Implementation Challenges of Wound Interdisciplinary Teams (WIT): A Community‐Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Project 10 May 20 th, 2010 Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement (ICE) Funding through CIHR Inst. of Cancer Research and CIHR Inst. of Health Services.
Advertisements

Challenges in Conducting Multi-Center Clinical Studies: Results from the Rapid Empiric Treatment with Oseltamivir Study (RETOS) Kendra Thompson, Kelly.
How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?
Debbie Schmidt RN, MCSE Conference 2009 Nurse 2.0 Engaging the Healthcare Consumer Mobile Wound Care.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Tobacco Control Interventions – Design Trade-Offs K. S. (Steve) Brown Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science Health Behaviour Research Group University.
The PAN-Care Project Development and testing of a comprehensive care planning service to enable patients with end stage pancreatic cancer die at home Department.
Abstract Background Significance Proposed Methods Research Trajectory Aims Children with Complex Chronic Conditions: A Formative Study to Support Development.
CArers of people with Dementia: Empowerment and Efficacy via Education (CAD: E 3 ) A multi-disciplinary study of the impact of educational interventions.
Introduction to MAST Kristian Kidholm Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Mary Wyrwich & Pat Egan Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO Literature Review Methods PurposeSample Clinic Flow Discussion.
From Output to Outcome: Quantifying Care Management Kelly A. Bruno, MSW and Danielle T. Cameron, MPH National Health Foundation Background Objectives Methods.
“The Effect of Patient Complexity on Treatment Outcomes for Patients Enrolled in an Integrated Depression Treatment Program- a Pilot Study” Ryan Miller,
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 9 Continuity of Care.
Specialised Geriatric Services Heather Gilley Sharon Straus.
1 Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, U. K. 2 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, U. K.
The Alberta Physician Assistant Demonstration Project N.E Gibson MSc, MD FACP, FRCPC Medical Lead AHS PA Demonstration Project.
This action-based research study used a descriptive triangulation process, which included quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze nursing students’
Mary K. Anthony, PhD,RN 1,2 Kathleen Vidal, MSN,RN 2 Pimpanitta Jittapiriom, PhD (candidate) 1 Carolyn Kleman, MSN, RN 1 Amany Farag, PhD,RN 3 Supported.
Chronic Disease Strategy Rural and Remote. Learning objectives Be familiar with the Chronic Disease Strategy in rural and remote settings Understand the.
Readmissions Driver Diagram OHA HEN 2.0. Readmissions AIMPrimary Drivers Secondary DriversChange Ideas Reduce Readmissions Identify patients at high-risk.
LifeCIT Development and pilot evaluation of a web-supported programme of Constraint Induced Therapy following stroke (LifeCIT) Meagher C 1, Conlon A 2,
Chapter 9 Case Management Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2007, 2001, 1997, 1993 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Title Investigators and sites. Clinical Trial Proposal Presentation Template for open forum at the 2017 ASM.
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire McGill Pain Questionnaire
Flow-chart illustrating the design
DATA COLLECTION METHODS IN NURSING RESEARCH
Journal club 24/10/2016 Presented by Pitchayud Kantachuvesiri
BREAKING BARRIERS West Contra Costa Unified School District
Cheryl Schraeder, RN, PhD, FAAN Health Systems Research Center
NURSING PROCESS.
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
Table 1: Patient Demographics
Patient Registries and Health Outcomes in Diabetes: A Retrospective Study Nipa Shah, MD1; Fern Webb, PhD1; Liane Hannah, BSH1; Carmen Smotherman, MS2;
Research Questions Does integration of behavioral health and primary care services, compared to simple co-location, improve patient-centered outcomes in.
9/2/2017.
MUSIC THERAPY INTERVENTION
Lisa Weiss, M.D. Brian F. Pendleton, Ph.D. Susan Labuda Schrop, M.S.
South Texas Psychiatric PBRN
Qualitative Research Results Conclusions
System and Study of Patient
Northwestern Counseling & Support Services
Veterans with life-limiting illness: Baseline descriptors
Development of an electronic personal assessment questionnaire to capture the impact of living with a vascular condition: ePAQ-VAS Patrick Phillips, Elizabeth.
The Assessment Process Part II
Dr Gholamreza Roshandel; MD,MPH,PhD
Foster Care Managed Care Program
Process Indicators for Patient Navigation
Feasibility Study) PB-PG
ACT Project Methodologies for assessment of coordinated care and telehealth - IFIC 2014 Cristina Bescos, Helen Schonenberg 9/22/2018 ACT Programme.
Professor Stephen Pilling PhD
Management of Type II Diabetes
Apply the MyTransition App In Transition
Community Step Up Program
Unmet Needs and the Role of Discrimination
Person Centred Medical Neighbourhood Readiness Program
Observational Studies vs. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)
Brief review Older Persons’ Integrated Care Team Community Healthcare East Emer Nolan Senior Physiotherapist September 2018 September 2018.
A pragmatic stepped intervention cluster randomized trial
2019 Model of Care Training University of Maryland Medical Systems Health Plans, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.
Community-Based Co-Supervisory Community Health Worker Model
How to apply successfully to the NIHR HTA Board?
Socio-Demographic Data by Age, Gender and Ethnicity
Module 5: Formulating Research Questions
IMPACT OF PHARMACIST DELIVERED CARE IN THE COMMUNITY PHARMACY SETTING
Dunleavy G1, Posadzki PP1, Kyaw BM2, Car J 1, 3.
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
REACHnet: Research Action for Health Network
Presentation transcript:

