5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Infrastructures Services Department LIU-SPS external beam dump - Internal Review Civil Engineering Aspect for Option B (LSS4) 30/7/2014 Martin.
Advertisements

A3 - dual carriageway link between London and Portsmouth 6.5km new road, 1.77km in bored tunnel £371 million Construction started January 2007 Project.
NNN07 - Hamamatsu M. Russo - Switzerland Fréjus site pre-study and beyond NNN07 – HAMAMATSU Workshop on Next Generation Nucleon Decay and Neutrino.
What are they and what are they used for?. Contract Documents Architects working drawings Specifications Schedules Bill of Quantities.
CERN TS Department / Civil Engineering Group 8 February 2008 Civil Engineering Layouts & Tunnel Cross Section 1 CLIC/ILC Collaboration Meeting 8 Feb 2008.
Plasma Wakefield (AWAKE) Project Meeting 18 October 2012 Civil Engineering Feasibility Issues for the West Area EDMS : John Osborne GS-SE.
CFS challenges for a linear collider J.Osborne CERN ILC-GDE Dubna - 4 June 2008 OUTLINE : Introduction Civil Engineering -Geology (water, stability issues.
John Osborne GS/SE March 2013
HSE Preliminary General Requirements for FCC layout and air management A. Henriques & M. Widorski on behalf of the HSE Unit 17/12/2014 FCC I&O Meeting.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
Posiva Oy Olkiluoto Eurajoki Puh. (02) 8372 (31) faksi (02) DOPAS Demonstration of Plugs and Seals Posiva Plug Experiment POPLU at URCF.
Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.
CES Status J.Osborne 6 November 2009 Status Report from Civil Engineering and Services Working Group J.Osborne GS/SEM for CES Working Group.
FCC Tunnel Civil Engineering and Geology John Osborne (CERN GS-SE) 4 April 2014.
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
LHC scheduling applied to CLIC and ILC TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009 K. Foraz K. Foraz - CERN TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
John Osborne : GS-SEM Civil Engineering 19 May 2009 Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG CTC 19 May 2009 Tunnel Cross Section.
10/2010 IWLC2010 Global Design Effort 1 Brief Overview of Interaction Region Conventional Facilities in RDR Times Presenter Tom Lackowski.
Civil Engineering and Services - drawings for CDR - CDR chapter J.Osborne and M.Gastal for CES WG 1.
EUROn Safety 13/06/2012M. Dracos1. Safety workshop 13/06/2012M. Dracos2 A first two days safety workshop has been organized at CERN last May (
Global Design Effort - CFS TILC08 Working Group 1 - March 5, CFS Cost Reductions Conventional Facilities and Siting Group A. Enomoto, V.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
Modern GROUND IMPROVEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR HIGHWAYS
General Infrastructures Services Department Civil Engineering planning for LSS4 Option, presented at review workshop 30/7/ months Planning and Resources:
FHI 32: FCC tunnel layout and transferline update Tuesday, 9 February 2016 CE Updates: Comparison of 100km Intersecting and Non-Intersecting options New.
Europe / CERN studies for SB2009 ILC Re-Baseling J.Osborne CERN (CFS & CES) 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 28 September - 4 October 2009.
March 22, –  Design Concept & Hall Layout  Access Tunnel  Top heading Tunnel  Displacement of detector hall by push-pull operation.
MDI 9 th Meeting - 22 nd January 2016 FCC Experimental Caverns - Feasibility and Excavation C. Cook (GS), J. Osborne (GS),
Infrastructure and Operation meeting 20 th January 2016 Amberg’s Report Summary : Comparison of 100km Intersecting and Non-Intersecting options C. Cook.
CLIC MODULE TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION Keith Kershaw CES, 8 October 2008.
Review of FCC tunnel footprint & implementation Introduction & scope Philippe Lebrun Review of FCC tunnel footprint & implementation CERN, 11 June 2015.
LAGUNA-LBNO at Fréjus General Meeting September 2013, Paris Giovanni Como and Davide Vietti.
PRESENTED BY- Namrata M. Lolge (09CM16F) M. Tech. 1 st sem NITK.
Design considerations for the FCC electrical network architecture FCC week 2016, Rome, April 2016 Davide Bozzini - CERN/EN/EL With the contribution.
1 Building Design Progress Dan Wilcox March 2012.
DIAPHRAGM WALLS.
LAGUNA-LBNO at Fréjus General Meeting June 2013, Geneva Giovanni Como, Francesco Amberg, Daniele Bronzetti 1.
1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.
Structural Slab Analysis
Civil Design for Tunnel Case Studies
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
FCC Underground Infrastructure
Civil Engineering for FCC-eh and LHeC
Civil Engineering update - alignment configuration
FCC Civil Engineering Optimisation and Design Development
Detector Hall Design and Cost Information CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
FCC Civil Engineering John Osborne, Jo Stanyard, Matt Stuart(SMB - Site Engineering - FAS Section) Cost & schedule Phase 3 - specification 10th May 2017.
CLIC Civil Engineering & Infrastructure
FCC Civil Engineering John Osborne & Jo Stanyard (SMB - Site Engineering - FAS Section) FCC week outline 10th May 2017.
$150K Chicago/ANL seed funding for Braidwood site investigation
Tunnel Cross Section Studies
CLIC / ILC Collaboration for CFS works
FCC Civil Engineering update
Latest ILC tunnel cross section May 2017
FCC-ee MDI Civil Engineering update
Detector hall in mountain regions
(Additional materials)
ILC DRAFT CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Flat topography & Mountainous sites
A very first look at siting issues
Civil Engineering for FCC-eh IR
CLIC Civil Engineering Update
Pre-Contract Cost Control
Detector hall in mountain regions
Extract from today’s talk given to DCB
FCC Week 2019 Civil Engineering Summary
Life Cycle Costing.
Presentation transcript:

