MMU Regulations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Services Division. Progression and Award Regulations for Taught Courses Registry Academic Services Division Chris Bexton, PG Registry Manager.
Advertisements

Award Boards. Student-facing as distinct from module- facing Field Boards Degree class calculated on the basis of an aggregate mean score Level 1 does.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Registry
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law.
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
CONTINUING STUDENTS: PROGRESSION AND AWARD
Friday, April 17, 20151MA Academic Practice Assessment Regulations 2011 / 2012 Peggy Cooke Head of Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement.
External Examiner Workshop. The Assessment Process Colin Davis Academic Registry 20 November 2013.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY NEW STUDENTS: PROGRESSION AND AWARD How do I progress between levels? How is my final award calculated?
Academic Affairs Presentation Examination Liaison Officers 16 February 2015 Catherine McCorry / Angela Douglas Academic Affairs.
Operation of Central Progression and Award Boards Laurence Fuller Head of Student Records and Examinations Planning and Academic Administration.
Our Academic Framework Modular Regulations. Two semesters –September to January –February to June –(The summer period) BUT Three terms –September to Christmas.
The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus School of Computer Science Faculty of Science.
Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS Faculty / Quality Assurance Services.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY Board of Examiners and Examination Committee Training Quality Assurance Services.
Assessment Boards External Examiner Training 13 May 2015.
1 External Examiner Induction Beatrice Ollerenshaw Karen Hadley Jessica Greenlees.
Programme Leader’s event The framework and progression.
The University’s examination and assessment regulations Hilary Gilbert Academic Standards and Partnership
External Examiners Induction
University of Brighton Regulations workshop for partner colleges Tanya Izzard, Partnership Manager
© University of South Wales University of South Wales ‘Regulations for Taught Courses’ Hayley Burns Head of Quality Unit.
Our Academic and Quality Frameworks Phil Brimson Quality Manager (Validation and Review)
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT SESSIONS FOR ACADEMIC STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
Summary of the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2012/13.
Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2014/15 Stewart Smith-Langridge Annette Cooke Governance Services 5 November
Operation of Subject Examination Boards Sarah Lane Senior School Manager, School of Law March 2015.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY BOARD OF EXAMINERS: STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT STAFF Quality Assurance Services.
The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus School of Computer Science Faculty of Science.
Changes to the Standard Assessment Regulations for 2013/14 August 2013.
Office of Academic Appeals & Regulation Web Site Our core activities are the resolution and determination.
1 External Examiner Induction Iain Rowan David Blackwell Jessica Greenlees Stuart Sutcliffe.
Summary of Standard Assessment Regulations Academic Year 2013/14.
External Examiner Induction Academic Regulations for Taught Programmes 2015/16 Annette Cooke/Alison Jones Quality and Enhancement Office 4 November 2015.
International Partnerships Conference 21 November 2013 CREATE THE DIFFERENCE1 Dr Noel Morrison Academic Registrar and Director of the Student Experience.
Diploma in IHTM: An Introduction Ioannis Evagelou, 18 August 2015 Validated by Manchester Metropolitan University, UK.
External Examiners’ Seminar 2011/12 Academic Regulations Lynn Jones Regulations, Assessment and Awards Manager Academic Registry.
Undergraduate Examination Board Briefing Prof Chris LANGLEY Chair – RSC Dominic STONE Secretary – RSC 25 th April 2016 Slide 1.
External Examiners’ Workshop The University’s key examination and assessment regulations Mr Paul Cecil Quality and Standards Manager (Academic Standards.
Prof Richard Barnes Student Director
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Northumbria University 2016/17 How your bachelors degree is classified
ACADEMIC REGULATIONS INCLUDING UPDATES
External Examiner Workshop Subject / School Boards
Postgraduate Examination Board Briefing
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
The New Academic Framework and progression
OBU Regulations.
Examination Board Briefing
External Examiners Induction
Taught Award Regulations
Late hand-in of assignments
Marks/Exams Information – All Years
An Introduction to External Examining Procedures at Bangor University
Edinburgh Napier Board of Examiners Briefing for Beginners
Academic Regulations Dr Sandra Mienczakowski Head of Academic Processes Student Services - Development.
Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
Guide 3: Examining Procedures at Liverpool Hope
Award Boards.
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
How will my Degree be Classified
Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
What must I do to progress to Certificate Level
Guide 5: Postgraduate regulations at Liverpool Hope
External Examiners Induction Academic Regulations
What must I do to progress to Honours Level
How will my Degree be Classified?
What happens if I don’t pass first time
Presentation transcript:

MMU Regulations

Where are the Full Regulations Postgraduate: http://www.mmu.ac.uk/academic/casqe/regulations/assessment/doc s/pg-regs.pdf Undergraduate: http://www.mmu.ac.uk/academic/casqe/regulations/assessment/doc s/ug-regs.pdf

Gaining an Award - Undergraduate To gain a Manchester Met award students must successfully complete all units with a minimum mark or in the case of a resit a capped mark of 40% Students need a full 120 Credits to be eligible for an award

Progression A unit is passed when an overall minimum mark of 40% is scored on the first attempt at the assessment(s) Only at Diploma level will condonements in units be possible Students on Diploma can be condoned in upto 30 credits where they acheived a overall unit mark of between 35 and 39%. Where a condonement is awarded the unit mark does not change and the fail is still recorded on the transcript. However the credits are given to the student allowing the award to be granted. NO Condonements are possible at any other level.

