZED, AUTOMATED WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR OLKARIA
Professor Vasilis Kanakoudis
Presentation transcript:

AMI Hidden Costs and Hidden Values Feb 2017 AMI Hidden Costs and Hidden Values Travis Smith Director of NA Smart Water Strategy

Hidden Operating Costs Back Haul Maintenance Data Plans Coverage Issues Field Issues, Obsolescence, Replacement Costs

Back Haul Costs Sensus Less Collectors $120-600 per collector/yr Other RF 5-10X collectors $12,000-$120,000 more over the life

Base Station Maintenance Costs Issues Sensus Others Natural Disasters (10% once over the 20 years) ~$2500 ~$12,500-$25,000 Vandalism/Damage Rare due to harden sites ~$10,000-$100,000 Upgrades ~$1,500 ~$7,500-$15,000 Product Issues Significantly more labor to diagnose the issue

Sensus Cellular $0 / end point $720 / end point over 20 years Data Plans Sensus $0 / end point Cellular $720 / end point over 20 years Escalation?

Coverage Issues RF Installation of More Collectors $1,500 Power Supply $5,000 Site Rental ~$10,000 over 20 years Back Haul $2,400-$12,000 over 20 yrs Cellular Alternative Infrastructure for non coverage or labor

Field Issues, Obsolescence, 10 yr Life Obsolescence – 10 Year Life Install $30-$50 / endpoint Replacement $60-$100 / endpoint Total $90-$150 more per endpoint than FlexNet What if the user has to experience end of life and obsolescence? $180-$300 per endpoint more than FlexNet Field Issues Site Visit $30-$50 / endpoint Per Occurrence

Total Hidden Costs Items Cost Increase Over FlexNet over 20 years Back Haul $12,000 - $120,000 Maintenance $27,000 - $127,000 Data Plans $720 / end point Coverage $18,900 - $ 28,500 End of Life, Obsolescence $90-$300 per end point Sensus Other RF $57,900 - $275,500 Why the need for pilots? Do other RF AMI systems work? Costs of no reads, on demand reads – labor, trucks, back office Sensus Cellular $810-1,020 / end point

Enhance Customer Service Value Propositions Water Utility Charters Water Utility Objectives WaterView Clean Drinking Water for Public Health HydroView Flow of Water for Fire Safety SourceView Sustainability of the Supply Account View Customer Service Financial Management AssetView Manage the life of the assets Increase Revenue Lower Costs Optimize Assets Reduce Risks Enhance Customer Service Return on Investment

Why More Often

Use Patterns

Action 2 am, Node 72 Historical Trends 325 Ft of Water 35 Psig 20 Gals Water Withdrawl Population est Mgal/day Mgal/yr Price of water ($/Kgal) Total Revenue $ 20% Loss Value 10% Loss Value Value of a 2.5 year payback based upon 10% recovery Totals Domestic Public Supply 264,444,444.44 23,800 8,687,000 4 $ 34,748,000,000 $ 6,949,600,000 $ 3,474,800,000 $ 8,687,000,000 less PR and USVIS   23,566 8,601,710 $ 34,406,841,800 $ 6,881,368,360 $ 3,440,684,180 $ 8,601,710,450 23% market share 5,420 1,978,393 $ 7,913,573,614 $ 1,582,714,723 $ 791,357,361 $ 1,978,393,404 5 mgd 55,556 5 1825 3 $ 5,475,000 $ 1,095,000 $ 547,500 $ 1,368,750 10mgd 111,111 10 3650 $ 10,950,000 $ 2,190,000 $ 1,095,000 $ 2,737,500 20 mgd 222,222 20 7300 $ 21,900,000 $ 4,380,000 $ 2,190,000 $ 5,475,000 50 mgd 555,556 50 18250 $ 54,750,000 $ 10,950,000 $ 5,475,000 $ 13,687,500 100 mgd 1,111,111 100 36500 $ 109,500,000 $ 21,900,000 $ 10,950,000 $ 27,375,000 200 mgd 2,222,222 200 73000 $ 219,000,000 $ 43,800,000 $ 21,900,000 $ 54,750,000 Action Historical Trends 2 am, Node 72 325 Ft of Water 35 Psig 20 Gals

Value Propositions – Non Revenue Water Increase Revenue Improved accuracy with Low Flow Registration, 20 Year accuracy, and Field Adjustable Accuracy Revenue from Tamper Detection and Unauthorized Use Lower Pressure Loss for more Consumption Revenue from Dispute Resolution Billing Error Corrections Lower Costs Reduce Leaks (Production and Transport Costs) Reduce Bad Debt, and Collections Costs Lower Repair Costs Reduce Costs for Dispute Resolution Reduce Replacement Costs Optimize Assets Extend the Life of Production and Treatment Facilities Optimize Storage and Pumping Operations Extend the Life of Mains and Service Lines Reduce Risks Fewer Main Breaks Better Fire Fighting Capabilities with Hydrant Monitoring and Pressure Management Predictive Analysis Reduce Water Quality Risk from Breakage Enhance Customer Service Improve Service Pressure Less Billing Disputes 5-15% 5-15% Return on Investment

