Aarhus, EU and Access to Justice in Environmental Decision-making

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to basic principles of Regulation (EC) 45/2001 Sophie Louveaux María Verónica Pérez Asinari.
Advertisements

Prof. Jan H. Jans EU and Aarhus Jurisdictional Cmpetition?
Interaction between EIA and Articles 6.3 and 6.4 of Habitats Directive Yvonne Scannell Law School, Trinity College, Dublin Arthur Cox, Solicitors, Dublin.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
Prof. Dr. Sabine Schlacke Institute for Environmental and Planning Law The Europeanization of the access to justice in environmental matters – the German.
Columns Picture here Aarhus Convention & Irish Environmental Law: Key Points & Potential Impact Áine Ryall Dublin, 4 February 2014.
ACCESS TO JUSTICE II: Case Study by Dr Matthias Keller, Aachen Case: „More than Music in the Air …“ Credit: ImaginAIR: Atmospheric pollution by NO2 Image.
Access to Justice in the Public Participation Context Aarhus Convention, Article 9(2) Áine Ryall School of Law, University College Cork, IRELAND Warsaw,
The relevance of EU Law and the procedures of the CJEU for the domestic judge Workshop on EU Law on Industrial Emissions Budapest, 3 June 2013 Trier, 11.
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY IN GREECE THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK & THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL GUARANTEES/ INSURANCE PRODUCTS TO COVER OPERATORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER.
EU joining the ECHR New opportunities under two legal systems EQUINET HIGH-LEVEL LEGAL SEMINAR Brussels, 1 – 2 July 2010 Dr. Mario OETHEIMER EU Agency.
A ARHUS C ONVENTION AND THE EU : A GENERAL OVERVIEW PARTICIPATORY AND PROCEDURAL RIGHTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS Warsaw, 4-6th March 2015.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
EC Study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in the EU Presentation at the 5th meeting of the Task Force on Access to.
Trends and developments at EU level on access to justice from the perspective of granting interim relief by national judges in the environmental field.
Course: Law of the European Union [5] Administrative and judicial procedures in the European Union Filip Křepelka,
The Aarhus Convention and Access to Justice in Ireland Where are we now? Michael Ewing Coordinator of the Environmental Pillar
ERA Workshop: Participatory and Procedural Rights in Environmental Matters Dr Matthias Keller Presiding Judge / Mediator Administrative Court Aachen ACCESS.
Article 9, paras.1 and 2 of the Aarhus Convention: overview “IMPLEMENTING THE AARHUS CONVENTION TODAY: PAVING THE WAY TO A BETTER ENVIRONMENT AND GOVERNANCE.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Developing Administrative Simplification: Selected Experiences.
Gösta Petri Consumer and Marketing Law Unit DG Justice and Consumers Consumer protection and enforcement in EU law.
Michael Fruhmann Dr. Michael Fruhmann EBRD Project Ukraine 29/30th March /31/ Procedural fairness and the EU Remedies Directive – an overview.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Private sector interests in legal protection Tomaž Vesel First.
Court of Justice of the European Union
Recent developments on Access to Justice in environmental matters in Sweden – Joanna Cornelius.
Effective Justice? - Synthesis report in EC study on implementation of Art. 9.3 and 9.4 of the AC in 17 of the Union’s Member States; 2012 Presentation.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
Cases C-401 to 403/12 and C-404 to 405/12: No review of legality in light of the Aarhus Convention Dr. Mariolina Eliantonio, LL.M. Prof. Chris Backes Maastricht.
European Law in the Case- law of the Constitutional Court of Latvia Kristine Kruma.
Environmental justice in Czech Republic & Poland.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
Compatibility of ICS in CETA with EU law Presentation by: Laurens Ankersmit GUE CETA conference 31/5/2016.
The Aarhus Convention and the role of the Courts
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters – Perspectives from the EU Forum of Judges for the Environment Prof. Dr. L. Lavrysen Ghent University Justice.
EU Law Law 326.
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
EU Legislative Powers: Principles and Procedures
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
The interaction between the Aarhus Convention and EU law
European Union Law Law 326.
JUDr. Michal Maslen, PhD. University of Trnava, Faculty of Law
Dr. José Ignacio Cubero Marcos University of the Basque Country
Transparency and Access to Justice in Environmental Decision-making
Filip Křepelka, Masarykova univerzita
EU Competences Tamara Ćapeta 2016.
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
European actions.
From an environmental law perspective Presentation at PhD seminar,
From Unibet to Protect – Direct effect of EU Environmental Law
Notice of the European Commission - Main challenges with regard to access to justice in environmental matters Anaïs Berthier ClientEarth Trier 9 July.
Judicial Powers: Decentralised National Procedures
National remedies and national actions
Fundamental rights.
How is the GDPR enforced ?
Protection of Species in Environmental Decision-making PROSPEC
When Aarhus meets with the Principle of legal protection in EU law …
The Commission – A sheep in wolf’s clothing..?
EDUARDO SALAZAR ORTUÑO UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA (SPAIN)
Fundamental rights.
The EDPS: competences and processing of personal data in EU funds
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II
Enforcement of European Union law
Public Participation in Czech Republic
The Aarhus Convention and the Access to Justice Pillar: Introduction to Article 9. 1 Stephen Stec Tirana, November 2008.
The right to access to justice between EU Charter and ECHR
Presentation transcript:

Aarhus, EU and Access to Justice in Environmental Decision-making Presentation at the conference Environmental Rights in Europe and Beyond LUND, 21-22 April 2016 Professor Jan Darpö Faculty of Law/ Uppsala Universitet

