Nonclinical Information in the Common Technical Document: Opportunities for Content Reuse Peggy Zorn, MPI Research Susan Mattano, Pfizer, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Documentum Team Lance Callaway, Brooke Durbin, Perry Koob, Lorie McMillin, Jennifer Song Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla, Missouri.
Advertisements

DR. CHRISTINA RUNDI MINISTRY OF HEALTH, MALAYSIA.
Optimos Solutions – Working For You Presented to JMATE 2006.
1 Pharmacology/Toxicology information to submit an IND for an anticancer drug.
Document Design Customized & Workplace Training AAI/Portland Community College Facilitated by George Knox.
Final Report Document. Format Title Page Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction Mission Statement Main PDS items Brief justification of the.
Technical Writing II Acknowledgement: –This lecture notes are based on many on-line documents. –I would like to thank these authors who make the documents.
©2014 Factorytalk Co., Ltd. Proprietary and Confidential eCTD Specification 17 July 2014.
Scientific Poster Design
Click to highlight each section of the article one by one Read the section, then click once to view the description of it If you want to read it, you.
Left click or use the forward arrows to advance through the PowerPoint Upon clicking, each section of the article will be highlighted one by one Read.
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Regulatory Requirement on Dossier of Medicinal.
CDER IND/NDA Reviews Guidance, The Common Technical Document and Good Review Practice John K. Leighton, Ph.D., DABT CDER/FDA.
Structure of Dossier of Medicinal Product- Q part
Guidance for Industry M4S: The CTD-Safety
Soc 3307f Research Report. Overview Typed, double-spaced, 12 point font Length: pages Finished report should have a  Title page  Table of Contents.
Justina A. Molzon, MS Pharm, JD
Christa Clasen Ankara, 6./7. April 2006
ICH V1 An FDA Update Min Chen, M.S., RPh Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA January 21, 2003.
Exploratory IND Studies
Report Format and Scientific Writing. What is Scientific Writing? Clear, simple, well ordered No embellishments, not an English paper Written for appropriate.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Medicines Regulatory Affairs
J. B. Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. © Copyright 2005 J. B. Chemicals Pharma Ltd. Electronic Submissions – eCTD Advantages Dr Milind Joshi.
1 Devising Longer Reports and Proposals Quarterly & annual reports/long range planning programs/systems evaluations/ grant requests/proposals Make strong.
 Major part of psychology for researchers, students, clinicians, etc…  Difference between journal article and popular press articles  Scholarly Journal-
WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines Programme, Abu Dhabi, October, 2010 Regulatory principles reflected in practice of WHO PQP Milan Smid,
Ivowen Ltd1 Ivowen Limited Preparation and Submission of a Traditional Herbal Medicinal Product Application.
Content Abstract –Brief (
CTD Dossier Preparation K. Srikantha Reddy Sr
Research Methodology Class.   Your report must contains,  Abstract  Chapter 1 - Introduction  Chapter 2 - Literature Review  Chapter 3 - System.
Technical Communication A Practical Approach Chapter 4: Organizing Information William Sanborn Pfeiffer Kaye Adkins.
Update on Current FDA Labeling Initiatives Iris P. Masucci, PharmD, BCPS Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA November 16, 2006 Pediatric Advisory.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
SAPRAA 5 Sept 2008 eCTD An overview of the full day presentation by Dr Olaf Schoepke at the SAAPI conference in July 2008.
Operating with Scientific Content DIA Dialogue on Structured Content Management Dec 2, 2010 Melanie Clare, GSK Ruedi Blattmann, LSCP Michael Brennan, J&J.
Metadata Driven Clinical Data Integration – Integral to Clinical Analytics April 11, 2016 Kalyan Gopalakrishnan, Priya Shetty Intelent Inc. Sudeep Pattnaik,
Project Report Format for Final Year Engineering Students.
ABSTRACT This is the template for preparing posters for the Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW). It is intended to define the required format for printing.
Design of Case Report Forms
Writing Scientific Research Paper
Review of Related Literature
The Five Secrets of Project Scheduling A PMO Approach
Abstract Provide a brief overview of your research project here..
Pre-Investigational New Drug (pre-IND) Meeting with FDA
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Technical Report Writing
CTD Content Management
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Vaccine Code Set Management Services Pilot
Definition SpecIfIcatIons
Publishing software and data
CPT and Disclosure: Connecting Critical Processes
Abstract Provide a brief overview of your research project here..
Abstract Provide a brief overview of your research project here..
Writing for academic publication: introduction to the presentation and formatting of research papers Rod Gameson.
Chapter 4 Automated Tools for Systems Development
HOW TO WRITE A SYSTEMATIC/NARRATIVE REVIEW
Technical Report Writing
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Definition SpecIfIcatIons
Metadata in the modernization of statistical production at Statistics Canada Carmen Greenough June 2, 2014.
Recent developments in Eurostat publications
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
CPT and Disclosure: Connecting Critical Processes
Writing reports Wrea Mohammed
What the Editors want to see!
Preparing Written Reports
Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition
Presentation transcript:

