SOCEM: Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Secondary Payloads Overview
Advertisements

Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
 An Kim  Cian Branco  David Warner  Edwin Billips  Langston Lewis  Thomas Work  Mackenzie Webb  Benjamin Cawrse (CS)  Jason Harris (TCC)
(c) 2014 California Institute of Technology. Government sponsorship acknowledged. Pre-Decisional: For planning and discussion purposes only. Mars CubeSat.
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure Craig L. Stevens, Jana L. Schwartz, and Christopher D. Hall Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Virginia.
University of Wyoming Michael Stephens, Eric Robinson, Alex Antonacci, Andrew Hellquist, Joe Backstrom, Bryan Overcast, Jeffrey Watters, Jonathan Melton,
Design of a small instrumented atmospheric descent probe NASA Ames Research Center.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Aerosonde User’s Workshop Wallops Aerosonde UAV Facility Mission Proposing And Costing Factors Chuck Williams.
Continuing Embry- Riddle’s CubeSat Satellite Development Program Presented by Clayton G. Jacobs Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott EagleSat.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
→ Potential ESA- Roscosmos Cooperation in Education Activities.
CubeSat Design Guidelines Professor A. Chen Professor J. Juang Teacher Assistant J. Vannitsen 16 Oct SPACE SCIENCE AND SATELLITE SYSTEM ENGINEERING.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
 An Kim  Cian Branco  David Warner  Edwin Billips  Langston Lewis  Mackenzie Webb  Alexander Streit (ECE)  Benjamin Cawrse (CS)  Jason Harris.
CanSat Interim Presentation II
Southeast Regional Space Grant Meeting Griffin Gate Marriott Resort Lexington, Kentucky 11 November 2006 Briefing
C. Hall, Randolph 224D 1 Space Systems Engineering and Design Our journeys to the stars will be made on spaceships created by determined,
Corotweek n°9 - ESTEC December 6th, 2005 COROT PROJECT STATUS 1 COROT PROJECT STATUS Thien LAM TRONG.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Page 1 of 35 Achieving Over-The-Horizon Requirements Using Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOS) Presented by Eric Saikin.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
NASA Centennial Challenges Nano-Satellite Launch Challenge Preliminary Rules Discussion Saturday, November 6, 2010 Menlo Park, California Andrew Petro.
Paul Butler Lauriston Girls’ School.  The FUNcube-1 satellite was designed and built by members of the volunteer amateur satellite organisations AMSAT-UK.
University Nanosat Competition Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University: SWESat Team Presented by: Stephanie Lengyel AZ Space Grant Symposium April 17 and.
USNA-203 Space Communications International Educational Network … Classroom Experience Navy SERB: 28 Aug 2002 Lt Col Billy R. Smith, Jr., USAF USNA Small.
1 University of Maryland DYMAFLEX SHOT II Pre-Flight Presentation June 29, 2012.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Judges Score Card Overview Mark Turner NASA Ames Research Center.
© 2014 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SPRSA Excess Capacity Panel Carol P. Welsch Orbital Sciences Corporation June 10, Welsch.
The Space in Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Courses HokieSat Labs Vomit Comet New Projects Chris Hall, Randolph 224D
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
1 63 rd Interdepartamental Hurricane Conference March 3, 2009 Justyna Nicinska Alexander E. MacDonald NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) 2008.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 Mission Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
NanoRacks, LLC Michael D. Johnson (832) Page No. 1 NanoRacks, LLC Cube Lab Cube Lab Ops TIM – Cube Lab Introduction 11/19/2009 Michael D. Johnson.
 An Kim  Cian Branco  David Warner  Edwin Billips  Langston Lewis  Thomas Work  Mackenzie Webb  Benjamin Cawrse (CS)  Jason Harris (TCC)
EagleSat-1 Continuing Embry-Riddle’s CubeSat Satellite Development Program
Simplifying Customer Software Integration Tim Myers April 9 th, 2011 Colorado Undergraduate Space Research Symposium Payload Configuration GUI.
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
CubeSat Team Final Presentation Team Members: Dylan Blackshear Todd Estep Gregory Lemmer Trevor McCarthy Juan Parducci Kimberly Scheider Nathan Schwinn.