Interests and “Rights” in Nature Conservation & Species Protection

A2J according to Aarhus Article 9(2): Substantive and procedural legality of any decision, act, omission… Article 6(1)a – listed activities (Annex I) Article 6(1)b – Significant Impact on the Environment Article 9(3): Acts and omissions in breach of environmental law, administrative or judicial procedures… Article 9(4): Adequate and effective reme-dies…injunctive relief…fair, equitable, timely and not prohibitively expensive…

Compliance Mechanism Article 15 and Decision I/7 (2004); Review of Compliance Compliance Committee (CC); independent and impartial experts nominated by the Parties and Public The Public Trigger, open sessions Recommendations (“decisions”) Report to MoP; advice & recommendations, ask for strategy, declaration of non-compliance, cautions, suspension…

PP & A2J in EU law Article 9(2) Directive 2003/35/EC: EIA-directive (2011/92), IED (2010/75)… also in other directives, such as SEA (2001/42), WFD (2000/60), ELD (2004/35)…

PP & A2J in EU law Article 9(3) EUs declaration on approval: In particular, the European Community also declares that the legal instruments in force (…) do not cover fully the implementation of the obligations resulting from Article 9 (3) of the Convention as they relate to administrative and judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities other than the institutions of the European Community as covered by Article 2 (2)(d) of the Convention, and that, consequently, its Member States are responsible for the performance of these obligations at the time of approval of the Convention by the European Community and will remain so unless and until the Community, in the exercise of its powers under the EC Treaty, adopts provisions of Community law covering the implementation of those obligations.

A substantial body of case law C-237/07 Janecek (2008): Air quality and A2J… C-75/08 Mellor (2009): Authorities must give reason. C-263/09 DLV (2010): ENGO standing… C-115/09 Trianel (2011); ”Schütznormtheorie”… C-240/09 Slovak Brown Bear (2011): Art. 9.3 and EU… C-128/09 Boxus, C-182/10 Solvay (2011): EIA and “specific legislative acts”… C-260/11 Edwards (2013): Costs in the UK… C-72/12 Altrip (2013): Procedural defects in EIA and A2J… C-416/10 Križan (2013): Effective remedies… C-404/13 ClientEarth (2014): Air quality and A2J…

C-115/09 Trianel (2011) It follows more generally that the last sentence of the third paragraph of Article 10a of Directive 85/337 must be read as meaning that the ‘rights capable of being impaired’ which the ENGO are supposed to enjoy must necessarily include the rules of national law implementing EU environment law and the rules of EU environment law having direct effect. C-115/09 Trianel [2011], para. 48 MKN, kväveoxider o partiklar SNF anmälde 2008 MN beslut i april-09: Trädplanetring, lägre hastigheter, dubbförbud, tung trafik – rådighet SE fällt i CJEU i maj-11 Lst JO-anmält av SNF samma månad Lst beslut i juli-11; partiklarna Sth stad & SNF överklagar…

C-240/09 Slovak Brown Bear (2011) It is, however, for the referring court to interpret, to the fullest extent possible, the procedural rules relating to the conditions to be met in order to bring administrative or judicial proceedings in accordance with the objectives of Article 9(3) of that convention and the objective of effective judicial protection of the rights conferred by EU law, in order to enable an ENGO, such as the LZ, to challenge before a court a decision taken following administrative proceedings liable to be contrary to EU environmental law. C-240/09 Trianel [2011], para. 50

Question marks & Discrepancies Differences in the lists, “self-executing effect”, cf the wolverine and the Bern Convention… Any other activity that may have Significant Effect on the Environment (the Habitats Directive) …”in accordance with its national law”, national criteria…? Substantive and procedural legality..? Articles 9(3) and 9(4) and Administrative Appeal..?

HFD on the appeals ban… Art 12 Habitats Directive is unconditional and precise, case-law under Art 288 = “rights”… Legal principles of Union law includes legal protection in court; Art 4(3) & Art 19(1) 2nd para TEU, Art 47 European Charter… C-240/09; P of equivalence, P of effectiveness (48), to the fullest extent possible (C‑432/05 Unibet), but here NOT… CABs in 2014, SEPA confirmed, AC  ACoA  HFD 2015-12-18; Case No 312-15

HFD about the P of legal protection P of “useful effect” (effet utile”) means that a court must have the possibility to check whether a national authority has acted accor-ding to clear and unconditional obligations according to a directive and – if not – can disapply conflicting national rules (C-127/02 p 66, C-263/08 p 45)… Thus have ENGOs “rights” according to the Habitats Directive, which must enjoy judicial protection… …in a court according to Article 267.

To be discussed… Court or tribunal and Article 267 TFEU… MS and the Commission… The role of the MS’ courts… Court or tribunal and Article 267 TFEU… Dual system for A2J; national and EU law..? Environmental “rights”…

To be discussed… … or obligations to pursue a particular course of conduct…?

….and finally… THANK YOU FOR LISTENING..!    jan.darpo@jur.uu.se www.jandarpo.se/ In English

Rights and interests… Article 47 of the EU Charter… Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in complian-ce with the conditions laid down in this Article. Article 19 Treaty of the EU (TEU) Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law.

C‑432/05 Unibet (2007) In that regard, the detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding an individual’s rights under Community law must be no less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (principle of equivalence) and must not render practically impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law (principle of effectiveness)… C‑432/05 Unibet [2007], para. 43