CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Deposition at Rocky Mountain National Park: the RoMANS Study Mike Barna Bill Malm Bret Schichtel Kristi Gebhart Air Resources Division National.
Advertisements

WRAP Meeting Nov 11, 2009 Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in Western National Parks Chris Shaver Air Resources Division National Park Service.
Modeling the Role of Oil and Gas Emissions on Regional Ozone in the Intermountain West: Using CAMx HDDM for W126 Ozone Mike Barna, NPS-ARD Tammy Thompson,
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Nitrogen Deposition over the US Raluca Ellis, Fabien Paulot Daven Henze, Daniel Jacob Harvard University, U. Colorado Boulder AQAST 3 meeting, June 13,
ROMANS Nitrogen Source Sensitivity Analysis Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bill Malm 1 Bret Schichtel 1 Jenny Hand 2 1 ARD-NPS, Fort Collins,
3SDW test case at NPS/CIRA Mike Barna NPS-ARD 5/29/13 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
Modeled Ammonia Nitrogen Deposition Source Apportionment at Rocky Mountain National Park for RoMANS2 Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
Ozone transport network Guoxun Tian CS 790G Fall 2010.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Critical Load Development for Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition Elizabeth Waddell Air Resources Specialist Pacific West Region
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Eighteen Years of Acid Wet Deposition at Mt. Mansfield Goals & Objectives One goal of the VMC is to understand the sources, mechanisms, and effects of.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
Trends in the Wet and Dry Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulfur Species
West-wide Jumpstart Air Quality Modeling Study Modeling Results November 7, 2013 Technical Project Team ENVIRON, Alpine Geophysics, Univ. of North Carolina.
PM Model Performance Goals and Criteria James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling Meeting Denver, CO May 26,
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
2004 Technical Summit Overview January 26-27, 2004 Tempe, AZ.
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Chemical transport modeling in support of NPS-CIRA activities Mike Barna 1 Marco Rodriguez 2 Kristi Gebhart 1 Bret Schichtel 1 Bill Malm 1 Jenny Hand 2.
Colorado Perspective on Nitrogen Oxides Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado APCD November 11, 2009.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
EANET activities and the applicability to model development Kazuhide Matsuda ADORC.
Application of the CMAQ-UCD Aerosol Model to a Coastal Urban Site Chris Nolte NOAA Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC 6.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Evaluation and Application of AMSTERDAM: Focus on Plume In Grid Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Rochelle Balmori Atmospheric.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Western Regional Technical Air Quality Studies: support for Ozone and other Air Quality Planning in the West Tom Moore Air Quality Program Manager Western.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) Model Performance Evaluation CAMx and CMAQ 2011b University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
NADP-Compatible Wet Chemistry Sampler Data Analysis, Telluride, CO Mark Williams Kim Raby University of Colorado Institute of Arctic and Alpine.
Principal Investigators: William C. Malm 1 Jeffrey L. Collett, Jr. 2 Authors: Michael G. Barna 1 Kristi A. Gebhart 1 Bret A. Schichtel 1 Contributors:
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
Robin L. Dennis, Jesse O. Bash, Kristen M. Foley, Rob Gilliam, Robert W. Pinder U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory,
Informed NPS Air Quality Management Decisions in Response to a Changing Climate.
NATURAL pH OF RAIN Equilibrium with natural CO 2 (280 ppmv) results in a rain pH of 5.7: This pH can be modified by natural acids (H 2 SO 4, HNO 3, RCOOH…)
Alternative title slide
Relative contributions of NH3, NO2, NH4+ and NO3- to dry deposition of Nitrogen at an agricultural site in the Indo-Gangetic Plain of India Saumya Singh,
Tanya L. Spero1, Megan S. Mallard1, Stephany M
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
FUTURE PREDICTION OF SURFACE OZONE OVER EAST ASIA UP TO 2020
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
Source apportionment of reactive nitrogen deposition
16th Annual CMAS Conference
/
17th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC
Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D.
Policy-driven priorities for improvements to the CMAQ photochemical modeling system Heather Simon, Kristen Foley, Sharon Phillips, Norm Possiel, Shawn.
Nitrogen Deposition: Measurement Techniques and Field Studies
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
Using CMAQ to Interpolate Among CASTNET Measurements
Evaluating Revised Tracking Metric for Regional Haze Planning
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results
Improving Regional PM2.5 Modeling along Utah’s Wasatch Front
Update on specifying boundary conditions for regional-scale air quality models Mike Barna, NPS-ARD RTOWG call 9/10/19.
Presentation transcript:

CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC Modeled Source Apportionment of Reactive Nitrogen in the Greater Yellowstone Area Tammy M. Thompson: Colorado State University (now at AAAS); Michael G. Barna, Bret A. Schichtel: National Park Service; C. Thomas Moore: Western States Air Resources Council (WESTAR) CMAS Annual Conference, October 24-26, 2016, Chapel Hill, NC

Outline Modeling Platform Source Apportionment Details, Why Use? Model Performance within the Grand Tetons based on National Park Service Special Study Source Apportionment Regions/Sectors Grand Tetons Ammonia concentrations Total Nitrogen Deposition The Greater Yellowstone Area

Why care about N deposition It’s a fertilizer, and can foster ecosystem change in sensitive environments Diatom communities in alpine lakes Wildflowers -> sedges GYA nitrogen ‘critical load’ at 3 kg/ha/yr See Fenn et al. (2003) for review of N deposition ecological effects 3

Inter-Mountain West Data Warehouse 2011 Modeling Domain (NPS & Class 1 in Red) 36km / 12km Domains focused on the Western US 2011 National Emissions Inventory with Improvements Oil and Gas Agriculture Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) 2011 met modeling by IWDW for Western US MOZART BCs Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) Fully Evaluated by IWDW

Grand Trends Study Area Field campaign: April – September, 2011 Measure N species across Grand Teton National Park

Annual Average Agricultural NH3 Emissions 2011: Tons/year/km2

Model Values in Blue Measured Values in Red Nitric Acid Particle Nitrate Ammonia Particle Ammonium Upper Grand Targhee shows good model performance for key measured Nitrogen Species Model Values in Blue Measured Values in Red All Values in µg/m3

Source Regions From Each Region, Trace Source Sectors Individually: Agriculture Oil and Gas Model Domain Boundaries All Other Source Sectors

Trace Regional Air Pollution Emissions to their Contributions in Grids Cells in Grand Tetons NP. We’ll look at three grid cells moving from West to East across the park

Who is Contributing to Ambient NH3 Concentration on the Western Side of Grand Tetons NP? (2011 Annual Average)

Who is Contributing to Ambient NH3 Concentration on the Center of Grand Tetons NP? (2011 Annual Average)

Who is Contributing to Ambient NH3 Concentration on the Eastern Side of Grand Tetons NP? (2011 Annual Average)

Inorganic Reactive N deposition budgets Modeled Measured The relative importance of N deposition pathways depends on the amount of precipitation (DR v GT). Dry deposition of ammonia is important in GTNP. In June and July, precipitation at Driggs (~54 mm each month) was greater than at NOAA Climate Center (~30 mm), consistent with their locations upwind and downwind of the Teton Range, respectively. Wet nitrogen deposition was also greater at Driggs. In August and September, monthly precipitation was less than 10mmat both Driggs and NOAA Climate Center, while at the higher elevation site, Upper Grand Targhee, 29 mm of precipitation fell in August and 36 mm fell in September. The highest average volume-weighted ion concentrations were of ammonium, calcium, nitrate, and sulfate at all three sites. At both Driggs and NOAA Climate Center, precipitation ion concentrations (μN) decreased in the order NH4 +>NO3 >Ca2+>SO4 2, while at Upper Grand Targhee, the order was NH4 +>Ca2+>NO3 >SO4 2. Nitrogen species were always more abundant than sulfur, on a molar basis, in the precipitation samples. The absolute amount of precipitation in 2011 was higher than the historical average during the wet period, indicating that dry deposition of NH3 may typically be a more important contributor also to spring nitrogen deposition than that observed during GrandTReNDS Note the importance of reduced N deposition

Source Contribution by Region ID CA BC (Surprisingly) large contribution from boundary and California Idaho the most significant source Wyoming and Utah also make significant contributions

Monthly Total Deposition by Source Sector

Conclusions Most of the N dep at GYA from Idaho; BC’s, CA, UT and Wyo also important Need better treatment of ammonia Measurement studies happening in RMNP now Evaluating models with bi-directional flux ammonia modeling capabilities If industrial agriculture is a large source (it is), then how to address for mitigation? Expanding both measurement and model capabilities for organic nitrogen