Nonclinical Information in the Common Technical Document: Opportunities for Content Reuse Peggy Zorn, MPI Research Susan Mattano, Pfizer, Inc.

Common Technical Document Module 1 Regional Administrative Information 1.0 CTD Table of Contents 2.1 Nonclinical Sections CTD Introduction 2.2 Clinical Overview 2.5 Nonclinical Overview 2.4 Module 2 Quality Overall Summary 2.3 Nonclinical Written and Tabulated Summaries 2.6 Clinical Summary 2.7 Module 3 Quality 3.0 Module 4 Nonclinical Study Reports 4.0 Module 5 Clinical Study Reports 5.0

Relationship of Nonclinical Content in the CTD 2.4 Nonclinical Overview 2.6.1 Nonclinical Introduction 2.6.2 & 2.6.3 Pharmacology Written / Tabulated Summaries 2.6.4 & 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Written/Tabulated Summaries 2.6.6 & 2.6.7 Toxicology Written/Tabulated Summaries 4.2.1 Pharmacology Study Reports 4.2.2 Pharmacokinetics Study Reports 4.2.3 Toxicology Study Reports

Overview of Nonclinical Sections in the CTD Nonclinical sections include Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics and Toxicology Breakdown of nonclinical information in Modules 4 and 2 is identical, detail level is different Module 4 provides detailed data on study level Module 2 provides summarized information by study type and discipline 2.4 Nonclinical Overview is the primary nonclinical summary document, providing integrated overall analysis of nonclinical information in the CTD; document structure also mirrors structure found in M4 nonclinical study reports and M2 nonclinical written summary documents Nonclinical information in the CTD is often the most “reusable” between regions

What’s Included in Nonclinical Sections of the CTD? Module 2 2.4 Nonclinical Overview 2.6.1 Introduction 2.6.2 Pharmacology Written Summary 2.6.3 Pharmacology Tabulated Summaries 2.6.4 Pharmacokinetics Written Summary 2.6.5 Pharmacokinetics Tabulated Summaries 2.6.6 Toxicology Written Summary 2.6.7 Toxicology Tabulated Summaries Module 4 4.2.1 Pharmacology study reports 4.2.2 Pharmacokinetics study reports 4.2.3 Toxicology study reports 4.3 Literature References

Toxicology Information Breakdown Module 4 4.2.3 Toxicology study reports 4.2.3.1 Single-Dose Toxicity 4.2.3.2 Repeat-Dose Toxicity 4.2.3.3 Genotoxicity 4.2.3.4 Carcinogenicity 4.2.3.5 Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity 4.2.4.6 Local Tolerance 4.2.4.7 Other Toxicity Studies Toxicology study reports generally include abstract, methods, results, conclusions and summary and individual data listings

Toxicology Information Breakdown Module 2 2.6.6 Toxicology Written Summary Brief Summary Single-Dose Toxicity Repeat-Dose Toxicity Genotoxicity Carcinogenicity Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Studies in Juvenile Animals Local Tolerance Other Toxicity Studies Discussion and Conclusions Tables and Figures Note breakdown of Toxicology Written Summary directly mirrors breakdown of Toxicology study reports in Module 4