5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting 1. Progress on tunnel cross-section options 2. A simplified model for the cost of a “smooth” tunnel excavated by TBM in sedimentary rock Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne 5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting CERN, 28 May 2014

Single tunnel, longitudinal ventilation Revised Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Double tunnel Revised Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Single tunnel, transverse ventilation To be revised with ventilation duct cross-sections Lebrun, Osborne, Collier FCC I&O meeting, 140326

Tunnel cost model: a word of caution The simplified cost model presented here is based on the study performed by Amberg Engineering for the CLIC CDR cost estimate Strictly valid for hard-rock TBM tunnelling in the molasse of the Geneva basin, it is based on a set of unit costs applicable to geology, depth below ground, tunnel size and configuration, excavation equipment, rock support, lining and sealing techniques, progress rates, personnel, materials, transport and handling Consequently, the model should not be used for estimating tunnel costs outside its range of validity It is recommended to use output results for relative cost comparison rather than absolute cost assessment Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

CLIC 3 TeV tunnel profile Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

CLIC tunnel cross-section Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Shafts, caverns and other singularities Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Methodology of Amberg study for CLIC underground works [1/2] Standard profiles were developed for each underground structure, including details on the excavated cross sections as well as the inner lining. For each of these standard profiles, the following main items are evaluated in quantity and price: Labour for workmanship like workers and foremen (below senior level) (shift work system: 3 shifts working 24 h/day, 7 days/week, 320 days/year , rest: official holidays and maintenance) Tunnel excavation with shielded TBM and single-pass pre-cast concrete lining, mucking and disposal Rock support for caverns by means of rock bolts with steel-fibre shotcrete Full sealing of the caverns and halls, as well as collecting and diverting of dropping water in the remaining structures Inner lining considered with reinforced concrete Implementation of an invert with sufficient bearing capacity to withstand the probable swelling pressure of the present Molasse Connection works to the neighbouring contracts Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Methodology of Amberg study for CLIC underground works [2/2] The previously listed main items cover basically 55 – 65 % of the final costs. Given the preliminary phase of the study, some further costing positions were added to the main items as percentage surcharge of the subtotal: Drainage including the pumping stations at the shaft bases (4%) Quality control (2%) Auxiliary measures (15%) such as pre-investigations, pre-injections, ground improvement Installations and equipment for construction works (e.g.: TBM, excavators, cranes, lorries) (30-40%) Overhead (15.9%) (according to the calculation scheme of Swiss Contractor Ass.) including: - surcharges on hourly wages e.g. for shift works 24 h/day and 7 days/week, workmen’s equipment, recruiting and training, - maintenance and operation of the workshops and site installations, - senior personnel for management and surveillance, - administration costs and interest rates, - insurance and contributions Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Amberg study for CLIC underground works Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Simplified cost model of TBM excavated tunnel Specified free diameter D Excavated diameter Dexc = D + 2 (tolerance + lining thickness+ grouting thickness) Cost per meter C = C1 + C2 + C3 + C4 + C5 C1 fixed cost per meter (e.g. TBM personnel for given progress rate) C2 proportional to excavated volume ~ Dexc2 C3 proportional to lining & grouting volumes ~ Dexc C4 proportional to invert (floor) volume C5 cost per meter of additional construction elements (partitions, firewall)  Cost per meter of finished tunnel is expected to scale between D and D2 Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

EXCEL table All dimensions and unit costs adjustable Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Cost of tunnel vs finished diameter (TBM in sedimentary rock, no additional construction) Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528

Cost structure of tunnel (TBM in sedimentary rock, no additional construction) Ph. Lebrun FCC I&O meeting 140528