CONSIDERING SODIUM IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLANNING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Question 2 How much of the nutrient should I apply??
Advertisements

Nutrient Management: Planning and Trends
Class 3: Soil Sampling and Testing Chris Thoreau.
Soil Salinity/Sodicity/Alkalinity and Nutrients
Gregg Carlson, David Clay, Doug Malo, Sharon Clay, and Cheryl Reese.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
Modeling of Soil Nutrients – An Introduction to Logical Spreadsheeting Russell Yost Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawai`i.
LECTURE 10 Introduction to some chemical properties of soils : Factors affecting plant growth (2)
Hailin Zhang Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Soil Physical and Chemical Quality and Management in Organic Production.
Ch. 4 continued Soil Properties.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
Soils of North Dakota Dave Franzen Professor, North Dakota State University, Fargo- Extension Soil Specialist.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 6 Manure Application Building Environmental.
Soil Salinity Saline Soil Solution Cation Exchange and Colloidal Phenomena Mineral Weathering Boron Chemistry Irrigation Water Quality.
How soils supply plant nutrients An Introduction to Soil Chemistry
GOLF COURSE AND TURF SOLUTIONS PRESENTED BY GAVIN OLSEN.
Soil Nutrient Accumulation in an Orchardgrass Hayfield following Poultry Litter Application R.A. Gilfillen 1 *, B.B. Sleugh 2, W.T. Willian 1, and M.L.
Nutrient Budgets For CNMPs Nutrient Management Planners Training March 31, 2009 Bobby Smith County Extension Coordinator UGA Cooperative Extension Morgan.
Watershed Assessment and Diagnosis of Condition for August 20, 2007 Joe Magner and Greg Johnson MPCA.
Soil Electrical Conductivity
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
Manure Recycling ACP Compost Solutions Workshop February 28, 2007 John Gundlach Manager of Organics Management Inland Empire Utilities Agency.
Soil Respiration Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: soil respiration and soil microbes O Explain the role of soil respiration in determining soil.
Unit C1. Basic Principles of Agricultural/Horticultural Science.
Roxanne Johnson Extension Water Quality Associate February 24, 2009 Tile Drainage Forum NDSU.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
Unit C. Basic Principles of Agricultural/Horticultural Science.
Sodicity and Salinity Kristie Watling NRW, Toowoomba Ph:
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
Milking Center Wastewater Treatment Created by Josh Appleby, MAEAP Verifier, MDA.
Assessing soil quality, soil testing procedures, soil test interpretation Weston Miller, OSU Extension Service.
Lesson 7. Understanding Soil Degradation. Next Generation Science/Common Core Standards Addressed ! HS-ESS2-2 Analyze geoscience data to make the claim.
Dr. Larry Cihacek Soil and Range Science Department NDSU School of Natural Resource Sciences Fargo, ND.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Soil and Plant Growth What is soil?
2009 Soybean Drying Tips Kenneth Hellevang, Ph.D., P.E.
Soil Texture and Textural Class
Unit 5 Lesson 3 Human Impact on Water
Unit 4 Lesson 1 Human Impact on Water
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 , and Shirley Clark3
Soil Testing and Fertiliser Application
Soil Water Original by Casey Osksa
Indian Wells Valley Groundwater Basin
The Netherlands: manure policy and request for a derogation to the livestock manure limit of 170 kg N/ha per year for dr. ir. Cindy.
The Principles of cation and anion exchange capacity
PRESENTATION TOPIC CONTAMINATED LAND AND BIOREMEDIATION
Irrigation Scheduling Overview and Tools
Manure 101 University of Wisconsin - Extension
EFFECT OF ABATTOIR WASTES ON THE PHYSICO- CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF TWO SOIL TYPES IN ENUGU STATE NIGERIA EDEH, I.G. AND IGWE, C.A. UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA,
J. Lucid, O. Fenton, J. Grant, M.G. Healy*
Chapter 15 Organic Amendments.
Winter application worksheet
SOIL! SOIL: Particles of minerals, organic matter (plant and animal), water, and air; that is found on most surfaces of the land. It takes 100+ years to.
Determining the Suitability of Soils for Drainage
Soils, Nutrients and Fertilizers Part I
SOIL CONTAMINATION.
Growth promoting substances
Subsurface (Tile) Drainage Hydrology & Water Quality
CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY
Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.
In-Field Soil Sampling
Determination of Exchangeable Potassium
Waste Minimization & Sludge Handling
Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Agricultural Ecology.
BASIC ISSUES OF MANURE MANAGEMENT: ASSIGNING MANURE SPREADING PRIORITIES RICHARD WOLKOWSKI AND KEITH KELLING DEPARTMENT OF SOIL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF.
Poultry Litter as Fertilizer?
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Chapter 14 Water Pollution.
Presentation transcript:

CONSIDERING SODIUM IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PLANNING L.J. Cihacek*, North Dakota State Univ.

Nutrient Management Generally, nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are the nutrients we are concerned about in managing nutrients from land application of solid wastes.

Nutrient Management Nutrient management planning typically involves consideration of N and P loading rates based on the N and/or P content of solid wastes, soil types, crops grown, soil management and risks for contamination of surface or ground water.

Nutrient Management However, solid wastes containing up to as much as 4-5 % sodium (Na) are being generated in North Dakota and some of these are destined to be applied to agricultural (cropped) land.

Sodium in Soils About 11% of all soils in North Dakota are affected by salts or Na. Many of the prominent agricultural soils in the state have mineralogies dominated by smectitic clays. These soils may already contain significant quantities of native Na and have a tendency to be dispersed.

Sodium in Soils Na in soils is a monovalent cation (+ charged) which when it occurs in quantities of more than 5 to 10% of the total cations in the soil will cause the soil structure to deteriorate and become dispersed.