Kentucky Space Enterprise Missions
USNA Standard CubeSat Bus USNA-P1 CubeSat (USNA-14)
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Reconfigurable Computing for Space Applications
Standardizing Access to the ISS for Small Payloads
USNA Next Generation Ground Station
Shape Memory Alloy Reusable Deployment Mechanism
Overview 3 2 Introduction Design Analysis Fabrication Testing
Kentucky Space Facilities for satellite development, testing and operation Twyman Clements1, David Jones1 ,Jason Bratcher1, Jessamyn Delgado2, Daniel Erb1,
Space Express Sub-Orbital Mission
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
SPACE Mission Badge 9/17/2018.
Systems Engineering Management
Sounding Rocket PDR Team Name
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Atmospheric Re-Entry Goal: To re-enter the CubeSat into the atmosphere and survive re-entry and hit the ground without any deceleration from parachute,
Eagle Space Flight Team
Eagle Space Flight Team Electronics Team
System Identification of a Nanosatellite Structure
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Mark Suder
Open Cosmos
Steve Alvarado Max Bezold Alex Clements Mary Fralick Jason Rexroat
IlliniSat-3 Power Board
3 Phases of ThinSat Program
RockOn... A Sounding Rocket Payload Workshop
Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission
Presentation transcript:

SOCEM: Sub-Orbital CubeSat Experimental Mission SOCEM Overview On the morning of 27 March 2010, launched aboard NASA Wallops Flight Facility’s Hall 12.067 Terrier-Improved Malemute sounding rocket, SOCEM demonstrated, for the first time ever, sub-orbital space flight for CubeSats. Roughly 75 seconds after first stage ignition, a 2U CubeSat (ADAMASat) and a 1U CubeSat (Cal Poly 1U) were ejected into space. Both payloads performed nominally, transmitting data back to ground stations as far west as Kentucky. The mission effectively introduced and proved a new platform for sub-orbital access to space for pico-class CubeSat payloads, via Wallops’ 17” diameter sounding rocket form factor. SOCEM Hardware Mission Success Criteria SOCEM satisfied all six minimum and comprehensive mission success criteria. Minimum success criteria: Integration of PCL in Hall 12.067 payload section, Delivery and integration of CubeSats into PCL, Acceptance testing of complete payload. Comprehensive success criteria: Successful ejection of CubeSats, Reception of telemetry data from CubeSats on portable ground stations at Wallops and in Kentucky, Successful reception of experiment results from the monofilament cutter system. ADAMASat, Kentucky Space’s 2U CubeSat payload on SOCEM, tested a component of an antenna deployment system which will fly on KySat-1, the program’s flagship orbital satellite set to launch November 2010. The Cal Poly 1U, Cal Poly’s CubeSat payload on SOCEM, tested an attitude determination system. Launch of SOCEM, aboard Hall 12.067, the maiden flight of NASA Wallops’ two-stage Terrier-Improved Malemute. NASA Wallops Flight Facility conducted vibration and spin deployment testing of the Hall payload section, including mass models of the SOCEM hardware. Left: payload section undergoing vibration testing. Middle: payload section undergoing spin balancing, prior to deployment testing. Right: payload section in deployment bay. Left: the Poly CubeSat Launcher (PCL), developed by Cal Poly, used a spring to propel the CubeSats out of the rocket. Middle: the pedestal interfaced between the PCL and the rocket’s payload deck. Right: the beanie interfaced between the CubeSats and the rocket’s skin. At Wallops Flight Facility, Kentucky Space team members successfully closed links to both CubeSats. SOCEM was a collaboration between the NASA Sounding Rocket Program Office (SRPO) at NASA Wallops, Kentucky Space, and California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly). More information on SOCEM is available at, http://ssl.engr.uky.edu/socem ssl_questions_wiki@ideasvn.ece.engr.uky.edu Benefits of Sub-Orbital Space Flight Fast mission turnaround Low cost Can be used to increase TRLs Left: an AGI STK simulation showing a sufficient link margin for ADAMASat packet receipt as far west as Kentucky. The model was successfully verified on 27 March 2010. Right: the ADAMASat FREE GUI, a freely released serial port terminal which allowed volunteers tracking ADAMASat to view the packet data parsed in real time as the data arrived.