Resits Where students do not acheive a overall mark of 40% in any single unit (with the exception of Diploma students who are eligible for condonement) then the student must resit the failed assessments A resit mark will always be capped at 40% Diploma students may take advantage of in-year resits where failed units can be given a quick resit within the same period of study. This is not available to other students on higher levels of study. Student are automatically given one chance to resit.

Resits Where a student does not engage in the resit opportunity they will not be permitted another opportunity. Where the first resit opportunity is engaged with students will normally have one final opportunity to pass the unit. Where a student fails in upto 90 credits of their academic programme they can be reassessed in all elements prior to the next commencement of study opportunity. Where a student fails in more than 90 credits in any one year they will be required to resit the entire year with attendance

Awards - Honours The first method of classification takes a weighted average of 25% of the weighted average of students marks at Higher Diploma combined with 75% of the weighted average of their marks at Degree. This overall average is then compared to the table below to work out the classification. Where a student is direct entry to the Degree they are calculated on the alternative method (next slide) Weighted Average Mark (M) Honours Classification M = 70 – 100% First Class M = 60 – 69% Second Class, Division One (Upper Second) M = 50 – 59% Second Class, Division Two (Lower Second) M = 40 – 49% Third Class

Awards Honours – Alternative Method Where students have a Level 6 average within 2% of the next award band then the following rules apply. The below also applies to direct entry students to Degree. Credit Profile (from 120 credits at Level 6) Together with minimum mean mark in Level 6 units Honours Classification At least 60 credits with marks ≥ 70% 68% First Class At least 60 credits with marks ≥ 60% 58% Class Two, Division One (Upper Second) At least 60 credits with mark ≥ 50% 48% Class Two, Division Two (Lower Second) At least 120 credits with marks of at least 40% 40% 40% Third Class

Awards MBA MBA pass mark is 50% for all units. Where a mark falls between 45% and 49% then upto 30 credits can be condoned Weighted Average Mark (M) Honours Classification M = 70 – 100% Distinction M = 60 – 69% Merit M = 50 – 59% Award M = <50% Fail

Plagiarism - Diploma Type of Misconduct Penalty First offence where the plagiarism or collusion does not represent more than 20% of the element of assessment Assignment marked and no cap applied (Type of engagement: Developmental Engagement); First offence where the plagiarism or collusion is greater than 20% of the element of assessment. Written warning and a mark of 0 - with no opportunity to rework assessment - for the element carried forward (Type of engagement: Formal Meeting with Head of Department); Second offence of any extent in any unit within the same programme of study Further written warning and a mark of 0 - with no opportunity to rework assessment - for the element carried forward (Type of engagement: Formal Meeting with Head of Department); Any subsequent offence anywhere within the same programme of study mark of 0 for all units the student has taken so far at that level, and imposition of a 40% cap on unit marks in all further units taken at that level (Type of engagement: Formal Meeting with Head of Department);

Plagiarism – Higher Diploma/Degree Type of Misconduct Penalty First offence at any academic level where the plagiarism or collusion does not represent more than 20% of the element of assessment Assessment element mark capped at 40% (Type of engagement: Formal Meeting with Head of Department First offence at any academic level where the plagiarism or collusion represents more than 20% of the element of assessment Mark of 0 for the element of assessment (Type of engagement: Formal Meeting with Head of Department) Any offence at Level 5 or 6 where there is any previous offence recorded in a lower academic level Mark of 0 for the unit concerned (Type of engagement: Formal Meeting with Head of Department) Any offence at Level 5 or 6 where there is any previous offence recorded in the same academic level Mark of 0 for all elements of assessment previously undertaken at that level, and 40% cap on all unit marks at the level (Type of engagement: Assessment Disciplinary Committee)

Plagiarism – MBA

Academic Misconduct Regulations For more details on academic misconduct please find the link to Manchester Met regulations below http://www.mmu.ac.uk/academic/casqe/regulations/assessment/doc s/academic-misconduct.pdf

Final Note Make a point of reading the academic regulations as this information will be of interest at some point in the next 6 months If you have a query regarding an aspect of a unit your are studying then first see the unit leader. If the response is not to your satisfaction then see Mr. Currie the Programme Leader. Queries must all be dealt with in this order as these are the best individuals in a position to give you the appropriate answer.