Sodium in Soils Dispersed soils are “greasy” when wet, very hard when dry, have massive structure and are generally unsuitable for plant growth. Dispersed soils also do not drain well, have water ponding on them and do not bear traffic very well.

Sodium in Soils Field experience by soil scientists in North Dakota indicated that many soils began showing signs of dispersion when the exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) reached between 5 to 7% and significant dispersion began to appear when the ESP reached about 10%.

Sodium in Soils Soils that have been affected by applied sodium are difficult if not impossible to rejuvineate to their original productivity.

Development of ND Guidelines NDSU Soil Science Department was approached by the ND State Health Department to assist in developing Na application guidelines for “high” Na containing wastes for the solid waste permitting process.

Background Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Na application guidelines give values of maximum application rates of 170 lb Na/A. Value based on choride (Cl) loading values for groundwater developed by Wisconsin. Guidelines rarely used by MPCA because Na was not perceived as a problem.

Background 170 lbs Na/A appeared to be too high based on field experience of ND Soil Scientists. Field scientists and soil testing laboratories were consulted to develop a more scientific approach in using Na guidelines.

Background Cation exchange capacity (CEC) and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) can be estimated by relatively common standard soil testing methodologies by most soil testing laboratories. Decision made to base Na application rates on these two tests plus on Na analysis of material to be applied.

Background Since soils of differing texture and mineralogy have differing CEC then application rate would be based on soil CEC and not a fixed value. Examples: Coarse textured soils = low CEC Medium textured soils = medium CEC Fine Textured soils = High CEC

Background Also, since soil ESP is based on the percentage of Na+ of the total soil cations, a simple target level of Na could be calculated. Finally, in some soils, ESP’s of >5% may cause dispersion, so A 5% ESP was considered to be a “safe” level that would not cause soil degradation.

Background Thus, Na application rates would then be calculated based on the difference of ESP levels at 5% CEC minus actual ESP as a % of CEC. Example: A soil with an ESP of 2% could safely handle additional sodium until an ESP of 5% was reached through waste application

Examples

Table 1. Sodium Contents of Some Agricultural Wastes __________________________________________________________________________ Material Na Content1| Na applied /T material__ ----%------ -lb T-1 (kg Mt –1)- Meat-packing Plant Manure (MPPM) 4.6 92 (103) Corn-processing Biosolids (CPB) 4.8 96 (107) Rendering Plant Biosolids (RPB) 0.5 10 (11) ___________________________________________________________________________ 1| On a dry-matter basis

Table 3. Allowable Na Application Levels for Selected North Table 3. Allowable Na Application Levels for Selected North Dakota Soils Soil Series NRCS Pedon No. Na Content CEC ESP --cmol kg –1--- --cmol kg –1-- -%- Barnes S79ND-021-005 1.4 1.90 7.4 Fargo2| S93MN-089-026 0.5 1.1 Hegne2| S93MN-119-021 0.8 46.2 1.7 Rhodes S64ND-011-002 1.0 23.1 4.3 Williams S54ND-101-002 0.1 23.7 0.4 S79ND-015-007 6.9 22.7 30.3 1| From USDA-NRCS National Soils Database. 2| Data for soils from Polk County, MN. These soils are widely distributed throughout MLRA 56 (Red River Valley of the North) in both Minnesota and North Dakota.

Table 4. Allowable Application Rates of Three Agricultural Wastes on Selected North Dakota Soils.     Allowable Rates of: 1| Soil Series NRCS Pedon No. MPPM CPB RPB -----------------------Tons A-1 (Mg ha-1)------------------- Barnes S79ND-021-005 ------------------------Do Not Apply--------------------- Fargo S93MN-089-026 0.85 (1.9) 0.81 (1.8) 7.8 (17.5) Hegne S93MN-119-021 0.75 (1,7) 0.72 (1.6) 6.9 (15.5) Rhoades S64ND-011-002 0.05 (0.1) 0.5 (1.1) Williams S54ND-101-002 0.55 (1.2) 0.53 (1.2) 5.1 (11.4) S79ND-015-007 -------------------------Do Not Apply----------------------   1| On a dry matter basis

Table 2. CEC and ESP of Selected North Dakota Soils 1| Allowable Difference Soil Series NRCS Pedon No. CEC Maximum Na Level 1| Na application 2| From MN Guideline --------- C mol kg-1----- lb A-1 (kg ha-1) Barnes S79ND-021-005 19 0.9 -23 (-26) -193 (-216) Fargo S93MN-089-026 45 2.2 78 (87) -92 (-103) Hegne S93MN-119-021 46.2 2.3 69 (77) -101 (-113) Rhoades S64ND-011-002 23.1 1.1 5 (6) -165 (-185) Williams S54ND-101-002 23.7 1.2 51 (57) -119 (-133) S79ND-015-007 22.7 -267 (299) -436 (-488)

Summary Science-based (rather than rate-based) guidelines have been established for application of solid wastes containing high levels of Na based on soil CEC and ESP information. Guidelines tailor Na applications to soil properties to prevent soil degradation.

Summary Guidelines have been applied to several land application permits for solid waste disposal by the ND State Health Department. Guidelines also require post application monitoring (soil testing) to ensure Na levels have not been exceeded

Summary In some cases wastes could be reapplied if 5% levels were not reached due to first application.

Summary In North Dakota, on some soils, the Na application rate may limit waste application rates before N or P management considerations do.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author gratefully acknowledges the valuable advice and discussions provided by Robert Deutsch, Agvise Laboratories, Northwood, ND, Larry Swenson NDSU Soil Testing Laboratory and Mike Sweeney, Professor Emeritus, NDSU, Fargo, ND.