Toxicology Information Breakdown Module 2 Nonclinical Tabulated Summaries Tabulated summary is created for all toxicology studies included in Module 4 2.6.7 Toxicology Tabulated Summaries 2.6.7.1 Toxicology Overview 2.6.7.2/3 Toxicokinetics Studies & Data 2.6.7.4 Toxicology Drug Substance 2.6.7.5 Single-Dose Toxicity 2.6.7.6/7 Repeat-Dose Toxicity 2.6.7.8/9 Genotoxicity 2.6.7.10 Carcinogenicity 2.6.7.11-2.6.7.15 Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity 2.6.7.16 Local Tolerance 2.6.7.17 Other Toxicity Studies Study-level tabulated summaries

Toxicology Information: Opportunities for Content Reuse Text and data included in Toxicology study reports form the basis for the Toxicology Written and Tabulated summary documents provided in Module 2 Abstracts from the Module 4 Toxicology study reports can be reused directly in corresponding sections in the Toxicology Written Summary Toxicology tabulated summaries can be populated directly from protocol/study information and raw data captured in data collection systems and/or study reports Addition of system to capture noteworthy findings provides opportunity for further automation

2.6.7.1 Toxicology Overview Tabulated Summary Sample

2.6.7.7 Repeat-Dose Pivotal Tabulated Summary Sample

2.6.7.7 Repeat-Dose Pivotal Tabulated Summary Sample (continued)

2.4 Nonclinical Overview Primary nonclinical summary document Nonclinical Overview Structure Overview on Nonclinical Testing Strategy Pharmacology Pharmacokinetics Toxicology Integrated Overview and Conclusions References

Toxicology Information: Opportunities for Content Reuse 2.4 Nonclinical Overview Contains major sections for Toxicology Breakdown of major sections mirrors breakdown of toxicology study reports, written summary and tabulated summaries Paying careful attention to how study reports, written summary and tabulated summaries are structured can lead to opportunities for direct population of several 2.4 Nonclinical Overview sections

Implications for Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics Sections in CTD Same opportunities demonstrated for Toxicology also exist for Pharmacology and Pharmacokinetics Sections Breakdown of Module 4 study report mirrors sections included in Module 2 Written Summaries Study reports can form basis of information for Module 2 Written and Tabulated Summaries Opportunity to directly feed sections from Written Summaries to Nonclinical Overview Integrated approach to development of all nonclinical sections can lead to significant content reuse opportunities

Nonclinical Information Flow in the CTD Nonclinical Summary Documents Study data collection systems containing general protocol/study information and raw data Study Reports Nonclinical Overview Abstract Report Body Summary Tables Written Summaries Individual Listings Electronic capture of Noteworthy Findings Tabulated Summaries

Additional Opportunities for Reuse of Nonclinical Information in the CTD Investigator’s Brochure compilation Annual Reporting Product Labeling Direct submission of nonclinical datasets using SEND standard (second FDA pilot in planning stages)

How Can Technology Help? Nonclinical sections have to be built from the beginning with content reuse in mind Manage, collect and summarize study information, raw data and findings in electronic format, preferably using standard database formats Use of “Smarter” document technologies Use of XML to “code” documents to pave way for reuse Document templates that are prepopulated with information from other finalized documents and/or authoritative database sources Leverage full capabilities of document management/publishing systems to centrally store attributes, link documents and publish “virtual” documents created from information pulled from various source documents Automated adherence to submission document guidelines (fonts, margins, page orientation, bookmarking, hyperlinking, etc.) through use of standardize stylesheets and advanced document automation

Implications for Document Management and Submissions Publishing Much of the structure and metadata required for document management systems is embedded in the CTD More automated submission assembly can be facilitated by fully utilizing CTD structures Document management systems can be a major driver in enabling content reuse across the CTD if appropriate functionality is utilized/developed

In Conclusion … Deliberate planning to enable content reuse is necessary Making full use of existing databases and document management systems, in conjunction with smarter document technologies, can significantly increase content reuse Using CTD structures and terminology whenever possible in systems enables automation Increasing content reuse won’t eliminate work associated with authoring submission documents, but it has the potential to dramatically increase accuracy and efficiency Lessons learned with content reuse for nonclinical information in the CTD are easily applied to other areas of the CTD