Typical 5 MGD Utility

Common Losses

Revenue Water Measurement Grouping Billed Water Exported Billed Metered Consumption Billed Unmetered Consumption Billed Not Collected Metered Use Unbilled Metered Consumption Unbilled Unmetered Consumption Unauthorized Consumption Customer Metering Inaccuracies Systematic Data Handling Errors Leakage on Mains Leakage on Service Lines Spills and Overflow

Non Revenue Water Measurement Grouping Billed Water Exported Billed Metered Consumption Billed Unmetered Consumption Billed Not Collected Metered Use Unbilled Metered Consumption Unbilled Unmetered Consumption Unauthorized Consumption Customer Metering Inaccuracies Systematic Data Handling Errors Leakage on Mains Leakage on Service Lines Spills and Overflow 1 2 3 9 4 2 7 1 7 5 4 6 5 8 7 3 6 8 9

Non Revenue Water Status Quo Costs Increase as Leaks Grow Revenue Decreases as Apparent Losses Grow

Solution Packages 93-97% Revenue Water Apparent Losses Real Losses 1 2 C & I accuracy improvements Improve Residential Accuracy and Reduce Billing Errors Reduce Unauthorized Use and bad debt Mass Balance Acoustic View Fluid Energy Advanced Leak Detection Apparent Losses Real Losses 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Non Revenue Solutions 10% Cost Reduction 11% Revenue Gain Revenue Increases as Apparent Losses are Reduced Costs Reduced as Real Losses are Controlled Infrastructure Expansion is Deferred Customer Service Is Improved Labor is Optimized 11% Revenue Gain

Lost Opportunity Basis Sensus Water Balance Source Input Delivery Consumption/ Loss Type of Use or Loss Revenue/ Non-Revenue Measurement Grouping Examples Lost Opportunity Basis Surface Water Total System Input Water Exported Authorized Consumption Billed Authorized Consumption Revenue Water Billed Water Exported Municipal Transfer Water None Water Supplied Billed Metered Consumption Residential, Commercial, Industrial Use, Including Customer Leaks Billed Unmetered Consumption Flat Fee Structures for Accounts Non- Revenue Water Billed Not Collected Metered Use Residential, Commercial, Industrial Use, but payment not collected for leak adjustments, bad debt, or forgiveness. Revenue Lost Unbilled Authorized Consumption Unbilled Metered Consumption City Use, Other Authorized Non payment Applications, Flushing Unbilled Unmetered Consumption City Use, Other Authorized Non payment Applications, Flushing, Firefighting Water Losses Apparent Losses Unauthorized Consumption Unauthorized use, Tamper Customer Metering Inaccuracies Residential, Commercial, Industrial Meters accuracy errors Ground Water Systematic Data Handling Errors Billing errors, unit errors, resolution errors, estimated reads Real Losses Leakage on Mains Leaks on Transmission and/or Distribution Mains Production Costs Lost Purchased or Imported Water Leakage on Service Lines Leaks on Service Connections Up to Customer Meters Leakage & Overflows at Storage Storage Tank Leaks and Overflows

Asset Optimization

Main Break Costs REPAIR According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, the U.S. suffers from 240,000 water main breaks a year. That's roughly 700 water main breaks each day. 15 breaks per 100 miles (161 km) per year of water main is common. @ $3,205 (USD) per break of repair costs, = $48,075 / year / 100 miles of mains WATER COSTS 1-4 hours duration 10-1,000 GPM = 600-240,000 gallons @ $1.25/1000 gallons = $0.75 - $300 BUSINESS – SOCIAL COSTS Street closures and citizens quality of life ????? Lost business productivity ????

Replacement Costs $ 926,807 (US$) / Mile of Pipe $ 579,254 (US$) / km of Pipe

Value Propositions – Asset Management Increase Revenue Lower Pressure Loss for more Consumption Lower Costs Reduce Leaks (Production and Transport Costs) Lower Repair Costs Reduce Costs for Dispute Resolution Reduce Replacement Costs Optimize Assets Extend the Life of Production and Treatment Facilities Optimize Storage and Pumping Operations Extend the Life of Mains and Service Lines Reduce Risks Fewer Main Breaks Better Fire Fighting Capabilities with Hydrant Monitoring and Pressure Management Predictive Analysis Reduce Water Quality Risk from Breakage Enhance Customer Service Improve Service Pressure Avoid Lost Business Revenue Daily Disruptions 5-15% Return on Investment

Asset Values AWWA Benchmark is 11 breaks per 100 miles of water mains per year. What if we could reduce that by 36% - 80 fewer breaks over 20 yrs $6M in rehabilitation and replacement costs What if we could reduce that by 10% per year - $12M over 20 years

Thank You