Implementation Challenges of Wound Interdisciplinary Teams (WIT): A Community‐Based Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

Background of WIT study 2008 OHTAC systematic review MDWCTs might improve healing of chronic wounds, but results not definitive In 2010, OHTAC commissioned THETA to conduct a field evaluation Explore the role of specialized MDWCTs for community-based patients with chronic wounds in ON

Objectives of WIT study Primary To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of systematic referral to specialized MDWCTs with comprehensive primary care delivery vs. ‘usual care’ for the tx of community-based clients with chronic wounds in the GTA Secondary To evaluate satisfaction and QoL, and explore perceptions of study participants, their family caregiver(s), and service providers, using qualitative methods

WIT Study Design Two-arm pragmatic RCT in community-based patients with chronic wounds comparing: Systematic referral to specialized MDWCTs in conjunction with comprehensive primary care delivery (intervention arm) vs. Current practice of primary care delivery

Study Population WIT Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Newly referred to Toronto Central CCAC for wound management; >18 years of age; Patient/Proxy provides written informed consent; and Someone in the patient’s home must be able to speak English Exclusion criteria Surgical wounds; Burns; Malignant wounds; and Patients deemed palliative

Study Overview WIT

Stratification & Randomization WIT

Data Collection of WIT study Outcome Instruments/ Tools Data sources Primary Time to wound closure Planimetry wound measurement of digital wound photographs by blinded outcome assessors Monthly digital wound photographs captured by nurses Secondary Rate of wound healing (cm2/month) Wound recurrence during the 6 months after closure Tracked by Toronto Central CCAC Toronto Central CCAC electronic records Time to discharge (for healed wounds) from CCAC Chart abstraction at Toronto Central CCAC Additional Secondary Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) EQ-5D and SF-12 Monthly phone surveys carried out by study coordinator Satisfaction with care CSQ-8 Costs and resources used Cost survey Chart abstraction at MDWCTs MDWCTs’ medical records

Demographics WIT

WIT Study Result Systematic referral to MDWCTs in this study design did not appear to have a significant effect on either health outcomes or costs Lack of significant findings might be partially due to the pragmatic nature of the RCT and inclusion of subjects with different wound aetiologies in different care settings with insufficient power for subgroup analyses

Complex Interactions of Academic-Community Collaboration WIT

Process Evaluation Framework WIT

Process Measures for Evaluation WIT

Process Measures for Evaluation (cont’d) WIT

Qualitative Interviews WIT Characteristics of 11 frontline healthcare providers (purposive sampling) Designation of Healthcare Providers Role in the WIT study 1. CCAC Client Services Manager Recruitment 2. CCAC Case Manager 3. Coordinator of Nursing agency A Nurse assignment 4. Coordinator of Nursing agency B 5. MDWCT 1 Chiropodist Intervention 6. MDWCT 1 Nurse Practitioner 7. MDWCT 2 RN 8. MDWCT 2 MD 9. Intervention Arm Nurse Intervention and Data collection 10. Control Arm Nurse Data collection 11. Community Clinic Nurse

Qualitative Interviews WIT Demographics of 16 patients in qualitative interviews (purposive sampling) Gender Wound group (1,2,3,4) Randomization (C=control I=intervention) MDWCT (n=none 1=team 1 2=team 2) Service type (1=Clinic 2=in-home) Agency Clinic Duration in the study (months) Exit wound status (0=not healed 1=healed 2=withdrawn) F 3 I 1 6 M C 2 4

Implementation Challenges WIT Anticipated challenges Development of a meaningful research question Study integration into community practice Community members not familiar with research ethics and research processes Unanticipated challenges Complicated enrollment logistics Delay in transfer of care from non-study to study nurses Data collection problems Problems with the primary endpoint Pragmatic trial issues Low number of systematic referral to MDWCTs Fluctuation in the two MDWCTs’ capacity

Recommendations WIT Early collaboration with the frontline healthcare providers to understand their perspectives and their level of commitment and readiness Simplification of logistics to facilitate broader community participation Sample size estimation for pragmatic studies need to accommodate the impact of contextual issues Pilot study and modelling methods to evaluate the feasibility of complex intervention trial prior to full scale implementation A mixed methods design with the inclusion of qualitative study is particularly suitable for complex settings