Adaption of antitrust compliance program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GREETINGS TO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS FOR ICAIS POST QUALIFICATION COURSE VIDEO CONFERENCE FROM HYDERABAD 26 AUGUST 2005.
Advertisements

Competition Cartels, Collusion & the Code By Andrew C Wood Hon MRCSA (Life) Barrister August 2011.
Scott D. Hammond Deputy Assistant Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division Detroit, Michigan February 15, 2013.
Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct Laura K. Kennedy Senior Vice President, Ethics and Compliance SAIC.
TAX Yuliana Revyuk, KPMG in Ukraine Investment in Ukraine: Certain key tax issues.
Supply Chain Competition Compliance in Scotland Scottish Supply Chain Forum 14 June 2011 Garfield House Hotel, Cumbernauld Road, Stepps Mark Clough, Partner.
BlueCare Tennessee and BlueCare, Independent Licensees of BlueCross BlueShield Association How the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 Impacts BlueCare Tennessee.
John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief, New York Field Office Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice Judicial Training Program Moscow, Russia July.
Detecting Cartels: What Can We Do? Joo-yong Lee Deputy Director, Cartel Policy Team, Cartel Bureau Korea Fair Trade Commission 7 April 2006, Seoul, Korea.
POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP ORIGINAL IDEAS. UNCOMMON SOLUTIONS. U.S. INTERNATIONAL CARTEL ENFORCEMENT Presented by Neil R. Ellis Vienna, Austria.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE. Government regulation on banking market in Russia Competition aspects.
WELCOME Annual Meeting & Compliance Seminar. Code of Conduct - Impact on Corporate Culture by Andy Greenstein Knight Capital Group, Inc.
New HR Challenges in the Dynamic Environment of Legal Compliance By Teri J. Elkins.
Supplier Ethics: Program Checklist
Data Protection Paul Veysey & Bethan Walsh. Introduction Data Protection is about protecting people by responsibly managing their data in ways they expect.
Investigation and Enforcement of competition law.
UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES IN VIETNAM Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam – 12 Sept 2012.
Criminal Antitrust Practice Donald C. Klawiter J. Clayton Everett, Jr. Jennifer M. Driscoll.
The Institutionalization of Business Ethics
Obtaining Evidence through Discovery & Witnesses John W. McReynolds Assistant Chief New York Field Office Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice.
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Tim Timmons Vice President Compliance and Regulatory Services Health Future, LLC.
NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 4 INVESTIGATION.
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
An Introduction to regulation, it ’ s significance and rationale Kevin Hinde.
Mini Plenary 3: Cartel Enforcement and Leniency in Developing Agencies Leniency Programme in Turkey Gülçin DERE Competition Expert Turkish Competition.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF COMPETITION AGENCIES. GENERAL STRUCTURE OF CA CAs differ in size, structure and complexity The structure depicts power distribution.
Developing and Implementing an Effective Compliance Program Mary Sacilotto,BA,CHC Chief Compliance Officer Alliance, Inc.
©2008, Promega Corporation. All rights reserved. ©2007, Promega Corporation. All rights reserved. Global Financial Crisis -- Practical Implications for.
Medical Device Compliance Congress: Emerging Compliance Issues in Asia Anne Trimmer.
The Institutionalization of Business Ethics
Fines: A Contextual Approach The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do no necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission.
RESEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF COMPETITION BY MOKUBUNG N. MOKUBUNG 1.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
Bid Rigging as Provided for under the Fair Competition Act, 2003 and the Proposed Amendments Presenter: Grace Freedom Nicholas Investigation Department.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE International Competition Network 6 th Annual Conference Moscow 2007 Application Experience of International Competition Network.
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
Business and Society POST, LAWRENCE, WEBER Antitrust, Mergers, and Global Competition Chapter 9.
Antitrust. Fundamental Assumptions Competition is good Big is not bad Monopoly practices are bad People should be allowed to buy whatever quality they.
Alfredo M. O´Farrell American Bar Association - Fall Meeting Latin American Antitrust: New Rules and Issues for American and European Investors.
INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT Presentation by Duncan T. Morotsi 15 th March
Imbalance between Private and Public Enforcement in Colombia Webinar Series - ICN Alfonso Miranda Londoño December 15,
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
Investigation Timeline
Antitrust Law Compliance Policy and Guidelines November 19, 2004.
1 Consumer Protection & Anti- competitive conduct in Telecommunications Part V & Part XIB of the Trade Practices Act 1974 Australian Communications and.
Standards Anti-Trust Compliance Briefing August 31, 2004.
1 Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine Guidelines on setting fines imposed for violations of the law on protection of economic competition GENERAL APPROACHES.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Government Regulation of Competition and Prices Twomey Jennings.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.8-1 Chapter 8 Developing an Effective Ethics Program.
Chapter 4 The Institutionalization of Business Ethics Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. MGT University of Bahrain College.
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
Investigative powers and other enforcement tools
Philippine Competition Commission Creating a Culture of Competition
Sales promotion via the Internet by companies with a distribution network How to avoid conflicts with the network Marco Hero TIGGES Rechtsanwälte Zollhof.
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
The Institutionalization of Business Ethics
Corporate Responsibility
Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Competition and Antitrust Compliance Programs for Business
Introduction to Competition Policy & Law
Is Your Ethics Program in Order?
Competition law Class 8-9
Competition Law Enforcement in the E.U. - Dawn Raids -
Calculated risk between the leniency benefits and class actions in Colombia Gabriel Ibarra Pardo - Ibarra Abogados December 2015.
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
Ethics as Culture key elements
Chapter 8 Developing an Effective Ethics Program
Unlocking Children’s Rights
Ethics as Culture key elements
Calculated risk between the leniency benefits and class actions in Colombia Gabriel Ibarra Pardo - Ibarra Abogados December 2015.
Presentation transcript:

Adaption of antitrust compliance program to the local regulatory environment Vladimir Sayenko Partner March 2016

What is antitrust compliance? What is compliance? Compliance means respecting the law. In the competition field, it means business proactively respecting competition rules. The primary benefit of an antitrust compliance program is to avoid or catch quickly anticompetitive conduct within the company. The “United States Sentencing Guidelines” specifically identify an effective compliance and ethics program as a basis for reducing a company’s “culpability score,” and therefore, the company’s ultimate criminal fine and penalties. (U.S. v. KAYABA INDUSTRY COMPANY, September 2015) A consulting firm that provided services to the cartelists can be liable, even if it is not present on the market where the infringements were committed (the Court of Justice decision in the Heat Stabilisers cartels case Commission v AC-Treuhand AG of 22 October 2015)

Antitrust investigations Classification of antitrust compliance risks Antitrust investigations Provision of inaccurate information Failure to meet deadline false substance Anticompetitive concerted practices cartels verticals parallel behavior bid riding Abuse of dominant position price fixing entry/exit market barriers Unfair competition misleading advertisement parasitic copying Merger control failure to obtain merger clearance post-closing risks Private Damages Claims

Risk zones by staff category Anticompetitive concerted practices Abuse of dominant position Unfair competition Merger control Provision of inaccurate information Senior management √ Legal department Sales department Marketing department Administrative staff

. Compliance workflow Starting point In-house v external counsel: Acknowledgment of violation Leniency procedure Regulator consultations, comfort letters Normal Collection of feedback, proactive monitoring and audits In-house v external counsel: most civil law countries do not protect communications between corporations and their in-house lawyers! Introduction or update of compliance policy, regular employee education . Compliance due diligence Starting point Activity

Review of correspondence Interviews with managers Competition Compliance Due Diligence Due diligence report Review of documents Review of correspondence Safety Winter is coming… Interviews with managers Mock dawn raids

Compliance embedded as company culture and policy Fundamental principles of antitrust (with local adaptation): no price fixing no customer allocation no market allocation, no bid rigging Other Market Players Interaction Communication with the Regulator Code of conduct: Reporting of all contacts with competitors Participation in industry associations Anonymous hotline to report violations No retribution against whistleblowers No destruction of evidence Dawn Raid Defense

Employee Education Top Managers Legal department Heads of departments Sales department Marketing department Other departments

Preliminary conclusions Formal consultations with regulator Preliminary conclusions (comfort letters) Abuse of dominant position Cartels and other concerted practices Concentration Unfair competition

Leniency conditions Leniency Procedure First to apply Not the initiator Termination of violation Cooperation with Regulator

Acknowledgment of Violation Fine Anticompetitive concerted practices up to 10% of revenue Abuse of dominant position Unfair competition up to 5% of revenue Merger control temporary amnesty cap: EUR 4000 until mid-September 2016 Provision of inaccurate information up to 1% of revenues EUR 530 to EUR 5300 until mid-September 2016 Fining Guidelines (Recommendations) dated 15 September 2015 and 16 February 2016

Judicial Review No judicial review on merits Fining guidelines are not mandatory AMC is always right: wins vast majority of cases Judicial reform: Commercial v. Administrative Courts

E-mail: info@sk.ua Website: www.sk.ua 10 Muzeyny Provulok Kyiv 01001, Ukraine Теl: +380 44 499 6000 Fax: +380 44 499 6250